Multicomponent Polymer Composite/Nanocomposite Systems Using Polymer Matrices from Sustainable Renewable Sources

  • Carmen-Alice TeacăEmail author
  • Ruxanda Bodîrlău
Part of the Advanced Structured Materials book series (STRUCTMAT, volume 75)


Green composites are increasingly promoted for sustainable development considering the growing awareness of environmental and waste management issues. Recent advances in natural fiber development, and nanocomposites research area generate significant opportunities for obtaining materials from renewable resources with improved properties and suitable for different applications. Green composites are made from both renewable resource-based polymers (biopolymers) and bio-fillers (including nano-type fillers), with a positive environmental impact. Green composites based on biopolymer matrix (plasticized starch) have been obtained by combination with various bio-fillers (beech wood sawdust, fir tree needles, beech wood lignin). Their structure and properties were further investigated through Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and TG/DTG/DTA simultaneous thermal analysis methods, as well as by water uptake and opacity measurements. The results are presented in this chapter.


Composites Thermoplastic starch Beech wood sawdust Fir tree needles Beech wood lignin Properties 



This work was supported by a grant of the Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research, CNCS-UEFISCDI––Project number PN-II-ID-PCE-2011-3-0187 (We gratefully acknowledge the project director, Dr. Dan Roşu, for overall guidance and fruitful discussion on the experimental data presented in this chapter).


  1. Abdul Khalil HPS, Bhat AH, Irena Yusra AF (2012) Green composites from sustainable cellulose nanofibrils: a review. Carbohyd Polym 87:963–979Google Scholar
  2. Abe K, Iwamoto S, Yano H (2007) Obtaining cellulose nanofibers with a uniform width of 15 nm from wood. Biomacromolecules 8:3276–3278Google Scholar
  3. AL-Oqla FM, Sapuan SM (2014) Natural fiber reinforced polymer composites in industrial applications: feasibility of date palm fibers for sustainable automotive industry. J Clean Prod 66:347–354Google Scholar
  4. Abraham E, Deepa B, Pothan LA, Cintil J, Thomas S, John MJ, Anandjiwala R, Narine SS (2013) Environmental friendly method for the extraction of coir fibre and isolation of nanofiber. Carbohyd Polym 92:1477–1483Google Scholar
  5. Abraham E, Deepa B, Pothan LA, Jacob M, Thomas S, Cvelbar U, Anandjiwala R (2011) Extraction of nanocellulose fibrils from lignocellulosic fibres: a novel approach. Carbohyd Polym 86:1468–1475Google Scholar
  6. Azwa ZN, Yousif BF, Manalo AC, Karunasena W (2013) A review on the degradability of polymeric composites based on natural fibres. Mater Design 47:424–442Google Scholar
  7. Averous L, Pollet E (2014) Nanobiocomposites based on plasticized starch, Chapter 8, Starch polymers from genetic engineering to green applications, Edited by P. Halley and L. Averous, Elsevier, pp 211–239Google Scholar
  8. Barone JR (2009) Lignocellulosic fiber-reinforced keratin polymer composites. J Polym Environ 17:143–151Google Scholar
  9. Bettini SHP, Bonse BC, Melo EA, Munoz PAR (2010) Effect of sawdust surface treatment and compatibilizer addition on mechanical behavior, morphology, and moisture uptake of polypropylene/sawdust composites. Polym Eng Sci 50:978–985Google Scholar
  10. Blaker JJ, Lee KY, Bismarck A (2011) Hierarchical composites made entirely from renewable resources. J Biobased Mater Bioenergy 5:1–16Google Scholar
  11. Bledzki A, Jaszkiewicz A (2010) Mechanical performance of biocomposites based on PLA and PHBV reinforced with natural fibers-a comparative study to PP. Compos Sci Technol 70:1687–1696Google Scholar
  12. Bledzki AK, Mamun AA, Volk J (2010) Barley husk and coconut shell reinforced polypropylene composites: the effect of fibre physical, chemical and surface properties. Compos Sci Technol 70:840–846Google Scholar
  13. Bodîrlău R, Spiridon I, Teacă CA (2007) Chemical investigation of wood tree species in temperate forest in east-northern Romania. BioResources 2:41–57Google Scholar
  14. Bodîrlău R, Teacă CA, Spiridon I (2009) Preparation and characterization of composites comprising modified hardwood and wood polymers/poly(vinyl chloride). BioResources 4:1285–1304Google Scholar
  15. Bodîrlău R, Teacă CA, Spiridon I (2014) Green composites comprising thermoplastic corn starch and various cellulose-based fillers. BioResources 9:39–53Google Scholar
  16. Cai X, Riedl B, Zhang S, Wan H (2008) The impact of the nature of nanofillers on the performance of wood polymer nanocomposites. Compos A 39:727–737Google Scholar
  17. Chakraborty A, Sain M, Kortschot M (2005) Cellulose microfibrils: a novel method of preparation using high shear refining and cryocrushing. Holzforschung 59:102–107Google Scholar
  18. Chang PR, Jian RJ, Yu JG, Ma XF (2010) Starch-based composites reinforced with novel chitin nanoparticles. Carbohyd Polym 80:420–425Google Scholar
  19. Chang PR, Wu D, Anderson DP, Ma X (2012) Nanocomposites based on plasticized starch and rectorite clay: structure and properties. Carbohyd Polym 89:687–693Google Scholar
  20. Chauhan M, Gupta M, Singh B, Bhattacharyya SK, Singh AK, Gupta VK (2013) Pretreatment of pine needles/wood particles and their composites with isocyanate prepolymer adhesive. Polym Eng Sci 53:1740–1750Google Scholar
  21. Chauhan M, Gupta M, Singh B, Singh AK, Gupta VK (2012) Pine needle/isocyanate composites: dimensional stability, biological resistance, flammability, and thermo-acoustic characteristics. Polym Compos 33:324–335Google Scholar
  22. Chen W, Yu H, Liu Y, Hai Y, Zhang M, Chen P (2011a) Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanofibers from four plant cellulose fibers using a chemical-ultrasonic process. Cellulose 18:433–442Google Scholar
  23. Chen W, Yu H, Liu Y, Chen P, Zhang M, Hai Y (2011b) Individualization of cellulose nanofibers from wood using high-intensity ultrasonication combined with chemical pretreatments. Carbohyd Polym 83:1804–1811Google Scholar
  24. Cherian BM, Leao AL, de Souza SF, Thomas S, Pothan LA, Kottaisamy M (2010) Isolation of nanocellulose from pineapple leaf fibres by steam explosion. Carbohyd Polym 81:720–725Google Scholar
  25. Chung YL, Hsi-Mei L (2007) Properties of cast films made of HCl—methanol modified corn starch. Starch/Stärke 59:583–592Google Scholar
  26. Csizmadia R, Faludi G, Renner K, Móczó J, Pukánszky B (2013) PLA/wood biocomposites: improving composite strength by chemical treatment of the fibers. Compos A 53:46–53Google Scholar
  27. Dai H, Chang PR, Geng F, Yu J, Ma X (2010a) Preparation and properties of starch-based film using N, N-bis-(2-hydroxyethyl)formamide as a new plasticizer. Carbohyd Polym 79:306–311Google Scholar
  28. Dai H, Chang PR, Yu J, Geng F, Ma X (2010b) N-(2-hydroxypropyl)formamide and N-(2-hydroxyethyl)-N-methylformamide as two new plasticizers for thermoplastic starch. Carbohyd Polym 80:139–144Google Scholar
  29. Dobircau L, Sreekumar PA, Saiah R, Leblanc N, Terrié C, Gattin R, Saiter JM (2009) Wheat flour thermoplastic matrix reinforced by waste cotton fibre: agro-green-composites. Compos A 40:329–334Google Scholar
  30. Dong C, Parsons D, Davies IJ (2014) Tensile strength of pine needles and their feasibility as reinforcement in composite materials. J Mater Sci 49:8057–8062Google Scholar
  31. Eichhorn SJ (2011) Cellulose nanowhiskers: promising materials for advanced applications. Soft Matter 7:303–315Google Scholar
  32. Fang JM, Fowler PA, Tomkinson J, Hill CAS (2002) The preparation and characterization of a series of chemically modified potato starches. Carbohyd Polym 47:245–252Google Scholar
  33. Faruk O, Bledzki AK, Fink HP, Sain M (2014) Progress report on natural fiber reinforced composites. Macromol Mater Eng 299:9–26Google Scholar
  34. Faruk O, Bledzki AK, Fink HP, Sain M (2012) Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibers: 2000-2010. Prog Polym Sci 37:1552–1596Google Scholar
  35. Fernandes EM, Mano JF, Reis RL (2013a) Hybrid cork–polymer composites containing sisal fibre: morphology, effect of the fibre treatment on the mechanical properties and tensile failure prediction. Compos Struct 105:153–162Google Scholar
  36. Fernandes EM, Correlo VM, Mano JF, Reis RL (2013b) Novel cork–polymer composites reinforced with short natural coconut fibres: effect of fibre loading and coupling agent addition. Compos Sci Technol 78:56–62Google Scholar
  37. Fujisawa S, Ikeuchi T, Takeuchi M, Saito T, Isogai A (2012) Superior reinforcement effect of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibrils in polystyrene matrix: optical, thermal, and mechanical studies. Biomacromolecules 13:2188–2194Google Scholar
  38. Fukuzumi H, Saito T, Iwata T, Kumamoto Y, Isogai A (2009) Transparent and high gas barrier films of cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Biomacromolecules 10:162–165Google Scholar
  39. Gao W, Dong H, Hou H, Zhang H (2012) Effects of clays with various hydrophilicities on properties of starch–clay nanocomposites by film blowing. Carbohyd Polym 88:321–328Google Scholar
  40. Gironès J, López JP, Mutjé P, Carvalho AJF, Curvelo AAS, Vilaseca F (2012) Natural fiber-reinforced thermoplastic starch composites obtained by melt processing. Compos Sci Technol 72:858–863Google Scholar
  41. Gregorova A, Hrabalova M, Kovalcik R, Wimmer R (2011) Surface modification of spruce wood flour and effects on the dynamic fragility of PLA/wood composites. Polym Eng Sci 51:143–150Google Scholar
  42. Gupta M, Chauhan M, Khatoon N, Singh B (2010) Composite boards from isocyanate bonded pine needles. J Appl Polym Sci 118:3477–3489Google Scholar
  43. Habibi Y, Dufresne A (2008) Highly filled bionanocomposites from functionalized polysaccharide nanocrystals. Biomacromolecules 9:1974–1980Google Scholar
  44. Habibi Y, Lucia LA, Rojas OJ (2010) Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications. Chem Rev 110:3479–3500Google Scholar
  45. Hietala M, Mathew AP, Oksman K (2013) Bionanocomposites of thermoplastic starch and cellulose nanofibers manufactured using twin-screw extrusion. Eur Polym J 49:950–956Google Scholar
  46. Hubbe MA, Rojas OJ, Lucia LA, Sain M (2008) Cellulosic nanocomposites: a review. BioResources 3:929–980Google Scholar
  47. Huber T, Müssig J, Curnow O, Pang S, Bickerton S, Staiger MP (2012) A critical review of all-cellulose composites. J Mater Sci 47:1171–1186Google Scholar
  48. Ifuku S, Morooka S, Nakagaito AN, Morimoto M, Saimoto H (2011) Preparation and characterization of optically transparent chitin nanofiber/(meth)acrylic resin composites. Green Chem 13:1708–1711Google Scholar
  49. Isogai A (2013) Wood nanocelluloses: fundamentals and applications as new bio-based nanomaterials. J Wood Sci 59:449–459Google Scholar
  50. Janardhnan S, Sain MM (2006) Isolation of cellulose microfibrils–an enzymatic approach. BioResources 1:176–188Google Scholar
  51. Jonoobi M, Harun J, Shakeri A, Misra M, Oksman K (2009) Chemical composition, crystallinity, and thermal degradation of bleached and unbleached kenaf bast (Hibiscus cannabinus) pulp and nanofibers. BioResources 4:626–639Google Scholar
  52. Kalia S, Avérous L, Njuguna J, Dufresne A, Cherian BM (2011) Natural fibers, bio- and nanocomposites. Int J Polymer Sci; Article ID 735932
  53. Kaewtatip K, Thongmee J (2012) Studies on the structure and properties of thermoplastic starch/luffa fiber composites. Mater Design 40:314–318Google Scholar
  54. Kaushik A, Singh M, Verma G (2010) Green nanocomposites based on thermoplastic starch and steam exploded cellulose nanofibrils from wheat straw. Carbohyd Polym 82:337–345Google Scholar
  55. Kaushik A, Singh M (2011) Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanofibrils from wheat straw using steam explosion coupled with high shear homogenization. Carbohyd Res 346:76–85Google Scholar
  56. Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S, Tom Lindström, Ankerfors M, Gray D, Dorris A (2011) Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew Chem Int Ed 50:5438–5466Google Scholar
  57. Klemm D, Schumann D, Kramer F, Heßler N, Koth D, Sultanova B (2009) Nanocellulose materials—different cellulose, different functionality. Macromol Symp 280:60–71Google Scholar
  58. Koga H, Saito T, Kitaoka T, Nogi M, Suganuma K, Isogai A (2013) Transparent, conductive, and printable composites consisting of TEMPO-oxidized nanocellulose and carbon nanotube. Biomacromolecules 14:1160–1165Google Scholar
  59. Kord B (2011) Nanofiller reinforcement effects on the thermal, dynamic mechanical and morphological behavior of HDPE/rice husk flour composites. BioResources 6:1351–1358Google Scholar
  60. Kumar AP, Singh RP (2008) Biocomposites of cellulose reinforced starch: Improvement of properties by photo-induced crosslinking. Bioresour Technol 99:8803–8809Google Scholar
  61. LeCorre D, Vahanian E, Dufresne A, Bras J (2012) Enzymatic pretreatment for preparing starch nanocrystals. Biomacromolecules 13:132–137Google Scholar
  62. LeCorre D, Bras J, Dufresne A (2011) Evidence of micro- and nanoscaled particles during starch nanocrystals preparation and their isolation. Biomacromolecules 12:3039–3046Google Scholar
  63. Lee KY, Tang M, Williams CK, Bismarck A (2012a) Carbohydrate derived copoly(lactide) as the compatibilizer for bacterial cellulose reinforced polylactide nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 72:1646–1650Google Scholar
  64. Lee KY, Buldum G, Mantalaris A, Bismarck A (2014) More than meets the eye in bacterial cellulose: biosynthesis, bioprocessing, and applications in advanced fiber composites. Macromol Biosci 14:10–32Google Scholar
  65. Lee KY, Ho KKC, Schlufter K, Bismarck A (2012b) Hierarchical composites reinforced with robust short sisal fibre preforms utilising bacterial cellulose as binder. Compos Sci Technol 72:1479–1486Google Scholar
  66. Lee KY, Bharadia P, Blaker JJ, Bismarck A (2012c) Short sisal fibre reinforced bacterial cellulose polylactide nanocomposites using hairy sisal fibres as reinforcement. Compos A 43:2065–2074Google Scholar
  67. Lei Y, Wu Q (2010) Wood plastic composites based on microfibrillar blends of high density polyethylene/poly(ethylene terephthalate). Bioresour Technol 101:3665–3671Google Scholar
  68. Liu D, Zhong T, Chang PR, Li K, Wu Q (2010) Starch composites reinforced by bamboo cellulosic crystals. Bioresour Technol 101:2529–2536Google Scholar
  69. Liu H, Xie F, Yu L, Chen L, Li L (2009) Thermal processing of starch-based polymers. Prog Polym Sci 34:1348–1368Google Scholar
  70. Ma X, Chang PR, Yu J (2008a) Properties of biodegradable thermoplastic pea starch/carboxymethyl cellulose and pea starch/microcrystalline cellulose composites. Carbohyd Polym 72:369–375Google Scholar
  71. Ma XF, Jian RJ, Chang PR, Yu JG (2008b) Fabrication and characterization of citric acid-modified starch nanoparticles/plasticized-starch composites. Biomacromolecules 9:3314–3320Google Scholar
  72. Majdzadeh-Ardakani K, Navarchian AH, Sadeghi F (2010) Optimization of mechanical properties of thermoplastic starch/clay nanocomposites. Carbohyd Polym 79:547–554Google Scholar
  73. Majeed K, Jawaid M, Hassan A, Abu Bakar A, Abdul Khalil HPS, Salema AA, Inuwa I (2013) Potential materials for food packaging from nanoclay/natural fibres filled hybrid composites. Mater Design 46:391–410Google Scholar
  74. Martins IMG, Magina SP, Oliveira L, Freire CSR, Silvestre AJD, Neto CP, Gandini A (2009) New biocomposites based on thermoplastic starch and bacterial cellulose. Compos Sci Technol 69:2163–2168Google Scholar
  75. JD Megiatto Jr, Ramires EC, Frollini E (2010) Phenolic matrices and sisal fibers modified with hydroxy terminated polybutadiene rubber: impact strength, water absorption, and morphological aspects of thermosets and composites. Ind Crop Prod 31:178–184Google Scholar
  76. Moran JI, Vazquez A, Cyras VP (2013) Bio-nanocomposites based on derivatized potato starch and cellulose, preparation and characterization. J Mater Sci 48:7196–7203Google Scholar
  77. Moran JI, Alvarez VA, Cyras VP, Vazquez A (2008) Extraction of cellulose and preparation of nanocellulose from sisal fibers. Cellulose 15:149–159Google Scholar
  78. Mueangta S, Hanchana A (2013) Effect of jute and kapok fibers on properties of thermoplastic cassava starch composites. Mater Design 47:309–315Google Scholar
  79. Müller P, Renner K, Móczó J, Fekete E, Pukánszky B (2014) Thermoplastic starch/wood composites: interfacial interactions and functional properties. Carbohyd Polym 102:821–829Google Scholar
  80. Nair SS, Hurley DC, Wang S, Young TM (2013) Nanoscale characterization of interphase properties in maleated polypropylene-treated natural fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Polym Eng Sci 53:888–896Google Scholar
  81. Nair SS, Zhu JY, Deng Y, Ragauskas AJ (2014) Characterization of cellulose nanofibrillation by microgrinding. J Nanopart Res 16:2349. doi: 10.1007/s11051-014-2349-7 Google Scholar
  82. Ojijo V, Ray SS (2013) Processing strategies in bionanocomposites. Prog Polym Sci 38:1543–1589Google Scholar
  83. Pandey KK (1999) A study of chemical structure of soft and hardwood and wood polymers by FTIR spectroscopy. J Appl Polym Sci 71:1969–1975Google Scholar
  84. Pandey JK, Ahn SH, Lee CS, Mohanty AK, Misra M (2010) Recent advances in the application of natural fiber based composites. Macromol Mater Eng 295:975–989Google Scholar
  85. Pandey JK, Chu WS, Kim CS, Lee CS, Ahn SH (2009) Bio-nano reinforcement of environmentally degradable polymer matrix by cellulose whiskers from grass. Compos B 40:676–680Google Scholar
  86. Pandey JK, Singh RP (2005) Green nanocomposites from renewable resources: effect of plasticizer on the structure and material properties of clay-filled starch. Starch/Stärke 57:8–15Google Scholar
  87. Prachayawarakorn J, Ruttanabus P, Boonsom P (2011) Effect of cotton fiber contents and lengths on properties of thermoplastic starch composites prepared from rice and waxy rice starches. J Polym Environ 19:274–282Google Scholar
  88. Qamhia II, Sabo RC, Elhajjar RF (2014) Static and dynamic characterization of cellulose nanofibril scaffold-based composites. BioResources 9:381–392Google Scholar
  89. Qiao X, Tang Z, Sun K (2011) Plasticization of corn starch by polyol mixtures. Carbohyd Polym 83:659–664Google Scholar
  90. Ramires EC, Megiatto JD Jr, Gardrat C, Castellan A, Frollini E (2010) Biobased composites from glyoxal-phenolic resins and sisal fibers. Bioresour Technol 101:1998–2006Google Scholar
  91. Reddy MM, Vivekanandhan S, Misra M, Bhatia SK, Mohanty AK (2013) Biobased plastics and bionanocomposites: current status and future opportunities. Prog Polym Sci 38:1653–1689Google Scholar
  92. Rojas OJ, Montero GA, Habibi Y (2009) Electrospun nanocomposites from polystyrene loaded with cellulose nanowhiskers. J Appl Polym Sci 113:927–935Google Scholar
  93. Rowell RM (2012a) Chemical modification of wood to produce stable and durable composites. Cell Chem Technol 46:443–448Google Scholar
  94. Rowell RM (ed) (2012b) Handbook of wood chemistry and wood composites, Second Edition, CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, p 703Google Scholar
  95. Sailaja RRN, Deepthi MV (2010) Mechanical and thermal properties of compatibilized composites of polyethylene and esterified lignin. Mater Design 31:4369–4379Google Scholar
  96. Satyanarayana KG, Arizaga GGC, Wypych F (2009) Biodegradable composites based on lignocellulosic fibers-an overview. Prog Polym Sci 34:982–1021Google Scholar
  97. Savadekar NR, Mhaske ST (2012) Synthesis of nano cellulose fibers and effect on thermoplastics starch based films. Carbohyd Polym 89:146–151Google Scholar
  98. Singha AS, Thakur VK (2008a) Saccaharum cilliare fiber reinforced polymer composites. E-J Chem 5:782–791Google Scholar
  99. Singha AS, Thakur VK (2008b) Effect of fibre loading on urea-formaldehyde matrix based green composites. Iran Polym J 17:861–873Google Scholar
  100. Singha AS, Thakur VK (2008c) Synthesis and characterization of pine needles reinforced RF matrix based biocomposites. J Chem 5:1055–1062Google Scholar
  101. Singha AS, Thakur VK (2008d) Fabrication of Hibiscus Sabdariffa fibre reinforced polymer composites. Iran Polym J 17:541–553Google Scholar
  102. Singha AS, Thakur VK (2009a) Study of mechanical properties of urea-formaldehyde thermosets reinforced by Pine needle powder. BioResources 4:292–308Google Scholar
  103. Singha AS, Thakur VK (2009b) Grewia optiva fiber reinforced novel, low cost polymer composites. J Chem 6:71–76Google Scholar
  104. Singha AS, Thakur VK (2009c) Synthesis, characterization and analysis of Hibiscus Sabdariffa fibre reinforced polymer matrix based composites. Polym Polym Compos 17:189–194Google Scholar
  105. Singha AS, Thakur VK (2010a) Synthesis and characterization of short Grewia optiva fiber based polymer composites. Polym Compos 31:459–470Google Scholar
  106. Singha AS, Thakur VK (2010b) Mechanical, morphological, and thermal characterization of compression-molded polymer biocomposites. Int J Polym Anal Charact 15:87–97Google Scholar
  107. Singha AS, Thakur VK (2010c) Synthesis, characterization and study of pine needles reinforced polymer matrix based composites. J Reinf Plast Compos 29:700–709Google Scholar
  108. Singha AS, Thakur VK, Mehta IK (2010) Renewable resource based green polymer composites: analysis and characterization. Int J Polym Anal Charact 15:137–146Google Scholar
  109. Singha AS, Thakur VK, Mehta IK, Shama A, Khanna AJ, Rana RK, Rana AK (2009a) Surface-modified Hibiscus sabdariffa fibers: physicochemical, thermal, and morphological properties evaluation. Int J Polym Anal Charact 14:695–711Google Scholar
  110. Singha AS, Thakur VK, Mishra BN (2009b) Study of grewia optiva fiber reinforced urea-formaldehyde composites. J Polym Mater 26:81–90Google Scholar
  111. Soykeabkaew N, Laosat N, Ngaokla A, Yodsuwan N, Tunkasiri T (2012) Reinforcing potential of micro- and nano-sized fibers in the starch-based biocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 72:845–852Google Scholar
  112. Sreekumar PA, Gopalakrishnan P, Leblanc N, Saiter JM (2010) Effect of glycerol and short sisal fibers on the viscoelastic behavior of wheat flour based thermoplastic. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 41:991–996Google Scholar
  113. Stark NM, Gardner DJ (2008) Outdoor durability of wood-polymer composites (Chapter 7). In: Wood-polymer composites Edited by Oksman Niska K, Sain M, Woodhead Publishing Limited Cambridge, England and CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton USA, pp. 142–165Google Scholar
  114. Stelte W, Sanadi AR (2009) Preparation and characterization of cellulose nanofibers from two commercial hardwood and softwood pulps. Ind Eng Chem Res 48:11211–11219Google Scholar
  115. Syverud K, Chinga-Carrasco G, Toledo J, Toledo PG (2011) A comparative study of Eucalyptus and Pinus radiata pulp fibres as raw materials for production of cellulose nanofibrils. Carbohyd Polym 84:1033–1038Google Scholar
  116. Teacă CA, Bodîrlău R, Roşu D, Roşu L, Varganici CD (2014) Multicomponent bio-based polymer systems comprising starch and wood polymers—structure and thermal behavior. J Biobased Mater Bioenergy 8:253–260Google Scholar
  117. Thakur VK, Singha AS (2010) Mechanical and water absorption properties of natural fibers/polymer biocomposites. Polym Plast Technol Eng 49:670–694Google Scholar
  118. Thakur VK, Singha AS (2011) Physico-chemical and mechanical behavior of cellulosic pine needles based biocomposites. Int J Polym Anal Charact 16:390–398Google Scholar
  119. Thakur VK, Singha AS, Misra BN (2011) Graft copolymerization of methyl methacrylate onto cellulosic biofibers. J Appl Polym Sci 122:532–544Google Scholar
  120. Thakur VK, Singha AS, Thakur MK (2012a) Biopolymers based green composites: mechanical, thermal and physico-chemical characterization. J Polym Environ 20:412–421Google Scholar
  121. Thakur VK, Singha AS, Thakur MK (2012b) In-air graft copolymerization of ethyl acrylate onto natural cellulosic polymers. Int J Polym Anal Charact 17:48–60Google Scholar
  122. Thakur VK, Singha AS, Thakur MK (2012c) Graft copolymerization of methyl acrylate onto cellulosic biofibers: synthesis, characterization and applications. J Polym Environ 20:164–174Google Scholar
  123. Thakur VK, Singha AS, Thakur MK (2012d) Surface modification of natural polymers to impart low water absorbency. Int J Polym Anal Charact 17:133–143Google Scholar
  124. Thakur VK, Thakur MK (2014a) Processing and characterization of natural cellulose fibers/thermoset polymer composites. Carbohyd Polym 109:102–117Google Scholar
  125. Thakur VK, Thakur MK (2014b) Recent advances in graft copolymerization and applications of chitosan: a review. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 2:2637–2652Google Scholar
  126. Thakur VK, Thakur MK, Raghavan P, Kessler MR (2014a) Progress in green polymer composites from lignin for multifunctional applications: a review. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 2:1072–1092Google Scholar
  127. Thakur VK, Thakur MK, Gupta RK (2014b) Review: raw natural fiber–based polymer composites. Int J Polym Anal Charact 19:256–271Google Scholar
  128. Thakur VK, Vennerberg D, Kessler MR (2014c) Green aqueous surface modification of polypropylene for novel polymer nanocomposites. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:9349–9356Google Scholar
  129. Thakur VK, Vennerberg D, Madbouly SA, Kessler MR (2014d) Bio-inspired green surface functionalization of PMMA for multifunctional capacitors. RSC Adv 4:6677–6684Google Scholar
  130. Thakur VK, Thunga M, Madbouly SA, Kessler MR (2014e) PMMA-g-SOY as a sustainable novel dielectric material. RSC Adv 4:18240–18249Google Scholar
  131. Thakur VK, Grewell D, Thunga M, Kessler MR (2014f) Novel composites from eco-friendly soy flour/SBS triblock copolymer. Macromol Mater Eng 299:953–958Google Scholar
  132. Vermeylen R, Derycke V, Delcour JA, Goderis B, Reynaers H, Koch MHJ (2006) Structural transformations during gelatinization of starches in limited water: combined wide- and small-angle x-ray scattering study. Biomacromolecules 7:1231–1238Google Scholar
  133. Wu Y, Wang S, Zhou D, Zhang Y, Wang X, Yang R (2013) Biodegradable poly(vinyl alcohol) nanocomposites made from rice straw fibrils: mechanical and thermal properties. J Compos Mater 47:1449–1459Google Scholar
  134. Xie F, Pollet E, Halley PJ, Averous L (2013) Starch-based nano-biocomposites. Prog Polym Sci 38:1590–1628Google Scholar
  135. Yang HS, Kim DJ, Kim HJ (2003) Rice straw-wood particle composite for sound absorbing wooden construction materials. Bioresour Technol 86:117–121Google Scholar
  136. Yang H, Yan R, Chen H, Lee DH, Zheng C (2007) Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel 86:1781–1788Google Scholar
  137. Zeppa C, Gouanvé F, Espuche E (2009) Effect of a plasticizer on the structure of biodegradable starch/clay nanocomposites: thermal, water-sorption, and oxygen-barrier properties. J Appl Polym Sci 112:2044–2056Google Scholar
  138. Zhang JS, Chang PR, Wu Y, Yu JG, Ma XF (2008) Aliphatic amidediol and glycerol as a mixed plasticizer for the preparation of thermoplastic starch. Starch/Stärke 60:617–623Google Scholar
  139. Zhang QX, Yu ZZ, Xie XL, Naito K, Kagawa Y (2007) Preparation and crystalline morphology of biodegradable starch/clay nanocomposites. Polymer 48:7193–7200Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Advanced Research Center for Bionanoconjugates and Biopolymers“Petru Poni” Institute of Macromolecular ChemistryIaşiRomania

Personalised recommendations