Skip to main content

Behaviour of Elevated Water Storage Tanks Under Seismic Events

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 3520 Accesses

Abstract

Liquid storage tanks are lifeline structures and strategically very important. Water tanks, in particular are important to the continued operation of water distribution system in the event of earthquakes. Most of the failures of large tanks after earthquakes are suspected to have resulted from the dynamic buckling caused by overturning moments of seismically induced liquid inertia and surface slosh waves. Recent earthquakes have shown that liquid storage tanks are found to be vulnerable to damage. The dynamic behaviour of liquid containing structures cannot be estimated by the same approach as for normal building structure as the weight of storage tanks varies in time because of variable liquid storage level. Also there exists sloshing of liquid which influences the response of the tank. Current knowledge about the behaviour of liquid storage tank is extensive, but many of the analytical and theoretical results are for tanks ground supported and open tanks. Therefore, appropriate modeling of the liquid storage tanks is essential for dynamic analysis and seismic response evaluation. In most of the research works, the liquid storage tank has been modeled using two mass model or three mass model concepts. The major difference of these two models is the number of lumped masses into which the liquid column is divided. The two-mass model is convenient for designers to use due to ease but the three-mass model predicts the seismic response more accurately. The objective of the study is to investigate the uncontrolled response of Steel and Reinforced Cement Concrete (RCC) Elevated Water reservoirs of different aspect ratio S = H/R (height of the container to its radius) and subjected to different strong ground motion earthquakes. The simulation of water tank using three-mass model concept is carried out through MATLAB. The paper deals with two H/R ratios viz. 0.6 and 1.85. The governing equations of motion are solved by State Space Method. In the first phase, the response of the tanks to different real earthquake ground excitations is investigated using simplified three mass model of the tank. In the second phase, characteristics of earthquakes are varied and emphasis is given to study their effect on response of the tanks. The response quantities such as sloshing displacement, impulsive displacement, tower displacement and base shear are measured by varying the characteristics of earthquake time history. It is observed that the sloshing displacement is highly influenced by the characteristics of the time history compared to other response quantities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Anderson JC, Bertero, VV (1987) Uncertainties in establishing design earthquakes. J Struct Eng 113(8):1709–1724

    Google Scholar 

  2. Uang C-M, Bertero, VV (1988) Implications of recorded earthquake ground motion on seismic design of building structures. Earthquake Engineering, Research Center, University of California, Berkeley (UCB/EERC-88/13)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bertero VV, Anderson JC, Krawinkler H, Miranda E (1991) Design guidelines for ductility and drift limits: review of state-of-the-practice and state-of-the-art in ductility and drift-based earthquake-resistant design of tall buildings. Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley (UCB/EERC-91/15)

    Google Scholar 

  4. JP Singh and Associates, Richmond, California (1995) Seismic loading: code versus site specific. Portland regional seminar on seismic engineering issues

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shoji Y, Tanii K, Kamiyama M (2004) The duration and amplitude characteristics of earthquake ground motions with emphasis on local site effects. In: 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kianoush MR, Ghaemmaghami AR (2011) The effect of earthquake frequency content on the seismic behavior of concrete rectangular liquid tanks using the finite element method incorporating soil–structure interaction. Eng Struct 33(2011):2186–2200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shekari MR, Khaji N, Ahmadi MT (2010) On the seismic behavior of cylindrical base-isolated liquid storage tanks excited by long-period ground motions. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30(2010):968–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jacobsen LS (1949) Impulsive hydrodynamics of fluid inside a cylindrical tank and of fluid surrounding a cylindrical pier. Bull Seismol Soc Am 39:189–204

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Epstein HI (1976) Seismic design of liquid storage tanks. J Struct Div-ASCE 102(ST.9):1659–1673

    Google Scholar 

  10. Barton DC, Parker JV (1987) FEM analysis of the seismic response of anchored and unanchored liquid storage tanks. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 15(3):299–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wei C, Haroun MA, Liu F (1996) Large amplitude liquid sloshing in seismically excited tanks. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 25(7):653–669

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liu H, Schubert DH (2001) Effects of nonlinear geometric and material properties on the seismic response of fluid/tank system. American Water Works Association, D100

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shrimali MK, Jangid RS (2003) Earthquake response of isolated elevated liquid storage steel tanks. J Constr Steel Res 59(2003):1267–1288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Livaoglu R, Dogangun A (2006) Simplified seismic analysis procedures for elevated tanks considering fluid–structure–soil interaction. J Fluids Struct 22:421–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Omidinasab, F, Shakib H (2008) Seismic vulnerability of elevated water tanks using performance based design. In: 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing, China

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ozdemir Z, Souli M, Fahjan YM (2010) Application of nonlinear fluid-structure interaction methods to seismic analysis of anchored and unanchored tanks. Eng Struct 32:409–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Moslemi M, Kianoushi M, Pogorzelski W (2011) Seismic response of liquid-filled elevated tanks. Eng Struct 33:2074–2084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang R, Weng D, Ren X (2011) Seismic analysis of a LNG storage tank isolated by a multiple friction pendulum system. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 10(2):253–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Haroun MA, Housner GW (1982) Dynamic characteristics of liquid storage tanks. J Struct Div-ASCE 108(EM5):783–800

    Google Scholar 

Bibliography

  1. Asari Falguni P, Vanza MG (2012) Structural control system for elevated water tank. Int J Adv Eng Res Stud 1(3):325–328

    Google Scholar 

  2. Housner GW (1963) The dynamic behavior of water tanks. Bull Seismol Soc Am 53(2):381–387

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tung ATY, Kiremidjian AS (1991) Seismic reliability analysis of elevated liquid-storage vessels. J Struct Eng 117:1372–1392

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. V. Waghmare .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer India

About this paper

Cite this paper

Waghmare, M.V., Madhekar, S.N., Matsagar, V. (2015). Behaviour of Elevated Water Storage Tanks Under Seismic Events. In: Matsagar, V. (eds) Advances in Structural Engineering. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2193-7_91

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2193-7_91

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi

  • Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2192-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2193-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics