Trade in Intermediate Goods, Endogenous Growth and Intellectual Property Rights

  • Bidisha Chakraborty
Part of the India Studies in Business and Economics book series (ISBE)


The present chapter develops a product cycle model of North-South trade and integrates the Romer (1990) model and Helpman (1993) model. In this chapter, North innovates the variety of intermediate goods, and South imitates it. Final goods are not traded, while a variety of capital-intensive intermediate goods are traded. The effect of intellectual property rights on economic growth is studied. It is shown that a unique steady-state balanced growth equilibrium may exist, or there may be multiple steady-state equilibria, and tighter intellectual property rights may lead to both a higher and a lower steady-state balanced growth rate depending on the human capital endowment of both the countries.


Human Capital Final Good Intermediate Good Balance Growth Balance Growth Path 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



I am grateful to the participants of the DEGIT 2011 conference for their valuable comments.


  1. Akiyama T, Furukawa Y (2009) Intellectual property rights and appropriability of innovation. Econ Lett 103:138–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Eicher T, Penalosa CG (2008) Endogenous strength of intellectual property rights: implications for economic development and growth. Eur Econ Rev 52:237–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Falvey R, Foster N, Greenaway D (2004) Intellectual Property Rights and Economic Growth. Research Chapter 2004/12, Research chapter series, Internationalisation of Economic Policy, The University of NottinghamGoogle Scholar
  4. Gould DM, Gruben WC (1996) The role of intellectual property rights in economic growth. J Dev Econ 48:323–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Grossman G, Helpman E (1991a) Quality ladders in the theory of growth. Rev Econ Stud 58:43–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Grossman G, Helpman E (1991b) Endogenous product cycles. Econ J 101:1229–1241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Helpman E (1993) Innovation, imitation, and intellectual property rights. Econometrica 61(6):1247–1280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lai E (1998) International intellectual property rights protection and rate of product innovation. J Dev Econ 55(1):133–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mondal D, Gupta MR (2008a) Intellectual property rights protection and unemployment in a North South model: a theoretical analysis. Econ Model 25:463–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mondal D, Gupta MR (2008b) Innovation, imitation and intellectual property rights: introducing migration in Helpman’s model. Jpn World Econ 20:369–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rivera Batiz LA, Romer PM (1991) Economic integration and endogenous growth. Q J Econ 106(2):531–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Romer P (1990) Endogenous technological change. J Polit Econ 98(5):S71–S102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Schneider PH (2005) International trade, economic growth and intellectual property rights: a panel data study of developed and developing countries. J Dev Econ 78:529–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ventura J (1997) Growth and interdependence. Q J Econ 112(1):57–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsJadavpur UniversityKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations