Skip to main content

Comparison and Analysis of Fuzzy Methods—TOPSIS, COPRAS-G, ANP, ELECTRE and AHP Using MATLAB

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the International Conference on Soft Computing Systems

Abstract

Fuzzy logic is a multi-valued logic which is obtained from fuzzy set theory. It deals with human resourcing which is approximate than ‘very unlikely’, when compared to the traditional binary sets the truth value ranges in degree between 0 and 1. The main concept of fuzzy logic is that it provides a practical way of approach to automate the complex data analysis, fusion and inference processes which is usually performed by human experts with extensive experiences. COPRAS-G and COPRAS (Venkatesan et al. in Performance analysis of mobile agent failure recovery in e-service applications 32(1–2):38–43, 2005, Licata in Employing fuzzy logic in the diagnosis of a clinical case, 2010) decision-making methods are separately used in various applications to illustrate the approximate evaluation of attributes. This helps in selecting the best thing. It can be used to select best websites, company, project manager, etc. It can also be used to select the location for constructing warehouse, underground dam, etc. We propose the case study to compare both COPRAS and COPRAS-G (Aruldoss et al. in A survey on multi criteria decision making methods and its applications, 2013, Dhavachelvan et al. in A new approach in development of distributed framework for automated software testing using agents, 2006) decision making fuzzy methods for finding the rate of diseases occurring to children, teenagers and old aged people. That is, what are the diseases may occur at certain age can be accurately predicted through this project. Two methods Simplified COPRAS and COPRAS-G are implemented with the same input to obtain the best and the worst alternative. The ranking of the Simplified COPRAS-G and COPRAS method are compared by the parameters. Each parameter is applied in both the method in order to find the better method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT)—Volume 4 Issue 6- June 2013 Detection of Heart Diseases using Fuzzy Logic Sanjeev Kumar, ursimranjeet Kaur Asocc. Prof., Department of EC, Punjab Technical University ACET, Amritsar, Punjab India

    Google Scholar 

  2. Liao H, Xu Z, Zeng X-J (2014) Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their application in multi-criteria decision making. Info Sci 271

    Google Scholar 

  3. Skorupski J (2014) Multi-criteria group decision making under uncertainty with application to air traffic safety Warsaw University of Technology, faculty of transport, Koszykowa 75, 00-662 Warszawa, Poland

    Google Scholar 

  4. TanselIç Y (2014) A TOPSIS based design of experiment approach to assess company ranking, department of industrial engineering, faculty of engineering, Baskent University, 06810 Etimesgut, Ankara, Turkey

    Google Scholar 

  5. Amudhavel J, Vengattaraman T, Basha MSS, Dhavachelvan P (2010) Effective maintenance of Replica in distributed network environment using DST. International conference on advances in recent technologies in communication and computing (ARTCom) 2010, pp 252, 254, 16–17 Oct 2010. doi:10.1109/ARTCom.2010.97

  6. Bindu Madhuri Ch, Anand Chandulal J, Padmaja M (2010) Selection of best web site by applying COPRAS-G method. Department of computer science and engineering, Gitam University, India

    Google Scholar 

  7. Raju R, Amudhavel J, Pavithra M, Anuja S, Abinaya B () A heuristic fault tolerant MapReduce framework for minimizing makespan in hybrid cloud environment. International conference on green computing communication and electrical engineering (ICGCCEE) 2014, pp 1, 4, 6–8 Mar 2014. doi:10.1109/ICGCCEE.2014.6922462

  8. Junior FRL, Osiro L, Carpinetti LCR (2014) A comparison between Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection, School of Engineering of São Carlos, University of São Paulo, Production Engineering Department, São Carlos, SP, Brazil. Federal University of TrianguloMineiro (UFTM), Production Engineering Department, Uberaba, MG, Brazil

    Google Scholar 

  9. Raju R, Amudhavel J, Kannan N, Monisha M (2014) A bio inspired energy-aware multi objective chiropteran algorithm (EAMOCA) for hybrid cloud computing environment. International conference on green computing communication and electrical engineering (ICGCCEE) 2014, pp 1, 5, 6–8 Mar 2014. doi:10.1109/ICGCCEE.2014.6922463

  10. Miranda Lakshmi T, Prasanna Venkatesan V (2014) A comparison of various normalization in techniques for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Raju R, Amudhavel J, Kannan N, Monisha M () Interpretation and evaluation of various hybrid energy aware technologies in cloud computing environment—a detailed survey. International conference on green computing communication and electrical engineering (ICGCCEE) 2014, pp 1, 3, 6–8 Mar 2014. doi:10.1109/ICGCCEE.2014.6922432

  12. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics (2011) The comparative analysis of MCDA methods SAW and COPRAS’ Valentinas Podvezko Vilnius Gediminas Technical University Sauletekio av. 11, LT-2040 Vilnius, Lithuania

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vengattaraman T, Abiramy S, Dhavachelvan P, Baskaran R (2011) An application perspective evaluation of multi-agent system in versatile environments. Int J Expert Syst Appl, Elsevier 38(3):1405–1416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tavana M, Momeni E, Rezaeiniya N, Mirhedayatian SM, Rezaeiniyab H (2012) A novel hybrid social media platform selection model using fuzzy ANP and COPRAS-G’. Business systems and analytics department, lindback distinguished chair of information systems and decision sciences, Expert Syst Appl 40

    Google Scholar 

  15. Venkatesan S, Dhavachelvan P, Chellapan C (2005) Performance analysis of mobile agent failure recovery in e-service applications. Int J Comput Stand Interfaces, 32(1–2):38–43. ISSN 0920-5489

    Google Scholar 

  16. Licata G (2010) Employing fuzzy logic in the diagnosis of a clinical case Dipartimento FIERI, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Palermo, Italy; it received 20 Oct 2009; revised 9 Dec 2009; accepted 14 Dec 2009

    Google Scholar 

  17. Aruldoss M, Miranda Lakshmi T, Prasanna Venkatesan V (2013) A survey on multi criteria decision making methods and its applications. Am J Info Syst

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dhavachelvan P, Uma GV, Venkatachalapathy VSK (2006) A new approach in development of distributed framework for automated software testing using agents. Int J Knowl–Based Syst, Elsevier, 19(4):235–247, Aug 2006

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Kumarakrishsnan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer India

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kumarakrishsnan, S. et al. (2016). Comparison and Analysis of Fuzzy Methods—TOPSIS, COPRAS-G, ANP, ELECTRE and AHP Using MATLAB. In: Suresh, L., Panigrahi, B. (eds) Proceedings of the International Conference on Soft Computing Systems. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 398. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2674-1_53

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2674-1_53

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi

  • Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2672-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2674-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics