Skip to main content

A “Collective Impact Framework” to Improve Output and Outcomes in Disaster Reconstruction Programs

  • Chapter
Managing Humanitarian Logistics

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics ((SPBE))

  • 1981 Accesses

Abstract

Day by day the man-made and the natural disasters are on the rise. Reconstruction, the longest duration of the post-disaster phases, is going through various challenges in terms of resourcing and effectiveness of execution. Resourcing of resources that include funds for reconstruction programs is generally received from government or from donors through international agencies. Because of the economic condition, many countries as donor are not able to fulfill the increased demand. As a result, the gap in fulfillment vs. requirement of resources in the reconstruction programs is increasing. From the experience of the author, it is also felt that there is enough room for improvement in the execution approach, which can significantly improve the output and outcomes of the reconstruction programs. Keeping this in view this paper discusses about a framework that focuses on collective impact. Collective impact is a powerful approach and is beyond collaboration. It is understood from academic literature that there are successful examples of collective impact in addressing social issues. This approach of collective impact is represented in the form of a framework in this paper. When this framework is implemented, it can help to get more output and outcomes from the available resources in the reconstruction programs. The paper identifies elements of best practices followed to get more output either in service delivery or in product development process in world-leading companies making use of the author’s experience as a practitioner and review of articles associated with social sector innovation. In writing this paper the author has blended his academic interest with the learning from his experience both in social sector and in corporate. This paper is the starting point to the implementation of the defined framework. It provides a valuable framework for practitioners and also for academicians. From a practitioner’s point of view, it is important to validate the positive impact of this framework in reconstruction programs, and from an academician’s point of view, it is important to see how further details and value can be added to this. This paper seeks to integrate the experience and understanding the opportunity for improvement in reconstruction programs with the concepts in the literatures associated with disaster management and social sector innovation. This paper will help the practitioner to experiment and bring improvement to the present approach of working in reconstruction programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander O, Yves P (2009) Business model generation. Osterwalder Alexander and Pigneur Yves (Self-published), Amsterdam. ISBN 978-2-8399-0580-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns LR, DeGraaff RA, Danzon PM, Kimberly JR, Kissick WL, Pauly MV (2002) The Wharton school study of the health care value chain. In: Burns LR (ed) The health care value chain: producers, purchasers, and providers. Wiley Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 3–26. ISBN 978-0-7879-6021-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Chia S, Zalzala A, Zalzala L, Karimi A (2013) Towards intelligent technologies for a self-sustainable, RFID-based, decentralized rural e-Health system. IEEE Technol Soc Mag 32(1):36–43, IEEE, Spring 2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jack W, Suri T (2010) The Economics of M-PESA. http://www.mit.edu/~tavneet/M-PESA.pdf

  • Kania J, Kramer M (2011) Collective Impact. Stanford Soc Innov Rev. http://www.ssireview.org/articles/entry/collective_impact

  • Le Masurier J, Rotimi JOB, Wilkinson S (2006) A comparison between routine construction and post-disaster reconstruction with case studies from New Zealand. In: Boyd D (ed) Proceedings of 22nd annual ARCOM conference, 4–6 September 2006, Birmingham, UK, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, pp 523–530

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuinness E (2011) Can health micro-insurance protect the poor. Microfinance Opportunities, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters DH, Garg A, Bloom G, Walker DG, Brieger WR, Rahman MH (2008) Poverty and access to health care in developing countries. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1136:161–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinead B, Helen S, Lesley G (2008) Small-scale evaluation in health: a practical guide. SAGE, Los Angeles. ISBN 978-1-4129-3006-2

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debashish Naik .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer India

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Naik, D. (2016). A “Collective Impact Framework” to Improve Output and Outcomes in Disaster Reconstruction Programs. In: Sahay, B., Gupta, S., Menon, V. (eds) Managing Humanitarian Logistics. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2416-7_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics