Skip to main content

Trade in Intermediate Goods, Endogenous Growth and Intellectual Property Rights

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Understanding Development

Part of the book series: India Studies in Business and Economics ((ISBE))

  • 690 Accesses

Abstract

The present chapter develops a product cycle model of North-South trade and integrates the Romer (1990) model and Helpman (1993) model. In this chapter, North innovates the variety of intermediate goods, and South imitates it. Final goods are not traded, while a variety of capital-intensive intermediate goods are traded. The effect of intellectual property rights on economic growth is studied. It is shown that a unique steady-state balanced growth equilibrium may exist, or there may be multiple steady-state equilibria, and tighter intellectual property rights may lead to both a higher and a lower steady-state balanced growth rate depending on the human capital endowment of both the countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See, for example, Helpman (1993); Grossman and Helpman (1991a); Lai (1998); Akiyama and Furukawa (2009); Mondal and Gupta (2008a, b); Eicher and Penalosa (2008); Schneider (2005); Falvey et al. (2004); Gould and Gruben (1996), etc.

  2. 2.

    See Grossman and Helpman (1991b)

  3. 3.

    In Romer’s (1990) model . Hence, in Romer’s (1990) model. Note that since the R&D sector is perfectly competitive, the profit of the R&D firm\(\pi_r^n = 0\).

  4. 4.

    A detailed derivation is given in the Appendix.

References

  • Akiyama T, Furukawa Y (2009) Intellectual property rights and appropriability of innovation. Econ Lett 103:138–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eicher T, Penalosa CG (2008) Endogenous strength of intellectual property rights: implications for economic development and growth. Eur Econ Rev 52:237–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falvey R, Foster N, Greenaway D (2004) Intellectual Property Rights and Economic Growth. Research Chapter 2004/12, Research chapter series, Internationalisation of Economic Policy, The University of Nottingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould DM, Gruben WC (1996) The role of intellectual property rights in economic growth. J Dev Econ 48:323–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman G, Helpman E (1991a) Quality ladders in the theory of growth. Rev Econ Stud 58:43–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman G, Helpman E (1991b) Endogenous product cycles. Econ J 101:1229–1241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helpman E (1993) Innovation, imitation, and intellectual property rights. Econometrica 61(6):1247–1280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai E (1998) International intellectual property rights protection and rate of product innovation. J Dev Econ 55(1):133–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondal D, Gupta MR (2008a) Intellectual property rights protection and unemployment in a North South model: a theoretical analysis. Econ Model 25:463–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondal D, Gupta MR (2008b) Innovation, imitation and intellectual property rights: introducing migration in Helpman’s model. Jpn World Econ 20:369–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera Batiz LA, Romer PM (1991) Economic integration and endogenous growth. Q J Econ 106(2):531–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer P (1990) Endogenous technological change. J Polit Econ 98(5):S71–S102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider PH (2005) International trade, economic growth and intellectual property rights: a panel data study of developed and developing countries. J Dev Econ 78:529–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ventura J (1997) Growth and interdependence. Q J Econ 112(1):57–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to the participants of the DEGIT 2011 conference for their valuable comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bidisha Chakraborty .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Profit of intermediate good firm of North is

$$ \pi_x^n = p_n^nx_n^n + p_s^nx_s^n-{r_n}(x_n^n + x_s^n). $$

Using Eq. (6.15), we have

$$ \pi_x^n = \alpha {p^n}{x^n}, $$
(6.39)

where \({x^n}\) is given by Eq. (6.2).

From Eq. (6.23), we have

$$ P_A^n = \frac{{\pi_x^n}}{{({r^n} + m)}}. $$
(6.40)

From Eq. (6.15) we know that \(p_n^n = p_s^n = {p^n}\). Hence, replacing \({p^n}\) by \(p_n^n\) given by Eq. (6.11) in Eq. (6.39), we have

$$ \pi_x^n = \alpha (1-\alpha){P_n}{T_n}{(H_n^Y)^\alpha }{(x_n^n)^{-\alpha }}(x_n^n + x_s^n). $$
(6.41)

Using Eqs. (6.40) and (6.41), we have

$$ P_A^n = \frac{1}{{({r^n} + m)}}\alpha (1-\alpha){P_n}{T_n}{(H_n^Y)^\alpha }{(x_n^n)^{-\alpha }}(x_n^n + x_s^n). $$
(6.42)

Using Eqs. (6.20) and (6.42), we have

$$ w_A^n = P_A^n{\delta_n}A = \frac{1}{{({r^n} + m)}}\alpha (1-\alpha){P_n}{T_n}{(H_n^Y)^\alpha }{(x_n^n)^{-\alpha }}(x_n^n + x_s^n){\delta_n}A. $$

Now, using Eqs. (6.13), (6.14) and (6.18), we have

$$ \frac{{x_n^s}}{{x_n^n}}=(\frac{{{r_s}}}{{{r_n}}}{)^{-\frac{1}{\alpha }}}{(1-\alpha)^{-\frac{1}{\alpha }}}$$

and

$$ \frac{{x_s^n}}{{x_n^n}}=(\frac{{{P_s}{T_s}}}{{{P_n}{T_n}}}{)^{\frac{1}{\alpha }}}\frac{{H_s^Y}}{{H_n^Y}}. $$

Equating \(w_A^n\) and \(w_Y^n\) given by the Eq. (6.25) and using the expressions of \(\frac{{x_n^s}}{{x_n^n}}\) and \(\frac{{x_s^n}}{{x_n^n}},\) we have \(H_n^Y\) given by Eq. (6.26).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer India

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chakraborty, B. (2016). Trade in Intermediate Goods, Endogenous Growth and Intellectual Property Rights. In: Banerjee, S., Mukherjee, V., Haldar, S. (eds) Understanding Development. India Studies in Business and Economics. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2455-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2455-6_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi

  • Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2454-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2455-6

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics