Advertisement

The Way Forward: Public Policy to Address Regional Imbalances in India, Process and Outcome

  • Rakhee Bhattacharya
Chapter
Part of the India Studies in Business and Economics book series (ISBE)

Abstract

Chapter ten emphasizes an alternative approach in policy making for regional development from conventional ‘top-down’ to a joint effort of concerned stakeholders involved in public and private domains. As economic regions are not recognized with their potentials and endowments, development performance at regional levels therefore tends to remain lopsided, arbitrary and under-utilised with political and administrative boundaries. Some such regions may require a real competitive edge by finding niches or by mainstreaming endogenous ideas and knowledge. Many a time such economic differences are deeply linked with longstanding unequal power relations between leading and backward regions. Political representation from advanced Indian regions along with strong central intervention continued to dominate in the decision-making and policy formation process, which has aggravated growth-gaps and uneven development outcomes, eventually made it difficult for backward regions to ‘catch-up’ and many have manifested with social unrest and conflicts. Therefore, by assessing all economic, social and political context of regional development, a knowledge-based policy intervention in the low-performing regions is extremely crucial. An optimum choice of policy strategy connecting potentialities, linkages, political voice and various other dynamics that influence both the pattern of growth and social justice across the regions, needs to be found out. Thus, political sensitization, democratization, awakening and analyses of regional development in India need to be prioritized in policy recommendation to redress the imbalance between the strong and weak regions. Therefore along with decentralized governance, a multi-level federalism, by transferring power to the local, regional and territorial levels, may be an important tool as local political institutions can better understand the aspirations and uniqueness of the local situations and can represent and respond adequately to their needs and demands.

Keywords

Regional Development Political Representation Regional Imbalance Performance Grant Multilevel Governance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Charbit, C. 2011. Governance of public policies in decentralised contexts: The multi-level approach. OECD Regional Development Working Papers, 2011/04, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5kg883pkxkhc-en. Accessed 20 Apr 2013.
  2. Election Commission of India. 2009. Election Commission of India, General Elections, 2009 (15th Lok Sabha) at http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/archiveofge2009/Stats/VOLI/03_NumberAndTypeOfConstituencies.pdf. Accessed 25 may 2013.
  3. Election Commission of India. 2014. Election Commission of India, General Elections Schedule, 2014 (16th Lok Sabha) at http://eci.nic.in/eci_main1/GE2014/Schedule/Home.htm.
  4. FAQs- Delimitation of Constituencies, Election Commission of India. 2014. Available via http://eci.nic.in/eci_main1/delimitation_faq.aspx. Accessed 21 Apr 2013.
  5. Gradus, Yehuda. 1983. The role of politics in regional inequality: The Israeli case. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 73 (3): 388–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Luger, M. I., and Maynard N. C. 2008. On the government's role in regional economic development. In Public policy for regional development, ed. J. Martinez-Vazquez, and F. Vaillancourt, 28–46. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Martinez-Vazquez, Jorge, and Francois, Vaillancourt, ed. 2008. Public policy for regional development. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Massey, D. 2001. The progress in human geography lecture, geography on the agenda. Progress in Human Geography 25 (1): 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Nijkamp, Peter. 2012. Regional development: Education and integration. Indian Journal of Regional Science 44 (1): 1–10.Google Scholar
  10. Pscharopoulos, George, and Harry Anthony, Patrinos. 1994. Indigenous people and poverty in Latin America: An empirical analysis. Washington, D. C.: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Report. 2006. World Development Report: Equity and Development. Washington, D. C.: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  12. Report. 2010. National strategy of regional development: Regions, cities, rural areas, 2010–2020. Warsaw. Ministry of Regional Development. Google Scholar
  13. Report. 2013. World Development Report. Washington, D.C: The world BankGoogle Scholar
  14. Statistical Report on General Elections. 1999. Statistical Report on General Elections, 1999 to the Thirteenth Lok Sabha Volume I, Election Commission of India at http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/SR_KeyHighLights/LS_1999/Vol_I_LS_99.pdf.

Copyright information

© Rajiv Gandhi Institute for Contemporary Studies 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rajiv Gandhi Institute for Contemporary StudiesRajiv Gandhi FoundationNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations