Advertisement

Cellulose Acetate Nanocomposites with Antimicrobial Properties

  • Adina Maria Dobos
  • Mihaela-Dorina Onofrei
  • Silvia IoanEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Advanced Structured Materials book series (STRUCTMAT, volume 75)

Abstract

The chapter overviews recent progress made in the area of cellulose acetate nanocomposites, considering their high-volume applications and easy processing ability. Based on their structural details, the review provides data concerning the manufacturing, characterization, and new developments in this area, with particular emphasis on biomedical applications. Stress is laid on the importance of antimicrobial activity, correlated with different bacteria characteristics, on also considering that their interaction mechanisms create inhibitory effects against microbial growth in a solid medium, and decide their areas of applicability. In this context, the presented aspects show that cellulosic materials can be designed and fine-tuned to acquire certain properties required in different biomedical areas.

Keywords

Nanocomposite Cellulose derivative Antimicrobial activity 

References

  1. Alderman DAA (1984) A review of cellulose ethers in hydrophilic matrices for oral controlled-release dosage forms. Int J Pharm Technol Prod Man 5:1–9Google Scholar
  2. Amro NA, Kotra LP, Wadu-Mesthrige K, Bulychev A, Mobashery S, Liu G (2000) High-resolution atomic force microscopy studies of the Escherichia coli outer membrane: structural basis for permeability. Langmuir 16:2789–2796Google Scholar
  3. Ang-atikarnkul P, Watthanaphanit A, Rujiravanit R (2014) Fabrication of cellulose nanofiber/chitin whisker/silk sericin bionanocomposite sponges and characterizations of their physical and biological properties. Compos Sci Technol 96:88–96Google Scholar
  4. Anitha S, Brabu B, Thiruvadigal John D, Gopalakrishnan C, Natarajanc TS (2013) Optical, bactericidal and water repellent properties of electrospun nano-composite membranes of cellulose acetate and ZnO. Carbohyd Polym 97:856–863Google Scholar
  5. Appendini P, Hotchkiss JH (2002) Review of antimicrobial food packaging. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 3:113–126Google Scholar
  6. Badawi E, Ashraf N (2013) Carbon nanotubes-cellulose acetate nanocomposites: membranes for water desalination—thesisGoogle Scholar
  7. Bae E, Park HJ, Lee J, Kim Y, Yoon J, Park K, Choi K, Yi J (2010) Bacterial cytotoxicity of the silver nanoparticle related to physicochemical metrics and agglomeration properties. Environ Toxicol Chem 29:2154–2160Google Scholar
  8. Bajaj PJ (2002) Finishing of textile materials. Appl Polym Sci 83:631–659Google Scholar
  9. Baumann MD, Kang CE, Stanwick JC, Wang Y, Kim H, Lapitsky Y, Shoichet MS (2009) An injectable drug delivery platform for sustained combination therapy. J Cont Rel 138:205–213Google Scholar
  10. Belly RT, Kydd GC (1982) Silver resistance in microorganisms. Dev Ind Microbiol 23:567–577Google Scholar
  11. Beneventi D, Chaussy D, Curtil D, Zolin L, Bruno E, Bongiovanni R, Destro M, Gerbaldi C, Penazzi N, Tapin-Lingua S (2014) Pilot-scale elaboration of graphite/microfibrillated cellulose anodes for Li-ion batteries by spray deposition on a forming paper sheet. Chem Eng J 243:372–379Google Scholar
  12. Biermann C (1996) Handbook of pulping and papermaking, 2nd edn. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Bondeson D (2007) Biopolymer-based Nanocomposites: processing and properties. Thesis for the degree of philosophiae doctor Trondheim. ISBN 978-82-471-1254-0 (printed ver); ISBN 978-82-471-1268-7 (electronic ver); ISSN 1503-818Google Scholar
  14. Bragg PD, Rannie DJ (1974) The effect of silver ions on the respiratory chain of Escherichia coli. Can J Microbiol 20:883–889Google Scholar
  15. Brown RM Jr (1998) Microbial cellulose: a new resource for wood, paper, textiles, food and specialty products. Position PaperGoogle Scholar
  16. Brown TA, Smith DG (1976) The effects of silver nitrate on the growth and ultrastructure of the yeast Cryptococcus albidus. Microbios Lett 3:155–162Google Scholar
  17. Burd A, Kwok CH, Hung SC, Chan HS, Gu H, Lam WK, Huang L (2007) A comparative study of the cytotoxicity of silver-based dressings in monolayer cell, tissue explant, and animal models. Wound Repair Regen 15:94–104Google Scholar
  18. Chan MW, Schwaitzberg SD, Demcheva M, Vournakis J, Finkielsztein S, Connolly RJ (2000) Comparison of poly-N-acetyl glucosamine (P-GlcNAc) with absorbable collagen (Actifoam), and fibrin sealant (Bolheal) for achieving hemostasis in a swine model of splenic hemorrhage. J Trauma 48:454–457Google Scholar
  19. Clement JL, Jarrett PS (1994) Antibacterial silver. Met Based Drugs 1:467–482Google Scholar
  20. Costa HO, de Souza FC (2005) Evaluation of the tissue regeneration of the burned pig´s skin followed by BiotissueTM grafting. Acta ORL/T’ecnicas emOtorrinolaringologia 23:192–196Google Scholar
  21. Coutinho FMB, Costa THS, Carvalho DL (1997) Polypropylene-wood fiber composites: effect of treatment and mixing conditions on mechanical properties. J Appl Polym Sci 65:1227–1235Google Scholar
  22. Culler SR, Ishida H, Koenig JL (1986) Silane interphase of composites: effect of process conditions on gamma—aminopropyltriethoxysilane. Polym Compos 7:231–238Google Scholar
  23. Cui W, Li X, Xie C, Chen J, Zou J, Zhou S, Weng J (2010) Controllable growth of hydroxyapatite on electrospun poly(dl-lactide) fibers grafted with chitosan as potential tissue engineering scaffolds. Polymer 51:2320–2328Google Scholar
  24. Dahlin C, Linde A, Gottlow J, Nyman S (1988) Healing of bone defects by guided tissue regeneration. Plastic Reconstruct Surgery 81:672–676Google Scholar
  25. Dai L, Chen XL, Wang WJ, Zhou T, Hu BH (2003) Growth and luminescence characterization of large-scale zinc oxide nanowires. J Phys Condens Matter 15:2221–2226Google Scholar
  26. Danese PN (2002) Antibiofilm approaches: prevention of catheter colonization. Chem Biol 9:873–880Google Scholar
  27. Dobos AM, Onofrei MD, Ioan S (2014) Liquid crystals and cellulose derivatives composites. In: Thakur VK, Kessle MR (eds) Green biorenewable biocomposites from knowledge to industrial applications, CRC Press, ISBN: 9781771880329Google Scholar
  28. Dunn K, Edwards-Jones V (2004) The role of Acticoat with nanocrystalline silver in the management of burns. Burns 30(1):S1–S9Google Scholar
  29. Eichhorn SJ, Dufresne A, Aranguren M, Marcovich NE, Capadona JR, Rowan SJ, Weder C, Thielemans W, Roman M, Renneckar S, Gindl W, Veigel S, Keckes J, Yano H, Abe K, Nogi M, Nakagaito AN, Mangalam A, Simonsen J, Benight AS, Bismarck A, Berglund LA, Peijs T (2010) Review: current international research into cellulose nanofibres and nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 45:1–33Google Scholar
  30. Evans BR, O’Neill HM, Malyvanh VP, Lee I, Woodward J (2003) Palladium-bacterial cellulose membranes for fuel cells. Biosens Bioelectron 18:917–923Google Scholar
  31. Ewald A, Gluckermann SK, Thull R, Gbureck U (2006) Antimicrobial titanium/silver PVD coatings on titanium. Biomed Eng Online 5:22–31Google Scholar
  32. Fischer TH, Thatte HS, Nichols TC, Bender-Neal DE, Bellinger DA, Vournakis JN (2005) Synergistic platelet integrin signaling and factor XII activation in poly-N-acetyl glucosamine fiber-mediated hemostasis. Biomaterials 26:5433–5443Google Scholar
  33. Fong J, Wood F (2006) Nanocrystalline silver dressings in wound management: a review. Int J Nanomedicine 1:441–449Google Scholar
  34. Fuhrmann GF, Rothstein A (1968) The mechanism of the partial inhibition of fermentation in yeast by nickel ions. Biochem Biophys Acta 163:331–338Google Scholar
  35. Fukushima H, Drzal LT, Rook BP, Rich MJ (2006) Thermal conductivity of exfoliated graphite nanocomposites. J Therm Anal Calorim 85:235–238Google Scholar
  36. Furr JR, Russell AD, Turner TD, Andrews A (1994) Antibacterial activity of actisorb plus, actisorb and silver nitrate. J Hosp Infect 27:201–208Google Scholar
  37. Ghatge ND, Khisti RS (1989) Performance of new silane coupling agents along with phenolic nobake binder for sand core. J Polym Mater 6:145–149Google Scholar
  38. Gopalan Nair K, Dufresne A (2003) Crab shell chitin whisker reinforced natural rubber nanocomposites. 1. Processing and swelling behavior. Biomacromolecules 4:657–665Google Scholar
  39. Gonz´alez L, Rodr´ıguez A, de Benito JL, Marcos- Fern´andez A (1997) Applications of an azide sulfonyl silane as elastomer crosslinking and coupling agent. J Appl Polym Sci 63: 1353–1359Google Scholar
  40. Hajipour MJ, Fromm KM, Ashkarran AA, de Aberasturi DJ, Larramendi IR, Rojo T, Serpooshan V, Parak Wolfgang J, Mahmoudi M (2012) Antibacterial properties of nanoparticles. Trends Biotechnol 30:499–511Google Scholar
  41. Hassanien AM, El-Hashash MA, Mekewi MA, Guirguis DB, Ramadan AM (2013) Fabrication of polyvinyl alcohol/cellulose acetate (PVA/CA/PEG), antibacterial membrane for potential water purification application. Hydrol Current Res 4:1–6Google Scholar
  42. Hart J, Silcock D, Gunnigle S, Cullen B, Light ND, Watt PW (2002) The role of oxidised regenerated cellulose/collagen in wound repair: effects in vitro on fibroblast biology and in vivo in a model of compromised healing. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 34:1557–1570Google Scholar
  43. Helenius G, Bäckdahl H, Bodin A, Nannmark U, Gatenholm P, Risberg B (2006) In vivo biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose. J Biomed Mater Res A 76:431–438Google Scholar
  44. Heller J (1987) Use of polymers in controlled release of active agents, In: Robinson JR, Lee VHL (eds) Controlled drug delivery. Fundamentals and applications, 180–210Google Scholar
  45. Hilal N, Al-Khatib L, Atkin BP, Kochkodan V, Potapchenko N (2003) Photochemical modification of membrane surfaces for (bio) fouling reduction: a nano-scale study using AFM. Desalination 158:65–72Google Scholar
  46. Huang Y, Zhang L, Yang J, Zhang X, Xu M (2013) Structure and properties of cellulose films reinforced by chitin whiskers. Macromol Mater Eng 298:303–310Google Scholar
  47. Huang L, Nagapudi K, Chaikof EL (2001) Engeenered collagen-PEO nanofibers and fabrics. J Biomat Sci Polym Ed 12:979–993Google Scholar
  48. Huang ZM, Zhang YZ, Kotaki M, Ramakrishna S (2003) A review on polymer nanofibers by electrospinning and their applications in nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 63:2223–2253Google Scholar
  49. Hu L, Wu H, Cui Y (2010a) Printed energy storage devices by integration of electrodes and separators into single sheets of paper. Appl Phys Lett 96:183502–183504Google Scholar
  50. Hu L, Pasta M, La Mantia F, Cui L, Jeong S, Dawn Deshazer H, Choi JW, Han SM, Cui Y (2010b) Stretchable, porous, and conductive energy textiles. Nano Lett 10:708–714Google Scholar
  51. Hu L, La Mantia F, Wu H, Xie X, McDonough J, Pasta M, Cui Y (2011) Lithium-ion textile batteries with large areal mass loading. Adv Energy Mater 1:1012–1017Google Scholar
  52. Iguchi M, Yamanaka S, Budhiono A (2000) Bacterial cellulose—amasterpiece of nature’s arts. J Mater Sci 35:261–270Google Scholar
  53. Imazato S, Ebi N, Takahashi Y, Kaneko T, Ebisu S, Russell RR (2003) Antibacterial activity of bactericide-immobilized filler for resin-based restoratives. Biomaterials 24:3605–3609Google Scholar
  54. Ioan S, Dobos-Necula AM (2012) Silver nanoparticles in cellulose derivative matrix. In: Thakur VK, Singha AS (eds) Nanotechnology in polymers. Studium Presss, USA, chapter 11, pp 191–248Google Scholar
  55. Jabbour L, Gerbaldi C, Chaussy D, Zeno E, Bodoardo S, Beneventi D (2010) Microfibrillated cellulose–graphite nanocomposites for highly flexible paperlike Li-ion battery electrodes. J Mater Chem 20:7344–7347Google Scholar
  56. Jabbour L, Destro M, Gerbaldi C, Chaussy D, Penazzi N, Beneventi D (2012) Aqueous processing of cellulose based paper-anodes for flexible Li-ion batteries. J Mater Chem 22:3227–3233Google Scholar
  57. Jabbour L, Destro M, Chaussy D, Gerbaldi C, Penazzi N, Bodoardo S, Beneventi D (2013) Flexible cellulose/LiFePO4 paper-cathodes: toward eco-friendly wallpaper Li ion batteries. Cellulose 20:571–582Google Scholar
  58. Jadhav S, Gaikwad S, Nimse M, Rajbhoj A (2011) Copper oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, characterization and their antibacterial activity. J Cluster Sci 22:121–129Google Scholar
  59. Johnson JR, Kuskowski MA, Wilt TJ (2006) Systematic review: antimicrobial urinary catheters to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection in hospitalized patients. Ann Int Med 144:116–126Google Scholar
  60. Jonas R, Farah LF (1998) Production and application of microbial cellulose. Polym Degrad Stab 59:101–106Google Scholar
  61. Joseph K, Mattoso CLH, Toledo RD (2000) Natural fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites.In: Frollini E, Leao AL, Mattoso CLH (eds) Nature Polymeric Agrofibers Compos, chapter 4, Embrapa. S˜an Carlos, Brazil, pp 159–201Google Scholar
  62. Kaith BS, Singha AS, Kumar S, Misra BN (2005) FASH2O2 initiated graft copolymerization of methylmethacrylate onto flax and evaluation of some physical and chemical properties. J Polym Mat 22:425–432Google Scholar
  63. Kalia S, Kaith BS, Sharma S, Bhardwaj B (2008) Mechanical properties of flax-g-poly(methyl acrylate) reinforced phenolic composites. Fibers Polym 9:416–422Google Scholar
  64. Kalia S, Kaith BS, Kaur I (2009) Pretreatments of natural fibers and their application as reinforcing material in polymer composites-a review. Polym Eng Sci 49:1253–1272Google Scholar
  65. Kalia S, Dufresne A, Cherian BM, Kaith BS, Av´erous L, Njuguna J, Nassiopoulos E (2011) Cellulose-based bio- and nanocomposites: a review. Int J Polym Sci 2011:35, Article ID 837875Google Scholar
  66. Khoushab F, Yamabhai M (2010) Review: chitin research revisited. Mar Drugs 8:1988–2012Google Scholar
  67. Kim J, Kwon S, Ostler E (2009) Antimicrobial effect of silver-impregnated cellulose: potential for antimicrobial therapy. J Biol Eng 3:1–9Google Scholar
  68. Klasen HJ (2000) A historical review of the use of silver in the treatment of burns II. Renewed Interest silver. Burns 26:131–138Google Scholar
  69. Kwon J-W, Yoon SH, Lee SS, Seo KW, Shim IS (2005) Preparation of silver nanoparticles in cellulose acetate polymer and the reaction chemistry of silver complexes in the polymer. Bull Korean Chem Soc 26:837–840Google Scholar
  70. Lansdown AB (2002a) Silver. I: Its antibacterial properties and mechanism of action. J Wound Care 11:125–130Google Scholar
  71. Lansdown AB (2002b) Toxicity in mammals and how its products aid wound repair. J Wound Care 11:173–177Google Scholar
  72. Lea SB, Koepsel RR, Morley SW, Matyjaszewski K, Sun Y, Russell Alan J (2004) Permanent, nonleaching antibacterial surfaces. 1. Synthesis by atom transfer radical polymerization. Biomacromolecules 5:877–882Google Scholar
  73. Legnani C, Barud HS, Quirino WG, Caiut JMA, Ribeiro SJL, Achete CA, Cremona M (2009) Transparent nanocomposite bacterial cellulose used as flexible substrate for OLED. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on advanced materials. Rio de Janeiro, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  74. Leijonmarck S, Cornell A, Lindbergh G, Wågberg L (2013a) Flexible nano-paperbased positive electrodes for Li-ion batteries—preparation process and properties. Rapid Commun Nano Energy 2:794–800Google Scholar
  75. Leijonmarck S, Cornell A, Lindbergh G, Wagberg L (2013b) Single-paper flexible Liion battery cells through a papermaking process based on nano-fibrillated cellulose. J Mater Chem A 1:4671–4677Google Scholar
  76. Li WJ, Laurencin CT, Caterson EJ, Tuan RS, Ko FK (2002) Electrospun nanofibrous structure: a novel scafold for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 60:613–621Google Scholar
  77. Li D, McCann JT, Gratt M, Xia Y (2004) Photocatalytic deposition of gold nanoparticles on electrospun nanofibers of titania. Chemi Phys Lett 394:387–391Google Scholar
  78. Li Q, Mahendra S, Lyon DY, Brunet L, Liga MV, Li D, Alvarez Pedro JJ (2008a) Antimicrobial nanomaterials for water disinfection and microbial control: potential applications and implications. Water Res 42:4591–4602Google Scholar
  79. Li XH, Shao CL, Liu YC, Chu XY, Wang CH, Zhang BX (2008b) Photoluminescence properties of highly dispersed ZnO quantum dots in polyvinylpyrrolidone nanotubes prepared by a single capillary electrospinning. J Chem Phys 129:114708–114715Google Scholar
  80. Lin M-F, Thakur VK, Tan EJ, Lee PS (2011a) Surface functionalization of BaTiO3 nanoparticles and improved electrical properties of BaTiO3/polyvinylidene fluoride composite. RSC Adv 1:576–578Google Scholar
  81. Lin M-F, Thakur VK, Tan EJ, Lee PS (2011b) Dopant induced hollow BaTiO3 nanostructures for application in high performance capacitors. J Mater Chem 21:16500–16504Google Scholar
  82. Longer MA, Robinson JR (1980) Sustained-release drug delivery systems. In: Remington JP (ed) Remington’s pharmaceutical sciences, 18th edn. Mack publishing, easton, pp 1676–1693Google Scholar
  83. Lonsdale HK, Padall HK (1972) Reverse osmosis membrane research. Plenum press, New York 155Google Scholar
  84. Lonnberg H, Fogelstr¨om L, Samir MASA, Berglund L, Malmstr¨om E, Hult A (2008) Surface grafting of microfibrillated cellulose with poly(ε-caprolactone)—synthesis and Characterization. Europ Polym J 44:2991–2997Google Scholar
  85. Lukens RJ (1983) Chemistry of fungicidal action. Mol Biol Biochem Biophys 10Google Scholar
  86. Macedo NL, Matuda FS, Macedo LGS, Monteiro ASF, Valera MC, Carvalho YR (2004) Evaluation of two membranes in guided bone tissue regeneration: histological study in rabbits. Braz J Oral Sci 3:395–400Google Scholar
  87. Madhumathi K, Sudheesh Kumar PT, Abhilash S, Sreeja V, Tamura H, Manzoor K, Nair SV, Jayakumar R (2010) Development of novel chitin/nanosilver composite scaffolds for wound dressing applications. J Mater Sci Mater Med 21:807–813Google Scholar
  88. Maiti P, Yamada K, Okamoto M, Ueda K, Okamoto K (2002) New polylactide/layered silicate nanocomposites: role of organoclays. Chem Mater 14:4654–4661Google Scholar
  89. Matthews JA, Wnek GE, Simpson DG, Bowlin GL (2002) Electrospinning of collagen nanofibers. Biomacromolecules 3:232–238Google Scholar
  90. Martin CR (1995) Template synthesis of electronically conductive polymer nanostructures. Acc Chem Res 28:61–68Google Scholar
  91. Martin CR (1996) Membrane-based synthesis of nanomaterials. Chem Mater 8:1739–1746Google Scholar
  92. Miller LP, McCallan EA (1957) Toxic action of metal ions to fugus spores. Agric Food Chem 5:116–122Google Scholar
  93. Morganti P, Muzzarelli RAA, Muzzarelli C (2006) Multifunctional use of innovative chitin nanofibrils for skin care. J Appl Cosmetology 24:105–114Google Scholar
  94. Morones JR, Elechiguerra JL, Camacho A (2005) The bactericidal effect of silver nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 16:2346–2353Google Scholar
  95. Murugaraj P, Mainwaring DE, Jakubov T, Mora-Huertas NE, Khelil NA, Siegele R (2006) Electron transport in semiconducting nanoparticle and nanocluster carbon– polymer composites. Solid State Commun 137:422–426Google Scholar
  96. Necula M, Dunca S, Stoica I, Olaru N, Olaru L, Ioan S (2010) Morphological properties and antibacterial activity of nano-silver-containing cellulose acetate phthalate films. Int J Polym Anal Charact 15:341–350Google Scholar
  97. Necula AM, Stoica I, Olaru N, Doroftei F, Ioan S (2011) Silver nanoparticles in cellulose acetate polymers. Rheological and morphological properties. J Macromol Sci Part B: Phys 50:639–651Google Scholar
  98. Nemetz AP, Loures DRR, Coelho JCU (2001) Efeito estrutural da utilização de celulose biossintética e politetrafluoretileno expandido como substitutos do peritônio em cães Arquivos Brasileiros De Cirugia Digestiva 14:139–142Google Scholar
  99. Novaes AB Jr, Novaes AB (1992) IMZ implants placed into extraction sockets in association with membrane therapy (Gengiflex) and porous hydroxyapatite: a case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 7:536–540Google Scholar
  100. Novaes AB Jr, Novaes AB (1997) Soft tissue management for primary closure in guided bone regeneration: surgical technique and case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 12:84–87Google Scholar
  101. Ottaviani MF, Valluzzi R, Balogh L (2002) Internal structure of silver-poly(amidoamine) dendrimer complexes and nanocomposites. Macromolecules 35:5105–5115Google Scholar
  102. Olson DG, Tripathi SA, Giannone RJ (2010) Deletion of the Cel48S cellulase from clostridium thermocellum. Int J Polym Sci Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 107:17727–17732Google Scholar
  103. Pal S, Tak YK, Song JM (2007) Does the antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles depend on the shape of the nanoparticle? a study of the gram-negative bacterium Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microb 73:1712–1720Google Scholar
  104. Panacek A, Kolar M, Vecerova R, Pruceka R, Soukupova J, Krystof V, Hamal P, Zboril R, Kvítek L (2009) Antifungal activity of silver nanoparticles against Candida spp. Biomaterials 30:6333–6340Google Scholar
  105. Park HS, Park YO (2005) Filtration properties of electrospun utrafine fiber webs. Korean J Chem Eng 22:165–172Google Scholar
  106. Percival SL, Bowler PG, Russell D (2005) Bacterial resistance to silver in wound care. J Hosp Infect 60:1–7Google Scholar
  107. Pinto RJB, Marques PAAP, Neto CP, Trindade T, Daina S, Sadocco P (2009) Antibacterial activity of nanocomposites of silver and bacterial or vegetable cellulosic fibers. Acta Biomater 5:2279–2289Google Scholar
  108. Pinto RJB, Neves MC, Pascoal Neto C, Trindade T (2012) Growth and chemical stability of copper nanostructures on cellulosic fibers. Eur J Inorg Chem 2012:5043–5049Google Scholar
  109. Pinto RJB, Daina S, Sadocco P, Neto CP, Trindade T (2013) Antibacterial activity of nanocomposites of copper and cellulose. BioMed Res Int 280512:6Google Scholar
  110. Van Den Plas D, De Smet K, Lens D, Sollie P (2008) Differential cell death programmes induced by silver dressings in vitro. Eur J Dermatol 18:416–421Google Scholar
  111. Pommet M, Juntaro J, Heng JYY, Mantalaris A, Lee AF, Wilson K, Kalinka G, Shaffer Milo SP, Bismarck A (2008) Surface modification of natural fibers using bacteria: depositing bacterial cellulose onto natural fibers to create hierarchical fiber reinforced nanocomposites. Biomacromolecules 9:1643–1651Google Scholar
  112. Ray D, Sarkar BK, Rana AK, Bose NR (2001) Effect of alkali treated jute fibres on composite properties. Bull Mat Sci 24:129–135Google Scholar
  113. Ranby BG (1952) The cellulose micelles. Tappi 35:53–58Google Scholar
  114. Richards RME (1981) Antimicrobial action of silver nitrate. Microbios 31:83–91Google Scholar
  115. Richards RME, Odelola HA, Anderson B (1984) Effect of silver on whole cells and spheroplasts of a silver resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbios 39:151–258Google Scholar
  116. Rujitanaroj P, Pimpha N, Supaphol P (2008) Wound-dressing materials with antibacterial activity from electrospun gelatin fiber mats containing silver nanoparticles. Polymer 49:4723–4732Google Scholar
  117. Ruparelia JP, Chatterjee AK, Duttagupta SP, Mukherji S (2008) Strain specificity in antimicrobial activity of silver and copper nanoparticles. Acta Biomat 4:707–716Google Scholar
  118. Russell AD, Hugo WB (1994) Antimicrobial activity and action of silver. Prog Med Chem 31:351–371Google Scholar
  119. Salata LA, Craig GT, Brook IM (1995) In vivo evaluation of a new membrane (Gengiflex) for guided bone regeneratien (GBR). J Dental Res 74:825–831Google Scholar
  120. Sarma TK, Chowdhury D, Paul A, Chattopadhyay A (2002) Synthesis of Au-nanoparticle conductive polyaniline composite using H2O2 as oxidizing as well as reducing agent. Chem Comun 14:1048–1049Google Scholar
  121. Schadler LS (2003) Polymer-based and polymer-filled nanocomposites. In: Ajayan PM, Schadler LS, Braun PV (eds) Nanocomposite science and technology. Weinheim Wiley-VCH Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  122. Schneider A, Wang XY, Kaplan DL, Garlick JA, Egles C (2009) Biofunctionalized electrospun silk mats as a topical bioactive dressing for accelerated wound healing. Acta Biomat 5:2570–2578Google Scholar
  123. Schreurs WJA, Rosenburgh H (1982) Effect of silver ions on transport and retention of phosphate by Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 152:7–13Google Scholar
  124. Shafei AE, Abou-Okeil A (2011) ZnO/carboxymethyl chitosan bionanocomposite to impart antibacterial and UV protection for cotton fabric. Carbohydr Polym 83:920–925Google Scholar
  125. Shaikh S, Birdi A, Qutubuddin S, Lakatosh E, Baskaran H (2007) Controlled release in transdermal pressure sensitive adhesives using organosilicate nanocomposites. Annals Biomed Eng 35:2130–2137Google Scholar
  126. Shah J, Brown RM Jr (2005) Towards electronic paper displays made from microbial cellulose. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 66:352–355Google Scholar
  127. Shiraishi Y, Toshima N (2000) Oxidation of ethylene catalyzed by colloidal dispersion of poly(sodium acrylate) protected silver nanoclusters. Coll Surf A 169:59–66Google Scholar
  128. Shoda M, Sugano Y (2005) Recent advances in bacterial cellulose production. Biotechnol Bioproc Eng 10:1–8Google Scholar
  129. Silva EC (2009) Hidroxiapatita Sintetica em alveolo dentario apos exodontia em Felis catus: estudo clınico, radiologico e histomorfometrico. M.S. Dissertation, Universidade FederalGoogle Scholar
  130. Singha AS, Thakur VK (2008a) Saccaharum cilliare fiber reinforced polymer composites. E-J Chem 5:782–791Google Scholar
  131. Singha AS, Thakur VK (2008b) Effect of fibre loading on urea-formaldehyde matrix based green composites. Iran Polym J 17:861–873Google Scholar
  132. Singha AS, Thakur VK, Mehta IK, Shama A, Khanna AJ, Rana RK, Rana AK (2009) Surface-modified hibiscus sabdariffa fibers: physicochemical, thermal, and morphological properties evaluation. Int J Polym Anal Charact 14:695–711Google Scholar
  133. Singha AS, Thakur VK (2010 a) Mechanical, morphological, and thermal characterization of compression-molded polymer biocomposites. Int J Polym Anal Charact 15:87–97Google Scholar
  134. Singha AS, Thakur VK (2010b) Synthesis, characterization and study of pine needles reinforced polymer matrix based composites. J Reinf Plast Compos 29:700–709Google Scholar
  135. Singh N, Galande C, Miranda A, Mathkar A, Gao W, Mohana Reddy AL, Vlad A, Ajayan PM (2012) Paintable battery. Sci Rep 2:481Google Scholar
  136. Siqueira G, Bras J, Dufresne A (2010) Cellulosic bionanocomposites: a review of preparation, properties and applications. Polymers 2:728–765Google Scholar
  137. Son WK, Youk JH, Lee TS, Park WH (2004) Preparation of antimicrobial ultrafine cellulose acetate fibers with silver nanoparticles. Macromol Rapid Commun 25:1632–1637Google Scholar
  138. Son WK, Youk JH, Park WH (2006) Antimicrobial cellulose acetate nanofibers containing silver nanoparticles. Carbohydr Polym 65:430–434Google Scholar
  139. Sondi I, Salopek-Sondi B (2004) Silver nanoparticles as antimicrobial agent: a case study on E. coli as a model for Gramnegative bacteria. J Colloid Int Sci 275:177–182Google Scholar
  140. Southward RE, Thompson DW (2001) Reflective and conductive silvered polyimide films for space applications prepared via a novel single-stage self-metallization technique. Mat Des 22:565–576Google Scholar
  141. Stashak TS, Farstvedt E, Othic A (2004) Update on wound dressings: indications and best use. Clin Technol Equine Pract 3:148–163Google Scholar
  142. Subramanian V, Wolf EE, Kamat PV (2004) Catalysis with TiO2/Gold nanocomposites. Efect of metal particle size on the Fermi level equilibration. J Am Chem Soc 126:4943–4950Google Scholar
  143. Tam KH, Djurisic AB, Chan CMN, Xi YY, Tse CW, Leung YH, Chanb WK, Leungc FCC, Au DWT (2008) Antibacterial activity of ZnO nanorods prepared by a hydrothermal method. Thin Solid Films 516:6167–6174Google Scholar
  144. Thakur VK, Singha AS, Kaur I, Nagarajarao RP, Liping Y (2010a) Silane functionalization of saccaharum cilliare fibers: thermal, morphological, and physicochemical study. Int J Polym Anal Charact 15:397–414Google Scholar
  145. Thakur VK, Singha AS, Mehta IK (2010b) Renewable resource-based green polymer composites: analysis and characterization. Int J Polym Anal Charact 15:137–146Google Scholar
  146. Thakur VK, Singha AS, Misra BN (2011) Graft copolymerization of methyl methacrylate onto cellulosic biofibers. J Appl Polym Sci 122:532–544Google Scholar
  147. Thakur VK, Yan J, Lin M-F et al (2012a) Novel polymer nanocomposites from bioinspired green aqueous functionalization of BNNTs. Polym Chem 3:962–969Google Scholar
  148. Thakur VK, Singha AS, Thakur MK (2012b) In-air graft copolymerization of ethyl acrylate onto natural cellulosic polymers. Int J Polym Anal Charact 17:48–60Google Scholar
  149. Thakur VK, Singha AS, Thakur MK (2012c) Biopolymers based green composites: mechanical, thermal and physico-chemical characterization. J Polym Environ 20:412–421Google Scholar
  150. Thakur VK, Singha AS, Thakur MK (2012d) Graft Copolymerization of Methyl Acrylate onto Cellulosic Biofibers: synthesis, characterization and applications. J Polym Environ 20:164–174Google Scholar
  151. Thakur VK, Singha AS, Thakur MK (2012d) Modification of natural biomass by graft copolymerization. Int J Polym Anal Charact 17:547–555Google Scholar
  152. Thakur VK, Thakur MK (2014a) Processing and characterization of natural cellulose fibers/thermoset polymer composites. Carbohydr Polym 109:102–117Google Scholar
  153. Thakur VK, Thakur MK (2014b) Recent trends in hydrogels based on psyllium polysaccharide: a review. J Cleaner Product 82:1–15Google Scholar
  154. Thakur VK, Vennerberg D, Kessler MR (2014a) Green aqueous surface modification of polypropylene for novel polymer nanocomposites. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:9349–9356Google Scholar
  155. Thakur VK, Thakur MK, Raghavan P, Kessler MR (2014b) Progress in green polymer composites from lignin for multifunctional applications: a review. ACS Sust Chem Eng 2:1072–1092Google Scholar
  156. Thakur VK, Thakur MK, Gupta RK (2014c) Review: raw natural fiber–based polymer composites. Int J Polym Anal Charact 19:256–271Google Scholar
  157. Thompson CM, Herring HM, Gates TS, Connell JW (2003) Preparation and characterization of metal oxide/polyimide nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 63:1591–1598Google Scholar
  158. Thurmann RB, Gerba CP (1988) Molecules mechanisms of viral inactivation by water disinfectants. Adv Appl Microbiol 33:75–105Google Scholar
  159. Thurmann RB, Gerba CP (1989) The molecules mechanisms of copper and silver ion disinfection of bacteria and viruses. Crit Rev Environ Control 18:295–315Google Scholar
  160. Tian X, Zhang X, Liu W, Zheng J, Ruan C, Cui P (2006) Preparation and properties of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/silica nanocomposites. J Macromol Sci Part B Phys 45:507–513Google Scholar
  161. Tiller JC, Lee SB, Lewis K, Klibanov AM (2002) Polymer surfaces derivatized with poly(vinyl-N-hexylpyridinium) kill airborne and waterborne bacteria. Biotechnol Bioeng 79:465–471Google Scholar
  162. Vargas-Reus MA, Memarzadeh K, Huang J, Ren GG, Allaker RP (2012) Antimicrobial activity of nanoparticulate metal oxides against peri-implantitis pathogens. Int J Antimicrob Agents 40:135–139Google Scholar
  163. Wang X, Drew C, Lee SH, Senecal KJ, Kumar J, Samuelson LA (2002) Electrospun nanofibrous membranes for highly sensitive optical sensors. Nano Lett 2:1273–1275Google Scholar
  164. Wang M, Singh H, Hatton TA, Rutledge GK (2004) Field responsive superparamagnetic composite nanofibers by electrospinning. Polymer 45:5505–5514Google Scholar
  165. Watanabe Y, Mukai B, Kawamura KI, Ishikawa T, Namiki M, Utoguchi N, Fujii M (2002) Preparation and evaluation of press-coated aminophylline tablet using crystalline cellulose and polyethylene glycol in the outer shell for timed-release dosage forms. In: Zasshi Y (ed) The Pharmaceutical Society of Japan, 122:157–162Google Scholar
  166. Wongpanit P, Sanchavanakit N, Pavasant P, Bunapresert T, Tabata Y, Rujiravanit R (2007) Preparation and characterization of chitin whisker-reinforced silk fibroin nanocomposite sponges. Eur Polym J 43:4123–4135Google Scholar
  167. Watkins JJ, McCarthy TJ (1995) Polymer/metal nanocomposite synthesis in supercritical CO2. Chem Mater 7:1991–1994Google Scholar
  168. Wiegand C, Heinze T, Hipler UC (2009) Comparative in vitro study on cytotoxicity, antimicrobial activity, and binding capacity for pathophysiological factors in chronic wounds of alginate and silver-containing alginate. Wound Repair Regen 17:511–521Google Scholar
  169. Wright JB, Lam K, Hansen D, Burrell RE (1999) Efficacy of topical silver against fungal burn wound pathogens. Am J Infect Control 27:344–350Google Scholar
  170. Wu Y, Jia W, An Q, Liu Y, Chen J, Li G (2009a) Multiaction antibacterial nanofibrous membranes fabricated by electrospinning: an excellent system for antibacterial applications. Nanotechnology 20:245101Google Scholar
  171. Wu J, Hou S, Ren D, Mather PT (2009b) Antimicrobial properties of nanostructured hydrogel webs containing silver. Biomacromolecules 10:2686–2693Google Scholar
  172. Xie S, Li W, Pan Z, Chang B, Sun L (2000) Mechanical and physical properties on carbon nanotubes. J Phys Chem Solids 61(7):1153–1158Google Scholar
  173. Yang QB, Li DM, Hong YL, Li ZY, Wang C, Qiu SL, Wei Y (2003) Preparation and characterization of a PAN nanofibre containing Ag nanoparticles via electrospinning. Synthetic Met 137:973–974Google Scholar
  174. Yano H, Sugiyama J, Nogi M, Matsuura T, Hikita M, Handa K (2005) Optically transparent composites reinforced with networks of bacterial nanofibers. Adv Mat 17:153–155Google Scholar
  175. Yuvaraj D, Kaushik R, Narasimha RK (2010) Optical, field-emission and antimicrobial properties of ZnO nanostructured films deposited at room temperature by activated evaporation. ACS Appl Matter Interfaces 2:1019–1024Google Scholar
  176. Zhu C, Xue J, He J (2009) Controlled in-situ synthesis of silver nanoparticles in natural cellulose fibers toward highly efficient antimicrobial materials. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 9:3067–3074Google Scholar
  177. Zeng J, Xu X, Chen X, Liang Q, Bian X, Yang L, Jing X (2003) Biodegradable electrospun fibers for drug delivery. J Controlled Release 92:227–231Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adina Maria Dobos
    • 1
  • Mihaela-Dorina Onofrei
    • 1
  • Silvia Ioan
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.“Petru Poni” Institute of Macromolecular ChemistryIasiRomania

Personalised recommendations