Abstract
We have already mentioned in Chap. 2 that the question of optimal estimation of the covariate parameters under the covariate model was first studied by Troya Lopes, J Stat Plan Inference 6:373–419, (1982a); 7:49–75, (1982b) in Completely Randomized Design (CRD) set-up. Later, Das et al., J Stat Plan Inference 115:273–285, (2003) extended her work to the construction of optimum covariate designs in the set-up of Randomized Block Designs (RBD). Also, Rao et al., Electron Notes Discret Math 15:157–160, (2003) established a relationship between mixed orthogonal arrays (MOAs) and OCDs in CRD and RBD set-ups. In this chapter we discuss the construction procedures of OCDs in RBD set-up as considered by Das et al., J Stat Plan Inference 115:273–285, (2003) and Rao et al., Electron Notes Discret Math 15:157–160, (2003).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Das K, Mandal NK, Sinha BK (2003) Optimal experimental designs with covariates. J Stat Plan Inference 115:273–285
Dey A, Mukerjee R (1999) Fractional factorial plans. Wiley, Hoboken
Hedayat AS, Sloane NJA, Stufken J (1999) Orthogonal arrays: theory and applications. Springer, New York
Rao CR (1947) Factorial experiments derivable from combinatorial arrangements of arrays. J R Stat Soc (Suppl) 9:128–139
Rao CR (1973) Some combinatorial problems of arrays and applications to design of experiments. In: Srivastava JN (ed) A survey of combinatorial theory. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, pp 349–359
Rao PSSNVP, Rao SB, Saha GM, Sinha BK (2003) Optimal designs for covariates’ models and mixed orthogonal arrays. Electron Notes Discret Math 15:157–160
Troya Lopes J (1982a) Optimal designs for covariate models. J Stat Plan Inference 6:373–419
Troya Lopes J (1982b) Cyclic designs for a covariate model. J Stat Plan Inference 7:49–75
Wallis WD, Street AP, Wallis JS (1972) Combinatorics: room squares, sum-free sets, Hadamard matrices. Lecture notes in mathematics, vol 292. Springer, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Proof of Theorem 3.4.3 It is observed that X is a symmetric matrix. Now \((i,i)\mathrm{th}\) block matrix of X X \(^\prime \) is
\(\begin{array}{rll} (\mathbf{X}\mathbf{X}^\prime )_{ii} &{}=\displaystyle \sum _{k=1,~k\ne i}^p(a_{ik}\mathbf{A}-\mathbf{I}_p)(a_{ki}\mathbf{A}-\mathbf{I}_p)+(a_{ii}\mathbf{A}+\mathbf{J}_p-\mathbf{I}_p)(a_{ii}\mathbf{A}+\mathbf{J}_p-\mathbf{I}_p)&{} \\ &{}=\displaystyle \sum _{k=1~k\ne i}^p(a_{ik}^2\mathbf{A}^2-2a_{ik}\mathbf{A}+\mathbf{I})+(\mathbf{J}_p-\mathbf{I}_p)(\mathbf{J}_p-\mathbf{I}_p)\,\mathrm{since}~a_{ij}=a_{ji}\,\text {and}\,a_{ii}=0~\forall i \\ &{} =(p\mathbf{I}_p-\mathbf{J}_p)\displaystyle \sum _{k=1}^pa_{ik}^2-2\mathbf{A}\displaystyle \sum _{k=1}^pa_{ik}+(p-1)\mathbf{I}_p+p\mathbf{J}_p-2\mathbf{J}_p+\mathbf{I}_p\\ &{}=(p\mathbf{I}_p-\mathbf{J}_p)(p-1) -2\mathbf{A}.0+(p-1)\mathbf{I}_p+(p-2)\mathbf{J}_p+\mathbf{I}_p&{}\\ &{}=(p(p-1)+p)\mathbf{I}_p+(p-2)\mathbf{J}_p-(p-1)\mathbf{J}_p&{} \\ &{}=p^2\mathbf{I}_p-\mathbf{J}_p&{} \end{array}\)
\((i,j)\mathrm{th}\) block matrix of X X \(^\prime \) is
\(\begin{array}{rl} (\mathbf{X}\mathbf{X}^\prime )_{ij} &{}=\displaystyle \sum _{k=1,~k\ne i,j}^p(a_{ik}\mathbf{A}-\mathbf{I}_p)(a_{kj}\mathbf{A}-\mathbf{I}_p)+(a_{ii}\mathbf{A}+\mathbf{J}_p-\mathbf{I}_p)(a_{ji}\mathbf{A}-\mathbf{I}_p)\\ &{}~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+(a_{ij}\mathbf{A}-\mathbf{I}_p)(a_{jj}\mathbf{A}+\mathbf{J}_p-\mathbf{I}_p)\\ &{}=\displaystyle \sum _{k=1,~k\ne i,j}^p(a_{ik}a_{jk}\mathbf{A}^2-a_{ik}\mathbf{A}-a_{jk}\mathbf{A}+\mathbf{I}_p+(\mathbf{J}_p-\mathbf{I}_p)(a_{ji}\mathbf{A}-\mathbf{I}_p)\\ {} &{}\quad +(a_{ij}\mathbf{A}-\mathbf{I}_p)(\mathbf{J}_p-\mathbf{I}_p)\\ &{}=-(p\mathbf{I}_p-\mathbf{J}_p)+a_{ij}\mathbf{A}+a_{ij}\mathbf{A}+(p-2)\mathbf{I}_p-\mathbf{J}_p-a_{ij}\mathbf{A}-\mathbf{I}_p-\mathbf{J}_p-a_{ij}\mathbf{A}+\mathbf{I}_p\\ &{}=-\mathbf{J}_p\\ \mathrm{{Thus}}\,\mathbf{X}\mathbf{X}^\prime &{}=p^2\mathbf{I}_{p^2}-\mathbf{J}_{p^2}. \end{array}\)
\(\square \)
Theorem 3.4.5
The columns of the matrix D are orthogonal.
Proof
The cross product of \(i\mathrm{th}\) and \(j\mathrm{th}\) elements of B,
\(\begin{array}{rl} \displaystyle \sum _{k=1}^pb_{ki}b_{kj} &{}= \displaystyle \sum _{k=1,~k\ne i,j}^pb_{ki}b_{kj}+b_{ii}b_{ij}+b_{ji}b_{jj}+b_{(p+1),i}b_{(p+1),j} \\ &{}=\displaystyle \sum _{k=1,~k\ne i,j}^{p}(a_{ki}\alpha )(a_{kj}\alpha )+(-\beta )(a_{ij}\alpha )+(a_{ji}\alpha )(-\beta )+\beta .\beta \\ &{}=\displaystyle \sum _{k=1,~k\ne i,j}^{p}a_{ki}a_{kj}(\alpha .\alpha )+a_{ij}((-\beta ).\alpha )+a_{ji}(\alpha .(-\beta ))+c \\ &{}=c\displaystyle \sum _{k=1}^{p}a_{ki}a_{kj}+0+0+c \\ &{} =-c+c=0. \end{array}\)
Similarly, it can be shown that the columns of C are also orthogonal. Now we want to show that any column of B is orthogonal to any column of C. For this, we consider the cross product of \(i\mathrm{th}\) column of B and \(j\mathrm{th}\) column of C: \(\begin{array}{rl} \displaystyle \sum _{k=1}^pb_{ki}c_{kj} &{}= \displaystyle \sum _{k=1,~k\ne i,j}^pb_{ki}c_{kj}+b_{ii}c_{ij}+b_{ji}c_{jj}+b_{(p+1),i}c_{(p+1),j} \\ &{}=\displaystyle \sum _{k=1,~k\ne i,j}^{p}(a_{ki}\alpha )(a_{kj}\beta )+(-\beta )(a_{ij}\beta )+(a_{ji}\alpha )(\alpha )+\beta .(-\alpha ) \\ &{}=\displaystyle \sum _{k=1,~k\ne i,j}^{p}a_{ki}b_{kj}(\alpha .\beta )+a_{ij}((-\beta ).\beta )+a_{ji}(\alpha .(-\alpha ))+0=0-c+c+0=0 \end{array}\)
\(\square \)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer India
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Das, P., Dutta, G., Mandal, N.K., Sinha, B.K. (2015). OCDs in Randomized Block Design Set-Up. In: Optimal Covariate Designs. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2461-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2461-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2460-0
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2461-7
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)