Advertisement

Role of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria and Their Formulation in Biocontrol of Plant Diseases

  • S. S. Shaikh
  • R. Z. Sayyed
Chapter

Abstract

Fungal phytopathogens are a major threat to crop plants. More than 60 fungal phytopathogens are known to cause various plant diseases. These diseases lead to the loss of 30 % crop yield that accounts to about 20,000 crore rupees per year in the global market. Different methods of chemotherapy have been used to control these diseases. However, uncontrolled use of chemical fungicides has severely affected the agroecosystem, leading to the development of pesticide-resistant pests and emergence of new species of pests. Increased dependence on chemicals is inevitably associated with environmental and health hazards. In this regard, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) have been found as an effective, eco-friendly, and sustainable replacement to the chemical fungicides. The present chapter focuses on antifungal traits such as siderophores, lytic enzymes, hydrogen cyanide, and antibiotics of PGPR, development of effective formulation of PGPR for longer shelf life and competitiveness with the natural environment, obstacles in formulation development, and characteristics of bioformulation. Biotechnological attributes of PGPR with respect to plant growth promotion, disease resistance, and iron nutrition are also discussed.

Keywords

Shelf Life Biocontrol Agent Lytic Enzyme Induce Systemic Resistance Hydrogen Cyanide 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgement

Author RZS is thankful to UGC, New Delhi, for providing financial support in this research project.

References

  1. Akhtar MS, Siddiqui ZA (2009) Use of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for the biocontrol of root-rot disease complex of chickpea. Aust Plant Pathol 38:44–50Google Scholar
  2. Albareda M, Rodríguez-Navarro DN, Camacho M, Temprano FJ (2008) Alternatives to peat as a carrier for rhizobia inoculants: solid and liquid formulations. Soil Biol Biochem 40:2771–2779Google Scholar
  3. Arora NK, Khare E, Maheshwari DK (2010) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: constraints in bioformulation, commercialization, and future strategies. In: Maheshwari DK (ed) Plant growth and health promoting bacteria, microbiology monographs. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 97–115Google Scholar
  4. Askeland RA, Morrison SM (1983) Cyanide production by Pseudomonas fluorescens and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Appl Environ Microbiol 45:1802–1807PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Bashan Y (1998) Inoculants of plant growth promoting bacteria use in agriculture. Biotech Adv 6:729–770Google Scholar
  6. Bashan Y, Holguin G (1998) Proposal for the division of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria into two classifications: biocontrol-PGPB (plant growth-promoting bacteria) and PGPB. Soil Biol Biochem 30:1225–1228Google Scholar
  7. Besson F, Michel G (1992) Biosynthesis of bacillomycin D activating enzymes by the use of affinity chromatography. FEBS Lett 308:18–21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bloemberg GV, Lugtenberg BJJ (2001) Molecular basis of plant growth promotion and biocontrol by rhizobacteria. Curr Opin Plant Biol 4:343–350PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Brar SK, Sarma SJ, Chaabouni E (2012) Shelf-life of biofertilizers: an accord between formulation and genetics. J Biofertil Biopestici 3:5Google Scholar
  10. Brittenham GM (1994) New advances in iron metabolism, iron deficiency and iron overload. Curr Opin Hematol 1:549–556Google Scholar
  11. Burges HD, Jones KA (1998) Trends in formulation of microorganisms and future research requirements. In: Burges HD (ed) Formulation of microbial biopesticides- beneficial organisms nematodes and seed treatment. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 311–331Google Scholar
  12. Castric PA (1975) Hydrogen cyanide, a secondary metabolite of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Can J Microbiol 21:613–618PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Castric PA (1977) Glycine metabolism by Pseudomonas aeruginosa: hydrogen cyanide biosynthesis. J Bacteriol 130:826–831PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Chaiharn M, Chunhaleuchanon S, Lumyong S (2009) Screening siderophore producing bacteria as potential biological control agent for fungal rice pathogens in Thailand. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 25(11):1919–1928Google Scholar
  15. Chincholkar SB, Chaudhari BL, Talegaonkar SK, Kothari RM (2000) Microbial iron chelators: a tool for sustainable agriculture. In: Upadhayay RK, Mukherji KG, Chamola BP (eds) Biocontrol potential and their exploration in crop disease management, vol 1. Kluwer Academic Press, New York, pp 49–70Google Scholar
  16. Chinnadurai C, Balachandar D, Sundaram SP (2009) Characterization of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase producing methylobacteria from phyllosphere of rice and their role in ethylene regulation. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 25:1403–1411Google Scholar
  17. Chitarra GS, Breeuwer P, Nout MJR, Aelst AC, van Rombouts FM, Abee T (2003) An antifungal compound produced by B. subtilis YM 10-20 inhibits germination of Penicillium roqueforti conidiospores. J Appl Microbiol 94:159–166PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Collins DP, Jacobsen RJ (2003) Optimizing a Bacillus subtilis isolate for biological control of sugar beet Cercospora leaf spot. Biol Cont 26:153–161Google Scholar
  19. Compant S, Duffy B, Nowak J, Clement C, Barka EA (2005) Use of plant growth-promoting bacteria for biocontrol of plant diseases: principles, mechanisms of action and future prospects. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:4951–4959PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Constantinescu F (2001) Extraction and identification of antifungal metabolites produced by some B. subtilis strains. Analele Institutului de Cercetari Pentru Cereale Protectia Plantelo 31:17–23Google Scholar
  21. Cronin D, Möenne-Loccoz Y, Fenton A, Dunne C, Dowling DN, O’Gara F (1997) Role of 2, 4-diacetylphloroglucinol in the interactions of the biocontrol pseudomonad strain F113 with the potato cyst nematode Globodera rostochiensis. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:1357–1361PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. De Souza JT, Weller DM, Raaijmakers JM (2003) Frequency, diversity and activity of 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol producing fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. in Dutch take-all decline soils. Phytopathol 93:54–63Google Scholar
  23. Emmert EA, Handelsman J (1999) Biocontrol of plant disease: a (gram) positive perspective. FEMS Microbiol Lett 171:1–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Fernando DWG, Nakkeeran S, Zhang Y (2005) Biosynthesis of antibiotics by PGPR and its relation in biocontrol of plant diseases. In: Siddiqui ZA (ed) PGPR: biocontrol and biofertilization. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 67–109Google Scholar
  25. Frankowski J, Lorito M, Scala F, Schmidt R, Berg G, Bahl H (2001) Purification and properties of two chitinolytic enzymes of Serratia plymuthica HRO-C48. Arch Microbiol 176:421–426PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Fravel DR (1988) Role of antibiosis in the biocontrol of plant diseases. Annu Rev Phytopathol 26:75–91Google Scholar
  27. Fravel DR, Connick WJ Jr, Jack AL (1998) Formulation of microorganisms to control plant diseases. In: Berges HD (ed) Formulation of microbial biopesticides, beneficial microorganisms, nematodes and seed treatments. Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht, pp 187–202Google Scholar
  28. Freitas SDS, Pizzinato MA (1997) Action of rhizobacteria on the Colletotrichum gossypii incidence and growth promotion in cotton seedlings. Summa Phytopathol 23:36–41Google Scholar
  29. Garbeva P, van Veen JA, van Elas JD (2004) Assessment of the diversity, and antagonism towards Rhizoctonia solani AG3, of Pseudomonas species in soil from different agricultural regimes. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 47:51–64PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Glick BR (2012) Plant growth-promoting bacteria: mechanisms and applications. Scientifica Article ID 963401, http://dx.doi.org/10.6064/2012/963401
  31. Glick BR, Patten CL, Holguin G, Penrose DM (1999) Biochemical and genetic mechanisms used by plant growth promoting bacteria. Imperial College Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Gohel V, Singh A, Misuria V, Phadnis A, Chhatpar HS (2005) Bioprospecting and antifungal potential of chitinolytic microorganisms. Afr J of Biotech 5(2):54–72Google Scholar
  33. Gupta SC (2005) Evaluation of liquid and carrier based Rhizobium inoculants in chickpea. Ind J of Pulses Res 18:40–42Google Scholar
  34. Gupta CP, Dubey RC, Maheshwari DK (2002) Plant growth enhancement and suppression Macrophomina phaseolina causing charcoal rot of peanut by fluorescent Pseudomonas. Biol Fertil Soils 35:399–405Google Scholar
  35. Gutierrez FJ, Ramos-Solano B, Probanza A, Mehouachi J, Tadeo FR, Talon M (2001) The plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria Bacillus licheniformis produce high amounts of physiologically active gibberellins. Physiol Plant 111:206–211Google Scholar
  36. Hass D, Defago G (2005) Biological control of soil borne pathogens by fluorescent pseudomonads. Nat Rev Microbiol 3:307–319Google Scholar
  37. Hider RC, Kong X (2010) Chemistry and biology of siderophores. Nat Prod Rep 27:637–657PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Hoben HJ, Aung NN, Somasegaran P, Kang UG (1991) Oils as adhesives for seed inoculation and their influence on the survival of Rhizobium spp. and Bradyrhizobium spp. on inoculated seeds. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 7:324–330PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Höfte M (1993) Classes of microbial siderophores. In: Barton LL, Hemming BC (eds) Iron chelation in plants and soil microorganisms. Academic, San Diego, pp 3–26Google Scholar
  40. Idris HA, Labuschagne N, Korsten L (2007) Screening rhizobacteria for biological control of Fusarium root and crown rot of sorghum in Ethiopia. J Biocontrol 40:97–106Google Scholar
  41. Johri BN, Rao CVS, Goel R (1997) Fluorescent pseudomonads in plant disease management. In: Dadarwal KR (ed) Biotechnological approaches in soil microorganisms for sustainable crop production. Scientific Publishers, Jodhpur, pp 193–223Google Scholar
  42. Jones KA, Burges HD (1998) Technology of formulation and application. In: Burges HD (ed) Formulation of microbial biopesticides- beneficial organisms nematodes and seed treatment. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 2–27Google Scholar
  43. Kamil Z, Rizk M, Saleh M, Moustafa S (2007) Isolation and identification of rhizosphere soil chitinolytic bacteria and their potential in antifungal biocontrol. Global J Mol Sci 2(2):57–66Google Scholar
  44. Kim KJ, Yang YJ, Kim JG (2003) Purification and characterization of Chitinase from Streptomyces sp. M-20. J Biochem Mol Biol 36(2):185–189PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Kim YC, Jung H, Kim KY, Park SK (2008) An effective biocontrol bioformulation against Phytophthora blight of pepper using growth mixtures of combined chitinolytic bacteria under different field conditions. Eur J Plant Pathol 120:373–382Google Scholar
  46. Kishore GK, Pande S (2007) Chitin-supplemented foliar application of chitinolytic Bacillus cereus reduces severity of Botrytis gray mold disease in chickpea under controlled conditions. Lett Appl Microbiol 44:98–10PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Kloepper JW, Schroth MN (1981) Development of a powder formulation of rhizobacteria for inoculation of potato seed pieces. Phytopathol 71:590–592Google Scholar
  48. Kloepper JW, Leong J, Teintze M, Schroth MN (1980) Enhanced plant growth by siderophores produced by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Nature 286:885–886Google Scholar
  49. Kloepper JW, Lifshitz R, Zablotowicz RM (1989) Free living bacterial inocula for enhancing crop productivity. Trend Biotechnol 7:39–43Google Scholar
  50. Kloepper JW, Tuzun S, Kuc J (1992) Proposed definitions related to induced disease resistance. Biocontrol Sci Technol 2:349–351Google Scholar
  51. Kosanke JW, Osburn RM, Shuppe GI, Smith RS (1992) Slow rehydration improves the recovery of dried bacterial populations. Can J Microbiol 38:520–525PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Kremer RJ, Peterson HL (1982) Effect of inoculant carrier on survival of Rhizobium on inoculated seed. Soil Sci 134:117–125Google Scholar
  53. Kumar V, Gupta P (2010) Studies on shelf-life of fly-ash based Azotobacter Chroococcum formulation and its bio-efficacy in wheat. Res J Agric Biol Sci 6(3):280–282Google Scholar
  54. Lemanceau P, Albouvette A (1993) Suppression of Fusarium wilts by fluorescent pseudomonas: mechanism and applications. Biocon Sci Technol 3:219–234Google Scholar
  55. Lewis JA (1991) Formulation and delivery system of biocontrol agents with emphasis on fungi Beltsville symposia in agricultural research. In: Keister DL, Cregan PB (eds) The rhizosphere and plant growth. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, pp 279–287Google Scholar
  56. Loni PP, Shyam S, Bajekal (2011) Alkaline chitinase from Bacillus firmus SBPL-05 isolated from alkaline-saline environment of Lonar lake. Indian J Fundam Appl Life Sci 1(3):161–165Google Scholar
  57. Lopez-Millan AF, Morales F, Abadia A, Abadia J (2001) Iron deficiency-associated changes in the composition of the leaf apoplastic fluid from field-grown pear (Pyrus communis) trees. J Exp Bot 52:1489–1498PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Lorck H (1948) Production of hydrocyanic acid by bacteria. Physiol Plant 11:142–146Google Scholar
  59. Lucy M, Reed E, Glick BR (2004) Applications of free living plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek Int J Gen Mol Microbiol 86:1–25Google Scholar
  60. Lugtenberg B, Kamilova F (2009) Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 63:541–556PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Madhaiyan M, Poonguzhali S, Sa T (2007) Characterization of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase containing Methylobacterium oryzae and interactions with auxins and ACC regulation of ethylene in canola (Brassica campestris). Planta 226:867–876PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Manjula K, Podile AR (2001) Chitin-supplemented formulations improve biocontrol and plant growth promoting efficiency of Bacillus subtilis AF 1. Can J Microbiol 47:618–625PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Mazzola M (2002) Mechanism of natural soil suppressiveness to soil borne diseases. Antonie van Leeuwenhock 81:557–564Google Scholar
  64. Miethke M, Marahiel MA (2007) Siderophore-based iron acquisition and pathogen control. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 71(3):413–451PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Nakkeeran S, Kavitha K, Mathiyazhagan S, Fernando WGD, Chandrasekar G, Renukadevi P (2004) Induced systemic resistance and plant growth promotion by Pseudomonas chlororaphis strain PA-23 and Bacillus subtilis strain CBE4 against rhizome rot of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.). Can J Plant Pathol 26:417–418Google Scholar
  66. Nakkeeran S, Fernando DWG, Siddiqui ZA (2005) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria formulations and its scope. In: Siddiqui ZA (ed) PGPR: biocontrol and biofertilization. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 257–296Google Scholar
  67. Nielsen TH, Thrane C, Christophersen C, Anthoni U, Sorensen J (2000) Structure production characteristic and fungal antagonism of tensin – a new antifungal cyclic lipopeptide from Pseudomonas fluorescence. J Appl Microbiol 89:992–1001PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Paau AS (1988) Formulation useful in applying beneficial microorganisms to seeds. Trends Biotechnol 6:276–278Google Scholar
  69. Paau AS (1998) Formulation of beneficial organisms applied to soil. In: Burges HD (ed) Formulation of microbial biopesticides- beneficial organisms nematodes and seed treatment. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 236–253Google Scholar
  70. Pandey P, Maheshwari DK (2007) Bioformulation of Burkholderia sp. MSSP with multispecies consortium for growth promotion of Cajanus cajan. Can J Microbiol 53:213–222PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Park SH, Lee JH, Lee HK (2000) Purification and characterization of chitinase from a marine bacterium, Vibrio sp. 98CJ11027. J Microbiol 38(4):224–229Google Scholar
  72. Patten CL, Glick BR (1996) Bacterial biosynthesis of indole-3-acetic acid. Can J Microbiol 42:207–220PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Pieterse CMJ, Pelt JA, Van Wees SCM, Ton J, L-Kloosterziel KM, Keurentjes JJB, Verhagen BMW (2001) Rhizobacteria mediated induced systemic resistance: triggering, signaling and expression. Eur J Plant Pathol 107:51–61Google Scholar
  74. Podile AR, Kishore GK (2006) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. In: Gnanamanickam SS (ed) Plant associated bacteria. Springer, Amsterdam, pp 195–230Google Scholar
  75. Rabindran R, Vidhyasekaran P (1996) Development of formulation of Pseudomonas fluorescens PfALR2 for management of rice sheath blight. Crop Prot 15:715–721Google Scholar
  76. Ramamoorthy V, Viswanathan R, Raghuchander T, Prakasam V, Samiyappan R (2001) Induction of systemic resistance by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in crop plants against pests and diseases. Crop Prot 20:1–11Google Scholar
  77. Ramos Solano B, García JAL, Villaraco AG, Algar E, Cristobal JG, Mañero FJG (2010) Siderophore and chitinase producing isolates from the rhizosphere of Nicotiana glauca Graham growth and induce systemic resistance in Solanum lycopersicum L. Plant Soil 334:189–197Google Scholar
