Skip to main content

Conceptualisations of Nature in Indian Traditions of Thought

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Nature in Indian Philosophy and Cultural Traditions

Abstract

This chapter analyses the equivalents of the term “nature” in Indian philosophy. After an initial survey of various concepts related to nature, I discuss in some detail a few terms like prakŗti, nisarga , padārtha, and dravya from different schools of Indian philosophy. The process of evolution and creation of the material world and the way things are related to each other is described. As some of these terms persist in the contemporary times as equivalents of nature, I dwell at length on some pre-modern interpretations of these concepts and also briefly suggest the ecological implications of such understandings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For details on some of these sacred beliefs, see Chap. 7 of this book on the idea of nature landscapes as sacred.

  2. 2.

    I am aware here that the idea is more about translation of “concepts” which can be regarded under the same theories and philosophy of translation. Many of these ideas presented here are a result of my discussion with Dr. Sundar Sarukkai on his paper “Translating Concepts: some issues in the methodology of history of non-Western science” (Sarukkai 2010).

  3. 3.

    From a discussion with Dr. Sundar Sarukkai in February 2010.

  4. 4.

    Detailed examples of such usages will be provided in the following sections of this chapter.

  5. 5.

    This meaning was provided by Sri Siddharth Arya, one of the few traditional Sāṁkhya scholars of the gurukul system in India.

  6. 6.

    Like in verbs such as nipatati—falls down, and niṣati—sits down.

  7. 7.

    Emphasis in the original quotation.

  8. 8.

    These elements will be discussed in detail in Chap. 4.

  9. 9.

    The term used by Potter and Bhattacharyya (1993) is resider–residence, but since the primitive locus of the Nyāya is a loci relationship that can be defined by “in” or “at” or “on”, the translation “residence” seems to be biased to view of the loci as a container that I want to avoid. The possibilities of shelter are not spatiotemporal or related to materiality in this case.

  10. 10.

    In philosophical context, the relation between whole and parts is a much debated subject and to refer to nature as whole constituted by parts is also problematic.

  11. 11.

    Valid knowledge called prama can be obtained by direct perception according to almost all Indian philosophies.

  12. 12.

    Prakṛti forms a part of the dyad the material principle that coexists with the Consciousness principle (Purușa). See the following Sect. 3.5 on Sāṃkhya philosophy for more details.

  13. 13.

    For example, prakritic soundarya (in Hindi)—natural beauty, etc. The word paryāvaran (in Hindi) seems to indicate “environment” word in recent times. It means covered around and is very similar to the etymology of “environs”—“around,” from en- “in” + viron “circle, circuit,” from (French) virer “to turn”.

  14. 14.

    The prefix “pari” refers to complete, entire. From S. v “Pari” in Monier-Williams, Leumann, and Cappeller, A Sanskrit English Dictionary, Parisara is used to refer to nature in the Kannada language.

  15. 15.

    For the original verse, see “Sāṁkhya Kārika, Verse 3”, trans. Sinha (1979, II ed. Reprint, p. 4).

  16. 16.

    Material does not refer to the gross matter alone but encompasses all created “stuff” of the universe.

  17. 17.

    These elements are earth, water, fire, air, and ethereal space. See Chap. 4 for a discussion on the five elements.

  18. 18.

    The Vaiśeṣika reference is in sense or quality, or property of something. See Narain (1961), for an interesting discussion on guṇa.

  19. 19.

    See Vijnāna Bhikṣu’s commentary of “Sāṁkhya Pravachana-Sūtram, Book I, Sūtra 61” in Sinha (1979, p. 95).

  20. 20.

    Summary and translation by Potter and Larson, in Larson and Bhattacharya (1987, p. 154).

  21. 21.

    For a detailed discussion on tripartite process that links material effect and the material cause, see Larson and Bhattacharya (1987, pp. 99–101).

  22. 22.

    Prakṛta is used in the geometry of altar construction where the measuring stick is divided into four lengths each called prakṛta prakrama—ordinary measure (from Jacobsen 2002, p. 31).

  23. 23.

    And also from S. v “kṛtrima” in Monier-Williams, Leumann, and Cappeller, A Sanskrit English Dictionary, p. 303.

  24. 24.

    This philosophy provides an interesting alternative to the problems of advaita where the reality of the world is only an appearance . For more on advaita, also see Nelson (2000).

References

  • Apte, V. S. (1986). The student’s sanskrit English dictionary. 1899 reprint. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnhart, M. G. (1997). Ideas of nature in an Asian context. Philosophy East and West, 47(3), 417–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, N. N. (1982). History of the tantric religion. New Delhi: Manohar Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruun, O., & Kalland, A. (Eds.). (1995). Images of nature: An introduction. In Asian perceptions of nature: A critical approach (pp. 1–24). Richmond: Nordic Institute of Asia Studies, Curzon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chari, S. (2004/1988). Fundamentals of Viśiṣṭādvaita Vedānta: A study based on Vedānta Deśika’s Tattvamuktākalāpa. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, S. (1922). A history of Indian philosophy (Vol.1). 2004 reprint. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Private Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande, M. (1993). Sanskrit and Prakrit: Sociolinguistic issues. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, J. (Ed.). (1977). Introduction.  In A. Swami Hariharananda (commentary and translation) ‘Sāṁkhya—sutras’ of Panchashika and Sāṁkhyakhyatattvaloka. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottelieb, R. S. (Ed.). (2004). Introduction. In This sacred Earth: Religion, nature, environment. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halbfass, W. (1992). On being and what there is: Classical Vaiaseosika and the history of Indian ontology. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, K. A. (2002). Prakṛti in Sāṁkhya-yoga: Material principle, religious experience, ethical implications. Reprint. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Pvt. Limited, Indian edition. (First published by Peter Lang Publishing, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsley, D. (1995). Ecology and religion: Ecological spirituality in a cross cultural perspective. New Jersey: Prentice hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, G. J. (1979). Classical Sāṁkhya: An interpretation of its history and meaning (2nd ed.). New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, G. J., &  Bhattacharya, R. S. (Eds.). (1987). Sāṁkhya: A dualist tradition in Indian philosophy, Encyclopedia of Indian philosophies (Vol. 4). Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. (2005). Zoos: A philosophical tour. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, J. N. (1999). Reason and tradition in Indian thought: An essay on the nature of Indian philosophical thinking. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, J. N. (2000). Moral philosophy. In Classical Indian philosophy. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monier-Williams, M., Ernst, L., & Carl, C. (1990). A Sanskrit English dictionary. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers. (First Published by Oxford University Press, 1899)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumme, P. Y. (2000). The potential contribution of Śrivaiṣṇavism. In L. E. Nelson (Ed.), Purifying the earthly body of God: Religion and ecology in Hindu India (pp.133–163). New Delhi: D K Printworld (P) Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narain, H. (1961). Finding an English equivalent for ‘Guṇa’. Philosophy East and West, 11(1/2), 45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayanan, V. (2001). Water, wood, and wisdom: Ecological perspectives from the Hindu traditions. Daedalus—Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Science (online). www.amacad.org/publications/fall2001/narayanan.aspx (Accessed 25 May, 2004).

  • Nelson, L. (2000). The dualism of non-dualism: Advaita Vedanta and the irrelevance of nature. In L. E. Nelson (Ed.), Purifying the earthly body of god: Religion and ecology in Hindu India (pp. 61–88). New Delhi: D.K Printworld (P) Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, K. H. (1977). The encyclopedia of Indian philosophies: Indian metaphysics and epistemology, Vol. 2 of encyclopedia of Indian philosophies. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, K. H. & Bhattacharyya, S. (Eds). (1993). Metaphysics. In Indian philosophical analysis: Nyāya-Vaiśeṣika from Gaṅgeśa to Raghunātha Śiromaṇi, Vol. 6 of encyclopedia of Indian philosophies. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, K. B. R. (1963). The Guṇas of Prakṛti according to the Sāṃkhya Philosophy. Philosophy East and West, 13(1): 61–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolston, H. I. I. I. (1987). Can the east help the west to value nature? Philosophy East and West, 37(2), 172–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarukkai, S. (2002). Translating the world: Science and language. Lanham: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarukkai, S. (2010). Translation as method: Implications for history of science. In B. Lightman, L. Stewart, & G. McOuat, (Eds.), Circulating knowledge (to appear). Leiden: Brill Press. Also as preprint paper, Translating concepts: Some issues in the methodology of history of non-western science, presented in the Conference Circulating Knowledge, East and West, University of King’s College Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, July 21–23 (By the courtesy of author).

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, R. P. (2005). Environment and vedic literature. In D. C. Srivastava (Ed.), Readings in environmental ethics: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 106–114). Jaipur: Rawat Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, J. (2006). Indian philosophy (Vols. 1 & 2). 1952 reprint. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, N. (Trans.). (1979). The Saṃkhya philosophy (2nd ed.). 1915 reprint. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharilal Publishers Pvt. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meera Baindur .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer India

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baindur, M. (2015). Conceptualisations of Nature in Indian Traditions of Thought. In: Nature in Indian Philosophy and Cultural Traditions. Sophia Studies in Cross-cultural Philosophy of Traditions and Cultures, vol 12. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2358-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics