Public Service Delivery – An Integrative Framework


This section consolidates the lessons from the 16 chapters into a comprehensive list of interactional elements that propose a more optimal service delivery scenario for developing countries. The consolidation highlights some known and some not-so-known elements as inputs and moderators for an enhanced public service experience. For example, the knowledge and ideology of the delivering agency, the mental readiness of the population to accept enhanced services, and technology acceptance of the population are some of the not-so-known elements that have emerged as significant inputs for a good public delivery system. These and other inputs are seen to be moderated by several critical issues, for example, the evaluation parameters decided for the service, the market readiness to receive and expand the service, and agency capability for learning and transferability of experience. These inputs and moderators together, consequently, provide for an enhanced public service delivery scenario for developing countries.


Service Delivery Public Service Social Entrepreneurship Private Partnership Private Agency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Anang FT (1994) Evaluating the role and impact of foreign NGOs in Ghana. In: Sandberg E (ed) The changing politics of non-governmental organizations and African states. Praeger, WestportGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews R, Entwistle T (2010) Does cross sectoral partnership deliver? An empirical exploration of public service effectiveness, efficiency and equity. J Public Adm Res Theory 20(3):679–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carley M (2006) Partnerships and statutory local governance in devolved Scotland. Int J Pub Sector Manag 19(3):250–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carty A (2012) How to ensure successful PPP procurement. European PPP Expertise Center, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen Q, Zhang N (2013) IT supported business performance and e-commerce application in SMEs. J Elect Comm Org 11(2):41–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark J (1991) Democratizing development: the role of voluntary organizations. Kumarian, West HartfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Collier P, Hoeffler A (2002) Greed and grievance in civil war. Working paper CSAE WPS/2002-01. Centre for the Study of African Economies, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Crook RC, Manor J (1998) Democracy and decentralisation in South Asia and West Africa: participation, accountability and performance. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Cruz NF, Marques RC (2014) Revisiting the determinants of local government performance. Omega 44:91–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deininger K, Mpuga P (2005) Does greater accountability improve the quality of public service delivery? Evidence from Uganda. World Dev 33(1):171–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Downs A (1967) Inside bureaucracy. Little and Brown, BostonGoogle Scholar
  12. Dubey M (1998) Financial engineering in the procurement of projects. Asia Law and Practice Publishing Limited, Hong KongGoogle Scholar
  13. Edwards M, Humle D (1996) Too close for comfort? The impact of official aid on nongovernmental organizations. World Dev 26(6):961–973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eikenberry A, Kluver J (2004) The marketization of the nonprofit sector: civil society at risk? Public Adm Rev 64(2):132–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Esman MJ (1991) Management dimension of development, perspectives and strategies. Kumarian, West HartfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Ferlie E, Ashburner L, Fitzgerald L, Perrigrew A (1996) The new public management in action. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fisher J (1993) The road from Rio: sustainable development and the nongovernmental movement in the third world. Kumarian, WestportGoogle Scholar
  18. Fisher J (1998) Nongovernments, NGOs and the political development of the third world. Kumarian, WestportGoogle Scholar
  19. Fletcher S, Potts JS, Heeps C, Pike K (2009) Public awareness of marine environmental issues in the UK. Mar Policy 33:370–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Giddens A (1999) Beyond left and right. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Gilliam WS, Zigler EF (2001) A critical meta analysis of all evaluations of state funded preschool from 1977 to 1998: implications for policy, service delivery and program evaluation. Early Child Res Q 15:441–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gore T (2004) The open methods of coordination and policy mainstreaming: the European employment strategy and regional conversion programs in UK. Eur Plann Stud 12(1):123–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heller P, Harilal KN, Chaudhuri S (2007) Building local democracy: evaluating impact of decentralization in Kerala, India. World Dev 35(4):626–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Imeson RJ, van der Bergh JCJM (2006) Policy failure and stakeholder dissatisfaction in complex ecosystem management: the case of the Dutch Wadden Sea shellfishery. Ecol Econ 56(4):488–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Isham J, Pritchett L, Woolcock M, Busby G (2003) The varieties of the resource experience: how natural resource export structures affect the political economy of economic growth. Mimeo/World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  26. Jessop B (2002) Governance and meta governance. In: Bang H (ed) Governance, governmentality and democracy. Manchester University Press, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  27. Kettl D (2000) The global public management revolution. The Brooklyn Institution, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  28. Korten DC (1990) Getting to the 21st century. Kumarian Press, West HartfordGoogle Scholar
  29. Korten DC (1995) When corporations rule the world. Kumarian Press, West HartfordGoogle Scholar
  30. Korten DC (1999) The post-corporate world. Kumarian Press, West HartfordGoogle Scholar
  31. Kwak YH, Chih Y, Ibbs CW (2009) Towards a comprehensive understanding of public private partnerships for infrastructure development. Calif Manage Rev 51:51–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lane PR, Tornell A (1995) Power, growth and voracity effect. J Econ Growth 1(2):213–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lee J (2008) Preparing performance information in the public sector: an Australian perspective. Financ Account Manag 24(2):117–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lindsay C, McQuaid RW (2008) Interagency cooperation in activation. Social Policy Soc 7(3):353–365Google Scholar
  35. Lindsay C, McQuaid RW (2009) New governance and the case of activation policies. Social Policy Admin 43(5):445–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mahapatra LK, Singh P (2006) Opportunities and constraints in PESA Act, 1996. Seminar paper presented at the workshop on PESA, ISED, BhubaneshwarGoogle Scholar
  37. McLaughlin K, Osborne S (2000) A one way street or two way traffic? In: Osborne SP (ed) Managing public private partnerships for public services. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  38. Miller C (1999) Partners in regeneration: constructing a local regime for urban management? Policy Politics 27(3):343–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Morgan DR, England RE (1999) Managing urban America, 5th edn. Chatham House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. National Council of Public Private Partnership (2003) Critical choices: the debate over PPP and what it means for America’s future. NCPPP Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  41. Nativel C, Sunley P, Martin R (2002) Localizing welfare-at-work? Territorial flexibility and the new deal for young people. Environ Plann C: Govern Policy 20(6):911–932Google Scholar
  42. Nelson J, Zadek S (2000) Partnership alchemy. Copenhagen Centre, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  43. Osborne S (2010) The new Public Governance? Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  44. Osborne S, Brown K (2006) Managing change and innovation in public service organizations. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  45. Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Perry JL, Wise LR (1990) The motivational basis of public service. Public Adm Rev 50(3):367–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Price Water House Coopers (2010) Social private partnerships – innovation in public service delivery. Public Sector Research Centre, PricewaterHouseCoopers Ltd., United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  48. Rhodes R (1997) Understanding governance. Open University Press, BuckinghamGoogle Scholar
  49. Rhodes J, Tyler P, Brennan A (2003) New developments in area based initiatives in England. Urban Stud 40(8):1399–1426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Routh S, Khuda B (2000) An economic appraisal of alternative strategies for the delivery of MCH-FP services in urban Dhaka, Bangladesh. Int J Health Plann Manag 15:115–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Talen E, Anselin L (1998) Assessing spatial equity: an evaluation of measures of accessibility to public playgrounds. Environ Plan A 30(4):595–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Treby EJ, Clark MJ (2004) A practical approach to participatory decision making: an example for coastal zone management. Cost Manag 32:353–372Google Scholar
  53. Udayaadithya A, Gurtoo A (2011) Working of decentralized welfare institutions in India: social dynamics or institutional rational choice? J Afr Asian Stud 47(1):101–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Udayaadithya A, Gurtoo A (2014) Effectiveness of local governance: interaction between social capital and institutional structures. Asian Soc Work Policy Rev 8(1):71–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Uvin P, Miller D (1996) Paths to scaling-up: alternative strategies for local nongovernmental organizations. Hum Organ 55(3):344–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. World Bank (2000) Attacking poverty, world development report 2000 = 2001. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ye SD, Tiong RLK (2000) NPV-at- risk method in infra project mgmt evaluation. J Constr Eng Manag 126(3):227–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhang XQ (2011) Web based concession period analysis system. Expert Syst Appl 38(11):13532–13542Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management StudiesIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Management SchoolUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations