Multi-Market Firms and Export Quota: Effects of Withdrawal of the Multi-Fiber Arrangement

  • Saibal Kar
  • Mausumi Kar
Part of the India Studies in Business and Economics book series (ISBE)


The international trade in goods and services is dominated by multi-market firms. A firm’s decision to sell in the domestic market vis-à-vis the foreign market depends on a number of factors including transport costs, price uncertainties and the barriers to trade. We study the effect of a reduction in non-tariff barriers or quotas on the optimal decision of firms to allocate output between the domestic market and the foreign market. We offer a theoretical analysis on how firms reallocate sales between multiple markets when the exogenous barriers are lifted. We find that the theoretical conjecture might get valid support from the evolving pattern of exports by a large number of textile and apparel manufacturing firms originating in India. Principally, we obtain a condition under which the choice of the firm to operate in multiple markets depends on the relative strengths of how profit at the margin reacts to price uncertainty in one of the markets, as compared to the effect of the sales in one market on the price of another. It seems that the withdrawal of the quota since 2005 has led to a greater focus on the domestic market for Indian firms, and within the country there has also been an increased concentration of firms. We used the Hirschman-Herfindahl Index to measure if Indian firms have become more concentrated in terms of sales during the previous 2 decades. The concentration of firms has unambiguously increased in the past 2 years.


Transport Cost World Trade Organization Foreign Market Domestic Market Export Market 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This chapter has benefited from the presentation at the Annual General Conference on Contemporary Issues in Development Economics at Jadavpur University, December 2014 and CTRPFP National Conference at CSSSC held in February 2015. The usual disclaimer applies.


  1. Appelbaum RP, Bonacich E, Quan K (2005) The end of apparel quotas: a faster race to the bottom? Center for Global Studies, UC Santa Barbara, October 15–16, 2004.
  2. Bair J. Dussel Peters E (2006) Global commodity chains and endogenous growth: export dynamism and development in Mexico and Honduras. World Development 34(2):203–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dalal A, Katz E (2003) The multi-market firm, transportation costs, and the separation of the output and allocation decisions. Oxf Econ Pap 55:644–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gereffi G (2004) Industrial adjustment in the North Carolina textile and clothing industry, Presentation at the Global Apparel/Clothing Europe Conference at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, October 15–16, 2004.
  5. Gherzi Report (2003) Benchmarking of costs of production of textile products in India vis-à-vis China, Pakistan, Indonesia, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka. Swiss Textile Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  6. Gibbon P (2008) Governance, entry barriers, upgrading: re-interpretation of some GVC concepts from the experience of African garment exports. Compet Change 12(1):29–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Harris R (1985) Why voluntary export restraints are ‘Voluntary’. Can J Econ 18(4):799–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hashim DA (2005) Post-MFA: making the textile and garment industry competitive. Econ Polit Wkly 40:117–127. (January 8)Google Scholar
  9. Kar M (2012) National and global aspects of India’s textiles and apparel industry and trade: an overview. South Asian J Macroecon Public Finance 1(1):81–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kar M, Kar S (2011) The multi fibre arrangement and South Asia. In: Murshed SM et al (eds) South-South globalisation challenges and opportunities for development. Routledge, UKGoogle Scholar
  11. Kar M, Kar S (2014) Trade policy and inequality: evidence from post-MFA India and a theoretical model, forthcoming. UNU-WIDER Working Paper SeriesGoogle Scholar
  12. Katz E, Paroush J (1979) The effect of forward markets on exporting firms. Econ Lett 4:272–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Knappe M (2003) Textiles and clothing: what happens after 2005? Int Trade Forum 1(2):16. (International Trade center)Google Scholar
  14. Krishna K (1988) What do voluntary export restraints do? NBER Working Paper No. 2612. NBER, Mass, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Marjit S, Kabiraj T, Mukherjee A (2009) Quota as a competitive device. In: Kamigashi T, Zhao L (eds) International trade and economic dynamics: essays in memory of Koji Shimomura. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  16. Richardson DJ (1971) Constant market share analysis of export growth. J Int Econ 1:227–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tewari M (2006) Adjustments in India’s textile and apparel industry: reworking historical legacies in a post-MFA world. Environ Plan A 38(12):2325–2344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Trela I, Whalley J (1990) Global effects of developed country trade restrictions on textiles and apparel. Econ J 100(403):1190–1205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. United Nations Commission on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (2005) TNCs and the removal of textiles and clothing quotas, current studies in FDI and development. UNCTAD, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. United States International Trade Commission (USITC) (2004) Textiles and apparel: assessment of the competitiveness of certain foreign suppliers to the US market. USITC, Washington D.C. (Report declassified in January 2004)Google Scholar
  21. WTO (2004) Background Statistical Information With Respect to Trade in Textiles and Clothing, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  22. Yano M (1989) Voluntary export restraints and expectations: an analysis of export quotas in oligopolistic markets. Int Econ Rev 30(4):707–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Studies in Social SciencesKolkataIndia
  2. 2.IZABonnGermany
  3. 3.Women’s Christian CollegeKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations