Intensive Indoor and Outdoor Pilot-Scale Culture of Marine Copepods

  • Santhanam Perumal
  • S. Ananth
  • R. Nandakumar
  • T. Jayalakshmi
  • M. Kaviyarasan
  • Perumal Pachiappan


Copepods are more abundant than any other group of multicellular animals, including the hyper-abundant insects and nematodes. They consume phytoplankton and microorganisms, and they are in preyed upon by higher trophic levels, animals including fish and whales. In particular, they serve as primary prey for the larval stages of many fish species of economic importance. In aquaculture, copepods have been proven to be the much preferred and most adequate food for many marine fish larvae (Houde 1973; May et al. 1974; Kraul 1983, 1989, 1993) and are also used for the shrimp larvae (Shamsudin and Saad 1993). Good fish productivity of an aquatic ecosystem is related to the presence of copepods and their role as the main food component (May 1970; Bent 1993). The larvae of many marine fish require prey with size of about 50–100 μm wide at their first feeding stage (Detwyler and Houde 1970; Yufera and Pascual 1984). Even the rotifer of type “S” is too large in many cases (Houde 1973; May et al. 1974; Doi and Singhagraiwan 1993). The results concerning first feeding of commercially important fish on dry food organisms are encouraging (Fernandez-Dıaz and Yufera 1997; Cahu and Zambonino Infante 2001). However, live feeds cannot always be substituted because of biochemical and behavioural constraints of the fish larvae (Drillet et al. 2006).


Highly Unsaturated Fatty Acid Larval Rear Live Food Artemia Nauplius Marine Copepod 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The authors are thankful to the Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Govt. of India, New Delhi, India, for financial support to establish marine copepods culture facility and authorities of Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, India, for the facilities provided.


  1. Alvarez-Lajonchere L, Perez Sanchez L, Hernandez Molejon OG, Torres Gomez E (1996) Mass production of striped patao Eugerres brasilianus juveniles in Cuba. J World Aquac Soc 27:347–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ananth S, Santhanam P (2011) Laboratory culture and biochemical profile of marine copepod, Macrosetella gracilis (Dana). Aquaculture 12:49–55Google Scholar
  3. Bent U (1993) Methods for production of turbot fry based on copepods as food organisms. In: Carrillo M, Dahle L, Morales J, Sorgeloos P, Svennevig N, Wyban J (eds) From discovery to commercialization, osteden. Eur. Aquac. Soc. Spec. Publ., vol. 19. European Aquaculture Society, Oostende, p 609Google Scholar
  4. Cahu C, Zambonino Infante JZ (2001) Substitution of live food by formulated diets in marine fish larvae. Aquaculture 200:161–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Delbare D, Dhert P, Lavens P (1996) Zooplankton. In: Lavens P, Sorgeloos P (eds) Manual on the production and use of live food for aquaculture, vol 361, FAO Fish. Tech. Pap. Rome, FAO, pp 252–282Google Scholar
  6. Detwyler P, Houde ED (1970) Food selection by laboratory-reared larvae of the scaled sardine Harengula pensacolae (Pisces, Clupeidae) and the bay anchovy Anchoa mitchilli (Pisces, Engraulidae). Mar Biol 7:214–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Doi M, Singhagraiwan T (1993) Biology and culture of the red snapper, Lutjanus argentimaculatus. The Research Project of Fishery Resource Development in the Kingdom of Thailand, Rayong, Thailand, 51 ppGoogle Scholar
  8. Drillet G, Jorgensen NOG, Sorensen TF, Ramlov H, Hansen BW (2006) Biochemical and technical observations supporting the use of copepods as live feed organisms in marine larviculture. Aquac Res 37:756–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Edge R, McGarvey DJ, Truscott TG (1997) The carotenoids as antioxidants: a review. J Photochem Photobiol B 41:189–200CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Fernandez-Dıaz C, Yufera M (1997) Detecting growth in gilthead seabream, Sparus aurata L., larvae fed microcapsules. Aquaculture 153:93–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fox CJ, Harrop R, Wimpenny A (1999) Feeding ecology of herring (Clupea harengus) Baltic Sea herring and sprat. J Fish Biol 65:1563–1581Google Scholar
  12. Fujita S (1979) Culture of red sea bream, Pagrus major and its food. Spec. Publ.-EMS 14: 183–197Google Scholar
  13. Fukusho K (1980) Mass production of a copepod, Tigriopus japonicus in combination culture with a rotifer Brachionus plicatilis, fed omega-yeast as a food source. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 46(5):625–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Helland S, Terjesen BF, Berg L (2003) Free amino acid and protein content in the planktonic copepod Temora longicornis compared to Artemia franciscana. Aquaculture 215:213–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Houde ED (1973) Some recent advances and unsolved problems in the culture of marine fish larvae. Proc World Maric Soc 3:83–112Google Scholar
  16. Kanazawa A (1995) Effects of docosahexaenoic acid and phospholipids on stress tolerance of fish larvae. In: Lavens P, Jaspers E, Roelants I (eds) Larvi’95 fish and shellfish larviculture symposium. Spec. Publ., Eur Aquac Soc, vol 24. European Aquaculture Society, Ghent, p 105Google Scholar
  17. Kasturirangan LR (1963) A key for the identification of the more common planktonic copepoda of Indian coastal waters. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi (Publ Indian National Committee on Oceanic Research, No. 2), 87 ppGoogle Scholar
  18. Kinne O (1977) Marine ecology, vol III, Cultivation: Part 2. Wiley, New York, 1923 ppGoogle Scholar
  19. Kleppel GS (1993) On the diets of calanoid copepods. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 99:183–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kovalenko E, D’Abramo L, Ohs C, Buddington R (2002) A successful microbound diet for the larval culture of freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Aquaculture 210:385–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kraul S (1983) Results and hypotheses for the propagation of the grey mullet, Mugil cephalus L. Aquaculture 30:273–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kraul S (1989) Production of live prey for marine fish larvae. Actes Colloq IFREMER 9:595–607Google Scholar
  23. Kraul S (1993) Larviculture of the Mahimahi Coryphaena hippurus in Hawaii, USA. J World Aquac Soc 24:410–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kraul S, Nelson A, Brittain K, Wenzel D (1988) Feeding and handling requirements for hatchery culture of the mahimahi Coryphaena hippurus. Q Univ Hawaii Sea Grant Prog 10:1–6Google Scholar
  25. Kraul S, Ako H, Brittain K, Ogasawara A, Cantrell R, Nagao T (1991) Comparison of copepods and enriched Artemia as feeds for larval mahimahi, Coryphaena hippurus. In: Lavens P, Sorgeloos P, Jaspers E, Ollevier F (eds) Larvi’91 fish and crustacean larviculture symposium. Eur Aquac Soc Spec Publ, vol. 15. European Aquaculture Society, Ghent, pp 45–47Google Scholar
  26. Kraul S, Ako H, Nelson A, Brittain K, Ogasawara A (1992) Evaluation of live feeds for larval and postlarval mahimahi, Coryphaena hippurus. J World Aquac Soc 23:299–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kraul S, Brittain K, Cantrell R, Nagao T, Ako H, Ogasawara A, Kitagawa H (1993) Nutritional factors affecting stress resistance in the larval mahimahi Coryphaena hippurus. J World Aquac Soc 24:186–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lavens P, Sorgeloos P (1998) Present status and prospects of the use of Artemia cysts and biomass in shrimp farming. Anais do Aquicultura Brasil’98, vol. 1, Recife, 2 a 6 de Novembro de 1998. Latin American Chapter of the World Aquaculture Society, Pernambuco, Brazil, pp 147–162Google Scholar
  29. Leu MM, Chou YH (1996) Induced spawning and larval rearing of captive yellowfin porgy, Acanthopagrus latus (Houttuyn). Aquaculture 143:155–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Loya-Javellana GN (1989) Ingestion saturation and growth responses of Penaeus monodon larvae to food density. Aquaculture 81:329–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Luizi FS, Gara B, Shields RJ, Bromage NR (1999) Further description of the development of the digestive organs in Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus) larvae, with notes on differential absorption of copepod and Artemia prey. Aquaculture 176:101–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Matsuno T (1989) Animal carotenoid. In: Krinsky NI, Mathews-Roth MM, Taylor F (eds) Carotenoids chemistry and biology. Plenum Press, New York, pp 59–74Google Scholar
  33. Matsuno T, Watanabe T, Maoka T, Takemura Y (1990) Carotenoids of crustacea-VII. Carotenoids in the sea louse Ligia exotica (Crustacea: Isopoda). Comp Biochem Physiol 95:759–761Google Scholar
  34. Mauchline J, Blaxter JHS, Southward AJ, Tyler PA (1998) The biology of calanoid copepods-introduction. Elsevier Academic Press, California, 710 ppGoogle Scholar
  35. May RC (1970) Feeding larval marine fishes in the laboratory: a review. Calif Mar Res Commun Cal COFI Rep 14:76–83Google Scholar
  36. May RC, Popper D, McVey JP (1974) Rearing and larval development of Siganus canaliculatus (Park) (Pisces: Siganidae). Micronesica 10:285–298Google Scholar
  37. Merrylal James C, Martin Thompson PK (1986) Production of copepods in outdoor culture tank. In: Symposium on coastal aquaculture, 12–18, January 1980, Cochin, India, pp 1275–1280Google Scholar
  38. Mollmann C, Kornilovs G, Fetter M, Koster FW (2004) Feeding ecology of central Baltic Sea herring and sprat. J Fish Biol 65:1563–1581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Munilla-Moran R, Stark JR, Barbour A (1990) The role of exogenous enzymes on the digestion of the cultured turbot larvae, Scophthalmus maximus L. Aquaculture 88:337–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nanton DA, Castell JD (1999) The effects of temperature and dietary fatty acids on the fatty acid composition of harpacticoid copepods, for use as a live food for marine fish larvae. Aquaculture 175:167–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Norsker NH, Stottrup JG (1994) The importance of dietary HUFAs for fecundity and HUFA content in the harpacticoid, Tisbe holothuriae Humes. Aquaculture 125:155–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Olsen Y, Evjemo JO, Olsen A (1999) Status of the cultivation technology for production of Atlantic Ž.halibut Hippoglossus hippoglossus juveniles in Norway Europe. Flatfish culture. Flatfish Symposium, January 1998, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA. Aquaculture 176:1–13Google Scholar
  43. Olsen EM, Jorstad T, Kaartvedt S (2000) The feeding strategies of two large marine copepods. J Plankton Res 22:1513–1528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Perumal P, Ashok Prabu V, Nedumaran T, Santhanam P (2000) Studies on behaviour and survival rate of Oithona rigida Giesbrecht (Copepoda: Cyclopoida) fed with Coscinodiscus centralis Ehrenberg and Skeletonema costatum Cleve. Seaweed Res Util 22(1&2):135–137Google Scholar
  45. Rajkumar M, Rajasekar M, Santhanam P, Perumal P (2004) Length-weight relationship in Siganus javus L. (Pisces: Siganidae) from Parangipettai coast, southeast coast of India. J Aquat Biol 19:125–126Google Scholar
  46. Rajkumar M (2006) Studies on ecology, experimental biology and live feed suitability of Copepods, Acartia erythraea Giesbrecht and Oithona brevicornis Giesbrecht from Coleroon Estuary (India). Ph.D. thesis, Annamalai University, India, p 320Google Scholar
  47. Santhanakrishnan G, Visvakumar M (1995) Present status of marine shrimp seed production of future prospectus to meet the demand with suitable Technological development, 43–48. In: INDAQUA’95, MPEDA publication, Cochin, India 134 pGoogle Scholar
  48. Santhanam P (2002) Studies on the ecology, experimental biology and live food suitability of copepod, Oithona rigida Giesbrecht from Parangipettai coastal Environments (India), PhD thesis, Annamalai University, pp 163Google Scholar
  49. Santhanam P, Perumal P (2008) Marine plankton in Indian waters. In: Milton J (ed) Training manual on GIS and marine biodiversity. Lyola College Pub, India, 1–12 ppGoogle Scholar
  50. Schipp GR, Bosmans JM, Marshall AJ (1999) A method for hatchery culture of tropical calanoid copepods Acartia spp. Aquaculture 174:81–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shamsudin LS, Saad CR (1993) Live food organisms used in Malaysia for mass propagation of marine shrimp larvae, Penaeus monodon. In: Carrillo M, Dahle L, Morales J, Sorgeloos P, Svennecvcig N, Wyban J (eds) From discovery to commercialization, Oosteden. Eur. Aquac. Soc. Spec. Publ, vol 19. European Aquaculture Society, Oostende, p 170Google Scholar
  52. Shields RJ, Bell JG, Luizi FS, Gara B, Bromage NR, Sargent JR (1999) Natural copepods are superior to enriched Artemia nauplii as feed for halibut larvae (Hippoglossus hippoglossus) in terms of survival, pigmentation and retinal morphology: relation to dietary essential fatty acids. J Nutr 129:1186–1194PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Sies H, Stahl W (2005) New horizons in carotenoid research. In: Packer L, Obermüller-Jevic U, Kraemer K, Sies H et al. (eds) Carotenoids and retinoids: molecular aspects and health issues. AOCS Press, Urbana, pp. 315–320Google Scholar
  54. Sorgeloos P (2000) President’s column. World Aquac 31:3–71Google Scholar
  55. Sorgeloos P, Leger P (1992) Improved larviculture outputs of marine fish, shrimp and prawn. J World Aquac Soc 23:251–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sorgeloos P, Leger P, Lavens P (1988) Improved larval rearing of European and Asian seabass, seabream, mahi-mahi, siganid and milkfish using enrichment diets for Brachionus and Artemia. World Aquac 19:78–79Google Scholar
  57. Sorgeloos P, Dehasque KM, Dhert P, Lavens P (1994) Larviculture of marine finfish: the current status. Infofish Int 4(94):49–54Google Scholar
  58. Spenelli J (1979) Preparation of salmonid diets containing zooplankton and their effect on organoleptic properties of pen-reared salmonids. In: Halver JE, Thiews K (ed) Proceedings of the world symposium on finfish nutrition and fish feed technology, Hamburg, 20–23 June 1978, Heenemann, Berlin, Germany, pp. 383–392Google Scholar
  59. Stael M, Sanygontanagtit T, Van Ballaer E, Puwapanieh N, Tungsutapanich A, Lavens P (1995) Decapsulated cysts and Artemia flakes as alternative food sources for the culture of Penaeus monodon postlarvae. In: Lavens P, Jaspers E, Roelants I (eds) Larvi’95 fish and shellfish larviculture symposium. Eur. Aquac. Soc. Spec. Publ., vol. 24. European Aquaculture Society, Ghent, pp 342–345Google Scholar
  60. Stottrup JG (2000) The elusive copepods: their production and suitability in marine aquaculture. Aquac Res 31(89):703–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stottrup JG, Norsker NH (1995) Production and use of copepods in marine fish larviculture. In: Lavens P, Jaspers E, Roelants I (eds) Larvi’95 fish and shellfish larviculture symposium. Eur. Aquac. Soc. Spec. Publ., vol. 24. European Aquaculture Society, Ghent, p 320Google Scholar
  62. Stottrup JG, Norsker NH (1997) Production and use of copepods in marine fish larviculture. Aquaculture 155:231–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Stottrup JG, Richardson K, Kirkegaard E, Pihl NJ (1986) The cultivation of Acartia tonsa dana for use as a live food source for marine fish larvae. Aquaculture 52:87–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stottrup JG, Gravningen K, Norsker NH (1995) The role of different algae in the growth and survival of turbot larvae (Scophthalmus maximus L.) in intensive rearing systems. ICES Mar Sci Symp 201:173–186Google Scholar
  65. Støttrup JG, Shields R, Gillespie M, Gara MB, Sargent JR, Bell JG, Henderson RJ, Tocher DR, Sutherland R, Næss T, Mangor-Jensen A, van der Naas K, Meeren T, Harboe T, Sanchez FJ, Sorgeloos P, Dhert P, Fitzgerald R (1998) The production and use of copepods in larval rearing of halibut, turbot and cod. Bull Aquac Assoc Canada 4:41–45Google Scholar
  66. Sun B, Fleeger JW (1995) Sustained mass culture of Amphiascoides atopus a marine harpacticoid copepod in a recirculating system. Aquaculture 136(3):313–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Toledo JD, Golez MS, Doi M, Ohno A (1999) Use of copepod nauplii during early feeding stage of Grouper Epinephelus coioides. Fish Sci 65:390–397Google Scholar
  68. Varghese PU (1995) Aquaculture production to augment export of marine products from India 1–6. In: INDAQUA’95. MPEDA, Publication, Cochin, 134 pGoogle Scholar
  69. Vengadeshperumal N, Rajkumar PDM, Perumal P, Vijalakshimi S, Balasubramanian T (2010) Laboratory culture and biochemical characterization of the calanoid copepod, Acartia southwelli Sewell, 1914 and Acartia centrura Giesbretch, 1889. Adv Biol Res 4:97–107Google Scholar
  70. Watanabe T, Kiron V (1994) Prospects in larval fish dietetics. Aquaculture 124:223–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Watanabe T, Kitajima C, Fujita S (1983) Nutritional value of live organisms used in Japan for mass propagation of fish: a review. Aquaculture 34:115–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Witt U, Quantz G, Kuhlmann D, Kattner G (1984) Survival and growth of turbot larvae Scophthalmus maximus L. reared on different food organisms with special regard to long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids. Aquac Eng 3:190–1771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Yufera M, Pascual E (1984) La produccion de organismos zooplanctonicos para la alimentacio´n larvaria enacuicultura marina. Inf Tec Inst Investig Pesq 119:3–27Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Santhanam Perumal
    • 1
  • S. Ananth
    • 1
  • R. Nandakumar
    • 1
  • T. Jayalakshmi
    • 1
  • M. Kaviyarasan
    • 1
  • Perumal Pachiappan
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Marine ScienceBharathidasan UniversityTiruchirappalliIndia
  2. 2.Department of BiotechnologyPeriyar UniversitySalemIndia

Personalised recommendations