Abstract
This chapter examines the debates surrounding transgenic technology in agriculture through the response of civil society organizations (CSOs) to Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) cotton in India. The study shows that the views of CSOs on Bt cotton differ, and there is a need to understand the conflicting interests and ideologies of CSOs. The increasing corporatisation of inputs, as exemplified by the Monsanto-driven Bt crops, exacerbates this squeeze. In this context, this study attempts to understand the responses of CSOs to genetically modified crops, specifically Bt cotton in India, concentrating on the larger implications for the farming community and debates surrounding agricultural biotechnology in India.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Cahoon RS (2007) Licensing agreements in agricultural biotechnology. In: Anatole KrAttiger RM (ed) In intellectual property management in health and agricultural innovation: a handbook of best practices. MIHR/PIPRA, Oxford, pp 1009–1016
Chakrabarty K (2011) Agricultural productivity and credit- issues and way forward. Reserve Bank of India. Reserve Bank of India, Pune, India, pp 1–11
Dogra B (2012) Traditional breeding outperforms genetic engineering, The Hindu, October 21
Dynes M (2002) Africa torn between GM aid and starvation. London Times. http://www.organicconsumers.org/gefood/africa080802.cfm Accessed 21 June 2013
Falkner R (2006) The international politics of genetically modified food: diplomacy, trade and law. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke
Fink G (2010) Stress of war, conflict and disaster. Academic, Amsterdam
Gill S (1994) Gramsci, historical materialism and international relations. Cambridge University Press, New York
Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture, Committee on Agriculture. (2012) Cultivation of genetically modified crops – prospects and effects. Lok Sabha Secretariat, New Delhi
Gramsci A (1992) Prison notebooks. Columbia University Press, New York
Kloppenburg JR Jr (2004) First the seed: the political economy of plant biotechnology, 1492–2000. University of Wisconsin Press, London
Krishnakumar A (2003) What is Bt cotton, Frontline, India, 6 June
Lalitha N (2004) Diffusion of agricultural biotechnology and intellectual property Rights: emerging issues in India. Ecol Econ 49(2):187–198
Leach MI (2007) Science and citizens: globalisation and the challenge of engagement. Orient Longman, New Delhi
Mallick S, Haribabu E, Reddy BB (2011) Industrialization of seed production: implications for agriculture in India. Perspect Glob Dev Technol 10(3–4):441–457
Menon P (2001) A farm crisis and suicides, Frontline, India, 7 April
Merton RK (1973) The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Pinstrup-Andersen P, Cohen Marc J (2000) Modern biotechnology for food and agriculture: risks and opportunities for the poor. In: Agricultural biotechnology and the poor: an international conference on biotechnology, pp 159–169
Qaim M (2001) Transgenic crops and developing countries. Econ Pol Wkly 36(32):3064–3070
Raghuram N (2002) India joins the GM club. Trends Plant Sci 7(7):322–323
Ramani SV (2008) After the green revolution, Bt. cotton in India: blessing or regulatory headache? Ecole Polytechnique, Working paper, F-91128 Palaiseau Cedex, France, pp 1–17
Ramanna A (2005) Bt. cotton and India’s policy on IPRs. Asian Biotechnol Dev Rev 7(2):43–51
Saha A (2001) Risk in HYV and traditional rice cultivation: an enquiry in West Bengal agriculture. Indian J Agric Econ 56:57–88
Sahai S (2002) A mixed bag. Frontline, India, 7 June
Sahai S (2012a) Monsanto pays for its sins. http://www.genecampaign.org/articles/MONSANTO-Pays.pdf. Accessed 13 Aug 2012
Sahai S (2012b) The failure of Monsanto’s Bt cotton. http://www.genecampaign.org/articles/Failure.MonsantoBtCotton.pdf. Accessed 21 July 2012
Sahai S (2012c) What should be the strategy for Bt technology. http://www.genecampaign.org/articles/Strategyof-BtCotton.pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2012
Sahai S, Rehman S (2004) Bt-cotton, 2003–2004: fields swamped with illegal variants. Econ Pol Wkly 39(26):2673–2674
Scoones I (2005) Science, agriculture and the politics of policy: the case of biotechnology in India. Orient Longman Private Limited, New Delhi
Shiva V (1993) The violence of the Green Revolution: agriculture, ecology and politics. Zed Books, London
Shiva V (2001) Yoked to death: globalisation and the corporate control of agriculture. Navdanya, New Delhi
Shiva V (2002) Stolen harvest: the hijacking of the global food supply. Navdanya, New Delhi
Shiva V (2004) The future of food: countering globalization and recolonisation of Indian agriculture. Futures 36:715–732
Shiva V (2006) Seed dictatorship and food fascism. Navdanya, New Delhi
Shiva V (2008) Seed monopolies, genetic engineering and farmers suicides. Navdanya, pp 1–4. http://www.whale.to/b/shiva.pdf. Accessed 28 July 2013
Shiva V (2009) No GM crops and food: a handbook for activists. Navdanya, New Delhi
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer India
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kumari, M., Mallick, S. (2015). Bacillus thuringiensis Cotton in India: Debates Surrounding Agricultural Biotechnology. In: Majumdar, S., Guha, S., Marakkath, N. (eds) Technology and Innovation for Social Change. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2071-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2071-8_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2070-1
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2071-8
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)