Investigations for Ulcer of the Lower Extremity

  • Satyendra K. Tiwary


Ulceration of the lower limb in aging population with comorbidity associated has always been a challenge in philosophy of wound management. Acute ulcers have a predictable outcome with rapid progression or regression and outcome achieved within 3–4 weeks. The etiology of the lower limb ulcerations varies from different geographic regions in world. In Western societies, most chronic lower limb ulcers are due to vascular diseases, whereas in developing countries, trauma, infections, malignancies, and poorly controlled diabetes remain the most common causes of chronic lower limb ulceration [1–3]. The treatment of chronic lower limb ulcers requires multidisciplinary approach [4, 5]. Multifactorial etiology and interdisciplinary approach in management are key factors determining outcome [5].


Chronic Wound Chronic Ulcer Venous Ulcer Venous Reflux Acute Ulcer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Barclay KL, Granby T, Elton PJ. The prevalence of leg ulcers in Hospitals. Hosp Med. 1998;59(11):8.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    London NJ, Donnely R. ABC of arterial and venous disease Ulcerated lower limb. Br Med J. 2000;320:1589–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cleverland TJ, Gaines P. Stenting in peripheral vascular disease. Hosp Med. 1999;60:630–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ruckley CV. Caring for patients with chronic leg ulcer. BMJ. 1998;316:407–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rahman IA, Fadeyi A. Epidemiology, etiology, and treatment of chronic leg ulcer: experience with sixty patients. Ann Afr Med. 2010;9(1):1–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kahle B, Hermanns HJ, Gallenkemper G. Evidence based treatment of chronic leg ulcers. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011;108(14):231–7.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    van Gent WB, Wilschut ED, Wittens C. Management of venous ulcer disease. BMJ. 2010;341(7782):1092–6.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rayner R, Carville J, Keaton J, Prentice J, Santamaria XN. Leg ulcers: atypical presentations and associated comorbidities. Wound Practice Res. 2009;17(4):168–85.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moloney M, Grace P. Understanding the underlying causes of chronic leg ulceration. J Wound Care. 2004;13:215–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dean S. Leg ulcers: causes and management. Aust Fam Physician. 2008;36(7):480–4.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mekkes JR, Loots MM, van der Wal AC, Bos JD. Causes, investigation and treatment of leg ulceration. Br J Dermatol. 2003;148(3):388–401.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lazarides MK, Giannoukas AD. The role of hemodynamic measurements in the managements in the management of venous and ischemic ulcers. Int J Lower Extrem Wounds. 2007;6:254–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Androulakis AE, Giannoukas AD, Labropoulos N, Katsamouris A, Nicolaides AN. The impact of duplex scanning on vascular practice. Int Angiol. 1996;15:283–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mansour M, Labropoulos N. Vascular diagnosis. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2005.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Neglén P, Raju S. A rational approach to detection of significant reflux with duplex Doppler scanning and air plethysmography. J Vasc Surg. 1993;17(3):590–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Needham T. Physiological testing of lower extremity arterial disease: segmental pressure, plethysmography, and velocity waveforms. In: Mansour M, Labropoulos N, editors. Vascular diagnosis. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2005. p. 215–22.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Labropoulos N, Leon L, editors. Evaluation of chronic venous disease. In: Vascular diagnosis. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2005. p. 447–62.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Met R, Bipat S, Legemate DA, Reekers JA, Koelemy MJ. Diagnostic performance of computed tomography angiography in peripheral arterial diseases; a systemic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2009;301:415–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Uhl JF, Gillot C. Embryology and three dimensional anatomy of the superficial venous system of the lower limbs. Phlebology. 2007;22:194–206.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Poschenrieder F, Hamer OW, Herold T, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of intraarterial and i.v. MR angiography for the detection of stenoses of the infrainguinal arteries. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:117–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Morasch M, Collins J. The current role of MRA in planning interventions for lower extremity ischemia. In: Mansour M, Labropoulos N, editors. Vascular diagnosis. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2005. p. 293–306.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Froelich JB, Prince MR, Greenfield LJ, Downing LJ, Shah NL, Wakefield TW. “Bull’s -eye” sign on gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance venography determines thrombus presence and age: a preliminary study. J Vasc Surg. 1997;26:809–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yucel EK, Dumoulin CL, Waltman AC. MR angiography of lower-extremity arterial disease: preliminary experience. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1992;2(3):303–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Owen RS, Carpenter JP, Baum RA, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of angiographically occult runoff vessels in peripheral arterial occlusive disease. N Engl J Med. 1992;326(24):1577–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Masuda EM, Kistner RL. Long term results of venous valve reconstruction: a four to twenty one year follow up. J Vasc Surg. 1994;19:391–403.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ayerdi J, Hodgson K. Principles of arteriography. In: Rutherford R, editor. Vascular surgery. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2005. p. 281–99.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Buckly CJ, Arko FR, Lee S, et al. Intravascular ultrasound scanning improves long-term patency of iliac lesions treated with balloon angioplasty and primary stenting. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35:316–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Neglen P, Hollis KC, Olivier J, Raju S. Stenting of the venous outflow in chronic venous disease: long-term stent-related outcome, clinical and hemodynamic result. J Vasc Surg. 2007;46:979–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Agale SV, Kulkarni DR, Valand AG, Zode RR, Grover S. Marjolin’s ulcer—a diagnostic dilemma. J Assoc Physicians India. 2009;57(8):593–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ghauri SK, Nyamekye IK. Leg ulceration: the importance of treating the underlying pathophysiology. Phlebology. 2010;25(supplement 1):42–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Siddiqui AR, Bernstein JM. Chronic wound infection: facts and controversies. Clin Dermatol. 2010;28(5):519–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Han A, Zenilman JM, Melendez JH, et al. The importance of a multi-faceted approach to characterizing the microbial flora of chronic wounds. Wound Repair Regen. 2011;19(5):532–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Singh AV, Subhashree L, Milani P, Gemmati D, Zamboni P. Interplay of iron metallobiology, metalloproteinases, and FXIII, and role of their gene variants in venous leg ulcer. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2010;9(4):166–79.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of General surgeryInstitute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu UniversityVaranasiIndia

Personalised recommendations