Advertisement

Modeling of Biological Effect of Charged Particles for C-Ion RT

  • Naruhiro Matsufuji

Abstract

Absorbed dose is considered to be the most fundamental physical quantity in describing biological effects of ionizing radiations. The effect is then expressed as a function of the dose, which enables these effects to analyze quantitatively.

Keywords

Dose Distribution Tumor Control Probability Track Structure Biological Dose Physical Dose 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Elsässer T, Scholz M. Cluster Effects within the Local Effect Model. Radiat Res. 2007;167:319–29.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Friedrich T, et al. Calculation of the biological effects of ion beams based on the microscopic spatial damage distribution pattern. Int J Radiat Biol. 2012;88:103–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fossati P, et al. Dose prescription in carbon ion radiotherapy: a planning study to compare NIRS and LEM approaches with a clinically-oriented strategy. Phys Med Biol. 2012;57:7543–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hawkins RB. A statistical theory of cell killing by radiation of varying linear energy transfer. Radiat Res. 1994;140:366–74.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Inaniwa T, et al. Treatment planning for a scanned carbon beam with a modified microdosimetric kinetic model. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55(2010):6721–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kanai T, et al. Biophysical characteristics of HIMAC clinical irradiation system for heavy-ion radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;44:201–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kanai T, et al. Examination of GyE system for HIMAC carbon therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;64:650–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kase Y, et al. Microdosimetric measurements and estimation of human cell survival for heavy-ion beams. Radiat Res. 2006;166:629–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kase Y, et al. Biophysical calculation of cell survival probabilities using amorphous track structure models for heavy-ion irradiation. Phys Med Biol. 2008;53:37–59.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kellerer M, Rossi HH. A generalized formation of dual radiation action. Radiat Res. 1978;75:471–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Krämer M, Scholz M. Treatment planning for heavy-ion radiotherapy: calculation and optimization of biologically effective dose. Phys Med Biol. 2000;45:3319–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Matsufuji N, et al. 2007 Specification of carbon ion dose at the National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS). J Radiat Res. 2007;48:81–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Miyamoto T, et al. Carbon ion radiotherapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2003;66:127–40.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Scholz M, Elsässer T. Biophysical models in ion beam radiotherapy. Adv Space Res. 2007;40:1381–91.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Scholz M, Kraft G. Track structure and the calculation of biological effects of heavy charged particles. Adv Space Res. 1996;18:5–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Weyrather W, et al. RBE for carbon track-segment irradiation in cell lines of differing repair capacity. Int J of Radiation Biol. 1999;75:1357–64.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Center for Charged Particle Therapy, Medical Physics Research ProgramNational Institute of Radiological SciencesChibaJapan

Personalised recommendations