Success Factors

  • Chitra Sharma
Part of the Management for Professionals book series (MANAGPROF)


Success factors are the last “tan” of the Process Tangram. These are the factors that differentiate a process transformation program from others. The success factors covered in this chapter are leadership commitment, clear strategy and vision, value focus, quality, innovation, speed, process orientation, portfolio management approach, adequate funding, cross-functional teams, flexible IT architecture, MIS, and knowledge assets. This chapter provides insight into how these factors affect the transformation. It also provides a perspective on how these factors can be effectively utilized to maximize the benefits.


Business Process Transformation Program Process Orientation Knowledge Asset Failure Cost 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Barret DJ (2014) Leadership communication. McGraw-Hill Education, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Bettenhausen KL (1991) Five years of group research: what we have learned and what needs to be addressed. J Manag 17:345–381Google Scholar
  3. Bono ED (2009) Lateral thinking. Be more creative and productive. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Campanella J (1999) Principles of quality costs: principles, implementation, and use. ASQ Quality Press, MilwaukeeGoogle Scholar
  5. Carayannis EG, Gonzalez E (2003) Creativity and innovation = competitiveness? When, how and why. In: Shavinina LV (ed) The international handbook on innovation. Pergamon, Amsterdam, pp 587–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chesbrough HW (2006) Era of open innovation. In: Mayle D (ed) Managing innovation and change. Sage, London, pp 127–138Google Scholar
  7. Conboy K, Fitzgerald B (2004) Innovative systemic perspectives: toward a conceptual framework of agile methods: a study of agility in different disciplines. In: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM workshop on Interdisciplinary software engineering research. ACM, New York, pp 37–44Google Scholar
  8. Davenport TH (2013) Process innovation: reengineering work through information technology. Harvard Business Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  9. Deming WE (1993) Foundation of management of quality in the Western world. In: The new economics for industry, government, education, Centre for advanced engineering study. MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  10. Ganz M (2010) Leading change leadership, organization, and social movements In: Nohria N, Khurana R (eds) Handbook of leadership theory and practice. Harvard Business School Publication, Boston, pp 509–550Google Scholar
  11. Garvin DA (1984) What does product quality really mean? Sloan Manage Rev 26(1):25–43Google Scholar
  12. Godar SH, Ferris SP (2004) Virtual and collaborative teams, process technologies and practice. Idea Group Inc., LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gundry LK, Prather CW, Kickul JR (1994) Building the creative organization. Org Dyn, Spring, 22(4):22–37Google Scholar
  14. Halpern BL, Lubar K (2003) Dramatic techniques to reach out, motivate and inspire leadership presence. Gotham Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Hammer M, Champy J (1993) Reengineering the corporation: a Manifesto for business revolution. Harper Business, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Hargadon A, Sutton RI (2000) Building an innovation factory. Harv Bus Rev, (May–June), pp 157–166Google Scholar
  17. Heifetz RA, Laurie DL (1998) The work of leadership, Harvard business review on leadership. Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
  18. Kotter JP (1996) Leading change. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  19. Kugelar M, Vieting M (2003) Design of a process oriented structure. In: Jörg B, Kugeler M, Rosemann M (eds) Process management: a guide for the design of business processes. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 166–167Google Scholar
  20. Liebowitz J, Beckman T (1998) Knowledge organizations, what every manager should know. CRC Press LLC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  21. Majchrzak A (2008) Breaking the functional mind-set, the role of information technology. In: Grower V, Markus ML (eds) Business process transformation, vol 9, Advance in management information systems. M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, pp 125–140Google Scholar
  22. McCormack K (1999) The development of a measure of business process orientation and its link to the interdepartmental dynamics construct of market orientation. Accessed 1 Oct 2014
  23. McCormack KP, Johnson WC (2001) Business process orientation: gaining the e-Business competitive advantage. CRC Press LLC, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The knowledge creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Quality glossary, ASQ. Accessed 1 Oct 2014
  26. Radjou N, Prabhu J, Ahuja S (2012) Jugaad innovation, a frugal and flexible approach to innovation for the 21st century. Random House India, Jossy-Bass, Wiley, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  27. Regev G, Soffer P, Schmidt R (2006) Taxonomy of flexibility in business processes, business process modeling, development, and support. Accessed 1 Oct 2014
  28. Schaffer SP (2010) Cross-disciplinary team learning. In: Watkins R, Leigh D (eds) Handbook of improving performance in the workplace. Selecting and implementing performance interventions, volume 2. International Society of Performance Improvement, Pfeiffer, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  29. Škrinjar RR, Štemberger MI, Hernaus T (2007) The impact of business process orientation on organizational performance. In: Proceedings of the 2007, Informing science and IT education joint conference. Accessed 1 Oct 2014
  30. Targowski AS (2002) Knowledge mapping and management. In: White D (ed). IRM Press, HersheyGoogle Scholar
  31. Tissen R, Andriessen D, Deprez FL (2000) The knowledge dividend, creating high performance companies through value-based knowledge management. Pearson Education Limited, HarlowGoogle Scholar
  32. Weingart AR, Cronin MA, Houser CJS, Kagan J, Vogel C (2005) Functional diversity and conflict in cross functional product development teams- considering representational gaps and task characteristics. In: Neider LL, Schriesheim CA (eds) Understanding teams. Information Age Publishing Inc., Greenwich, pp 89–110Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chitra Sharma
    • 1
  1. 1.ICT, Change and Process Management ProfessionalGurgaonIndia

Personalised recommendations