Skip to main content

Effective Classification and Categorization for Categorical Sets: Distance Similarity Measures

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Systems Design and Intelligent Applications

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 339))

Abstract

Measuring the similarity between objects is considered one of the main hot topics nowadays and the main core requirement for several data mining and knowledge discovery task. For better performance most organizations are in need on semantic similarity and similarity measures. This article presents different distance metrics used for measuring the similarity between qualitative data within a text. The case study represents a qualitative data of Faculty of medicine Cairo University for theses. The dataset is about 5,000 thesis document with 35 departments and about 16,000 keyword. As a result, we are able to better discover the commonalities between theses data and hence, improve the accuracy of the similarity estimation which in return improves the scientific research sector. The experimental results show that Kulczynksi distance yields better with a 92.51 % without normalization that correlate more closely with human assessments compared to other distance measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dumais, S., Meek, D., Metzler, D.: Similarity measures for short segments of text. In: Proceeding ECIR’07 Proceedings of the 29th European Conference on IR Research, pp. 16–27 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hassanien, A.E., Fasmy, A.A, Ayeldeen, H.: Evaluation of semantic similarity across MeSH ontology: A cairo university thesis mining case study. In: 12th Mexican International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 139–144. Mexico City (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Batet, DSaM: Semantic similarity estimation in the biomedical domain: An ontology-based information-theoretic perspective. J. Biomed. Inf. Arch. 44, 749–759 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kitasuki, T., Aritsugi, M., Rahutomo, F.: Test collection recycling for semantic text similarity. In: Proceeding IIWAS12 Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications and Services, pp. 286–289 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Liu, T., Guo, J.: Text similarity computing based on standard deviation. In: Advances in Intelligent Computing, vol. 1, pp. 23–26. Springer, Berlin (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shen, J.Y., Bao, J.P., Liu, X.D., Liu, H.Y., and Zhang, X.D.: Finding plagiarism based on common semantic sequence model. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Advances in Web-Age Information Management, pp. 640–645 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lyon, C.M., Bao, J.P., Lane, P.C.R., Ji, W., Malcolm, J.A.: Copy detection in chinese documents using ferret. Lang. Resour. Eval. 1–10 (2006, in press)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bandyopadhyay, S., Saha, S.: Unsupervised classification. In: Unsupervised Classification: Similarity Measures, Classical and Metaheuristic Approaches, and Applications, pp. 59–73. Springer, Berlin (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bharkad, S.D., Kokare, M.: Performance evaluation of distance metrics: Application to fingerprint recognition. Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell. 25 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Choi, S.H., Choi, S.S., Tappert, C.C.: A survey of binary similarity and distance measures. J. Syst. Cybern. Inf. 8(1), 43–48 (2010, Key: citeulike:7358808)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Huang, A.: Similarity measures for text document clustering. In: New Zealand Computer Science Research Student Conference, pp. 49–56 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. McGill, M.J., Salton, G.: Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval, McGraw-Hill, New York (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Leydesdorff, L.: Similarity measures, author cocitation analysis, and information theory. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 56, 769–772 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. S. B. a. S. Saha, Unsupervised Classification: Similarity Measures, Classical and Metaheuristic Approaches, and Applications: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lalitha, Y.S., Sandhya, N., Govardhan, A., Anuradha, K.: Analysis of similarity measures for text clustering. In: International Conference on Information Systems Design and Intelligent Applications, p. 976, Vishakhapatnam (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Leydesdorff, L., Zaal, R.: Co-words and citations. Relations between document sets and environments. Informetrics, vol. 87, pp. 05–119. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  17. De Baets, S.J.B., De Meyer, H.: On the transitivity of a parametric family of cardinality-based similarity measures. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 50, 104–116 (2009)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Tang, C., Zhang, A., Jiang, D.: Cluster analysis for gene expression data: a survey. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 16, 1370–1386 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Faria, D., Pesquita, C., Falcao, A.O., Lord, P., Couto, F.M.: Semantic similarity in biomedical ontologies. PLOS: Comput. Biol. 5 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heba Ayeldeen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer India

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ayeldeen, H., Mahmood, M.A., Hassanien, A.E. (2015). Effective Classification and Categorization for Categorical Sets: Distance Similarity Measures. In: Mandal, J., Satapathy, S., Kumar Sanyal, M., Sarkar, P., Mukhopadhyay, A. (eds) Information Systems Design and Intelligent Applications. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 339. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2250-7_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2250-7_36

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi

  • Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2249-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2250-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics