Skip to main content

Multi-Market Firms and Export Quota: Effects of Withdrawal of the Multi-Fiber Arrangement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Understanding Development

Part of the book series: India Studies in Business and Economics ((ISBE))

Abstract

The international trade in goods and services is dominated by multi-market firms. A firm’s decision to sell in the domestic market vis-à-vis the foreign market depends on a number of factors including transport costs, price uncertainties and the barriers to trade. We study the effect of a reduction in non-tariff barriers or quotas on the optimal decision of firms to allocate output between the domestic market and the foreign market. We offer a theoretical analysis on how firms reallocate sales between multiple markets when the exogenous barriers are lifted. We find that the theoretical conjecture might get valid support from the evolving pattern of exports by a large number of textile and apparel manufacturing firms originating in India. Principally, we obtain a condition under which the choice of the firm to operate in multiple markets depends on the relative strengths of how profit at the margin reacts to price uncertainty in one of the markets, as compared to the effect of the sales in one market on the price of another. It seems that the withdrawal of the quota since 2005 has led to a greater focus on the domestic market for Indian firms, and within the country there has also been an increased concentration of firms. We used the Hirschman-Herfindahl Index to measure if Indian firms have become more concentrated in terms of sales during the previous 2 decades. The concentration of firms has unambiguously increased in the past 2 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Uruguay Round of GATT launched at Punta Del Este led to the Agreement on Textiles and Clothing (ATC) in 1995. It is the institutional shape given to the promise to end quotas in an orderly process within 10 years divided into three consecutive phases.

  2. 2.

    If the firms are not identical and vary in terms of size, while being part of a competitive market, the export share can be proportional to the size, and the domestic demand facing the firm should also have different intercepts. Presently, it should not alter our results. In future extensions we wish to consider a distribution of firms on a scale of size and/or risk aversion to cultivate potential differences in the choice problem.

  3. 3.

    Dalal and Katz (2003) show that a positive profit and positive sale in the export market are feasible even if the export price is lower than the domestic price (essentially if the marginal transport cost at home exceeds that for the foreign country).

References

  • Appelbaum RP, Bonacich E, Quan K (2005) The end of apparel quotas: a faster race to the bottom? Center for Global Studies, UC Santa Barbara, October 15–16, 2004. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/40f8w19g

  • Bair J. Dussel Peters E (2006) Global commodity chains and endogenous growth: export dynamism and development in Mexico and Honduras. World Development 34(2):203–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalal A, Katz E (2003) The multi-market firm, transportation costs, and the separation of the output and allocation decisions. Oxf Econ Pap 55:644–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi G (2004) Industrial adjustment in the North Carolina textile and clothing industry, Presentation at the Global Apparel/Clothing Europe Conference at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, October 15–16, 2004. http://www.unc.edu/depts/europe/conferences/04/global/papers.htm

  • Gherzi Report (2003) Benchmarking of costs of production of textile products in India vis-à-vis China, Pakistan, Indonesia, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka. Swiss Textile Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbon P (2008) Governance, entry barriers, upgrading: re-interpretation of some GVC concepts from the experience of African garment exports. Compet Change 12(1):29–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris R (1985) Why voluntary export restraints are ‘Voluntary’. Can J Econ 18(4):799–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashim DA (2005) Post-MFA: making the textile and garment industry competitive. Econ Polit Wkly 40:117–127. (January 8)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kar M (2012) National and global aspects of India’s textiles and apparel industry and trade: an overview. South Asian J Macroecon Public Finance 1(1):81–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kar M, Kar S (2011) The multi fibre arrangement and South Asia. In: Murshed SM et al (eds) South-South globalisation challenges and opportunities for development. Routledge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Kar M, Kar S (2014) Trade policy and inequality: evidence from post-MFA India and a theoretical model, forthcoming. UNU-WIDER Working Paper Series

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz E, Paroush J (1979) The effect of forward markets on exporting firms. Econ Lett 4:272–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knappe M (2003) Textiles and clothing: what happens after 2005? Int Trade Forum 1(2):16. (International Trade center)

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishna K (1988) What do voluntary export restraints do? NBER Working Paper No. 2612. NBER, Mass, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Marjit S, Kabiraj T, Mukherjee A (2009) Quota as a competitive device. In: Kamigashi T, Zhao L (eds) International trade and economic dynamics: essays in memory of Koji Shimomura. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DJ (1971) Constant market share analysis of export growth. J Int Econ 1:227–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tewari M (2006) Adjustments in India’s textile and apparel industry: reworking historical legacies in a post-MFA world. Environ Plan A 38(12):2325–2344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trela I, Whalley J (1990) Global effects of developed country trade restrictions on textiles and apparel. Econ J 100(403):1190–1205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Commission on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (2005) TNCs and the removal of textiles and clothing quotas, current studies in FDI and development. UNCTAD, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • United States International Trade Commission (USITC) (2004) Textiles and apparel: assessment of the competitiveness of certain foreign suppliers to the US market. USITC, Washington D.C. (Report declassified in January 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • WTO (2004) Background Statistical Information With Respect to Trade in Textiles and Clothing, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Yano M (1989) Voluntary export restraints and expectations: an analysis of export quotas in oligopolistic markets. Int Econ Rev 30(4):707–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This chapter has benefited from the presentation at the Annual General Conference on Contemporary Issues in Development Economics at Jadavpur University, December 2014 and CTRPFP National Conference at CSSSC held in February 2015. The usual disclaimer applies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saibal Kar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer India

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kar, S., Kar, M. (2016). Multi-Market Firms and Export Quota: Effects of Withdrawal of the Multi-Fiber Arrangement. In: Banerjee, S., Mukherjee, V., Haldar, S. (eds) Understanding Development. India Studies in Business and Economics. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2455-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2455-6_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi

  • Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2454-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2455-6

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics