Advertisement

Agriculture and Structural Transformation 1960–2040: Implications for Double-Digit Inclusive Growth

  • Kirit S. Parikh
  • Hans P. Binswanger-Mkhize
  • Probal P. Ghosh
Chapter
Part of the India Studies in Business and Economics book series (ISBE)

Abstract

If imports of food are constrained to levels only slightly higher than at present, at least a 4 % growth rate of agricultural GDP is needed to support GDP growth rates in excess of 8 %. This can be attained with a slightly optimistic agriculture TFPG growth rate of 2 % along with a slightly optimistic development of irrigation potential to 90 million ha (Mha) (net). But in the past two decades, agricultural growth has been less than 3 %, productivity growth has been lower than 2 %, and limits on total water availability in India, competition for water from urban areas, and slow improvements in water use efficiency have reduced the irrigation growth rate and could continue to reduce it in the future. Achieving the required agricultural growth further increase the need for TFP growth. The way agriculture develops would have a profound impact on structural transformation when labor is pulled out of agriculture at a speed that depends on the labor intensity of industry and services. A turning point is reached when the labor productivity differential between the sectors starts to diminish and the share of labor in agriculture starts to decline faster than its share in output. India seems to be far away from such a point and we seem to be heading for a system of part-time farmers with substantial income coming from rural nonfarm activities. This is also leading to feminization of agriculture.

Keywords

Total Factor Productivity Total Factor Productivity Growth Agricultural Commodity Agricultural Growth Total Factor Productivity Growth Rate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ackermann R (2011) New directions for water management in Indian agriculture. Background paper to centennial group. India 2039: Transforming Agriculture, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahluwahlia M (2011) Prospects and policy challenges in the twelfth plan. Econ Polit Wkly 46(21):88–105Google Scholar
  3. Binswanger-Mkhize HP (2012) India 1960–2010: structural change, the rural non-farm sector, and the prospects for agriculture. In: Stanford symposium series on global food policy and food security in the 21st century, Center for Food Security and the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  4. Binswanger-Mkhize HP, d’Souza A (2011) India, 1980–2008, structural change at the state level. Background paper to centennial group (2012)Google Scholar
  5. Binswanger-Mkhize HP, d’Souza A (2012) Structural transformation of the Indian economy and of its agriculture. In: Fuglie KO, Wang SL, Ball E (eds) 2012, productivity growth in agriculture: an international perspective. CABI, Wallingford, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  6. Binswanger-Mkhize H-P, Pradhan KC, Nagarajan HK, Singh SK, Singh JP (2011) India 1999–2007: structural change of Indian agriculture at the village and household level. Background Paper to Centennial Group 2012, India 2039: transforming agriculture, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  7. CGWB (2006) Dynamic ground water resources of India. Central Ground Water Board, Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  8. Eswaran M, Ramaswami KB, Wadhwa W (2008). How does poverty decline: suggestive evidence from India, 1983–1999. Bread Policy Paper No 14. http://ipl.econ.duke.edu/bread/papers/policy/p014.pdf
  9. Eswaran M, Kotwal A, Ramaswami B, Wadhwa W (2009) Sectoral labour flows and agricultural wages in India, 1983–2004: has growth trickled down? Econ Polit Wkly 44(2):46–55Google Scholar
  10. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2010) Aquastat database. http://www.fao.org/nr/water/aquastat/main/index.stm
  11. Fischer G, Frohberg K, Keyzer MA, Parikh Kirit S (1988) Linked national models—a tool for international food policy analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The NetherlandGoogle Scholar
  12. Fuglie KO (2010) Total factor productivity in the global agricultural economy: evidence from FAO data. In: Alston J, Babcock B, Pardey P (eds) The shifting patterns of agricultural production and productivity worldwide. Midwest Agribusiness Trade and Research Information Center (MATRIC). Iowa State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  13. Hazell PB, Headey D, Pratt AN, Byerlee D (2011) Structural imbalances and farm and nonfarm employment prospects in rural South Asia. Report for the World Bank, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  14. Himanshu H, Lanjouw P, Mukhopadhyay A, Murgai R (2011) Non-farm diversification and rural poverty decline: A perspective from Indian sample survey and village study. Working Paper 44. Asia Research Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. MOA (Ministry of Agriculture) (2009) Net area irrigated from different sources and gross irrigated area. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, Government of India, New Delhi, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  16. Narayana NSS, Parikh Kirit S, Srinivasan TN (1991) Agriculture, growth and redistribution of income: policy analysis with a general equilibrium model of India. North Holland’s contributions to economic analysis series with an Indian edition by Allied Publishers, New Delhi, 1991Google Scholar
  17. Narayanamoorthy A (2003) Averting water crisis by drip method of irrigation: a study of two water-intensive crops. Indian J Agric Econ 58(3):427–437Google Scholar
  18. Parikh K (1992) Food demand and supply possibilities till 2050. In: Vernon R (ed) Agriculture, environment and health: towards sustainable development into the 21st century. Minnesota University PressGoogle Scholar
  19. Parikh K, Binswanger-Mkhize HP, Ghosh P, d’Souza A (2011) Double digit inclusive growth: not without robust agricultural growth. Background paper to centennial group, India 2039: Transforming Agriculture, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  20. Parikh K, Ghosh P, Binswanger-Mkhize H, DeSouza A (2011) Background paper on the model. www.irade.organning Commission (2011) Report of the working group on major & medium irrigation and command area development for the XII Five Year Plan (2012–2017). Planning Commission, Government of India. http://planningcommission.nic.in/aboutus/committee/wrkgrp12/wr/wg_major.pdf
  21. Planning Commission (2011) Report of the working group on major & medium irrigation and command area development for the XII five year plan (2012–2017). Planning Commission, Government of India. http://planningcommission.nic.in/aboutus/committee/wrkgrp12/wr/wg_major.pdf
  22. Shah T, Gulati A, Hemant P, Shreedhar G, Jain RC (2009) Secret of Gujarat’s agrarian miracle after 2000. Econ Polit Wkly XLIV(52):45Google Scholar
  23. Swamy G, Binswanger HP (1983) Flexible consumer demand systems and linear estimation: food in India. Am J Agric Econ 65(4):675–684Google Scholar
  24. Vaidyanathan A, Sivasubramanian K (2004) Efficiency of water use in agriculture. Econ Polit Wkly 39(27):2989–2996Google Scholar
  25. World Bank (2010) Perspectives on poverty in India: stylized facts from survey data. Washington DC, March 11Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kirit S. Parikh
    • 1
  • Hans P. Binswanger-Mkhize
    • 2
  • Probal P. Ghosh
    • 1
  1. 1.Integrated Research and Action for DevelopmentDelhiIndia
  2. 2.College of Economics and ManagementChina Agricultural UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations