Advertisement

Is Higher Order Aberration Associated with Reduced Visual Acuity in Children?

  • Damber Thapa
  • William R. Bobier
  • Kaamran Raahemifar
  • Vasudevan Lakshminarayanan
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Physics book series (SPPHY, volume 166)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine whether the retinal image quality metrics calculated from the optical aberrations of the eye account for variation in visual acuity (VA) as measured by high contrast single letter chart. Strehl ratios and modulation transfer functions (MTF) were calculated from the ocular aberrations obtained from Hartmann-Shack images of pre-school children aged from 3 to 6 years. The Strehl ratios were grouped into three VA groups of 6/6, 6/9 and 6/12 and compared. No significant differences in Strehl ratios were observed. This finding suggests that optical aberrations alone do not completely describe the visual performance of the eye.

Keywords

Visual acuityVisual Acuity Root Mean Square Refractive Error Modulation Transfer Function Visual Performance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the industrial grant support from the Welch Allyn Company.

References

  1. 1.
    Rozema JJ, Van-Dyck DE, Tassignon MJ (2006) Clinical comparison of 6 aberrometers part 2: statistical comparison in a test group. J Cataract Refract Surg 32:33–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Seiler T, Mrochen M, Kaemmerer M (2000) Operative correction of ocular aberrations to improve visual acuity. J Refract Surg 16:S619–S622Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Williams D, Yoon G, Porter J, Guirao A, Hofer H, Cox I (2000) Visual benefit of correcting higher order aberrations of the eye. J Refract Surg 16:S554–S559Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Levy Y, Segal O, Avni I, Zadok D (2005) Ocular higher-order aberrations in eyes with supernormal vision. Am J Ophthalmol 139:225–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Villegas E, Alcn E, Artal P (2008) Optical quality of the eye in subjects with normal and excellent visual acuity. IOVS 49:4688–4696Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thapa D, Fleck A, Lakshminarayanan V, Bobier WR (2011) Ocular wavefront aberration and refractive error in pre-school children. J Mod Opt 58:1681–1689CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Miller D (2003) Physiologic optics and refraction. In: Kaufman PL, Alm A (eds) Alders physiology of the eye. Mosby Inc. Missouri, pp 161–194Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Applegate RA, Marsack JD (2005) Higher order optical aberrations predict visual acuity. IOVS 45:3613 E-AbstractGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marsack JD, Thibos LN, Applegate RA (2004) Metrics of optical quality derived from wave aberrations predict visual performance. J Vis 4:322–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lakshminarayanan V (2010) Model for predicting vision from a knowledge of wavefront aberrations. In: Khijwania S, Sharma AK (eds) [PHO-TONICS 2010] Proceedings of International Conference of Fiber Optics and Photonics, Viva Books, New Delhi, India, pp 165–170Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Damber Thapa
    • 1
  • William R. Bobier
    • 1
  • Kaamran Raahemifar
    • 4
  • Vasudevan Lakshminarayanan
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Optometry and Vision ScienceUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada
  2. 2.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada
  3. 3.Department of PhysicsUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada
  4. 4.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringRyerson UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations