Advertisement

Phylogenetic Relationships and Genetic Diversity

  • B. D. Singh
  • A. K. Singh

Abstract

The success of crop improvement activities depends on the presence of adequate amounts of genetic diversity within a given crop species. Genetic diversity is detectable as genetic differences among the genotypes, strains, clones, or populations of a species. The proper and judicious utilization of genetic resources necessitates reliable quantification of the existing genetic diversity in the different crop plants. This analysis facilitates the identification of diverse genotypes/lines that could be used as parents in hybridization programs to recover superior recombinants or to broaden the genetic base of the elite germplasm of the crop. It also facilitates the identification of genotypes with special character(s) of considerable usefulness for the breeders. Conservation of the existing genetic diversity is one of the most important activities relevant to plant breeding since it minimizes the impact of genetic erosion associated with the modern agricultural practices and the developmental activities. Molecular markers are valuable tools for genetic diversity analyses and genetic profiling of germplasm accessions. Molecular marker profiling of the germplasm helps the rejection of duplicate accessions and the defining of a set of accessions that comprise the “core collection” and thereby makes germplasm conservation relatively more economical. In this chapter, the use of molecular markers for genetic diversity analysis, conservation of genetic diversity, unraveling the genetic basis of heterosis, identification of heterosis loci, and prediction of heterosis in specific cross combinations have been discussed.

Keywords

Genetic Distance General Combine Ability Inbreeding Depression Genetic Diversity Analysis Heterotic Group 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Baranwal VK, Mikkilineni V, Zehr UB (2012) Heterosis: emerging ideas about hybrid vigour. J Exp Bot 63:6309–6314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernacchi D, Beck BT, Eshed Y et al (1998) Advanced backcross QTL analysis in tomato. I. Identification of QTLs for traits of agronomic importance from Lycopersicon hirsutum. Theor Appl Genet 97:381–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernardo R (2001) What if we knew all the genes for a quantitative trait in hybrid crops? Crop Sci 41:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown SM, Kresovich S (1996) Molecular characterization for plant genetic resources conservation. In: Paterson AH (ed) Genome mapping in plants. RG Landes Company, Austin, pp 85–93Google Scholar
  5. Geering ADW (2013) Molecular markers for plant biosecurity. In: Henry RJ (ed) Molecular markers in plants. Wiley, USA, pp 99–117Google Scholar
  6. Goff SA (2011) A unifying theory for general multigenic heterosis: energy efficiency, protein metabolism, and implications for molecular breeding. New Phytol 189:923–937PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gowen JW (ed) (1952) Heterosis. Iowa State College, AmesGoogle Scholar
  8. Gower JC (1971) A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics 27:857–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hua J, Xing Y, Wu W et al (2003) Single locus heterotic effects and dominance-by-dominance interactions can adequately explain the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:2574–2579PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jaccord P (1908) Nouvelles researches sur la distribution florale. Bull Soc Vaudoise Sci Natl 44:223–270Google Scholar
  11. Kaeppler S (2012) Heterosis: many genes, many mechanisms—end the search for an undiscovered unifying theory. ISRN Botany 12 pages. doi: 10.5402/2012/682824
  12. Krishnan GS, Singh AK, Waters DLE et al (2013) Molecular markers for harnessing heterosis. In: Henry RJ (ed) Molecular markers in plants. Wiley, USA, pp 119–136Google Scholar
  13. Lee M, Godshalk EB, Lamke KR et al (1989) Association of restriction fragment length polymorphism among maize inbreds with agronomic performance of their crosses. Crop Sci 29:1067–1071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee EA, Ash MJ, Good B (2006) Re-examining the relationship between degree of relatedness, genetic effects, and heterosis in maize. Crop Sci 47:629–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lippman ZB, Zamir D (2007) Heterosis: revisiting the magic. Trends Genet 23:60–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Luo X, Wu S, Tian et al (2011) Identification of heterotic loci associated with yield-related traits in Chinese common wild rice (Oryza rufipogon Griff.). Plant Sci 181:14–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Melchinger AE (1999) Genetic diversity and heterosis. In: Coors JG, Pandey S (eds) The genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crop plants. ASA-CSSA, Madison, pp 99–118Google Scholar
  18. Melchinger AE, Lee M, Lamkey KR et al (1990) Genetic diversity for restriction fragment length polymorphism and heterosis for two diallel sets of maize inbreds. Theor Appl Genet 80:488–496PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mohammadi SA, Prasanna BM (2003) Analysis of genetic diversity in crop plants – salient statistical tools and considerations. Crop Sci 43:1235–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Moll RH, Lonnquist JH, Fortuna JV et al (1965) The relation of heterosis and genetic divergence in maize. Genetics 52:139–144PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Nei M, Li W (1979) Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:5269–5273PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Radoev M, Becker HC, Ecke W (2008) Genetic analysis of heterosis for yield and yield components in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) by quantitative trait locus mapping. Genetics 179:1547–1558PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Reif JC, Melchinger AE, Xia XC et al (2003) Genetic distance based on simple sequence repeats and heterosis in tropical maize populations. Crop Sci 43:1275–1282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rogers JS (1972) Measure of genetic similarity and genetic distance; studies in genetics, VIII. Univ Texas Publ 2713:145–153Google Scholar
  25. Rymer PD, Rossetto M (2013) Applications of molecular markers in plant conservations. In: Henry RJ (ed) Molecular markers in plants. Wiley, USA, pp 81–98Google Scholar
  26. Schnable PS, Springer NM (2013) Progress toward understanding heterosis in crop plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 64:71–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shi JQ, Li RY, Zou J et al (2011) A dynamic and complex network regulates the heterosis of yield correlated traits in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). PLoS One 6:e21645PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Singh BD (2012a) Plant breeding, principles and methods, 9th edn. Kalyani Publishers, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  29. Sokal RR, Michener CD (1958) A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. University Kansas Sci Bull 38:1409–1438Google Scholar
  30. Tanksley SD, Nelson JC (1996) Advanced backcross QTL analysis: a method for the simultaneous discovery and transfer of valuable QTLs from unadapted germplasm into elite breeding lines. Theor Appl Genet 92:191–203PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wright S (1978) Evolution and genetics of populations, vol IV. Univ of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  32. Yao H, Gray AD, Auger DL et al (2012) Genomic dosage effects on heterosis in triploid maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:265–269Google Scholar
  33. Yu SB, Li JX, Xu GC et al (1997) Importance of epistasis as the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:9226–9231PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhang H-Y, He H, Chen L-B et al (2008) A genome-wide transcription analysis reveals a close correlation of promoter INDEL polymorphism and heterotic gene expression in rice hybrids. Mol Plant 1:720–731PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Author(s) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. D. Singh
    • 1
  • A. K. Singh
    • 2
  1. 1.School of BiotechnologyBanaras Hindu UniversityVaranasiIndia
  2. 2.Division of GeneticsIndian Agricultural Research InstituteNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations