Does Parental Education Have Any Role to Play on Female Child Disadvantage?

  • Soma Mandal
  • Arpita Ghose
Part of the India Studies in Business and Economics book series (ISBE)


In contrast to the existing studies that employ community level data to find out the discrimination against female child, the present chapter uses household level primary survey data from a small area of West Bengal, India, since the incidence of the discrimination against female child can properly be analysed using household level primary survey data. The existence of female child disadvantage (FCD) is verified by comparing female–male underweight level for each household following the World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) criterion. Nutritional deficiency is calculated using “WHO child growth standards” and “WHO reference 2007” tables for (i) children aged up to 5 years and (ii) children aged more than 5 and up to 6 years, respectively. The effect of an increase in the level of education of both father and mother of the child on the existence of FCD is tested separately along with family income, whether there is the custom of dowry, working status of the mother, the religion and cast of household as the other explanatory variables. It is found that 61.19 % of the sample households show bias against female children. An increase in education level of both mother and father reduces the probability of the existence of FCD, whereas the existence of the custom of dowry increases such probability. Thus, enhancing the education level of the parents and undertaking different measures for eradicating the dowry system such as making the existing law on dowry much more stringent and arranging different programmes to make people aware of the values of females are necessary for reducing the prevalence of FCD.


Educational Attainment Male Child Female Child Severe Malnutrition Acute Malnutrition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The fund provided for the project by the Centre for Advanced Studies, Department of Economics, Jadavpur University is gratefully acknowledged.


  1. Asfaw A, Lamanna F, Klasen S (2010) Gender gap in parents’ financing strategy for hospitalization of their children: evidence from India. Health Econ 19(3):265–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhuiya A, Streatfield K (1991) Mothers’ education and survival of female children in a rural area of Bangladesh. Popul Studies 45:253–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bisika T, Mandere G (2008) Integration of nutrition in the antiretroviral therapy scale up plan for Malawi. Malawi Med J 20(3):93–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chowdhury MK (1994) Mother’s education and effect of son preference on fertility in MATLAB, Bangladesh. Popul Res Policy Rev 13:257–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coale AJ (1991) Excess female mortality and the balance of sexes in the population: an estimate of the number of ‘missing females’. Popul Dev Rev 17:517–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dasgupta M (1987) Selective discrimination against female children in rural Punjab, India. Popul Dev Rev 13:77–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dasgupta M, Mari Bhat PN (1997) Fertility decline and increased manifestation of sex bias in India. Popul Studies 51:307–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dyson T, Moore M (1983) On kinship structure, female autonomy and demographic behaviour in India. Popul Dev Rev 9:35–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hatti N, Sekhar TV, Larsen M (2004) Lives at risk: declining child sex ratios in India. Lund Pap Econ Hist 93:1–42.; 2004. Accessed 8 April 2011Google Scholar
  10. Jayachandran S, Kuziemko I (2009) Why do mothers breastfeed girls less than boys? Evidence and implications for child health in India. NBER Working Paper No. 15041Google Scholar
  11. Karve I (1965) Kinship organization in India. Asia Publishing House, BombayGoogle Scholar
  12. Kishor S (1993) May god give sons to all: gender and child mortality in India. Am Soc Rev 58:247–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Klasen S (1994) Missing women reconsidered. World Dev 22:1061–1071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Klasen S, Wink C (2002) Missing women: current trends in gender bias inmortality. Fem Econ 28(2):285–312Google Scholar
  15. Pal S (1999) An analysis of childhood malnutrition in rural India: role of gender, income and other household characteristics. World Dev 27:1151–1171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pande RP (2003) Selective gender differences in childhood nutrition and immunization in rural India: the role of siblings. Demography 40:395–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pitt MM, Rosenzweig MR, Hassan MdN (1990) Productivity, health and inequality in the intra-household distribution of food in low-income countries. Am Eco Rev 80:1139–1156Google Scholar
  18. Sen A (1989) Women’s survival as a development problem. Bull Am Acad Arts & Sci 43:14–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sen A (1990a) Gender and cooperative conflict. In: Tinker I (ed) Persistent inequalities: women and world development. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Sen A (1990b) More than 100 million women are missing. The New York Review of Books, 20 December, 60–66Google Scholar
  21. Accessed 12 Dec 2014
  22. Accessed 12 Dec 2014

Copyright information

© Springer India 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsJadavpur UniversityKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations