Advertisement

Particle Radiotherapy: An Introduction

  • Arabinda Kumar Rath

Abstract

There were 14.1 million new cancer cases, 8.2 million cancer deaths, and 32.6 million people living with cancer (within 5 year of diagnosis) in 2012 worldwide [1]. From 1954 through December 2014, a total of 137,179 patients across the world have been treated with all forms of particle therapy since it was first started in Berkeley in 1954 [2]. As on date, particle radiotherapy treatment constitutes about 1 % of the total number of patients receiving radiotherapy worldwide. These numbers justify the title of the book “Particle Radiotherapy: An emerging technology for treatment of cancer.” In the recent past, there is a significant interest by all stakeholders in this decade’s old technology and the chance that it will emerge as a technology of choice as a prime modality of cancer treatment is very high. The book is an attempt to have a closer look on what are the physical factors that make particles the choice of radiotherapy as well as the clinical evidence that are slowly pouring in from the exponentially growing number of particle therapy centers worldwide treating cancer patients.

Keywords

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Relative Biological Effectiveness Proton Therapy Particle Radiotherapy Particle Therapy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray, F. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11 [Internet]. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2013. From: http://globocan.iarc.fr.
  2. 2.
    Jermann M. Particle therapy statistics in 2014. Int J Particle Ther. 2015;2(1):50–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mould RF. A century of X-rays and radioactivity in medicine: with emphasis on photographic records of the early years. 1993, IOP Publication, London, UK.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wilson RR. Radiological use of fast protons. Radiology. 1946;47:487–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Raju MR. Pions and heavy ions in radiotherapy. Presented at the Xlth international cancer congress, Florence; 20–26 Oct 1974. Excerpta medica international congress series, vol 353. Surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy of cancer, vol 5. pp. 161–7.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Koehler AM, Preston WM. Protons in radiation therapy. Radiology. 1972;104:191–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Archambeau J, Bennett GW, Levine GS, Cowen R, Akanuma A. Proton radiation therapy. Radiology. 1974;110:445–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Raju MR. Heavy Particle Radiotherapy. Academic Press; 1980.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Suit H, Wette R. Radiation dose fractionation and tumor control probability. Radiat Res. 1966;29:267–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zietman AL, Bae K, Slater JD, Shipley WU, Efstathiou JA, et al. Randomized trial comparing conventional-dose with high-dose conformal radiation therapy in early-stage adenocarcinoma of the prostate: long-term results from Proton Radiation Oncology Group/American College of Radiology 95–09. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(7):1106–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Miyamato T, Yamamoto N, Nishimura H, et al. Carbon ion radiotherapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2003;66:127–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Raju MR. Particle radiotherapy: historical developments and current status. Radiat Res. 1996;145(4):391–407.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wedenberg M, Toma-Dasu I. Disregarding RBE variation in treatment plan comparison may lead to bias in favor of proton plans. Med Phys. 2014;41:091706.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tommasino T, Durante M. Proton radiobiology. Cancers. 2015;7:353–81.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    van de Water TA, Lomax AJ, Bijl HP, de Jong ME, Schilstra C, et al. Potential benefits of scanned intensity-modulated proton therapy versus advanced photon therapy with regard to sparing of the salivary glands in oropharyngeal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;79(4):1216–24.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hemalata Hospitals and Research CenterBhubaneswarIndia

Personalised recommendations