Abstract
The focus of educational policy over the years has been to reduce absentees and dropouts in the age group of 6–14 years. The RTE Act, 2009 wishes to ensure quality education for each child up to class VIII as a matter of legal right. Children who are dropouts and non-attendees learn in their own ways from real-life experiences. When they are compulsorily brought in or enticed into school classrooms, the responsibility of teachers and the school increases enormously to ensure that the children have adequate education to develop their talents and eventually to secure their livelihood. Our teachers who are trained in the traditional system of teaching are required to reorient themselves in order to adapt to the new methods of teaching. This requires capacity building in the modes of teaching; otherwise the dropouts and non-attendees will lose interest in studies and will stop coming to schools altogether. The extreme diversity in the background of students and their teachers has to be managed by following new pedagogical paradigms with an eye to vocational options and to certain principles of psychology. The syllabus of the teacher training institutes (TTI) should incorporate materials related to the psychology of dropout and non-attendee children. At the level of recruitment, teachers may be given a teacher aptitude test before they take the entrance examination for TTI admissions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Dash, M., & Khan, F. (2001). Impact of guided k-learning on the cognitive performance of low and high achievers. Psychological Studies, 46(1–2), 14–20.
DES Publication (2006). School matters. The report of the task force on student behavior in second level schools. SESS.ie/documents-and-publications/otherdes.
Doran, J. (2011). Inclusive education framework. NCSE: Bangor University, USA.
Govindaraju, R., & Venkatesan, S. (2010). A study on school dropouts in rural settings. Journal of Psychology, 1(1), 47–53.
Mukunda, K. V. (2009). What did you ask at school today?—A handbook of child learning. Noida, UP: Harper Collins Publishers.
National Sample Survey Organization (NSSR) Report. (2009–2010). 66th Round.
NCERT. (2005). National curriculum framework (2005). New Delhi: NCERT.
NUEPA. (2012a). Education for all: Status and trends. New Delhi: NUEPA.
NUEPA. (2012b). Elementary education in India progress towards UEE. New Delhi: NUEPA.
Pratham. (2010). Annual status of education report (rural), January 15, New Delhi.
Ricconuni, P., J., Loujeania, W. B., Antonis, K. & Dalun, Z. (2012). Cognitive behavioral interventions: An effective approach to help students with disabilities stay in school. Effective interventions in dropout prevention: A practice brief for educators.
Sajjad, H., Iqbal, M., Siddiqui, M. A. et al., (2012). Socio economic determinants of primary school dropouts: Evidence from south east Delhi, India. European Journal of Social Sciences, 30(3), 391–399.
SPDD. (2012). School dropouts in Cambodia, India, Tajikistan and Timor-Leste. School dropout prevention Pilot Program. Creative.
Uma, R. R. (2011). Reasons for rising school dropout rates of rural girls in India—An analysis using soft computing approach. International Journal of Current Research, 3(9), 140–143.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer India
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Veeraraghavan, V. (2016). Dropouts to Learners: The Challenge of the Right to Education Act 2009. In: Deb, S. (eds) Child Safety, Welfare and Well-being. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2425-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2425-9_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2424-2
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2425-9
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)