Skip to main content

Aleatory and Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Applied Mathematics

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics ((PROMS,volume 146))

  • 1372 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper, an effort has been made to combine aleatory and epistemic uncertainties in risk models. We have combined probabilistic distributions, generalized fuzzy numbers, and completely generalized interval valued fuzzy numbers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. M.B. Anoop, K.R. Balaji, N. Lakshmanan, Safety assessment of austenitic steel nuclear power plant pipelines against stress corrosion cracking in the presence of hybrid uncertainties. Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip. 85(4), 238–247 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Baraldi, E. Zio, A combined monte carlo and possibilistic approach to uncertainty propagation in event tree analysis. Risk Anal. 28(5), 1309–1326 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. C. Baudrit, D. Dubois, D. Guyonnet, H. Fargier, Joint treatment of imprecision and randomness in uncertainty propagation, in Proceedings of the Conference on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems (Perugia, 2004), pp. 873–880

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. Baudrit, D. Dubois, D. Guyonnet, Joint Propagation and exploitation of probabilistic and possibilistic information in risk assessment. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 14, 593–608 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. C. Baudrit, D. Dubois, Practical representations of incomplete probabilistic knowledge. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 51(1), 86–108 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. C. Baudrit, D. Dubois, N. Perrot, Representing parametric probabilistic models tainted with imprecision. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 159, 1913–1928 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. R. Chutia, Environmental risk modelling under probability-normal interval-valued fuzzy number. Fuzzy Inf. Eng. 3, 359–371 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. S.H. Chen, Operations on fuzzy numbers with function principal. Tamkang J. Manag. Sci. 6(1), 13–25 (1985)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. S.H. Chen, Ranking generalized fuzzy number with graded mean integration, in Proceedings of the 8th International Fuzzy Systems Association World Congress, vol. 2 (Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China, 1999), pp. 899–902

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. Dutta, H. Boruah, T. Ali, Fuzzy arithmetic with and without using \(\alpha \)-cut method: a comparative study. Int. J. Latest Trends Comput. 2, 99–107 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Dutta, T. Ali, A hybrid method to deal with aleatory and epistemic uncertainty in risk assessment. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 42, 37–44 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. Dutta, Combined approach to propagate aleatory and epistemic uncertainty in risk assessment. Int. J. Math. Comput. Appl. Res. 3(5), 2249–6955 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. Dutta, An approach to deal with aleatory and epistemic uncertainty within the same framework: case study in risk assessment. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 80(12), 40–45 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. EPA U.S., Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund, Volume I: Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part E, Supplemental Guidance for Dermal Risk Assessment). Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, EPA/540/R/99/005, Interim, Review Draft. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Sept 2001

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Flage, P. Baraldi, E. Zio, T. Aven, Possibility Probability Transformation in Comparing Different Approaches to the Treatment of Epistemic Uncertainties in a Fault Tree Analysis, eds. by B. Ale, I.A. Papazoglu, E. Zio. Proceedings of the ESREL Reliability, Risk and Safety Conference (Rhodes, Greece, 2010), pp. 714–721

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Flage, P. Baraldi, E. Zio, T. Aven, Probabilistic and Possibilistic treatment of epistemic uncertainties in fault tree analysis (2011) Submitted to Risk analysis

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Gehrke, C. Walker, E. Walker, Some comments on interval valued fuzzy sets. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 11, 751–759 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. D. Guyonnet, B. Cme, P. Perrochet, A. Parriaux, Comparing two methods for addressing uncertainty in risk assessments. J. Environ. Eng. 125(7), 660–666 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. Guyonnet, B. Bourgine, D. Dubois, H. Fargier, B. Cme, J.P. Chil, Hybrid approach for addressing uncertainty in risk assessments. J. Environ. Eng. 126, 68–78 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Haldar, R.K. Reddy, A random-fuzzy analysis of existing structures. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 48, 201–210 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. H. Hamrawi, S. Coupland, R. John, A novel a-cut representation for type-2 fuzzy sets, in 2010 IEEE International Conference Fuzzy Systems (Barcelona, Spain, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. H. Hamrawi, Type-2 fuzzy a-cuts. Ph.D. thesis. De Montfort University, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  23. J.C. Helton, W.L. Oberkampf, Alternative representations of epistemic uncertainty. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 85 1–3 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  24. E. Kentel, M.M. Aral, Probalistic-fuzzy health risk modeling. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 18, 324–338 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. J. Li, G.H. Huang, G.M. Zeng, I. Maqsood, Y.F. Huang, An integrated fuzzy-stochastic modeling approach for risk assessment of groundwater contamination. J. Environ. Manage. 82, 173–188 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. P. Limbourg, E. de Rocquigny, Uncertainty analysis using evidence theory—confronting level-1and level-2 approaches with data availability and computational constraints. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 95, 550–564 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. R.M. Maxwell, S.D. Pelmulder, A.F.B. Tompson, W.E. Kastenberg, On the development of a new methodology for groundwater-driven health risk assessment. Water Resour. Res. 34, 833–847 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. N. Pedronia, E. Zioa, E. Ferrariob, A. Pasanisid, M. Couplet, Propagation of aleatory and epistemic uncertainties in the model for the design of a flood protection dike, in PSAM 11 and ESREL (Helsinki, Finland, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  29. N. Pedronia, E. Zioa, E. Ferrariob, A. Pasanisid, M. Couplet, Hierarchical propagation of probabilistic and non-probabilistic uncertainty in the parameters of a risk model. Comput. Struct. 1–15 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  30. K.D. Rao, H.S. Kushwaha, A.K. Verma, A. Srividya, Quantification of epistemic and aleatory uncertainties in level-1 probabilistic safety assessment studies. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 92, 947–956 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. R. Sambuc, Function F-Flous, Application a laide au Diagnostic en Pathologie Thyroidienne (University of Marseille, These de Doctoraten Medicine, 1975)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Palash Dutta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer India

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dutta, P., Ali, T. (2015). Aleatory and Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification. In: Sarkar, S., Basu, U., De, S. (eds) Applied Mathematics. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 146. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2547-8_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics