Skip to main content

Collaborative Simulated Annealing Genetic Algorithm for Geometric Optimization of Thermo-electric Coolers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Hybrid Soft Computing Approaches

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 611))

  • 615 Accesses

Abstract

Thermo-electric Coolers (TECs) nowadays are applied in a wide range of thermal energy systems. This is due to its superior features where no refrigerant and dynamic parts are needed. TECs generate no electrical or acoustical noise and are environment friendly. Over the past decades, many researches were employed to improve the efficiency of TECs by enhancing the material parameters and design parameters. The material parameters are the most significant, but they are restricted by currently available materials and module fabricating technologies. Therefore, the main objective of TECs design is to determine a set of design parameters such as leg area, leg length, and the number of legs. Two elements that play an important role when considering the suitability of TECs in applications are rated of refrigeration (ROR) and coefficient of performance (COP). In this chapter, the technical issues of TECs were discussed. After that, a new method of optimizing the dimension of TECs using collaborative simulated annealing genetic algorithm (CSAGA) to maximize the rate of refrigeration (ROR) was proposed. Equality constraint and inequality constraint were taken into consideration. The results of optimization obtained by using CSAGA were validated by comparing with those obtained by using stand-alone genetic algorithm and simulated annealing optimization technique. This work revealed that CSAGA was more robust and more reliable than stand-alone genetic algorithm and simulated annealing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Scherbatskoy SA (1982) Systems, apparatus and methods for measuring while drilling: Google Patents

    Google Scholar 

  2. Goldsmid, HJ (2009) The thermoelectric and related effects. Introduction to thermoelectricity. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  3. Deb K (2001) Multi-objective optimization. Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms, pp 13–46

    Google Scholar 

  4. Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. Evolut Comput. IEEE Trans 6(2):182–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Van Laarhoven PJ, Aarts EH (1987) Simulated annealing. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Storn R, Price K (1995) Differential evolution-a simple and efficient adaptive scheme for global optimization over continuous spaces. ICSI Berkeley, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  7. Poli R, Kennedy J, Blackwell T (2007) Particle swarm optimization. Swarm Intell 1(1):33–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cheng Y-H, Lin W-K (2005) Geometric optimization of thermoelectric coolers in a confined volume using genetic algorithms. Appl Therm Eng 25(17–18):2983–2997. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2005.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Huang Y-X, Wang X-D, Cheng C-H, Lin DT-W (2013) Geometry optimization of thermoelectric coolers using simplified conjugate-gradient method. Energy 59:689–697. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2013.06.069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheng Y-H, Shih C (2006) Maximizing the cooling capacity and COP of two-stage thermoelectric coolers through genetic algorithm. Appl Therm Eng 26(8–9):937–947. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2005.09.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Xuan XC, Ng KC, Yap C, Chua HT (2002) Optimization of two-stage thermoelectric coolers with two design configurations. Energy Convers Manag 43(15):2041–2052. doi:10.1016/S0196-8904(01)00153-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nain PKS, Giri JM, Sharma S, Deb K (2010) Multi-objective performance optimization of thermo-electric coolers using dimensional structural parameters. In: Panigrahi B, Das, S, Suganthan P, Dash S (eds), Swarm, Evolutionary, and Memetic Computing, vol 6466. Springer, Berlin, pp 607–614

    Google Scholar 

  13. Venkata Rao R, Patel V (2013) Multi-objective optimization of two stage thermoelectric cooler using a modified teaching–learning-based optimization algorithm. Eng Appl Artif Intell 26(1):430–445. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2012.02.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yamashita O, Sugihara S (2005) High-performance bismuth-telluride compounds with highly stable thermoelectric figure of merit. J Mater Sci 40(24):6439–6444. doi:10.1007/s10853-005-1712-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rodgers P (2008) Nanomaterials: Silicon goes thermoelectric. Nat Nano 3(2):76–76

    Google Scholar 

  16. Poudel B, Hao Q, Ma Y, Lan Y, Minnich A, Yu B, Vashaee D (2008) High-thermoelectric performance of nanostructured bismuth antimony telluride bulk alloys. Science 320(5876):634–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Goldsmid HJ (2009) Introduction to thermoelectricity, vol 121. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yamashita O, Tomiyoshi S (2004) Effect of annealing on thermoelectric properties of bismuth telluride compounds doped with various additives. J Appl Phys 95(1):161–169. doi:10.1063/1.1630363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rowe D, Min G (1996) Design theory of thermoelectric modules for electrical power generation. IEE Proc Sci Meas Technol 143(6):351–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Boussaïd I, Lepagnot J, Siarry P (2013) A survey on optimization metaheuristics. Information sciences

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lee KY, El-Sharkawi MA (2008) Modern heuristic optimization techniques: theory and applications to power systems, vol 39. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Geng H, Zhu H, Xing R, Wu T (2012) A novel hybrid evolutionary algorithm for solving multi-objective optimization problems. In: Huang, D-S, Jiang, C, Bevilacqua V, Figueroa J (eds), Intelligent computing technology, vol 7389. Springer, Berlin, pp 128–136

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vasant P (2010) Hybrid simulated annealing and genetic algorithms for industrial production management problems. Int J Comput Methods 7(2):279–297

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Miettinen K (1999) Nonlinear multiobjective optimization, vol 12. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  25. Blum C, Roli A (2008) Hybrid metaheuristics: an introduction. Hybrid metaheuristics. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 1–30

    Google Scholar 

  26. Blum C, Roli A, Sampels M (2008) Hybrid metaheuristics: an emerging approach to optimization, vol 114. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shahsavari-Pour N, Ghasemishabankareh B (2013) A novel hybrid meta-heuristic algorithm for solving multi objective flexible job shop scheduling. J Manuf Syst 32(4):771–780. doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2013.04.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhao D, Tan G (2014) A review of thermoelectric cooling: materials, modeling and applications. Appl Therm Eng 66(1–2):15–24. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.01.074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen P-H, Shahandashti SM (2009) Hybrid of genetic algorithm and simulated annealing for multiple project scheduling with multiple resource constraints. Autom Constr 18(4):434–443. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2008.10.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Vasant P, Barsoum N (2009) Hybrid simulated annealing and genetic algorithms for industrial production management problems

    Google Scholar 

  31. Dingjun C, Chung-Yeol L, Cheol-Hoon P (2005, 16–16 Nov 2005) Hybrid genetic algorithm and simulated annealing (HGASA) in global function optimization. In: 17th IEEE international conference on paper presented at the tools with artificial intelligence, ICTAI 05, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hazra J, Sinha A (2009) Application of soft computing methods for economic dispatch in power systems. Int J Electr Electron Eng 2:538–543

    Google Scholar 

  33. Liu K, Du X, Kang L (2007) Differential evolution algorithm based on simulated annealing. In: Kang L, Liu Y, Zeng S (eds), Advances in computation and intelligence, vol 4683. Springer, Berlin, pp 120–126

    Google Scholar 

  34. Jing-Yu Y, Qing L, De-Min S (2006, 13–16 Aug 2006) A differential evolution with simulated annealing updating method. International Conference on paper presented at the machine learning and cybernetics, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  35. Xu X, Wang S (2007) Optimal simplified thermal models of building envelope based on frequency domain regression using genetic algorithm. Energy Build 39(5):525–536. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.06.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gozde H, Taplamacioglu MC (2011) Automatic generation control application with craziness based particle swarm optimization in a thermal power system. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 33(1):8–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kou H-S, Lee J-J, Chen C-W (2008) Optimum thermal performance of microchannel heat sink by adjusting channel width and height. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer 35(5):577–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Pezzini P, Gomis-Bellmunt O, Sudrià-Andreu A (2011) Optimization techniques to improve energy efficiency in power systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15(4):2028–2041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sharma N (2012) A particle swarm optimization algorithm for optimization of thermal performance of a smooth flat plate solar air heater. Energy 38(1):406–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Eynard J, Grieu S, Polit M (2011) Wavelet-based multi-resolution analysis and artificial neural networks for forecasting temperature and thermal power consumption. Eng Appl Artif Intell 24(3):501–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research work was supported by Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS (UTP) under the Exploratory Research Grant Scheme-PCS-No. 0153AB-121 (ERGS) of Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia (MOHE). The authors would like to sincerely thank the Department of Fundamental and Applied Sciences (DFAS) and Centre of Graduate Studies (CGS) of UTP for their strong support in carrying out this research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Doan V. K. Khanh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Acronyms

Symbol

Description

Unit

A

Cross-sectional area of TEC legs

mm2

L

Height of the confined volume

mm

N

Number of thermo-electric couple

S

Total area of STECs

mm2

ROR

Rate of refrigeration

W

COP

Coefficient of performance

TE

Thermo-electric element

TECs

Thermo-electrics coolers

STECs

Single-stage thermo-electrics coolers

TTECs

Two-stage thermo-electrics coolers

MWD

Measurement while drilling

Z

Figure of merit

ZT

Dimensionless figure of merit

I

Supplied current to TECs

A

T h

Hot side temperature

K

T c

Cold side temperature

K

T ave

Average of cold and hot side temperature

K

SOP

Single-objective optimization problem

MOP

Multi-objective cptimization problem

CSAGA

Collaborative simulated annealing genetic algorithm

GA

Genetic algorithm

SA

Simulated annealing

PSO

Particle swarm cptimization

ACO

Ant olony ptimization

NSGA-II

Non-dominated sorting algorithm

TLBO

Teaching–learning-based optimization

TS

Tabu search

DE

Differential evolution

α n = α p

Seebeck coefficient of n-type and p-type thermo-electric element

V/K

ρ n = ρ p

Electrical resistivity of n-type and p-type of thermo-electric element

Ωm

к n = к p

Thermal conductivity of n-type and p-type of thermo-electric element

W/mK

r c

Electrical contact resistance

Ωm2

Key Terms and Definitions

Thermodynamics: is a branch of physics concerned with heat and temperature and their relation to energy and work. It defines macroscopic variables, such as internal energy, entropy, and pressure that partly describe a body of matter or radiation. It states that the behavior of those variables is subject to general constraints that are common to all materials, not the peculiar properties of particular materials. These general constraints are expressed in the four laws of thermodynamics. Thermodynamics describes the bulk behavior of the body, not the microscopic behaviors of the very large numbers of its microscopic constituents, such as molecules. Its laws are explained by statistical mechanics, in terms of the microscopic constituents. Thermodynamics apply to a wide variety of topics in science and engineering.

Thermo-electrics coolers: uses the Peltier effect to create a heat flux between the junctions of two different types of materials. A Peltier cooler, heater, or thermo-electric heat pump is a solid-state active heat pump which transfers heat from one side of the device to the other, with consumption of electrical energy, depending on the direction of the current. Such an instrument is also called a Peltier device, Peltier heat pump, solid-state refrigerator, or thermoelectric cooler (TEC). They can be used either for heating or for cooling (refrigeration), although in practice the main application is cooling. It can also be used as a temperature controller that either heats or cools.

Rate of refrigeration: ROR or can be called cooling rate is the rate at which heat loss occurs from the surface of an object.

Coefficient of performance: or COP of a heat pump is a ratio of heating or cooling provided to electrical energy consumed. Higher COPs equate to lower operating costs. The COP may exceed 1, because it is a ratio of output–loss, unlike the thermal efficiency ratio of output–Input energy. For complete systems, COP should include energy consumption of all auxiliaries. COP is highly dependent on operating conditions, especially absolute temperature and relative temperature between sink and system, and is often graphed or averaged against expected conditions.

Meta-heuristic: is a higher-level procedure or heuristic designed to find, generate, or select a lower-level procedure or heuristic (partial search algorithm) that may provide a sufficiently good solution to an optimization problem, especially with incomplete or imperfect information or limited computation capacity. Meta-heuristic may make few assumptions about the optimization problem being solved, and so they may be usable for a variety of problems.

Hybrid algorithm: is an algorithm that combines two or more other algorithms that solve the same problem, either choosing one (depending on the data), or switching between them over the course of the algorithm. This is generally done to combine desired features of each, so that the overall algorithm is better than the individual components. “Hybrid algorithm” does not refer to simply combining multiple algorithms to solve a different problem—many algorithms can be considered as combinations of simpler pieces—but only to combining algorithms that solve the same problem, but differ in other characteristics, notably performance.

Genetic Algorithm: is a search meta-heuristic that mimics the process of natural selection. This meta-heuristic was routinely used to generate useful solutions to optimization and search problems. Genetic algorithms belong to the larger class of evolutionary algorithms which generate solutions to optimization problems using techniques inspired by natural evolutions, such as inheritance, mutation, selection, and crossover.

Simulated Annealing: is a generic probabilistic meta-heuristic for the global optimization problem of locating a good approximation to the global optimum of a given function in a large search space. It is often used when the search space is discrete (e.g., all tours that visit a given set of cities). For certain problems, simulated annealing may be more efficient than exhaustive enumeration—provided that the goal is merely to find an acceptably good solution in a fixed amount of time, rather than the best possible solution.

Robust optimization: is a field of optimization theory that deals with optimization problems in which a certain measure of robustness is sought against uncertainty that can be represented as deterministic variability in the value of the parameters of the problem itself and/or its solution. There are a number of classification criteria for robust optimization problems/models. In particular, one can distinguish between problems dealing with local and global models of robustness, and between probabilistic and non-probabilistic models of robustness. Modern robust optimization deals primarily with non-probabilistic models of robustness that are worst-case oriented and as such usually deploy Wald’s maximum models.

Nonlinear constraint optimization: is an important class of problems with a broad range of engineering, scientific, and operational applications. The form is

$${\text{Minimize}}\, f(x)\, {\text{subject to}}\, c(x) = 0 \, {\text{and}} \,x \geq 0,$$

where the objective function, f: Rn → R, and the constraint functions, \(c:\,R^{n} \, \to \,R^{m}\), are twice continuously differentiable. We denote the multipliers corresponding to the equality constraints, c(x) = 0, by y and the multipliers of the inequality constraints, x ≥ 0, by z ≥ 0. An NCO may also have unbounded variables, upper bounds, or general range constraints of the form \(\text{l}_{i} \, \le \,c_{i} \left( x \right)\, \le \,u_{i}\), which we omit for the sake of simplicity.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer India

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Khanh, D.V.K., Vasant, P.M., Elamvazuthi, I., Dieu, V.N. (2016). Collaborative Simulated Annealing Genetic Algorithm for Geometric Optimization of Thermo-electric Coolers. In: Bhattacharyya, S., Dutta, P., Chakraborty, S. (eds) Hybrid Soft Computing Approaches. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 611. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2544-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2544-7_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi

  • Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2543-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2544-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics