Advertisement

Professional Status of Physicians in the Russian Federation

  • Daria Prisyazhnyuk

Abstract

The problem of medical doctors (MDs) as a professional group has become acute since the mid-2000s when Russia began to implement “The Health” (2006–2011), a national priority project which aimed to improve the quality and accessibility of primary health care for its population. Official governmental reports regarding the implementation of the national project “Health” focus only on the material component of the reform process, namely the quantity of purchased equipment and the amount of funding spent. Until now, there has been little assessment of the sociopolitical processes involved in reforming the health care system and little understanding of whether the socioeconomic status and prestige of the medical profession have improved. This chapter seeks to fill that gap. The empirical data reported in this chapter is based on national statistics on health care reform (1995–2011) and several mass surveys of Russian physicians and the population, namely the Russian longitude monitoring survey (RLMS-HSE, HSE, 2005–2011, N = 12641), and “The prestige of the medical profession in Russian society” (Moscow, St. Petersburg, Novosibirsk, HSE, 2011, N = 120). The results show that the rhetoric of neoliberal reforms in the Russian system of public health care includes the professional group of doctors as a social institute in the regulation processes. In practice we observe the rather weak tendencies of medical professionalization.

Keywords

Medical Profession Professional Group Health Care Reform National Project Professional Autonomy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to express sincere gratitude to my research adviser Professor Pavel Romanov for his important critical comments and advice throughout my studies. This publication would not be possible without his support.

The study was conducted within the collective project “A variety of the types of social cohesion under the conditions of Russian reforms: conceptualization and qualimetry” (Russian Scientific Fund, grant №14-18-03784).

References

  1. Atkinson D (1982) Zemstvo and peasantry. The zemstvo in Russia. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 79–133Google Scholar
  2. Collins R (1990) Changing conceptions in the sociology of professions. In: Torstendahl R, Burrage M (eds) The formation of professions: knowledge, state and strategy. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Evetts J (2012) Similarities in contexts and theorizing: professionalism and inequality. Professions Professionalism 2(2)Google Scholar
  4. Freidson E (1970) Profession of medicine. Dodd, Mead & Co., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Freidson E (1994) Professionalism reborn: theory, prophecy and policy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 248 pGoogle Scholar
  6. Freidson (2001). Professionalism: the third logic. London: Polity PressGoogle Scholar
  7. Frieden NM (1976) The roots of zemstvo medicine. The publication of the twenty-fifth congress of the international society of the history of medicine. Colloque, QuebecGoogle Scholar
  8. Frieden NM (1977) The Russian cholera epidemic, 1892–1893, and medical professionalization. J Soc Hist 10:538–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Government of Russia (2007) The general wage agreement in the system of Saratov compulsory medical insurance. http://www.sartfoms.ru/normativ/461.pdf. (in Russian)
  10. Government of Russia (2011) The healthcare in Russia: the statistical compilation. Posstat, Moscow, 326 p (in Russian)Google Scholar
  11. Halmos P (1973) Professionalization and social change. University of Keele, KeeleGoogle Scholar
  12. Iarskaya-Smirnova E, Romanov P (2012) The very professions: the scales of the prestige and publicity. In: Romanov P, Iarsaya-Smirnova E (eds) Anthropology of professions: the occupational limits in the era of instability. Variant, Moscow, 236 p. (in Russian)Google Scholar
  13. Izvestia (2005) About the aims of realization of the priority national project (2005), No 816, 30 December. http://www.minzdravsoc.ru/docs/mzsr/orders/411
  14. Katrenko VS (2012) The report on the control measures “The monitoring of the costs of the “The Health” national project realization” and “The checking of the targeted and effective budget usage allocated under the priority of “The health” national project. http://www.ach.gov.ru/ru/bulletin/952/. (in Russian)
  15. Larson MS (1977) The rise of professionalism: sociological analysis. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  16. McClellend CE (1990) Escape from freedom? Reflections on German professionalization 1870–1933. In: Burrage M, Torstendahl R (eds) The formation of professions: knowledge, state and strategy. Sage, London, pp 97–113Google Scholar
  17. Medical Newspaper (2011) About the approval of primary healthcare’s organization (2011), No 808 n, 25 June. http://www.rg.ru/2012/01/27/polozhenie-dok.html
  18. Millerson GL (1964) The qualifying association. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Mirskiy MB (2005) The Russian medicine in XVI–XIX centuries. ROSSPEN, Moscow (in Russian)Google Scholar
  20. Parkin F (1974) Strategies of social closure in class formation. In: Parkin F (ed) The social analysis of the class structure. Tavistock Publications, London, pp 1–18Google Scholar
  21. Rechel B (2006) The health care workforce in Europe. Learning from experience. European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. World Health Organization, p 147. The Cromwell Press, Trowbridge, WiltsGoogle Scholar
  22. Saks M (1999) The wheel turns? Professionalisation and alternative medicine in Britain. J Interprof Care 13(2):129–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Saks M (2012) Defining the profession: the role of knowledge and expertise. Prof Prof 2(1):1–10Google Scholar
  24. Shcherbakova E (2008) Intersectorial and interregional differences in the salary – about 5,5. Demoscope Weekly, No 321–322Google Scholar
  25. The directions, the main activities and parameters of the priority national projects (2007), no 16, 21 February. rost.ru/education_doc_1_2007.doc. (in Russian)Google Scholar
  26. The Federal Office of Governmental Statistics (2011) Russian statistical annual. http://www.gks.ru/bgd/regl/b11_13/IssWWW.exe/Stg/d1/06-09.html. (in Russian)
  27. The most prestigious professions determined. Vzgliad, http://vz.ru/society/2007/9/22/110521.html. (in Russian)
  28. The Order of Ministry of the Healthcare and Social development (2008) No 128n., 28 June//base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc; base=LAW; n=76364. (in Russian)Google Scholar
  29. The Order of Ministry of the Healthcare and Social development (2011) No 260n., 1 April//base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc; base=LAW; n=76364. (in Russian)Google Scholar
  30. Ustilentsev AM (2011) The basis of the primary medical care reforming// boyrskymail15.com/_press/organ.htm. (in Russian)Google Scholar
  31. Volkov MV, Lemenev LM (1972) In: Volkov MV (ed) Scientific medical associations in the USSR. Izdatelstvo, Moscow, 234 pGoogle Scholar
  32. Volkova TI (2010) The state of wealthier of Zemstvo’s medical personnel in XX century. Iaroslavskiy Pedagogical Herald, 1, 4, 23–34Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyNational Research University – Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations