Advertisement

Transformation Program, Triggers, Goals, and Tools and Techniques

  • Chitra Sharma
Part of the Management for Professionals book series (MANAGPROF)

Abstract

The increasing complexity of dynamic external environment, technical advance, scarcity of resources, constant need of value addition, and organizational dynamics propels organizations to look for a mechanism to not only reach the desired state but also to create and maintain the capability to do so. This requires a transformation which involves the process of transformation itself as well as complete changes in terms of value add or utility. Process transformation is a commonly applied paradigm used to denote a journey of bringing about a substantial change and improvement typically on cross-functional processes in any organization. The first four “tans” of the process tangram, transformation program, triggers, goals, and tools and techniques, are covered in this chapter.

Keywords

Cash Flow Process Transformation Business Case Enterprise Architecture Payback Period 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Basu R (2011) FIT sigma a lean approach to building sustainable quality beyond six sigma. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  2. Chandra P (2011) Financial management, theory and practice. Tata McGraw-Hill Education, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  3. Chang RY, Niedzwiecki ME (1998) Continuous improvement tools: a practical guide to achieve quality results, vol 1. Wheeler Publishing, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  4. Dumas M, Rosa ML, Mendling J, Reijers HA (2013) Fundamentals of business process management. Springer, Berlin/HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eldenburg LG, Wolcott SK (2005) Cost management – measuring, monitoring and motivating performance. John Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  6. Hausser DL (1980) Comparison of different models for organizational analysis. In: Lawler EE III, Nadler DA, Cammann C (eds) Organizational assessment: perspectives on the measurement of organizational behavior and the quality of work life. Wiley, New York, p 133Google Scholar
  7. Hickson DJ, Pugh DS, Pheysey DC (1969) Operations technology and organization structure: an empirical reappraisal. Adm Sci Q 14(3):378–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Horngren CT et al (2009) Cost accounting – a managerial emphasis. Dorling Kindersley (India) Pvt. Ltd, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  9. Kaplan RS, Anderson SR (2007) Time-driven activity-based costing: a simpler and more powerful path to higher profits. Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation, BostonGoogle Scholar
  10. Khan MY, Jain PK (2010) Management accounting: text problems and cases. Tata McGraw-Hill, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  11. Ohlhorst FJ (2012) Big data analytics: turning big data into big money. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Raichura B, Rao V (2009) White paper – Lean IT transformation – reduce total cost of ownership, guarantee quality of service and achieve business agility. http://www.infosys.com/cloud/resource-center/documents/achieve-business-agility.pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2014
  13. Sproull B (2009) The ultimate improvement cycle – maximizing profit through the integration of lean six sigma and theory of constraints. CRC Press Taylor and Francis Group, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar

Suggested Reading

  1. Barfield JT, Raiborn CA, Kinney MR (2001) Cost accounting traditions and innovations. South Western, a Division of Thomson Learning, OhioGoogle Scholar
  2. Bogan CE, English MJ (1994) Benchmarking for best practices: winning through innovative adaptation. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Boxwell RJ Jr (1994) Benchmarking for competitive advantage. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Brealy RA, Myers SC, Allen F, Mohanty P (2007) Principles of corporate finance. Tata McGraw-Hill Education Private Limited, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  5. Burke R (2003) Project management – planning & control techniques. Wiley, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  6. Cabinet Office (2011) Managing successful programmes. The Stationery Office, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Cappels TM (2004) Financially focused project management. J. Ross Publishing, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  8. Chang RY, Niedzwiecki ME (1998) Continuous improvement tools, vol 2. Wheeler Publishing, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  9. Chin CMM, Spowage AC (2012) Project management methodologies: a comparative analysis. J Adv Perform Inf Value 4(1):106–118Google Scholar
  10. Cleland DI (1999) Project management – strategic design and implementation. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Coulson-Thomas C (1993) Transforming the company – bridging the gap between management myth and corporate reality. Kogan Page, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Davies C, Demb A, Espejo R (1979) Organization for program management. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Dragan ZM, Martinelli RJ, Waddell JM (2007) Program management for improved business results. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  14. Macdougall C (2014) Evolving programme governance models in a digital world. http://www.axelos.com/gempdf/Evolving_programme_governance_models_in_a_digital_world_White_Paper.pdf. Accessed 31 Oct 2014
  15. Gitlow H, Gitlow S, Oppenheim A, Oppenheim R, Irwin RD (1989) Tools and method for the improvement of quality. CRC Press, Homewood IrwinGoogle Scholar
  16. Harrington HJ (1996) The complete benchmarking implementation guide: total benchmarking management. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Lawler EE III, Nadler DA, Cammann C (1980) Organizational assessment – perspectives on the measurement of organizational behavior and the quality of work life, vol 2. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Project Management Institute (2013) The standard for program management. Project Management Institute, Newtown SquareGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chitra Sharma
    • 1
  1. 1.ICT, Change and Process Management ProfessionalGurgaonIndia

Personalised recommendations