Legal Basis for Responsible Working of the Administration in the Republic of Macedonia: An Assessment


This chapter critically analyzes the current laws in the Republic of Macedonia that address the authority and responsibilities of the public servants, i.e., the functioning, roles, and responsibilities of the employees in the administration. Analyses of the relevant legal documents, namely, Rule Book for the organization and systematizations of the working position, were conducted, along with interviews of 20 respondents, namely, four state secretaries, six section managers, five state counselors, three department managers, one counselor, and one state auditor, in 16 institutions of the state authority. Results show several lacunae which are discussed through the direction of closing the circle of responsibility. There is a further need for precise analysis of the legal regulation that will determine the role, authority, and responsibility of the administration in the country.


Civil Servant Public Administration Strategic Activity Legal Document State Secretary 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bailey SK (1968) Objectives of theory of public administration. In: Charlesworth JC (ed) Theory and practice in public administration: scope, objectives and methods. American Academy of Political and Social Science, Philadelphia, OctoberGoogle Scholar
  2. Breyer SS, Stewart RB, Sunstein CR (2006) Administrative law regulatory policy. Aspen Law Business, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Bryman A (2001) Social research methods. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Bullain N, Toftisova R (2004) A comparative analysis of European policies and practices of NGO – government cooperation. European Center for Not-for-Profit Law (ECNL), MacedoniaGoogle Scholar
  5. Danielle B, Demmke C, Nomden K, Polet R (2002) Civil services in the Europe of fifteen – trends and new development (Европски институт за јавна администрација). European Institute for Public Administration, ZagrebGoogle Scholar
  6. Dramer K (1997) Moral reasoning in the public service. In: Proceedings of the OECD symposium on “Ethics in the public sector: challenges and opportunities for OECD countries”, Paris, p. 18Google Scholar
  7. Eugen P (1993) The science of state department. School book, ZagrebGoogle Scholar
  8. Gilman SC (1996) Public service ethics: a global dialogue. Public Adm Rev 56(6):517–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goce G (2004) Reforms in the state department, Magazine for European questions. European dialogGoogle Scholar
  10. Janssen D (2008) Effective improvement as a result of the implementation of the CAF model in Europol. In: Fifth public conference of the public administration quality in Europe.
  11. Lian M, Berman J, West JP (2000) Human resource management in public service-Paradoxes, processes and problem. Sage Publication, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  12. Mayer TR (1986) Organization theory for public administration. Little & Brown Company, BostonGoogle Scholar
  13. Menzel DC (1997) Teaching ethics and values in public administration: are we making a difference? Public Adm Rev 57(3):224–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Michael C, May L (2005) Public administration-clashing values in the administration in public policy. Wadsworth, BelmontGoogle Scholar
  15. Naumovski P (2007) Administrative law. European University, SkopjeGoogle Scholar
  16. Petkovic M (2003) Organizational behavior. Economics Books, University of Belgrade, BelgradeGoogle Scholar
  17. Republic of Macedonia (1999) Strategy for developing of the public administration. Government report, Republic of MacedoniaGoogle Scholar
  18. Republic of Slovenia (2006) Strategy of cooperation of the government of the Republic of Slovenia with non-governmental organizations, Government report, Republic of SloveniaGoogle Scholar
  19. Risteska M (2006) Regulatory impact assessment in Macedonia and Estonia: lessons (to be) learned. Uprava IX(3):141–164Google Scholar
  20. Robert S, Kaplan D, Norton P (2001) Strategy focused organization how balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment. Harvard Business School Publish Cooperation, BostonGoogle Scholar
  21. Shafritz JM, Hyde AC, Parkes SJ (2003) Classics of public administration. Wadsworth, BelmontGoogle Scholar
  22. Sotir K (2005) New public management. Center for Quality, SkopjeGoogle Scholar
  23. Wiersma W (2000) Pecearcx Metxod in Education. Allyn & Bacon, UKGoogle Scholar
  24. Wore H, Miller CS, Wegener WF, Miller LS (2003) Effective police supervision. Nexis Matthew Bender, AlbanyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of LawUniversity “Goce Delcev”ShtipRepublic of Macedonia

Personalised recommendations