Advertisement

Economic Importance

  • M. Mani
  • C. Shivaraju
Chapter

Abstract

Mealybugs cause considerable negative economic impact on a wide range of crop plants. A high population of mealybug can lead to: fruit, flower/leaf drop, fruit/flower deformation and development of discoloured welts on the rind of the fruit, flower etc. They spread between continents through international trade. In the last 30 years, there have been several major outbreaks of mealybugs causing alarming damage to crops, as a result of invasion/accidental introductions. Losses and costs of controlling mealybugs in USA at several million dollars. In New Zealand, mealybugs are frequently occurring pests of horticultural crops causing serious economic losses in the country. In France, scale insects, including mealybugs, represent 31% of newly introduced species in recent years, although all mealybug pests on grapevine are native. Likewise in many countries, there were serious economic losses caused by mealybugs.

Keywords

Black Pepper Major Pest Classical Biological Control Sooty Mould Heavy Infestation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abo ME, Sy AA (1998) Rice virus diseases: epidemiology and management strategies. J Sustain Agric 11:113–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali SM (1962) Coccids affecting sugarcane in Bihar (Coccidae: Hemiptera). Indian J Sugar Res Dev 6:72–75Google Scholar
  3. Arif MI, Rafiq M, Ghaffar A (2009) Host plants of cotton mealybug (Phenacoccus solenopsis): a new menace to cotton agro ecosystem of Punjab, Pakistan. Int J Agric Biol 11(2):163–167Google Scholar
  4. Beardsley JW (1964a) Notes on the pineapple mealybug complex with descriptions of two new species (Homoptera, Pseudococcidae). Proc Hawaiian Entomol Soc 19:55–68Google Scholar
  5. Beardsley JW (1964b) Notes on the pineapple mealybug complex, with descriptions of two new species (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Proc Hawaiian Entomol Soc XIX(1):55–68Google Scholar
  6. Ben-Dov Y (1994) A systematic catalogue of the mealybugs of the world (Insecta: Homoptera: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with data on geographical distribution, host plants, biology and economic importance. Intercept Limited, Andover, 686pGoogle Scholar
  7. Ben-Dov Y (2005) The solanum mealybug, Phenacoccus solani Ferris (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae), extends its distribution range in the Mediterranean basin. Phytoparasitica 33:15–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ben-Dov Y (2006) Scales in a family/genus query. Available at http://www.sel.barc.usda.gov/scalecgi/chklist.exe? Family=Pseudococcidae&genus. Accessed 14 Aug 2008
  9. Bennet FD, Hughes IW (1959) Biological control of insect pests in Bermuda. Bull Entomol Res 50:423–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bento JMS, de Moraes GJ, Bellotti AC, Castillo JA, Warumby JF, Lapointe SL (1999) Introduction of parasitoids for the control of the cassava mealybug Phenacoccus herreni (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in north-eastern Brazil. Bull Entomol Res 89(5):403–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bhat AI, Devasahayam S, Sarma YR, Pant RP (2003) Association of a badnavirus in black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) transmitted by mealybug (Ferrisia virgata) in India. Curr Sci 84(12):1547–1550Google Scholar
  12. Bigger M (2009) A geographical distribution list of insects and mites associated with coffee derived from literature published before 2010. Available at www.ipmnetwork.net/commodity/coffee_insects.pdf. Accessed 16 July 2013
  13. Charles JG (1993) A survey of mealybugs and their natural enemies in horticultural crops in North Island, New Zealand, with implications for biological control. Biocontrol Sci Tech 3:405–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cox J (1989) The mealybug genus Planococcus (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Bull Br Mus Nat Hist (Entomol) 58:1–78Google Scholar
  15. Daane KM, Bentley WJ, Walton VM, Malakar-Kuenen R, Millar JG, Ingels CA, Weber EA, Gispert C (2006) New controls investigated for vine mealybug. Calif Agric 60:31–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Lotto G (1967) A contribution to the knowledge of the African Coccoidea, Homoptera. J Entomol Soc South Afr 29:109–120Google Scholar
  17. Dean HA, Schuster MF, Boling JC, Riherd PT (1979) Complete biological control of Antonina graminis in Texas with Neodusmetia sangwami (a classic example). Bull Entomol Soc Am 25:262–267Google Scholar
  18. Dufour B (1991) Place and importance of different insect species in the ecology of Cssv (Cocoa swollen shoot virus) in Togo. Café Cacao Thé 35:197–204Google Scholar
  19. Franco JC, Silva EB, Carvalho JP (2000) Mealybugs (Hemiptera, Pseudococcidae) associated with citrus in Portugal. ISA Press, Lisbon (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  20. Franco JC, Suma P, da Silva EB, Blumberg D, Mendel Z (2004) Management strategies of mealybug pests of citrus in Mediterranean countries. Phytoparasitica 32:507–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hall DG, Roda A, Lapointe SL, Hibbard K (2008) Phenology of Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in Florida based on attraction of adult males to pheromone traps. Fla Entomol 91:305–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hatting V (1993) Mealybugs and cottony cushion scale on citrus in South Africa. Citrus J 3:20–22Google Scholar
  23. Herbert FB (1920) Cypress bark scale. Bull US Dep Agric Bureau Entomol Wash 838:1–22Google Scholar
  24. Herren HR, Neuenschwander P (1991) Biological control of cassava pests in Africa. Annu Rev Entomol 36:257–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ho CT, Khoo KC (1997) Partners in biological control of cocoa pests: Mutualism between Dolichoderus thoracicus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and Cataenococcus hispidus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). Bull Entomol Res 87:461–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hodgson C, Abbas G, Arif MJ, Saeed S, Krar H (2008) Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Sternorrhyncha: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae), an invasive mealybug damaging cotton in Pakistan and India, with a discussion on seasonal morphological variation. Zootaxa 1913:1–35Google Scholar
  27. Kairo MTK, Pollard GV, Peterkin DD, Lopez VF (2000) Biological control of the hibiscus mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus Green (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in the Caribbean. Integr Pest Manag Rev 5:241–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kosztarab M, Kozar M (1988) Scale insects of Central Europe. Akdeiai Kiado, Budapest, 456 pGoogle Scholar
  29. Lockhart BEL, Autrey LJC, Comstock JC (1992) Partial purification and serology of Sugarcane mild mosaic virus, a mealybug-transmitted closterolike virus. Phytopathology 82:691–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mani M (2001) Biological control of fruit crops. In: Reddy PP, Verghese A, Krishna Kumar NK (eds) Integrated pest management in horticultural ecosystems. Capital Publishsing Company, New Delhi, pp 93–107Google Scholar
  31. Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A (1993) Bionomics and management of the striped mealybug, Ferrisia virgata (Ckll.) – A world review. Agric Rev 14:22–43Google Scholar
  32. Mani M, Shivaraju C (2012) Invasive papaya mealybug, Paracoccus marginatus and its biological control – an overview. J Biol Control 26(3):201–216Google Scholar
  33. Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A, Shivraju C (2011) Biological suppression of major mealybug species on horticultural crops. J Hortic Sci 6(2):85–100Google Scholar
  34. Manjunath TM (1986) Recent outbreaks of mealybugs and their biological control. In: Jayaraj S (ed) Resurgence of sucking pests. Proceedings of national symposium, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, pp 249–253Google Scholar
  35. Martorell LF (1940) Some notes on forest entomology. Carib For 1:23–24Google Scholar
  36. McKenzie HL (1967) Mealybugs of California with taxonomy, biology and control of North American species (Homoptera: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae). University of California Press, Berkeley, 534 pGoogle Scholar
  37. Millar JG, Daane KM, McElfresh JS, Moreira JA, Malakar-Kuenen R, Guillen M, Bentley WJ (2002) Development and optimization of methods for using sex pheromone for monitoring the mealybug Planococcus ficus (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) in California vineyards. J Econ Entomol 95:706–714CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Miller DC, Kosztarab M (1979) Recent advances in the study of scale insects. Annu Rev Entomol 24:1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nakahira K, Arakawa R (2006) Development and reproduction of an exotic pest mealybug, Phenacoccus solani (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) at three constant temperatures. Appl Entomol Zool 41:573–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Narasimham AU, Chako MJ (1988) Rastrococcus spp. (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) and their natural enemies in India as potential biocontrol agents for R. invadens Williams. Bull Entomol Res 78:703–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Neuenschwander P, Boavida C, Bokonon-Ganta Gado A, Herren HR (1994) Establishment and spread of Gyranusoidea tebygi Noyes and Anagyrus mangicola Noyes (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), two biological control agents released against the mango mealybug Rastrococcus invadens (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) in Africa. Biocontrol Sci Technol 4:61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Panis A (1969) Observations faunistiques et biologiques sur quelques Pseudococcidae (Homoptera, Coccoidea) vivant dans le midi de la France. Ann Zool Ecol Anim 1:211–244Google Scholar
  43. Ponnamma KN (1999) Coccoids associated with oil palm in India – a review. The Planter 75(882):445–451Google Scholar
  44. Sether DM, Hu JS (2002) Closterovirus infection and mealybug exposure are necessary for the development of mealybug wilt of pineapple disease. Phytopathology 92:928–935CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Sforza R (2008) Les cochenilles sur la vigne. In: Les ravageurs de la vigne. Eds Feret, Bordeaux, pp 188–210Google Scholar
  46. Snetsinger R (1966) Biology and control of root feeding mealybugs on Saintpaulia. J Econ Entomol 59:1077–1078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Streito JC, Martinez M (2005) Nouveaux ravageurs, 41 espèces depuis 2000. Phytoma La Défense des végétaux 586:16–20Google Scholar
  48. Takahashi R (1928) Coccidae of Formosa. Philipp J Sci 36:327–347Google Scholar
  49. Tsai C, Chan J, Fernandez L, Bosco D, Daane KM, Rodrigo RP (2008) Transmission of grapevine leaf roll-associated virus 3 by the vine mealybug (Planococcus ficus). Phytopathology 98:S159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Villa Castillo J (2006) The use of biological control to control forest pests in Mexico. [Spanish] El uso de control biologico para el control de plagas forestales en Mexico. Forestal XXI 8:11–12Google Scholar
  51. Walker JTS, Charles JG, Froud KJ, Connolly P (2004) Leafroll virus in vineyards: modelling the spread and economic impact. Horticulture and Food Research Institute of New Zealand Ltd, Mt AlbertGoogle Scholar
  52. Ward A (1966) Mealybugs (Hemiptera: pesudococcidae). Acta Entomol Sin 28:444–446Google Scholar
  53. Williams DJ (1986a) Scale insects (Hmoptera: coccoidea) on coffee in Papua New Guinea. Papua New Guinea. J Agric For Fish 34:1–7Google Scholar
  54. Williams DJ (1986b) Rastrococcus invadens sp. n. (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) introduced from the oriental region to West Africa and causing damage to mango, citrus and other trees. Bull Entomol Res 76:695–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Williams DJ (2004) Mealybugs of southern Asia. The Natural History Museum/Southdene SDN. BHD, London/Kuala Lumpur, 896 pGoogle Scholar
  56. Williams DJ, Granara de Willink MC (1992) Mealybugs of Central and South America. CAB International, Wallingford, 635 pGoogle Scholar
  57. Zada A, Dunkelblum E, Assael FJC, Silva EB, Protasov A, Mendel Z (2008) Attraction of Planococcus ficus males to racemic and chiral pheromone baits: flight activity and bait longevity. J Appl Entomol 132:480–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zeddies J, Schaab RP, Neuenschwander P, Herren HR (2001) Economics of biological control of cassava mealybugs in Africa. Agric Econ 24:209–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zimmerman EC (1948) Homoptera: Sternorrhyncha. Insect Hawaii 5:1–464Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian Institute of Horticultural ResearchBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations