Remedies of Arsenic Problem and Environmental Legislation in Pakistan Regarding Arsenic

  • Abida Farooqi


Worldwide huge number of technologies are available for arsenic removal from arsenic-contaminated water. Some of these technologies include pre-oxidation of arsenic(III) to arsenic(V) by the use of different oxidants, as As(V) has high adsorbance capacity and reacts more strongly than As(III) (Ahmed et al. 2001).


Rice Husk High Adsorbance Capacity Environmental Legislation Arsenic Removal Maximum Allowable Limit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Ahmed FM (2001) An overview of arsenic removal technologies in Bangladesh and India. Technologies for arsenic removal from drinking water. A compilation of papers presented at the International Workshop on Technologies for Arsenic Removal from Drinking Water. Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh and the United Nations University, Tokyo. May 2001Google Scholar
  2. Altundogan HS, Altundogan S, Tumen F, Bildik M (2002) Arsenic adsorption from aqueous solutions by activated red mud. Waste Manag 22:357–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amin MN, Kaneco Kitagawa T, Begum A, Katsumata H, Suzuki T, Ohta K (2006) Removal of arsenic in aqueous solutions by adsorption onto waste rice husk. Ind Eng Chem Res 45:8105–8110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Azizullah A, Khattak MNK, Richter P, Hader DP (2011) Water pollution in Pakistan and its impact on public health—a review. Environ Int 37:479–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Diamadopoulos E, Loannidis S, Sakellaropoulos GP (1993) As (V) removal from aqueous solutions by fly ash. Water Res 27:1773–1777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Farooqi A, Masuda H, Firdous N (2007) Toxic fluoride and arsenic contaminated groundwater in the Lahore and Kasur districts, Punjab, Pakistan and possible contaminant sources. Environ Pollut 145:839–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Frey M, Owen DM, Chowdhury ZK, Raucher RS, Edwards MA (1998) Cost to utilities of a lower MCL for arsenic: water utilities need to begin now to evaluate their costs for complying with a lower MCL for arsenic. J Am Water Works Assoc 90:89–102Google Scholar
  8. GoP. Pakistan Environmental Protection Act (1997) Govt. of PakistanGoogle Scholar
  9. GoP. Pakistan Environmental Protection Ordinance (1983) Govt. of PakistanGoogle Scholar
  10. Mohan D, Chander S (2006) Single, binary, and multicomponent sorption of iron and manganese on lignite. J Colloid Interface Sci 299:76–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Thar Desert, Pakistan. Chemosphere 78, 1313–1321Google Scholar
  12. NEQS (1993) National environmental quality standards for municipal and liquid industrial effluents. Ministry of Environment, Government of PakistanGoogle Scholar
  13. NEQS (2010) National environmental quality standards for municipal and liquid industrial effluents. Ministry of Environment, Government of PakistanGoogle Scholar
  14. PCRWR (2004) National water quality monitoring programme. Water Quality Report 2001–2003. Islamabad, Pakistan: Pakistan Council for Research in Water Resources (PCRWR)Google Scholar
  15. Rubel F (2003) Removal of arsenic from drinking water by adsorptive media (EPA, Office of Research and Development [ORD] Report, EPA/600/R-03/019). Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  16. Sneddon R, Garelick H, Valsami-Jones E (2005) An investigation into arsenic (V) removal from aqueous solutions by hydroxylapatite and bonechar. Miner Mag 69:769–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental SciencesQuiad-i-Azam UniversityIslamabadPakistan

Personalised recommendations