Abstract
Language processing takes place in a social context. Accordingly, it adjusts itself to the social situation. Using the case of interactions with non-native speakers, this chapter illustrates how the identity of our interlocutor influences which cues we attend to during language processing, and when and how these cues are utilised. It further demonstrates how an adjustment in allocation of attention can have cascading linguistic and social consequences. At the same time, the studies described in this chapter show that the flexibility of the language processing mechanisms is constrained by listeners’ cognitive resources and by the rate at which shifting in processing manner is required. Together, this chapter demonstrates the importance of studying cognitive processes in different social contexts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Anderson, M. C., Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(5), 1063–1087.
Arnold, J. E., Hudson Kam, C. L., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2007). If you say thee uh—you’re describing something hard: The on-line attribution of disfluency during reference comprehension. The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 33, 914–930.
Chambers, C. G., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Magnuson, J. S. (2004). Actions and affordances in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 687–696.
Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., Bunting, M. F., Therriault, D., & Minkoff, S. (2002). A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 30, 163–183.
Duffy, S. A., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K. (1988). Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 429–446.
Dumontheil, I., Apperly, I. A., & Blakemore, S. J. (2010). Online use of mental state inferences continues to develop in late adolescence. Developmental Science, 13(2), 331–338.
Epley, N., van Keysar, B., Boyen, L., & Gilovich, T. (2004). Perspective Taking as Egocentric Anchoring and Adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(3), 327–339.
Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (2005). Aging in context: Age-related changes in context use during language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 42, 133–142.
Ferreira, F., Ferraro, V., & Bailey, K. G. D. (2002). Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 11–15.
Grodner, D., & Sedivy, J. C. (2011). The effects of speaker-specific information on Pragmaticinferences. In N. Pearlmutter & E. Gibson (Eds.), The processing and acquisition of reference (pp. 239–272). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Hanulikova, A., Van Alphen, P. M., Van Goch, M., & Weber, A. (2012). When one person’s mistake is another’s standard usage: The effect of foreign accent on syntactic processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(4), 878–887.
Johnson, K., Strand, E. A., & D’Imperio, M. (1999). Auditory-visual integration of talker gender in vowel perception. Journal of Phonetics., 27, 359–384.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122–149.
Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., Balin, J. A., & Brauner, J. S. (2000). Taking perspective in conversation: The role of mutual knowledge in comprehension. Psychological Science, 11, 32–38.
Lev-Ari, S. (2015). Comprehending non-native speakers: Theory and evidence for adjustment in manner of processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1546.
Lev-Ari, S., Barr, D., & Keysar, B. (under review). Listeners are better attuned to non-native speakers’ perspectives.
Lev-Ari, S., Ho, E., & Keysar, B. (2011). Interacting with non-native speakers induces “good-enough” representation. Poster presented at The 24 th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing. CA: Stanford.
Lev-Ari, S., & Keysar, B. (2012). Less-detailed representation of non-native language: Why non-native speakers’ stories seem more vague. Discourse Processes, 49, 523–538.
Levelt, W. J. M. (1983). Monitoring and Self-Repair in Speech. Cognition, 14(1), 41–104.
McQueen, J. M., & Huettig, F. (2012). Changing only the probability that spoken words will be distorted changes how they are recognized. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(1), 509–517.
Niedzielski, N. (1999). The effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables. Journal of language and social psychology, 18(1), 62–85.
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2007). Do people use language production to make bpredictions during comprehension? Trends in cognitive sciences, 11(3), 105–110.
Sturt, P., Sanford, A. J., Stewart, A. J., & Dawydiak, E. (2004). Linguistic focus and good-enough representations: an application of the change-detection paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 882–888.
Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. E. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 1632–1634.
Traxler, M. J., Williams, R. S., Blozis, S. A., & Morris, R. K. (2005). Working memory, animacy, and verb class in the processing of relative clauses. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 204–224.
Uther, M., Knoll, M. A., & Burnham, D. (2007). Do you speak E-NG-LI-SH? A comparison of foreigner-and infant-directed speech. Speech Communication, 49(1), 2–7.
Van Berkum, J., van den Brink, D., Tesink, C. M., Kos, M., & Hagoort, P. (2008). The neural integration of speaker and message. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 580–591.
Veling, H., & van Knippenberg, A. (2004). Remembering can cause inhibition: Retrieval-induced inhibition as cue independent process. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 315–318.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer India
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lev-Ari, S. (2015). Adjusting the Manner of Language Processing to the Social Context: Attention Allocation During Interactions with Non-native Speakers. In: Mishra, R., Srinivasan, N., Huettig, F. (eds) Attention and Vision in Language Processing. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2443-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2443-3_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2442-6
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2443-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)