Advertisement

Development and Selection of Porous Scaffolds Using Computer-Aided Tissue Engineering

  • Nitin Sahai
  • Tanvi Jain
  • Sushil Kumar
  • Pradip Kumar DuttaEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Springer Series on Polymer and Composite Materials book series (SSPCM)

Abstract

Tissue engineering is considered a multidisciplinary field where the involvement of many course of studies as well as utilization of knowledge of various researchers/scientists and medical practitioners provided good health care and esthetics concepts. Porous scaffolds play very important role in tissue engineering and many of the relevant disciplines. Henceforth, the development and selection of proper scaffolds, particularly in the form of porous due to multifaceted microstructure-like veins and capillaries is essential. Computer-Aided Tissue Engineering (CATE) is an important tool to categorize the porous scaffolds in terms of design, modeling as well as experimental validation. The present article describes the selection of materials, facilitated properties, experimental methods, knowledge of computer to fabricate scaffolds.

Keywords

Porous scaffold Computer-aided tissue engineering Chitosan Design Characterization 

Notes

Acknowledgments

One of the authors (Tanvi Jain) gratefully acknowledged the financial support from TEQIP-II, MNNIT Allahabad for her Ph.D. research work.

References

  1. 1.
    Hutmacher DW (2000) Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials 21:2529–2543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Monique M, Dietmar WH (2007) Biodegradable polymers applied in tissue engineering research: a review. Polym Int 56:145–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Singh BK, Sirohi R, Archana D, Jain A, Dutta PK (2015) Porous chitosan scaffolds: a systematic study for choice of crosslinker and growth factor incorporation. Int J Polym Mater 64:242–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sun W, Starly B, Nam J, Darling A (2005) Bio- CAD modeling and its application in computer-aided tissue engineering. Comput Aided Des 37:1097–1114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sun W, Pallavi L (2002) Recent development on computer aided tissue engineering—a review. Comput Meth Prog Bio 67:85–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nguyen CM, Levy AJ (2011) Mechanics of interface failure in the trilayer elastic composite. Int J Solids Struct 48:2467–2484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sornsuwan T, Swain MV (2012) The effect of margin thickness, degree of convergence and bonding interlayer on the marginal failure of glass-simulated all-ceramic crowns. Acta Biomater 8:4426–4437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu PF, Zheng JY (2010) Recent developments on damage modeling and finite element analysis for composite laminates. Mater Design 31:3825–3834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hassania S, Bielawskic M, Beresc W, Balazinskib M, Martinua L, Klemberg-Sapieha JE (2010) Impact stress absorption and load spreading in multi-layered erosion-resistant coatings. Wear 268:770–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee KS, Jang KS, Park JH, Kim TW, Han IS, Woo SK (2011) Designing the fiber volume ratio in SiC fiber-reinforced SiC ceramic composites under Hertzian stress. Mater Design 32:4394–4401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kumar H, Srivastava R, Dutta PK (2013) Highly luminescent chitosan-l-cysteine functionalized CdTe quantum dots film: Synthesis and characterization. Carbohydr Polym 97:327–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hsueh CH, Kelly JR (2009) Simple solutions of multilayered discs subjected to biaxial moment loading. Dent Mater 25:506–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dutta J, Chattopadhyaya MC, Tripathi VS, Dutta PK (2004) Chitin & chitosan: novel biomaterials waiting for future developments. J Polym Mater 21:321–332Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jain T, Dutta PK (2011) Chitin nanoparticles for drug delivery: preparation, characterization and evaluation. Asian Chitin J 7:13–18Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dutta PK, Tripathi S, Mehrotra GK, Dutta J (2009) Perspectives for chitosan based antimicrobial films in food applications. Food Chem 114:1173–1182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Khang D, Choi J, Im YM, Kim YJ, Jang JH, Kang SS, Nama TH, Song J, Park JW (2012) Role of subnano-, nano- and submicron-surface features on osteoblast differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials 33:5997–6007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Phongying S, Aiba S, Chirachanchai S (2007) Direct chitosan nanoscaffold formation via chitin whiskers. Polymer 48:393–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang AJ, Cao WL, Ao Q, Gong K, Kong LJ, Gong YD, Zhang XF (2006) Controlling morphology and porosity of 3-D chitosan scaffolds produced by thermally induced phase separation technique. Asian Chitin J 2:69–78Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang AJ, Cao WL, Gong K, Ao Q, LiJun K, He CZ, Gong YD, Zhang XF (2006) Development of porous chitosan tubular scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Asian Chitin J 2:53–60Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zheng JP, Wang CZ, Wang XX, Wang HY, Yao KD (2007) Preparation of biomimetic three-dimensional gelatin/montmorillonite-chitosan scaffold for tissue engineering. React Funct Polym 67:780–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dutta PK, Dutta J, Tripathi VS (2004) Chitin and chitosan: chemistry, properties and applications. J Sci Ind Res 63:20–31Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Peter M, Binulal NS, Nair SV, Selvamurugan N, Tamura H, Jayakumar R (2010) Novel biodegradable chitosan–gelatin/nano-bioactive glass ceramic composite scaffolds for alveolar bone tissue engineering. Chem Eng J 158:353–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chua CK, Leong KF, Cheah CM, Chua SW (2003) Development of a tissue engineering scaffold structure library for rapid prototyping. Part 2: Parametric library and assembly program. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 21:302–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Starly B, Lau W, Bradbury T, Sun W (2006) Internal architecture design and freeform fabrication of tissue replacement structures. Comput Aided Des 38:115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cho TW, Cho YN, Chung SH, Yoo G, Ko SW (1999) Water-soluble chitin as a wound healing accelerator. Biomaterials 20:2139–2145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ma J, Wang H, He B, Chen J (2001) A preliminary in vitro study on the fabrication and tissue engineering applications of a novel chitosan bilayer material as a scaffold of human fetal dermal fibroblasts. Biomaterials 22:331–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ueno H, Yamada H, Tanaka I, Kaba N, Matsuura M, Okumura M, Kadosawa T, Fujinaga T (1999) Accelerating effects of chitosan for healing at early phase of experimental open wound in dogs. Biomaterials 20:1407–1414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Haipeng G, Yinghui Z, Jianchun L, Yandao G, Nanming Z, Xiufang Z (2000) Studies on nerve cell affinity of chitosan-derived materials. J Biomed Mater Res 52:285–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Taravel MN, Domard A (1995) Collagen and its interaction with chitosan II. Influence of the physicochemical characteristics of collagen. Biomaterials 16:865–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Taravel MN, Domard A (1996) Collagen and its interaction with chitosan III. Some biological and mechanical properties. Biomaterials 17:451–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jong WR (2004) Physical and mechanical properties of water resistant sodium alginate films. LWT—Food Sci Technol 37:323–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rossi F, Chatzistavrou X, Perale G, Boccaccini AR (2012) Synthesis and degradation of agar-carbomer based hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. J Applied Polym Sci 123:398–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chien KB, Shah RN (2012) Novel soy protein scaffolds for tissue regeneration: material characterization and interaction with human mesenchymal stem cells. Acta Biomater 8:694–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cheatham TE, Young MA (2000) Molecular dynamics simulation of nucleic acids: successes, limitations and promise. Biopolymers 56:232–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Koutsopoulos S (2002) Synthesis and characterization of hydroxyapatite crystals: a review study on the analytical methods. J Biomed Mater Res 62:600–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Li Z, Tan BH (2014) Towards the development of polycaprolactone based amphiphilic block copolymers: molecular design, self-assembly and biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 45:620–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mehdikhani NM, Fathi MH, Mortazavi V, Mousavi SB, Akhavan A, Haghighat A, Hashemi-Beni B, Razavi SM, Mashhadiabbas F (2015) Biodegradable nanocomposite coatings accelerate bone healing: in vivo evaluation. Dent Res J 12:89–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ratner BD, Hoffman AS, Schoen FJ, Lemons JE (eds.) (2004) Biomaterials science: an introduction to materials in medicine, Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ratner BD, Hoffman AS, Schoen FJ, Lemons JE (Third Edition) (2013) Introduction—biomaterials science: an evolving, multidisciplinary endeavour. Biomater Sci 25–39Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sondergaard CS, Witt R, Mathews G, Najibi S, Le L, Clift T, Si MS (2012) Prevascularization of self-organizing engineered heart tissue by human umbilical vein endothelial cells abrogates contractile performance. Cell Tissue Res 9:1492–1497Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Cicuendez M, Izquierdo BI, Sanchez SS, Vila M, Vallet RM (2012) Biological performance of hydroxyapatite–biopolymer foams: in vitro cell response. Acta Biomater 8:802–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zimmermann M, Flechsig C, Monica NL, Tripodi M, Adler G, Dikopoulos N (2008) Hepatitis C virus core protein impairs in vitro priming of specific T cell responses by dendritic cells and hepatocytes. J Hepatol 48:51–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Annabi N, Mithieux SM, Boughton EA, Ruys AJ, Weiss AS, Dehghani F (2009) Synthesis of highly porous crosslinked elastin hydrogels and their interaction with fibroblasts in vitro. Biomaterials 30:4550–4557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Jell G, Minelli C, Stevens MM, Meyer U, Handschel J, Wiesmann HP, Meyer T (eds) (2009) Fundamentals of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Springer publishers, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Zhang Y (2012) Damage resistance of graded ceramic restorative materials. J Eur Ceram Soc 32:2623–2632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Qiang AO, Wang A, Cao W, Zhao W, Gong Y, Zhao N, Zhang X (2005) Fabrication and characterization of chitosan nerve conduits with microtubular architecture. Tsinghua Sci Technol 10:435–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Sahai N, Tiwari RP (2012) Recent development in finite element methods and computer aided design in the development of porous scaffolds—a review. J Tissue Sci Eng 3:113Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sahai N (2012) Computer aided design in the development of porous scaffolds, M.Tech Thesis submitted to MNNIT Allahabad, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Miranda P, Pajares A, Saiz E, Tomsia AP, Guiberteau F (2008) Mechanical properties of calcium phosphate scaffolds fabricated by robocasting. J Biomed Mater Res A 85:218–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Adachi T, Osako Y, Tanaka M, Hojo M, Hollister SJ (2006) Framework for optimal design of porous scaffold microstructure by computational simulation of bone regeneration. Biomaterials 27:3964–3972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Miranda P, Pajares A, Guiberteau F, Deng Y, Lawn BR (2003) Designing damage-resistant brittle-coating structures. Bilayers Acta Mater 51:4347–4356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Miranda P, Pajares A, Guiberteau F (2008) Finite element modeling as a tool for predicting the fracture behavior of robocast scaffolds. Acta Biomater 4:1715–1724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Lacroix D, Chateau A, Ginebra MP, Planell A (2006) Micro-finite element methods of bone tissue-engineering scaffolds. Biomaterials 27:5326–5334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Hollister SJ, Maddox RD, Taboas JM (2002) Optimal design and fabrication of scaffolds to mimic tissue properties and satisfy biological constraints. Biomaterials 23:4095–4103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Olivares AL, Marsal E, Planel JA, Lacroix D (2009) Finite element study of scaffold architecture design and culture conditions for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 30:6142–6149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Guo Z, You S, Wang X, Bicanic N (2010) A FEM-based direct method for material reconstruction inverse problem in soft tissue elastography. Comput Struct 88:1459–1468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Chua CK, Leong KF, Cheah CM, Chua SW (2003) Development of a Tissue Engineering scaffold structure library for rapid prototyping. Part 1: investigation and classification. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 21:291–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Sahai N, Jain T, Kumar S, Dutta PK (2015) Chitosan based porous scaffolds by Computer Aided Tissue Engineering. Asian Chitin J 10:11–18Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Voor MJ, Yang S, Burden RL, Waddell SW (2008) In vitro micro-CT scanning of a rabbit distal femur: repeatability and reproducibility. J Biomech 41:186–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Watling CP, Lago N, Benmerah S, FitzGerald JJ, Tarte E, McMahon S, Lacour SP, Cameron RE (2010) Novel use of X-ray micro computed tomography to image rat sciatic nerve and integration into scaffold. J Neurosci Methods 188:39–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Giglio ED, Cometa S, Ricci MA, Zizzi A, Cafagna D, Manzotti S, Sabbatini L, Mattioli BM (2010) Development and characterization of rhVEGF-loaded poly(HEMA–MOEP) coatings electrosynthesized on titanium to enhance bone mineralization and angiogenesis. Acta Biomater 6:282–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Tanigawa S, Aida Y, Kawato T, Honda K, Nakayama G, Motohashi M, Suzuki N, Ochiai K, Matsumura H, Maeno M (2011) Interleukin-17F affects cartilage matrix turnover by increasing the expression of collagenases and stromelysin-1 and by decreasing the expression of their inhibitors and extracellular matrix components in chondrocytes. Cytokine 56:376–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Puppi D, Chiellini F, Piras AM, Chiellini E (2010) Polymeric materials for bone and cartilage repair. Prog Polym Sci 35:403–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Wang J, Ye M, Liu Z, Wang C (2009) Precision of cortical bone reconstruction based on 3D CT scans. Comput Med Imag Grap 33:235–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Galibarov PE, Prendergast PJ, Lennon AB (2010) A method to reconstruct patient-specific proximal femur surface models from planar pre-operative radiographs. Med Eng Phys 32:1180–1188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Rendina E, Lim YF, Marlow D, Wang Y, Clarke SL, Kuvibidila S, Lucas EA, Smith BJ (2012) Dietary supplementation with dried plum prevents ovariectomy-induced bone loss while modulating the immune response in C57BL/6 J mice. J Nutr Biochem 23:60–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Li J, Zhang L, Lv S, Li S, Wang N, Zhang Z (2011) Fabrication of individual scaffolds based on a patient-specific alveolar bone defect model. J Biotech 151:87–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Dash TK, Konkimalla BV (2012) Poly-є-caprolactone based formulations for drug delivery and tissue engineering. J Control Release 158:15–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Billiet T, Vandenhaute M, Schelfhout J, Vlierberghe SV, Dubruel P (2012) A review of trends and limitations in hydrogel-rapid prototyping for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 33:6020–6041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Baas Elbert, Jan HK (2008) A numerical model of heterogeneous surface strains in polymer scaffolds. J Biomech 41:1374–1378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Alves A, Duarte ARC, Mano JF, Sousa RA, Reis RL (2012) PDLLA enriched with ulvan particles as a novel 3D porous scaffold targeted for bone engineering. J Supercrit Fluid 65:32–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Chen JSS, Feng HY (2011) Optimal layer setup generation in layered manufacturing with a given error constraint. J Manuf Syst 30:165–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Li W, Lin D, Rungsiyakull C, Zhou S, Swain M, Li Q (2011) Finite element based bone remodeling and resonance frequency analysis for osseointegration assessment of dental implants. Finite Elem Anal Des 47:898–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Vo TN, Kasper FK, Mikos AG (2012) Strategies for controlled delivery of growth factors and cells for bone regeneration. Adv Drug Deliver Rev 64:1292–1309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Marcos-Campos I, Marolt D, Petridis P, Bhumiratana S, Schmidt D, Vunjak NG (2012) Bone scaffold architecture modulates the development of mineralized bone matrix by human embryonic stem cells. Biomaterials 33:8329–8342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Davidenko N, Gibb T, Schuster C, Best SM, Campbell JJ, Watson CJ, Cameron RE (2012) Biomimetic ollagen scaffolds with anisotropic pore architecture. Acta Biomater 8:667–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Sharifpoor S, Simmons CA, Labow RS, J. Santerre JP (2011) Functional characterization of human coronary artery smooth muscle cells under cyclic mechanical strain in a degradable polyurethane scaffold. Biomaterials 32:4816–4829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Lin S, Mequanint K (2012) The role of Ras-ERK-IL-1β signaling pathway in upregulation of elastin expression by human coronary artery smooth muscle cells cultured in 3D scaffolds. Biomaterials 33:7047–7056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Saito E, Liu Y, Migneco F, Hollister SJ (2012) Strut size and surface area effects on long-term in vivo degradation in computer designed poly(L-lactic acid) three-dimensional porous scaffolds. Acta Biomater 8:2568–2577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Fan X, Case ED, Ren F, Shu Y, Baumann MJ (2012) Part I: Porosity dependence of the Weibull modulus for hydroxyapatite and other brittle materials. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 8:21–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Vivanco J, Aiyangar A, Araneda A, Ploeg HL (2012) Mechanical characterization of injection-molded macro porous bioceramic bone scaffolds. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 9:137–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Manwart C, Torquato S, Hilfer R (2000) Stochastic reconstruction of sandstones. Phys Rev 62:893Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Li J, Regli W, Sun W (2005) A case study of swept volume representation of tissue scaffolds. In: Bioengineering conference, proceedings of the IEEE 31st annual Northeast, pp 182–183Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Wettergreen MA, Bucklen BS, Sun W et al (2005) Creation of a unit block library of architectures for use in assembled scaffold engineering. Comput Aided Des 37:1141–1149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Lal P, Sun W (2004) Computer modeling approach for microsphere-packed bone scaffold. Comput Aided Des 36:487–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Schroeder C, Regli WC, Shokoufandeh A, Sun W (2005) Computer-aided design of porous artifacts. Comput Aided Des 37:339–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Cai S, Xi J (2008) A control approach for pore size distribution in the bone scaffold based on the hexahedral mesh refinement. Comput Aided Des 40:1040–1050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Woodfield TBF, Malda J (2004) Design of porous scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering using a three-dimensional fiber-deposition technique. Biomaterials 25:4149–4161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Mehta AS, Singh BK, Singh N, Archana D, Snigdha K, Harniman R, Rahatekar SS, Tewari RP, Dutta PK (2015) Chitosan silk-based three-dimensional scaffolds containing gentamicin encapsulated calcium alginate beads for drug administration and blood compatibility. J Biomater Appl 29:1314–1325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Tai H, Mather ML, Howard D (2007) Control of pore size and structure of tissue engineering scaffolds produced by supercritical fluids processing. Eur Cell Mater 14:64–77Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Sanchez CT, Corney JR (2008) Effects of ultrasound on polymeric foam porosity. Ultrasonic Sonochem 15:408–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Hollister Scott J (2005) Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering. Nat Mater 4:518–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Tripathi G, Basu B (2012) A porous hydroxyapatite scaffold for bone tissue engineering: physico-mechanical and biological evaluations. Ceramic Int 38:341–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Zhensheng L, Hassna RR, Kip DH, Demin X, Miqin Z (2005) Chitosan–alginate hybrid scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 26:3919–3928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Hsieh CY, Tsai SP, Ho MH, Wang DM, Liu CE, Hsieh CH (2007) Analysis of freeze gelation and cross-linking processes for preparing porous chitosan scaffolds. Carbohydr Polym 67:124–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Mao JS, Liu HF, Yin YJ, Yao KD (2003) The properties of chitosan-gelatin membranes and scaffolds modified with hyaluronic acid by different methods. Biomaterials 24:1621–1629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Kang Y, Xu X, Yin G, Chen A, Liao L, Yao Y, Huang Z, Liao X (2007) A comparative study of the vitro Degradation of Poly (l-lactic acid)/β-tricalcium phosphate scaffold in Static and dynamic stimulated body fluid. Eur Polym J 43:1768–1778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Kim Cui J, Goh J, Kim P, Choi S, Lee B (2000) Survival and stability of Bifidobacteria loaded in alginate poly-Llysine microparticles. Int J Pharm 210:51–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Jin HH, Lee CH, Lee WK, Lee JK, Park HC, Yoon SY (2008) In-situ formation of the hydroxyapatite/chitosan-alginate composite scaffolds. Mat Lett 62:1630–1633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Byrane DP, Lacroix D, Planell JA, Kelly DJ, Prendergast PJ (2007) Simulation of tissue differentiation in a scaffold as a function of porosity, Young’s modulus and dissolution rate: Application of mechanobiological models in tissue engineering. Biomaterials 28:5544–5554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Liuyun J, Yubao L, Chengdong X (2009) Preparation and biological properties of a novel composite scaffold of nano-hydroxyapatite/chitosan/carboxymethyl cellulose for bone tissue engineering. J Biomed Sci 16:65–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Saey TH, Dietmar W, Hutmacher A (2006) comparison of micro CT with other techniques used in the characterization of scaffolds. Biomaterials 27:1362–1376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Ravi M, Warkhedkar Amba DB (2009) Material- solid modeling of human body: a heterogeneous B-spline based approach. Comput Aided Des 4:586–597Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Fang Z, Starly B, Sun W (2005) Computer-aided characterization for effective mechanical properties of porous tissue scaffolds. Comput Aided Des 37:65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Yoo D (2012) Heterogeneous minimal surface porous scaffold design using the distance field and radial basis functions. Med Eng Phys 34:625–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Landers R, Hübner U, Schmelzeisen R, Mülhaupt R (2002) Rapid prototyping of scaffolds derived from thermoreversible hydrogels and tailored for applications in tissue engineering. Biomaterials 23:4437–4447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    ZeinaIwan Hutmacher DW (2002) Fused deposition modeling of novel scaffold architectures for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials 23:1169–1185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Sandino C, Planell JA, Lacroix D (2008) A finite element study of mechanical stimuli in scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Biomech 41:1005–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Martino AD, Sittinger M, Risbud MV (2005) Chitosan: a versatile biopolymer for orthopaedic tissue-engineering. Biomaterials 26:5983–5990CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nitin Sahai
    • 1
  • Tanvi Jain
    • 2
    • 3
  • Sushil Kumar
    • 2
  • Pradip Kumar Dutta
    • 3
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Biomedical EngineeringNorth-Eastern Hill UniversityShillongIndia
  2. 2.Department of Chemical EngineeringM.N. National Institute of TechnologyAllahabadIndia
  3. 3.Department of ChemistryM.N. National Institute of TechnologyAllahabadIndia
  4. 4.Center for Medical Diagnostic and ResearchM.N. National Institute of TechnologyAllahabadIndia

Personalised recommendations