MMealybugs have been reported as serious pests in North America, South America, Canada, Mexico, USSR, France, South Africa, Australia, Italy, New Zealand, Chile, India and Middle east countries. Mealybugs are phloem feeders that use long, slender mouth parts to suck the sap from the trunk, cordons, buds, spurs, aerial roots, leaves, shoots, nodes, flower panicles and bunches. The grape mealybugs alone caused 50–100 %t yield losses in the field. The pest population is low in winter and rainy seasons and higher in summer months. Biological control is the only answer for adult mealybugs as they develop waxy coating. In the chemical control programme, specific insecticides that only kill mealybug crawlers or early instar nymphs, but not their predators, should be included. Cultural, mechanical, biological and chemical methods of control have to be integrated to manage the mealybug population thus preventing the loss caused by the mealybugs. The insects coming under Hemiptera, Sternorrhyncha, Coccoidea, Pseudococcidae are named as mealybugs (Williams 2004). Following the application by Miller (1975b), the family-group name Pseudococcidae (Cockerell 1905) was placed on the Official List of Family-Group Names in Zoology (Melville 1983) (type genus Pseudococcus Westwood 1840). Afifi (1968) attempted a higher classification of the Pseudococcidae based on a study of the characters of adult males of 17 species. The scale insects are generally divided into two groups, namely the archeococcids and the neococcids. The archeococcids possess two to eight pairs of abdominal spiracles, which are absent in the neococcids (Koteja 2008). The family Pseudococcidae (mealybugs) belongs to the neococcid group.


Natural Enemy Biological Control Program Classical Biological Control Carica Papaya Body Content 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



Dr. Sunil Joshi, Principal Scientist, NBAIR, Bangalore is acknowledged for providing information.


  1. Afifi SA (1968) Morphology and taxonomy of the adult males of the families Pseudococcidae and Eriococcidae (Homoptera: Coccoidea). Bull Brit Mus (Nat Hist) Entomol Suppl 13:1–210Google Scholar
  2. Arve S, Patel KG, Chavan S (2012) Phenacoccus solenopsis: the white menace to global agriculture: population dynamics, biology and chemical control of mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley on Hibiscus rosa-sinensis. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 156 pGoogle Scholar
  3. Beardsley JW (1965) Notes on the pineapple mealybug complex with descriptions of two new species (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Proc Hawaii Entomol Soc 19(1):56Google Scholar
  4. Becker H (2000) Three alien wasps may curb scale pest. Agric Res 58:16–17Google Scholar
  5. Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealybugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on geographical distribution, host plants, biology and economic importance. Intercept Limited, Andover, 686 pGoogle Scholar
  6. Ben-Dov Y, Miller DR, Gibson GAP (2006) ScaleNet: a database of the scale insects of the world. In: United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). http://www.sel.barc.usda.gov/scalenet/scalenet.htm
  7. Borchsenius NS (1947) On the taxonomic significance of morphological characters of mealybugs (Coccoidea, Pseudococcus). Akad Nauk Dok SSSR (Moscow) (In Russian) 58:2109–2110Google Scholar
  8. Bento JMS, de Moraes GJ, Bellotti AC, Castillo JA, Warumby JF, Lapointe SL (1999) Introduction of parasitoids for the control of the cassava mealybug Phenacoccus herreni (Hemiptera Pseudococcidae) in north-eastern Brazil. Bull Entomol Res 89:403–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Borchsenius NS (1948) Notes on Pseudococcus comstocki (Kuw.) and some allied species (Homoptera; Coccidea), with descriptions of three new species. Bull Ent Res 39:417–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Borchsenius NS (1949) Fauna of USSR Homoptera, Pseudococcidae. Akad Nauk Zool Inst 38(7):383Google Scholar
  11. Cockerell TDA (1905) Some Coccidae from the Philippine Islands. Proc Davenport Acad Sci 10:127–136Google Scholar
  12. Cox JM (1982) Revision of the New Zealand Pseudococcidae (Homoptera: Coccidea) with an experimental study of morphological variation. Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of London and for the Diploma of Membership of the Imperial College, London, 388 ppGoogle Scholar
  13. Cox JM, Williams DJ (1981) An account of cassava mealybugs (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) with a description of a new species. Bull Entomol Res 71:247–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Downie DA, Gullan PJ (2004) Phylogenetic analysis of mealybugs (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae) based on DNA sequences from three nuclear genes, and a review of the higher classification. Syst Entomol 29:238–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Downie DA, Gullan PJ (2005) Phylogenetic congruence of mealybug and their primary endosymbionts. J Evol Biol 18(2):315–324CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ezzat YM, McConnell HS (1956) The mealybug tribe Planococcini (Pseudococcidae: Homoptera). Bulletin A (Maryland Agricultural Experiment Station), University of Maryland, Agricultural Experiment Station, College Park, no. 84, 108 pGoogle Scholar
  17. Ferris GF (1950) Atlas of the scale insects of North America (series V). The pseudococcidae (Part I). Stanford University Press, Stanford, 278 pGoogle Scholar
  18. Gullan PJ, Martin JH (2003) Sternorrhyncha (jumping plant-lice, whiteflies, aphids and scale insects). In: Resh VH, Carde RT (eds) Enclyclopedia of insects. Academic Press, Amsterdam, pp 1079–1089Google Scholar
  19. Hardy NB, Gullan PJ, Hodgson CJ (2008) A subfamily-level classification of mealybugs (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) based on integrated molecular and morphological data. Syst Entomol 33(1):51–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Herren HR, Neuenschwander P (1991) Biological control of cassava pests in Africa. Annu Rev Entomol 36:257–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Keifer HH (1946) Isopropyl alcohol and phenol used in entomological mi9cro-technique. J Econ Entomol 39(5):655–666Google Scholar
  22. Kairo MTK, Pollard GV, Peterkin DD, Lopez VF (2000) Biological control of the hibiscus mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus Green (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidiae) in the Caribbean. Integr Pest Manag Rev 5:241–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Koteja J (1974a) Comparative studies on the labium in the Coccinea (Homoptera). Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Rolniczej w Krakowie 27:1–162Google Scholar
  24. Koteja J (1974b) On the phylogeny and classification of the scale insects (Homoptera, Coccinea) (discussion based on morphology of the mouthparts). Acta Zool Cracov 19:267–325Google Scholar
  25. Koteja J (2008) Xylococcidae and related groups (Hemiptera: Coccinea) from Baltic amber (In English; Summary in Polish). Pr Muz Ziemi 49:19–56Google Scholar
  26. Mani M, Joshi S, Kalyansundaram M, Shivaraju C, Krishnamoorthy A, Asokan R, Rebijith KB (2013) A new invasive Jack Beardsleyi mealybug, Pseudococcus jackbeardsleyi (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) on papaya in India. Florida Entomol 96(1):242–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McKenzie HL (1967) Mealybugs of California with taxonomy, biology and control of North American species (Homoptera: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae). University of California Press, Berkeley, 524 ppGoogle Scholar
  28. Melville RV (1983) Opinion 1247 Dactylopius Costa, (Nov. 1829) and Pseudococcus Westwood, 1840 (Insecta Homoptera): designation of type species. Bull Zool Nomencl 40:77–80Google Scholar
  29. Miller DR (1999) 2002. Identification of the Pink Hibiscus Mealybug Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) (Hemiptera: Stemorrhyncha: Pseudococcidae). Insecta Mundi 13:189–203Google Scholar
  30. Miller DR (1975) Dactylopius Costa, 1835 and Pseudococcus Westwood, 1840 (Insecta Homoptera): proposed designation of type-species under the plenary powers with proposed suppression of Diaprosteci Costa, 1828. ZN. (S.) 2056. Bull Zool Nomencl 31:146–153Google Scholar
  31. Miller DR, Miller GL, Hodges GS, Davidson JA (2005) Introduced scale insects Hemiptera: Coccoidea) of the United States and their impact on U.S. agriculture. Proc Entomol Soc Wash 107(1):123–158Google Scholar
  32. Narasimham AU, Chako MJ (1988) Rastrococcus spp. (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) and their natural enemies in India as potential biocontrol agents for R. invadens Williams. Bull Entomol Res 78:703–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. NBAII (2011) Annual report, National Bureau of Agriculturally Important Insects (ICAR), Post Box No. 2491, H.A. Farm Post, Bellary Road, Bangalore (Karnataka, India), 136 pGoogle Scholar
  34. Neuenschwander P, Herren HR (1988) Biological control of the cassava mealybug, Phenacoccus manihoti, by the exotic parasitoid Epidinocarsis lopezi in Africa. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 318:319–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Neuenschwander P, Boavida C, Bokonon-Ganta GA, Herren HR (1994) Establishment and spread of Gyranusoidea tebygi Noyes and Anagyrus mangicola Noyes (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), two biological control agents released against the mango Mealybug Rastrococcus invadens (Homoptera: Pseudocaccidae) in Africa. Biocontrol Sci Technol 4:61–69Google Scholar
  36. Neuenschwander P, Herren HR (1988) Biological control of the cassava mealybug, Phenacoccus manihoti, by the exotic parasitoid Epidinocarsis lopezi in Africa. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 318:319–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Thao ML, Gullan PJ, Baumann P (2002) Secondary (γ-Proteobacteria) endosymbionts infect the primary (β-Proteobacteria) endosymbionts of mealybugs multiple times and coevolve with their hosts. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:3190–3197PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Watson GW, Chandler LR (1999) Identification of mealybugs in the Caribbean Region. CAB International, Egham, 40 ppGoogle Scholar
  39. Westwood JO (1840) Synopsis of the genera of British Insects. [Appendix to]. An introduction to the modern classification of insects, founded on the natural habits and corresponding organisation of different families, vol. 2, London, Longman, Orme, Brown, Green, and Longmans, Paternoster-Row. 158 pGoogle Scholar
  40. Wilkey RF (1962) A simplified technique for clearing, staining and permanently mounting small arthropods. Ann Entomol Soc Am 55(5):606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Williams DJ, Cox JM, Yaseen M (1981) The cassava mealybug and its parasites in Paraguay and Bolivia. Biocontrol News Inf 2:88Google Scholar
  42. Williams DJ (1985) Australian mealybugs. British Museum (Natural History), London, 431pGoogle Scholar
  43. Williams DJ (1986) The identity and distribution of the genus Maconellicoccus Ezzat (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in Africa. Bull Entomol Res 16:351–357Google Scholar
  44. Williams DJ, Granara de Willink MC (1992) Mealybugs of Central and South America. CAB International, Wallingford, 635 ppGoogle Scholar
  45. Williams DJ (2004) Mealybugs of southern Asia. The Natural History Museum/Southdene Sdn. Bhd, London/Kaula Lumpur, 896 pGoogle Scholar
  46. Williams DJ, Granara de Willink MC (1992) Mealybugs of Central and South America. CAB International, Wallingford, 635pGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian Institute of Horticultural ResearchBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations