Equity Participation

  • T. V. S. Ramamohan Rao


International joint ventures are subject to moral hazard and instability. Low IPR protection and inadequate enforcement account for such problems. Principal agent models account for the moral hazard in terms of the randomness in revenue generated. Equity sharing arrangements, which have important commitment and control effects, can be expected to eliminate the moral hazard and produce royalty arrangements consistent with empirically observed stylized facts. This study demonstrates that the change in the variance is the primary channel through which the commitment and control effects affect the choice of such royalty payments.


Risk Aversion Information Asymmetry Foreign Country Variable Cost Moral Hazard 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Allen JW, Phillips GM (2000) Corporate equity ownership, strategic alliances, and product market relationships. J Financ 55(6):2791–2815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Saadon Y, Das SP (1996) Host-country policy, transfer pricing and ownership distribution in international joint ventures: a theoretical analysis. Int J Ind Organ 14(3):345–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beamish PW, Banks JC (1987) Equity joint ventures and the theory of the multinational enterprise. J Int Bus Stud 18(2):1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Besancenot D, Vrancenau R (2002) Manager honesty and foreign investment in developing countries. Res Econ 56(3):231–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brickley JA (2002) Royalty rates and upfront fees in share contracts: evidence from franchising. J Law Econ Organ 18(2):511–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cai H (2003) A theory of joint asset ownership. Rand J Econ 34(Spring):63–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Che YK, Hausch DB (1999) Cooperative investments and the value of contracting. Am Econ Rev 89(1):125–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen SFS, Hennert JF (2002) Japanese investors’ choice of joint ventures versus wholly-owned subsidiaries in the U.S.: the role of market barriers and firm capabilities. J Int Bus Stud 33(1):1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chishlom DC (1997) Profit-sharing versus fixed-payment contracts: evidence from the motion pictures industry. J Law Econ Organ 13(1):169–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Das SP (1998) On the choice of international joint ventures: the role of policy moral hazard. J Policy Reform 2:135–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Das SP (1999) Direct foreign investment versus licensing. Rev Dev Econ 3(1):86–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Das SP, Katayama S (2003) International joint ventures and host-country policies. Jpn Econ Rev 54(4):381–394MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Delois A, Beamish PW (1999) Ownership strategy of Japanese firms: transactional, institutional, and experience influences. Strateg Manag J 20(10):915–933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Desai MA, Foley CF, Hines JR (2001) International joint ventures and the boundaries of the firm. Available at
  15. Dhanraj C, Beamish PW (2004) Effect of equity ownership on the survival of international joint ventures. Strateg Manag J 25(3):295–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Falvey RE, Fried HO (1986) National ownership requirements and transfer pricing. J Dev Econ 24(2):249–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Folta TB, Janney JJ (2004) Strategic benefits to firms issuing private equity placements. Strateg Manag J 25(3):223–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gallini NT, Wright BD (1990) Technology transfer under asymmetric information. Rand J Econ 21(Spring):147–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gomes-Casseres B (1989) Ownership structures of foreign subsidiaries. J Econ Behav Organ 11(1):1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gomes-Casseres B (1990) Firm ownership preferences and host government restrictions: an integrated approach. J Int Bus Stud 25(1):1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hart O, Moore J (1998) Cooperatives vs. Outside ownership, NBER working paper 6421. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  22. Kawasaki S, McMillan J (1987) The design of contracts: evidence from Japanese subcontracting. J Jpn Int Econ 1(3):327–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Konrad KA, Lommerud KE (2001) Foreign direct investment, intra-firm trade and ownership structure. Eur Econ Rev 45(3):475–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu X, Wang C (2003) Does foreign direct investment facilitate technological progress? Evidence from Chinese industries. Res Policy 32(6):945–953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Madhok A (1997) Cost, value and foreign market entry mode: the transaction and the firm. Strateg Manag J 18(1):39–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McCalman P (2004) Foreign direct investment and intellectual property rights: evidence from Hollywood’s global distribution of movies and videos. J Int Econ 62(1):107–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Miller R, Glen J, Jaspersen F, Karmokolias Y (1997) International joint ventures in developing countries. Financ Dev 34(1):26–29Google Scholar
  28. Mjoen H, Tallman S (1997) Control and performance in international joint ventures. Organ Sci 8(3):257–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nichols S (1983) Agency contracts, institutional mode, and the transition to foreign direct investment by British manufacturing multinationals before 1939. J Econ Hist 43(3):675–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Noe TH, Rebello MJ, Shrikhande M (2002) Structuring international cooperative ventures. Rev Financ Stud 15(4):1251–1282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Okamuro H (2001) Risk sharing in the supplier relationship: new evidence from the Japanese automotive industry. J Econ Behav Organ 45(4):361–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pan Y (2002) Equity ownership in international joint ventures: the impact of source country factors. J Int Bus Stud 33(2):375–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pan Y, Li X (2000) Joint venture formation of very large multinational firms. J Int Bus Stud 31(1):179–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rangan S, Drummond A (2004) Explaining outcomes in competition among foreign multinationals in a focal host market. Strateg Manag J 25(3):285–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rauch JE (2001) Business and social networks in international trade. J Econ Lit 39(4):1177–1203MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sinha UB (2001) International joint ventures, licensing and buy-out under asymmetric information. J Dev Econ 66(1):127–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Svejnar J, Smith SC (1984) The economics of joint ventures in less developed countries. Q J Econ 99(1):149–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Teece DJ (1980) Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm. J Econ Behav Organ 1(3):237–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vishwasrao S (1994) Intellectual property rights and the mode of technology transfer. J Dev Econ 44(2):381–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yun M (1999) Subcontracting relations in the Korean automotive industry: risk sharing and technological capability. Int J Ind Organ 17(1):81–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. V. S. Ramamohan Rao
    • 1
  1. 1.Indian Institute of Technology KanpurKanpurIndia

Personalised recommendations