Advertisement

Hybridization-Based Markers

  • B. D. Singh
  • A. K. Singh

Abstract

Qualitative traits have long been used for genetic studies, including the preparation of linkage maps. They were also used as markers to identify genomic regions involved in the control of quantitative traits. Their usefulness as markers prompted the search for other more abundant, easily detectable and stable characteristics leading to the development of protein-based and, finally, DNA-based markers. In the current parlance, morphological and protein-based markers are called classical markers, while DNA markers are referred to as molecular markers. DNA-based markers represent variation in genomic DNA sequences of different individuals. Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) was the first DNA marker, but it was technically demanding and required considerable time for marker genotyping. Therefore, efforts were made to develop more user-friendly marker systems; as a result, several different marker systems like RAPDs, DAF, AFLP, SCAR, SSR, etc. were developed. DNA marker systems have been classified on the basis of different criteria, such as chronology of their development, genomic location and functional significance, and the method of marker detection. On the basis of detection method, the DNA markers are classified into three groups, viz., hybridization-based, PCR-based, and sequence-based markers. The marker systems RFLP, diversity array technology (DArT), variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs), single-feature polymorphism (SFP), and restriction-site-associated DNA (RAD) markers are detected by DNA:DNA hybridization. This chapter is devoted to the discussion of these hybridization-based marker systems, their salient features, as well as the advantages and limitations of these marker systems.

Keywords

Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Amplify Fragment Length Polymorphism Functional Marker Target Region Amplification Polymorphism Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Marker 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Akbari M, Wenzl P, Caig V et al (2006) Diversity arrays technology (DArT) for high-throughput profiling of the hexaploid wheat genome. Theor Appl Genet 113:1409–1420PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson JR, Lubberstedt T (2003) Functional markers in plants. Trends Plant Sci 8:554–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bagge M, Lubberstedt T (2008) Functional markers in wheat: technical and economic aspects. Mol Breed 22:319–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beckmann JS, Soller M (1983) Restriction fragment length polymorphism in genetic improvement: methodologies, mapping and cost. Theor Appl Genet 67:35–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beckmann JS, Soller M (1986) Restriction fragment length polymorphism in genetic improvement. Oxford Surv Plant Mol Cell Biol 3:197–250Google Scholar
  6. Borevitz JO, Liang D, Plouffe D et al (2003) Large-scale identification of single-feature polymorphisms in complex genomes. Genome Res 13:513–523PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Botstein D, White R, Skolnick M et al (1980) Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Human Genet 32:314–331Google Scholar
  8. de Vienne D (ed) (2003) Molecular markers in plant genetics and biotechnology. Science Publishers, EnfieldGoogle Scholar
  9. de Vienne D, Santoni S, Falque M (2003) Principal sources of molecular markers. In: de Vienne D (ed) Molecular markers in plant genetics and biotechnology. Science Publishers, Enfield, pp 3–46Google Scholar
  10. Grodzicker T, Williams J, Sharp P et al (1974) Physical mapping of temperature-sensitive mutations of adenoviruses. Cold Spring Harbor Symmp Quant Biol 39:439–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gupta PK, Roy JK, Prasad M (2001) Single nucleotide polymorphisms: A new paradigm for molecular marker technology and DNA polymorphism detection with emphasis on their use in plants. Current Sci 80:524–535Google Scholar
  12. Helentjaris TG (1992) RFLP analysis for manipulating agronomic traits in plants. In: Stalker HT, Murphy JP (eds) Plant breeding in the 1990s. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 357–372Google Scholar
  13. Hill JT, Demarest BL, Bisgrove BW et al (2013a) MMAPPR: mutation mapping analysis pipeline for pooled RNA-seq. Genome Res 23:687–697PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hill TA, Ashrafi H, Reyes-Chin-Wo S et al (2013b) Characterization of Capsicum annuum genetic diversity and population structure based on parallel polymorphism discovery with a 30K Unigene pepper GeneChip. PLoS ONE 8:e56200. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056200 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hill-Ambroz KL, Brown-Guedira GL, Fellers JP (2002) Modified rapid DNA extraction protocol for high throughput microsatellite analysis in wheat. Crop Sci 42:2088–2091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jaccoud D, Peng K, Feinstein D et al (2001) Diversity arrays: a solid state technology for sequence independent genotyping. Nucleic Acids Res 29:e25PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jeffreys AJ, Wilson V, Thein SL (1985) Hypervariable ‘minisatellite’ regions in human DNA. Nature 314:67–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jiang G-L (2013) Molecular markers and marker-assisted breeding in plants. InTech http://dx.doi. org. 10.5772/52583
  19. Jones CJ, Edwards KJ, Castaglione S et al (1997) Reproducibility testing of RAPD, AFLP and SSR markers in plants by a network of European laboratories. Mol Breed 3:381–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Miller MR, Dunham JP, Amores A et al (2007) Rapid and cost-effective polymorphism identification and genotyping using restriction site associated DNA (RAD) markers. Genome Res 17:240–248PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Muller-Starck G (1998) Isozymes. In: Karp A, Isaac PG, Ingram DS (eds) Molecular tools for screening biodiversity. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 75–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Murray HG, Thompson WF (1980) Rapid isolation of high molecular weight DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 8:4321–4325PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rafalski JA, Tingey SV (1993) Genetic diagnostics in plant breeding: RAPDs, microsatellites and machines. Trends Genet 9:275–280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd edn. Cold Springer Harbor Laboratory, NYGoogle Scholar
  25. Sax K (1923) Association of size differences with seed-coat pattern and pigmentation in Phaseolus vulgaris. Genetics 8:552–560PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Singh BD (2012b) Biotechnology, expanding horizons, 4th edn. Kalyani Publishers, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  27. Stussey T (1990) Plant taxonomy. Columbia Univ Press, NYGoogle Scholar
  28. Tanksley SD, Orton TJ (eds) (1983) Isozymes in plant genetics and breeding. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  29. Thoday JM (1961) Location of polygenes. Nature 191:368–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wenzl P, Carling J, Kudrna D et al (2004) Diversity arrays technology (DArT) for whole-genome profiling of barley. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:9915–9920PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Winzeler EA, Richards DR, Conway AR et al (1998) Direct allelic variation scanning of the yeast genome. Science 281:1194–1197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Xu Y (2010) Molecular plant breeding. CAB International, WallingfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Author(s) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. D. Singh
    • 1
  • A. K. Singh
    • 2
  1. 1.School of BiotechnologyBanaras Hindu UniversityVaranasiIndia
  2. 2.Division of GeneticsIndian Agricultural Research InstituteNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations