Abstract
The making of the ‘Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act 2010’ was one of the finest legislative endeavours in the recent times. The exercise was significant because nuclear energy and the consequences of pursuing such an energy form were debated extensively in the Parliament for the first time. The result was a liability law that had an exceptional domestic political acceptability, but in many ways appeared to defy conventional international practice. The international nuclear community, led by supplier countries and vendors has argued that the law should be amended to be compatible with the established practice of international nuclear liability law. Examining through two specific examples—limitation of liability and right of recourse, the author argues, that though the Indian law gives the impression of defiance, the Parliament has only utilised the provisions of international nuclear law conventions—expanding boundaries of interpretation. Further, a section on transboundary applicability of the Indian law, and India’s commitment under Convention on Supplementary Compensation to its neighbours is analysed to identify the operational difficulties.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Supplier shall include a person who—Manufactures and supplies, either directly or through an agent, a system, equipment or component or builds a structure on the basis of functional specification; or
Provides build to print or detailed design specifications to a vendor for manufacturing a system, equipment or component or building a structure and is responsible to the operator for design and quality assurances; or
Provides quality assurances or design services.
- 2.
Section 1(2) It extends to the whole of India.
(3) It also applies to nuclear damage suffered—(a) in or over the maritime areas beyond the territorial waters of India
(b) in or over the exclusive economic zone of India as referred to in Section 7 of the Territorial Waters, Continental Shelf, Exclusive Economic Zone and Other Maritime Zones Act, 1976; 80 of 1976.
(c) on board or by a ship registered in India under Section 22 of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 or under any other law for the time being in force; 44 of 1958.
(d) on board or by an aircraft registered in India under clause (d) of sub-Section (2) of Section 5 of the Aircraft Act, 1934 or under any other law for the time being in force; 22 of 1934.
(e) on or by an artificial island, installation or structure under the jurisdiction of India.
References
Abraham, M. (2011). Right of Recourse: Interpretation under Civil Liability for Damage Liability Rules, 2011. Retrieved November 19, 2011, from http://nuclearlaw.wordpress.com/2011/11/19/right-of-recourse-interpretation-under-civil-liability-for-damage-liability-rules-2011/.
Cherian, J. (2010). Safety last. The Frontline, 27(19), 98–100 (Frontline).
Currie, E. J. D. (2008). The problems and gaps in the nuclear liability conventions and an analysis of how an actual claim would be brought under the current existing treaty regime in the event of a nuclear accident. Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, 35(1), 85–127.
Curtis, L. (2010). India’s flawed nuclear legislation leaves U.S.–India partnership short. The Heritage Foundation. Retrieved July 24, 2012, from http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2010/08/indias-flawed-nuclear-legislation-leaves-us-india-partnership-short.
DAE. (2005). Joint Statement on India-USA Civil Nuclear Co-operation, viewed May 10, 2010, from http://www.dae.nic.in/?q=node/61.
Dikshit, S. (2011). U.S. wants IAEA to vet Indian liability law, The Hindu. Retrieved 20 July, viewed October 24, 2012, from http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/us-wants-iaea-to-vet-indian-liability-law/article2260867.ece.
Divan, S., & Rosencrantz, A. (2002). Environmental law and policy in India (3rd ed.). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Gopalakrishnan, A. (2011). Why the Nuclear Liability Rules Need to be Modified, DNA. Retrieved December 5, viewed November 23, 2013, from http://www.dnaindia.com/analysis/comment-why-the-nuclear-liability-rules-need-to-be-modified-1621411.
Greenpeace. (2010). Soli Sorabjee Opinion on Civil Nuclear Liability. Retrieved June 25, 2010, from http://www.greenpeace.org/india/en/publications/open-letter-from-greenpeace/soli-sorabjee-opinion-on-civil/.
Gruendel, R. J., & Kini, R. E. (2012). Through the looking glass: Placing India’s new civil liability regime for nuclear damage in context. Nuclear Law Bulletin, 1(89), 45–66.
Hariharan, A. (2011). India’s nuclear civil liability bill and supplier’s liability: One step towards modernizing the outdated international nuclear liability regime. William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review, 36(1), 223–255.
IAEA. (1997). The 1997 Vienna Convention on Civil Nuclear Liability for Nuclear Damage and 1997 Convention on Supplementary Convention for Nuclear Damage—Explanatory Texts, viewed March 20, 2010, from http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub1279_web.pdf.
IAEA. (2008). Communication dated 10 September 2008 received from the Permanent Mission of Germany to the Agency regarding a “Statement on Civil Nuclear Cooperation with India”, INFCIRC/734 (Corrected), IAEA. Retrieved April 27, 2012, from http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/2008/infcirc734c.pdf.
Jigeesh, A. M. (2012). Govt pulled up for diluting Civil Nuclear Liability Rules, Business Line. Retrieved August 28, 2013, from http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/industry-and-economy/govt-pulled-up-for-diluting-civil-nuclear-liability-rules/article3832551.ece.
Lok Sabha. (2010). Private sector participation in nuclear power sector, Unstarred Question no. 413. Retrieved January 18, 2012, from http://dae.nic.in/writereaddata/lsus240210.pdf.
Lok Sabha. (2011). New rules for civil nuclear liability, Unstarred question no. 2228. Retrieved June 2013, from http://dae.nic.in/writereaddata/2288-lsus071211.pdf.
Lok Sabha. (2012). Nuclear liability act, Unstarred Question No. 2932. Retrieved June 2013, from http://dae.nic.in/writereaddata/lsus2932.pdf.
Matveev, A. (2006). The Russian approach to nuclear liability. International Journal of Nuclear Law, 1(3), 270–286.
McRae, B. (2007). The convention on supplementary compensation for nuclear damage: Catalyst for a global nuclear liability regime. Nuclear Law Bulletin, 79(1), 17–36.
MEA. (2015). Frequently Asked Questions and Answers on Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act 2010 and related issues. Retrieved March 25, 2015, from http://www.mea.gov.in/press-releases.htm?dtl/24766/Frequently_Asked_Questions_and_Answers_on_Civil_Liability_for_Nuclear_Damage_Act_2010_and_related_issues.
OECD/NEA. (2014). Nuclear operator: Liability amounts and financial security limits, viewed March 30, 2015, from https://www.oecd-nea.org/law/2014-table-liability-coverage-limits.pdf.
Parliament of India, Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Science & Technology, Environment & Forests 2010, 212th report—“The Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Bill, 2010”. Retrieved June 16, 2011, from http://www.prsindia.org/uploads/media/Nuclear/SCR%20Nuclear%20Liability%20bill.pdf.
Pelzer, N. (2011). The Indian civil liability for nuclear damage act, 2010—legislation with flaws? ATW—International Journal for Nuclear Power, 56(1).
PTI. (2012). India’s liability law not in line with international norms: US, The Hindu 1 December. Retrieved December 30, 2013, from www.thehindu.com/news/international/indias-liability-law-not-in-line-with-international-norms-us/article4153366.ece.
Rajagopalan, R. P., & Purushothaman, U. (2012). Role of the Indian political system in shaping India’s nuclear policy. International Journal of Nuclear Law, 3(4), 246–258.
Ramachandran, R. (2010). A supplier’s deal? Frontline, 27(24) (Nov 20–Dec 03).
Ramachandran, R. (2011). Limiting liability. Frontline, 28(25) (Dec 03–16).
Sengupta, A., & Ambast, S. (2012). A dangerous recourse? A critical relook at section 17 of the civil liability for nuclear damage act, 2010. Journal of International Nuclear Law, 3(4), 292–307.
The Hindu. (2010). Raise cap in nuclear liability Bill to Rs.10,000 crore: Left, viewed August 24, 2013, from http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/raise-cap-in-nuclear-liability-bill-to-rs10000-crore-left/article569571.ece.
Srinivasan, M. R. (2012). A liability for our nuclear plans, The Hindu. Retrieved October 15, viewed October 15, 2012, from http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/a-liability-for-our-nuclear-plans/article3997102.ece.
Varadarajan, S. (2010a). Turn the nuclear bill from liability to asset, The Hindu. Retrieved June 16, viewed January 19, 2011, from http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/article458314.ece?homepage=true.
Varadarajan, S. (2010b). This is no way to write a law, The Hindu. Retrieved August 24, viewed February 17, 2011, from http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/article592116.ece?homepage=true.
Venkatesan, J. (2012). Supreme Court to examine constitutional validity of nuclear civil liability law, The Hindu. Retrieved March 17, viewed May 25, 2012, from http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/supreme-court-to-examine-constitutional-validity-of-nuclear-civil-liability-law/article3004778.ece.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer India
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ram Mohan, M.P. (2015). The Indian Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act, 2010: An Analysis. In: Nuclear Energy and Liability in South Asia. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2343-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2343-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2342-9
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2343-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawLaw and Criminology (R0)