Unlocking Public Service Delivery Impediments for SMES: The Case of Fiji

  • Salvin Saneel Nand


This paper, a conceptual analysis, suggests that one of biggest problems Small Micro Enterprises (SMEs) face is the regulatory compliance burden. The robust regulatory requirements coupled with the financial constrains have forced SMEs in Fiji to remain in the informal sector. It is evident from the analysis that the regulatory policy needs to be reviewed to provide efficient public service delivery for small and micro enterprises. In general, there should be a “One Stop” checklist (according to the business type) detailing all the regulatory compliance needed to be fulfilled in opening and maintaining a business. Also, checklist should be readily available in different languages and should come with considerable advice. Stand alone legislation on SMEs may be considered desirable for SMEs, rather than a plethora of provisions in different legislation.


Informal Sector Policy Implementation Regulatory Compliance Incrementalism Model Public Service Delivery 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Asia Development Bank (2009) ADB support for Public Sector Reforms in the Pacific: Enhance Results through Ownership, Capacity and Community RN SST REG 2009–24Google Scholar
  2. Beck T, Demirguc-Kunt A (2005) Small and medium–size enterprises: overcoming growth constraints, WB policy research working paper, WPS3127. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Cabinet of the Government of Fiji (2005) Cabinet memorandum-review of poverty alleviation program, Government of Fiji (cabinet)Google Scholar
  4. Chand G (2002) The informal sector in Fiji, paper prepared for Fiji Trades Union Congress, SuvaGoogle Scholar
  5. Davis G et al (1993) Public policy in Australia, 2nd edn. Allen & Unwin Pty Ltd, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  6. Dror Y (1964) Muddling through-“science” or inertia? Public Adm Rev 24(3):154–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fiji Bureau of Statistics (2002) Economic survey. Bureau of Statistics, SuvaGoogle Scholar
  8. Fiji Bureau of Statistics (2004) Economic survey. Bureau of Statistics, SuvaGoogle Scholar
  9. Fiji Institute of Applied Studies for the National Center for Small and Micro Enterprises (2010) Development regulatory impacts on small and micro enterprise success. National Center for Small and Micro Enterprises, FijiGoogle Scholar
  10. Gani HN, Duncan R, Toatu T (2007) Good governance indicators for seven Pacific island countries. Asian Development Bank, access to basic services for the poor: the importance of good governance 2007 Asia-Pacific MDG study series, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  11. Government of Fiji (1980) Fiji’s eight development plan, 1981–1985. Central Planning Office, SuvaGoogle Scholar
  12. Government of Fiji and UNDP (1997) Fiji poverty report. UNDP, SuvaGoogle Scholar
  13. Gurmeet S, Dutt P, Naz R (2010) Public service delivery in Fiji, Solomon Islands and Papua New Guinea: analysing quality in public services. Int J Serv Stand 6(2):170–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hewlett M (1991) Policy instruments, policy styles and policy implementation: national approaches to theories of instrument choice. Pol Stud 19(2):1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hjern B (1982) Implementation research – the link gone missing. J Public Policy 2(3):301–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hjern B, Porter D (1981) Implementation structures: a new unit of administrative analysis. Organ Stud 2:211–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hon. Qarase L (2004) Partnership for SME growth. Report of the 2nd annual national small and micro enterprises forum, raffles trade winds conventions centre. 25–26 August, FijiGoogle Scholar
  18. Ifereimi N (2010) Poor service delivery. The Fiji times, 25 Feb 2010.
  19. Income Tax Act (Cap. 201) – Income Tax (Small and Micro Enterprise Incentives) Regulations (2006) (FJ)Google Scholar
  20. Jeffrey JR (2006) Bottom-up versus top-down lawmaking. Univ Chic Law Rev 73(3):933–964Google Scholar
  21. Kumar S (2007) Poverty and affirmative action policies in Fiji: paradigmatic faults lines. Fijian studies: a journal of contemporary Fiji. Institute of Applied Studies, Lautoka, p 209Google Scholar
  22. Lane MB (2001) Affirming recent directions in planning theory: co-management of protected areas. Soc Nat Resour 14(8):657–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lindblom CE (1959) The science of muddling through. Public Adm Rev 19(2):79–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lindblom CE (1977) Politics and markets. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Lindblom CE (1979) Still muddling, not yet through. Public Adm Rev 39(6):517–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Majone G (1989) Evidence, argument and persuasion in the policy process. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  27. Majone G, Wildavsky A (1978) Implementation as evolution. In: Howard F (ed) Policy studies review annual. Sage, Beverly HillsGoogle Scholar
  28. Marcus B (2006) Lane the governance of coastal resources in Fiji- an analysis of the strategic issues. WP-Pacific technical report (International Water Project No 20) SPREPGoogle Scholar
  29. Michael C (1980) Rational techniques in policy analysis. Policy Studies Institute, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. National Center for Small and Micro Enterprises Development (2010) Report of the 2nd annual national SME forum: putting co-ordination and partnership into action for SME growth. NCSMED, SuvaGoogle Scholar
  31. Naz R (2002) E-governance for improved public service delivery in Fiji. J Serv Sci Manag 2(3):190–203Google Scholar
  32. Naz R (2011) Public service delivery dilemma: achieving quality of service in Fiji. J Pac Stud 31(1):79–80Google Scholar
  33. Olaks Consulting Services (2001) The national integrity systems. Country study report 2001. Transparency International, Australia, FijiGoogle Scholar
  34. Osborne D, Gaebler T (1992) Reinventing government: how the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Plume/Penguin Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Peoples Charter for Change, Pace & Progress 2008 (FJ)Google Scholar
  36. Pressman JL, Wildavsdky A (1984) Implementation: how great expectation in Washington is dashed in Oakland. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  37. Rebecca S (1999) The policy process: an overview. Working paper 118, Overseas Development Institute, LondonGoogle Scholar
  38. Reddy NP, Sharma BC, Vosikata P, Duncan S (2004) Understanding reforms in Fiji. Study commissioned by the Global Development Network. The Foundation for Development Cooperation, SuvaGoogle Scholar
  39. Ryan N (1995) Unraveling conceptual developments in implementation analysis. Aust J Public Adm 54(1):65–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sabatier P (1986) Top-down and bottom-up approaches in implementation research: a critical analysis and suggested synthesis. J Public Policy 6(1):21–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sabatier P, Mazmanian D (1979) The conditions of effective implementation. Policy Anal 5(Fall):481–504Google Scholar
  42. Schneider AL, Ingram H (1992) The social construction of target populations: implications for politics and policy. Am Polit Sci Rev 87(2):334–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Scott JC (1998) Seeing like a state: how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  44. Seithaml V, Parasuaman A, Mallthotra A (2002) Service quality delivery though web sites: a critical review of extant knowledge. J Acad Mark Sci 30(4):362–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Singh G, Pathak RD, Naz R, Belwal R (2010) E governance for improved public sector service delivery in India, Ethiopia and Fiji. Int J Public Sect Manag 23(3):254–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. The National Center for Small and Micro Enterprises Development Act 2002 (FJ)Google Scholar
  47. The National Employment Center Decree 2009 (FJ)Google Scholar
  48. The Reserve Bank (2012) Fiji small and medium enterprises credit guarantee scheme guidelines, 2012. Reserve Bank, SuvaGoogle Scholar
  49. Wadi H, Demsky T (1995) Education policy-planning process: an applied framework. UNESCO report, United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organisation, ParisGoogle Scholar
  50. Whiteside B (2012) Assisting and developing small businesses in Fiji, ANZ small and medium enterprise credit scheme conference publication. Reserve Bank of Fiji, SuvaGoogle Scholar
  51. World Bank (2004) World development report 2004: making service work for poor people. World Bank/Oxford University Press, Washington, DC, APDIP E-Note 11Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of LawThe University of FijiLautokaRepublic of Fiji

Personalised recommendations