Accountability in the Karnataka State Police in India

  • Meena Nair
  • Prabhakar Kollapudi
  • Prarthana Rao


The police department is generally considered to be more non-transparent than the other departments of the government. This paper details the trajectory of a study that Public Affairs Centre (PAC) carried out to look at practices of transparency and accountability in the police stations in Karnataka state (India), which are the focal points of direct citizen interaction with the police personnel to seek protection of their life and property and for grievance redress. Using the Citizen Report Card (CRC) approach, a systematic survey of 100 police stations covering 500 police personnel and 2,000 users of police services including complainants was carried out in Karnataka. The user survey focused on their experiences in reporting, registering and resolving grievances or problems. Observations of police stations and interviews with police personnel elicited views on how well they are able to process and settle the complainants’ problems and the difficulties and constraints they face in the course of this and other everyday work. The evidence generated was then used to stimulate the leadership of the State Police Department to create an agenda for reform to bring in greater transparency and accountability. The implementation of these reforms took place within a short period after the study report was submitted.


Police Station Police Department Exit Interview Life Balance Police Culture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Guruprasad DV (2008) A profile of junior ranks of Karnataka police- a survey of their attitudes, behaviour, mental makeup and stress levels: a study reportGoogle Scholar
  2. Karnataka State Police Department (2009) Police manual, government of Karnataka. Accessed 16 Nov 2009
  3. Kumar P (2009) Indian police. Publish America, Maryland, USAGoogle Scholar
  4. Mishra V (2005) National workshop on media on police reforms. In a workshop by Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative & Press Institute of India Venue, University of Jamia Milia Islamia, New Delhi, March 23 and 24.Google Scholar
  5. Munshi P (2009) Making breakthrough innovation happen – shifting policing paradigms -Trichy Police, HarperCollins, Noida, UP, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  6. Nair M, Kollapudi P, Rao P (2010) A mirror to the police: a bottom-up assessment of the Karnataka police. Public Affairs Centre, BangaloreGoogle Scholar
  7. Paul S (2006) Holding the state to account: lessons of Bangalore’s citizen report cards. Report of the Public Affairs Centre, BangaloreGoogle Scholar
  8. Sekhar S, Nair M, Reddy AV (2007) Public services in Hubli-Dharwad. Public Affairs Centre, BangaloreGoogle Scholar
  9. Sekhar S, Nair M, Kollapudi P, Rao P (2009) Study of Sarva Shiksha Abiyan initiatives on universalization of elementary education in Karnataka with special reference to concerns of gender and equity. Public Affairs Centre, BangaloreGoogle Scholar
  10. Shinar A (2009) Accountability for the Indian police: creating an external complaints agency. Human Rights Law Networks, BangaloreGoogle Scholar
  11. Singh SR (2009) Management of stress and coping behaviour of police personnel through Indian psychological techniques. J Indian Acad Appl Psychol 35(1):47–53Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Meena Nair
    • 1
  • Prabhakar Kollapudi
    • 1
  • Prarthana Rao
    • 1
  1. 1.Participatory Governance Research GroupPublic Affairs CentreBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations