Examining the Regional Imbalance in China: Comparison with India

  • Amitendu Palit
Part of the India Studies in Business and Economics book series (ISBE)


In the ninth chapter of this volume, the author carries out a cross-country analysis of India and China, the two giants of Asia. Having several common issues and threats between India and China, such comparative analyses can meaningfully provide inputs to India’s policy process. It is being argued that in the post-reform periods, both the nations have been facing very high regional disparity in their development. The socio-economic costs of a sustained divergence in income between their leading and backward regions have become a major policy challenge in development. The chapter therefore is significant, and explicitly highlights how regional imbalance in China has remained conspicuous, notwithstanding a conscious shift in development strategy towards balanced growth for several years. In spite of extensive state efforts to increase investment in the backward regions, economic activity remains sluggish in these regions, constraining growth of new income generating and earning opportunities. The author shows a clear comparative advantage in production in coastal areas. Specific development strategies are not easy, given that the Chinese economy has become far more market-oriented and globally integrated than what it was during the early years of economic transition. Under the current circumstances, state efforts and emphasis are not eliciting the desired response from the market forces. Furthermore, regional development strategies like the Go West, and the Western Development Strategy are producing partial outcomes that are accentuating intra-regional disparities and aggravating overall imbalance by expanding rural-urban differentials. This according to the author is an important lesson for India and other emerging economies that are also grappling with the challenge of regional imbalance.


Gross Domestic Product Capita Income Western Region Eastern Region Special Economic Zone 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Cai, F., D. Wang, and Y. Du. 2002. Regional disparity and economic growth in China: The impact of labour market distortions. China Economic Review 13:197–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chan, K. W., and M. Wang. 2008. Remapping China’s regional inequalities, 1990–2006: A new assessment of de facto and de jure population data. Eurasian Geography and Economics 49:21–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fan, C. C., and M. Sun. 2008. Regional inequality in China, 1978–2006. Eurasian Geography and Economics 49 (1): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fleisher, B., H. Li, and M. Zhao. 2010. Human capital, economic growth, and regional inequality in China. Journal of Development Economics 92 (2): 215–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fujita, M., P. Krugman, and A. J. Venables. 1999. The spatial economy. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Heng, Q. 2006. Income inequality in China and India: Structural comparison. Asia Scholarship Foundation, Asia Scholar, 4. Accessed 28 Jan 2013.
  7. Hoshino, M. 2011. Measurement of GDP per capita and regional disparities in China, 1979–2009. Discussion Paper DP2011–17, Kobe University, Japan, April 18. Accessed 5 Dec 2012.
  8. Kanbur, R., and X. Zhang. 2005. Fifty years of regional inequality in China: A journey through central planning, reform, and openness. Review of Development Economics 9 (1): 87–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lu, Z., and X. Deng. 2011. China’s western development strategy: policies, effects and prospects. MPRA Paper No. 35201, Munich Personal Repec Archive (MPRA), Accessed 20 Jan 2013.
  10. National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). 2011. Chinese statistical yearbook 2011. Beijing.Google Scholar
  11. Tsui, K. Y. 1996. Economic reform and interprovincial inequalities in China. Journal of Development Economics 50:353–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Zheng, Y., and M. Chen. 2007. China’s regional disparity and its policy responses. Briefing Series, Issue 25, China Policy Institute, University of Nottingham, September. Accessed 25 Jan 2013.

Copyright information

© Rajiv Gandhi Institute for Contemporary Studies 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of South Asian StudiesNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations