Skip to main content

Agriculture and Structural Transformation 1960–2040: Implications for Double-Digit Inclusive Growth

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Development in India

Abstract

If imports of food are constrained to levels only slightly higher than at present, at least a 4 % growth rate of agricultural GDP is needed to support GDP growth rates in excess of 8 %. This can be attained with a slightly optimistic agriculture TFPG growth rate of 2 % along with a slightly optimistic development of irrigation potential to 90 million ha (Mha) (net). But in the past two decades, agricultural growth has been less than 3 %, productivity growth has been lower than 2 %, and limits on total water availability in India, competition for water from urban areas, and slow improvements in water use efficiency have reduced the irrigation growth rate and could continue to reduce it in the future. Achieving the required agricultural growth further increase the need for TFP growth. The way agriculture develops would have a profound impact on structural transformation when labor is pulled out of agriculture at a speed that depends on the labor intensity of industry and services. A turning point is reached when the labor productivity differential between the sectors starts to diminish and the share of labor in agriculture starts to decline faster than its share in output. India seems to be far away from such a point and we seem to be heading for a system of part-time farmers with substantial income coming from rural nonfarm activities. This is also leading to feminization of agriculture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    All these growth rates declined in the 1990s and 2000s. The decadal averages hide a deeper slump in agricultural production and productivity growth from the mid-1990s to the first half of the 2000s. A good illustration is the behavior of the annual TFP growth calculated by Fuglie (2010). While it hovered around 2 % during the 1980s, it slowed to near zero in 2001 only to rebound afterwards and to reach 3 % and above in 2006 and 2007. Growth of agriculture also accelerated to slightly above 3 % in the years since 2006, which explains the decadal growth of agriculture of 2.8 % despite the poor performance during the early 2000s. However, the growth rate is still around 1 % below the target rate of the Government of India for agriculture at 4 %.

  2. 2.

    The poverty data with the higher poverty line resulting from the Tendulkar Committee report show similar convergence for the period 1993–1994 to 2004–2005. Preliminary estimates of the national poverty rate prepared by Ravi and cited in Ahluwahlia (2011) suggest that the national poverty rate under the new Tendulkar committee poverty line has declined further from 37.2 % in 2004–2005 to 37.2 % in 2009–2010, or at an accelerated rate of about 1 % per year. The urban-rural poverty rates for 2009–10 have not yet become available.

  3. 3.

    Growth in rural nonfarm sector employment has occurred all over India, but has been highly uneven. It is highest in Kerala, West Bengal, and Tamil Nadu, and lowest in Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, followed by Uttarakhand, Karnataka, Gujarat, and Maharashtra (World Bank 2010; Binswanger-Mkhize and d’Souza 2011).

  4. 4.

    India has achieved similar rates of TFP growth during the 1980s and again between 2003 and 2007; and the past growth rates of irrigation have exceeded what is needed to reach 108 Mha, though in recent years the growth rate has slowed down to 1 % per year, which can reach the 90 Mha targeted in the reference run.

References

  • Ackermann R (2011) New directions for water management in Indian agriculture. Background paper to centennial group. India 2039: Transforming Agriculture, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahluwahlia M (2011) Prospects and policy challenges in the twelfth plan. Econ Polit Wkly 46(21):88–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Binswanger-Mkhize HP (2012) India 1960–2010: structural change, the rural non-farm sector, and the prospects for agriculture. In: Stanford symposium series on global food policy and food security in the 21st century, Center for Food Security and the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Binswanger-Mkhize HP, d’Souza A (2011) India, 1980–2008, structural change at the state level. Background paper to centennial group (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Binswanger-Mkhize HP, d’Souza A (2012) Structural transformation of the Indian economy and of its agriculture. In: Fuglie KO, Wang SL, Ball E (eds) 2012, productivity growth in agriculture: an international perspective. CABI, Wallingford, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • Binswanger-Mkhize H-P, Pradhan KC, Nagarajan HK, Singh SK, Singh JP (2011) India 1999–2007: structural change of Indian agriculture at the village and household level. Background Paper to Centennial Group 2012, India 2039: transforming agriculture, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • CGWB (2006) Dynamic ground water resources of India. Central Ground Water Board, Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Eswaran M, Ramaswami KB, Wadhwa W (2008). How does poverty decline: suggestive evidence from India, 1983–1999. Bread Policy Paper No 14. http://ipl.econ.duke.edu/bread/papers/policy/p014.pdf

  • Eswaran M, Kotwal A, Ramaswami B, Wadhwa W (2009) Sectoral labour flows and agricultural wages in India, 1983–2004: has growth trickled down? Econ Polit Wkly 44(2):46–55

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2010) Aquastat database. http://www.fao.org/nr/water/aquastat/main/index.stm

  • Fischer G, Frohberg K, Keyzer MA, Parikh Kirit S (1988) Linked national models—a tool for international food policy analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherland

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuglie KO (2010) Total factor productivity in the global agricultural economy: evidence from FAO data. In: Alston J, Babcock B, Pardey P (eds) The shifting patterns of agricultural production and productivity worldwide. Midwest Agribusiness Trade and Research Information Center (MATRIC). Iowa State University

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazell PB, Headey D, Pratt AN, Byerlee D (2011) Structural imbalances and farm and nonfarm employment prospects in rural South Asia. Report for the World Bank, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Himanshu H, Lanjouw P, Mukhopadhyay A, Murgai R (2011) Non-farm diversification and rural poverty decline: A perspective from Indian sample survey and village study. Working Paper 44. Asia Research Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London

    Google Scholar 

  • MOA (Ministry of Agriculture) (2009) Net area irrigated from different sources and gross irrigated area. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, Government of India, New Delhi, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayana NSS, Parikh Kirit S, Srinivasan TN (1991) Agriculture, growth and redistribution of income: policy analysis with a general equilibrium model of India. North Holland’s contributions to economic analysis series with an Indian edition by Allied Publishers, New Delhi, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayanamoorthy A (2003) Averting water crisis by drip method of irrigation: a study of two water-intensive crops. Indian J Agric Econ 58(3):427–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Parikh K (1992) Food demand and supply possibilities till 2050. In: Vernon R (ed) Agriculture, environment and health: towards sustainable development into the 21st century. Minnesota University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Parikh K, Binswanger-Mkhize HP, Ghosh P, d’Souza A (2011) Double digit inclusive growth: not without robust agricultural growth. Background paper to centennial group, India 2039: Transforming Agriculture, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Parikh K, Ghosh P, Binswanger-Mkhize H, DeSouza A (2011) Background paper on the model. www.irade.organning Commission (2011) Report of the working group on major & medium irrigation and command area development for the XII Five Year Plan (2012–2017). Planning Commission, Government of India. http://planningcommission.nic.in/aboutus/committee/wrkgrp12/wr/wg_major.pdf

  • Planning Commission (2011) Report of the working group on major & medium irrigation and command area development for the XII five year plan (2012–2017). Planning Commission, Government of India. http://planningcommission.nic.in/aboutus/committee/wrkgrp12/wr/wg_major.pdf

  • Shah T, Gulati A, Hemant P, Shreedhar G, Jain RC (2009) Secret of Gujarat’s agrarian miracle after 2000. Econ Polit Wkly XLIV(52):45

    Google Scholar 

  • Swamy G, Binswanger HP (1983) Flexible consumer demand systems and linear estimation: food in India. Am J Agric Econ 65(4):675–684

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaidyanathan A, Sivasubramanian K (2004) Efficiency of water use in agriculture. Econ Polit Wkly 39(27):2989–2996

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2010) Perspectives on poverty in India: stylized facts from survey data. Washington DC, March 11

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kirit S. Parikh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer India

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Parikh, K.S., Binswanger-Mkhize, H.P., Ghosh, P.P. (2016). Agriculture and Structural Transformation 1960–2040: Implications for Double-Digit Inclusive Growth. In: Dev, S., Babu, P. (eds) Development in India. India Studies in Business and Economics. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2541-6_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics