Advertisement

Microbiology of Ulcer

  • Gopal Nath
  • Gopal Kumar
Chapter

Abstract

The primary function of normal, intact skin is to control microbial populations that reside on the skin surface and to prevent underlying tissue from becoming colonized and invaded by potential pathogens. Ulcer causes break in continuity of skin and makes a path for entry of pathogen. Infections of the lower extremity ulcers are a major source of morbidity and important cause of amputation and sometimes mortality in patients particularly with neuropathy and diabetes. Not all ulcers are infected. Evaluation of infection should involve a thorough examination of the extremity for clinical signs of infection along with appropriate laboratory and imaging studies. The organisms implicated are often Staphylococcus aureus (often MRSA in diabetic patients) and Group B streptococci in limb-threatening infection. Chronic infected wounds often have multidrug-resistant pathogens, especially after exposure to health care procedures and use of multiple antibiotics. The presence of a foot ulcer should heighten the index of suspicion for associated infection.

Keywords

Chronic Wound Fasciitis Necroticans Infected Ulcer Cutaneous Anthrax Resident Flora 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Edwards R, Harding KG. Bacteria and wound healing. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2004;17:91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ghannoum M, O’Toole GA. Microbial biofilms. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 2004.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Robson MC, Munnari RJ, Smith PD, et al. Maintenance of wound bacterial balance. Am J Surg. 1999;178:399.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schultz GS, Sibbald RG, Falanga V, et al. Wound bed preparation: a systematic approach to wound management. Wound Repair Regen. 2003;11 Suppl 1:S1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eming SA, Krieg T, Davidson JM. Inflammation in wound repair: molecular and cellular mechanisms. J Invest Dermatol. 2007;127:514.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carrascosa JM, Ribera M, Bielsa I, et al. Bacillary angiomatosis presenting as a malleolar ulcer. Arch Dermatol. 1995;131:963–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Laochumroonvorapong P, DiCostanzo DP, Wu H, et al. Disseminated Histoplasmosis presenting as pyoderma gangrenosum-like lesions in a patient with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Int J Dermatol. 2001;40:518–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Robinson DC, Adriaans B, Hay RJ, Yesudian P. The clinical and epidemiologic features of tropical ulcer (tropical phagedenic ulcer). Int J Dermatol. 1988;27:49–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Champion RH, Burton JL, Burns DA, et al. Rook, Wilkinson and Ebling’s textbook of dermatology. 6th ed. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific; 1998. p. 2257–75.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bowler P, Duerden B, Armstrong D. Wound microbiology and associated approaches to wound management. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001;14(2):244–69.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schultz GS, Sibbald RG, Falanga V, et al. Wound bed preparation: a systematic approach to wound management. Wound Repair Regen. 2003;11:1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schmidt K, Debus ES, Jeßberger S, et al. Bacterial population of chronic crural ulcers: is there a difference between the diabetic, the venous, and the arterial ulcer? Vasa. 2000;29:62–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Olivencia JA. Pathophysiology of venous ulcers: surgical implications, review and update. Dermatol Surg. 1999;25:880–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jeffcoate WJ, Harding KG. Diabetic foot ulcers. Lancet. 2003;361:1545–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gardner SE, Frantz RA, Doebbeling BN. The validity of the clinical signs and symptoms used to identify localized chronic wound infection. Wound Repair Regen. 2000;9:178–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bendy RH, Nuccio PA, Wolfe E, et al. Relationship of quantitative wound bacterial counts to healing of decubiti. Effect of topical gentamicin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1964;4:147–55.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Robson MC. Wound infection: a failure of wound healing caused by an imbalance of bacteria. Surg Clin North Am. 1997;77:637–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bowler PG, Davies BJ. The microbiology of infected and noninfected leg ulcers. Int J Dermatol. 1999;38:573–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schraibman IG. The significance of beta-haemolytic streptococci in chronic leg ulcers. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1990;72:123–4.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Trengove NJ, Stacey MC, McGechie DF, et al. Qualitative bacteriology and leg ulcer healing. J Wound Care. 1996;5:277–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lipsky BA. Evidence-based antibiotic therapy of diabetic foot infections. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 1999;26:267–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kingsley A. A proactive approach to wound infection. Nurs Stand. 2001;15:50–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Davies CE. The comprehensive analysis of the Microbial community of clinically non-infected chronic venous leg Review ulcers. PhD thesis. Department of Oral Surgery, Medicine and Pathology, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, UK; 2003.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Davies CE, Hill KE, Wilson MJ, et al. Use of 16S Ribosomal DNA PCR and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis for analysis of the micro floras of healing and nonhealing chronic venous leg ulcers. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:3549–57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tentolouris N, Jude EB, Smirnof I, et al. Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus: an increasing problem in a diabetic foot clinic. Diabet Med. 1999;16:767–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bowler PG, Davies BJ. The microbiology of acute and chronic wounds. Wounds. 1999;11:72–8.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Urbancic-Rovan V, Gubina M. Infection in superficial diabetic foot ulcers. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;25:S184–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kontiainen S, Rinne E. Bacteria in ulcera crurum. Acta Derm Venereol. 1988;68:240–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hansson C, Hoborn J, Moller A, et al. The microbial flora in venous leg ulcers without clinical signs of infection. Acta Derm Venereol. 1995;75:24–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Brook I, Frazier EH. Aerobic and anaerobic microbiology of chronic venous ulcers. Int J Dermatol. 1998;37:426–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ge Y, MacDonald D, Hait H, et al. Microbiological profile of infected diabetic foot ulcers. Diabet Med. 2002;19:1032–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gilchrist B, Reed C. The bacteriology of chronic venous ulcers treated with occlusive hydrocolloid dressings. Br J Dermatol. 1989;121:337–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jeandrot A, Richard JL, Combescure C, et al. Serum procalcitonin and C-reactive protein concentrations to distinguish mildly infected from non-infected diabetic foot ulcers: a pilot study. Diabetologia. 2008;51:347–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Newman LG, Waller J, Palestro CJ, et al. Unsuspected osteomyelitis in diabetic foot ulcers: diagnosis and monitoring by leukocyte scanning with indium and 111 oxyquinoline. JAMA. 1991;266:1246–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dow G. Infection in chronic wounds. In: Krasner DL, Rodeheaver GT, Sibbald RG, editors. Chronic wound care: a clinical source book for healthcare professionals. 3rd ed. Wayne: HMP Communications; 2001. p. 343–56.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Robson M, Duke W, Krizek T. Rapid bacterial screening in the treatment of civilian wounds. J Surg Res. 1973;14:420–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Tenorio A, Jindrak K, Weiner M, et al. Accelerated healing in infected wounds. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1976;142:537–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wheat LJ, Allen SD, Henry M, et al. Diabetic foot infections: bacteriologic analysis. Arch Intern Med. 1986;146:1935–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sapico FL, Ginunas VJ, Thornhill-Joynes M, et al. Quantitative microbiology of pressure sores in different stages of healing. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1986;5:31–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ehrenkranz N, Alfonso B, Nerneberg D. Irrigation-aspiration for culturing draining decubitus ulcers: correlation of bacteriologic findings with a clinical inflammatory scoring index. J Clin Microbiol. 1990;28:2389–93.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Georgios S, Nicos L. The evaluation of lower-extremity ulcers. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2009;26(4):286–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Galiano RD. ACS surgery: Principles and Practice. Chapter 27 Lower - extremity ulcers. 2008:7.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MicrobiologyInstitute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu UniversityVaranasiIndia

Personalised recommendations