  78. Ran LX, Liu CI, Wu GJ, van Loon LC, Bakker PAHM (2005) Suppression of bacterial wilt in Eucalyptus urophylla by fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. in China. Biol Control 32:111–120Google Scholar
  79. Rebah FB, Prevost D, Yezza A, Tyagi RD (2007) Agro-industrial waste materials and wastewater sludge for rhizobial inoculant production: a review. Bioresour Technol 98:3535–3546PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Saharan BS, Nehra V (2011) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: a critical review life sciences and medicine research. LSMR 21:1–30Google Scholar
  81. Sayyed RZ, Chincholkar SB (2009) Siderophore producing A. feacalis more biocontrol potential vis-a’-vis chemical fungicide. Curr Microbiol 58(1):47–51PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Sayyed RZ, Patel PR (2011) Biocontrol potential of siderophore producing heavy metal resistant Alcaligenes sp. and Pseudomonas aerogenosa RZS3. vis-à-vis organophosphorus fungicide. Ind J Microbiol 51(3):266–272Google Scholar
  83. Sayyed RZ, Naphade BS, Chincholkar SB (2005) Ecologically competent rhizobacteria for plant growth promotion and disease management. In: Rai MK, Chikhale NJ, Thakare PV, Wadegaonkar PA, Ramteke AP (eds) Rec trends biotechnol. Scientific Publishers, Jodhpur, pp 1–16Google Scholar
  84. Sayyed RZ, Naphade BS, Chincholklar SB (2007a) Siderophore producing A. feacalis promoted the growth of Safed musali and Ashwagandha. J Med Arom Plants 29:1–5Google Scholar
  85. Sayyed RZ, Patel DC, Patel PR (2007b) Plant growth promoting potential of P solubilizing Pseudomonas sp. occurring in acidic soil of Jalgaon. Asian J Microbiol Biotechnol Environ Sci 4:925–928Google Scholar
  86. Sayyed RZ, Reddy MS, Kumar KV, Yellareddygari SKR, Deshmukh AM, Patel PR, Gangurde NS (2012) Potential of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria for sustainable agriculture. In: Maheshwari DK (ed) Bacteria in agrobiology: plant probiotics. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 287–313Google Scholar
  87. Sayyed RZ, Chincholkar SB, Reddy MS, Gangurde NS, Patel PR (2013) Siderophore producing PGPR for crop nutrition and phytopathogen suppression. In: Maheshwari DK (ed) Bacteria in agrobiology: disease management. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 449–471Google Scholar
  88. Schippers B, Bakker A, Bakker P, van Peer R (1990) Beneficial and deleterious effects of HCN-producing pseudomonads on rhizosphere interactions. Plant Soil 129:75–83Google Scholar
  89. Sharma A, Shankhdhar D, Shankhdhar SC (2013a) Enhancing grain iron content of rice by the application of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Plant Soil Environ 59(2):89–94Google Scholar
  90. Sharma SB, Sayyed RZ, Trivedi MH, Gobi TA (2013b) Phosphate solubilizing microbes: sustainable approach for managing phosphorus deficiency in agricultural soils. Springer Plus 2:587Google Scholar
  91. Sindhu SS, Suneja S, Dadarwal KR (1997) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and their role in crop productivity. In: Dadarwal KR (ed) Biotechnological approaches in soil microorganisms for sustainable crop production. Scientific Publishers, Jodhpur, pp 149–193Google Scholar
  92. Singh PP, Shin YC, Park CS, Chung YR (1999) Biological control of Fusarium wilt of cucumber by chitinolytic bacteria. Phytopathol 89:92–99Google Scholar
  93. Singleton P, Keyser H, Sande E (2002) Development and Evaluation of Liquid Inoculants. In: Herridge D (ed) Inoculants and nitrogen fixation of legumes in Vietnam, ACIAR Proceedings Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Canberra, Australia 109:52–66Google Scholar
  94. Slininger PJ, Van Cauwenberge JE, Bothast RJ, Weller DM, Thomashow LS, Cook RJ (1996) Effect of growth culture physiological state, metabolites, and formulation on the viability, phytotoxicity, and efficacy of the take-all biocontrol agent Pseudomonas fluorescens 2–79 stored encapsulated on wheat seeds. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 45:391–398Google Scholar
  95. Sullivan DJO, Gara FO (1992) Traits of fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. involved in suppression of plant root pathogens. Microbiol Rev 56(4):662–676Google Scholar
  96. Thrane C, Harder NI, Neiendam NM, Sorensen J, Olson S (2000) Visconiamide producing Pseudomonas fluorescence DR 54 exerts a biocontrol effect on Pythium ultimum in sugar beet. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 33:139–146PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Tilak KVBR, Saxena AK (1986) Biofertilizers – their role in crop production. Fertil Indust 19:187–194Google Scholar
  98. Velusamy P, Kim KY (2011) Chitinolytic activity of Enterobacter sp. KB3 antagonistic to Rhizoctonia solani and its role in the degradation of living fungal hyphae. Int Res J Microbiol 2(6):206–214Google Scholar
  99. Vendan RT, Thangaraju M (2006) Development and standardization of liquid formulation for Azospirillum bioinoculant. Ind J Microbiol 46:379–387Google Scholar
  100. Vendan RT, Thangaraju M (2007) Development and standardization of cyst based liquid formulation of Azospirillum bioinoculant. Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung 54:166–177Google Scholar
  101. Vessey JK (2003) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers. Plant Soil 255:571–586Google Scholar
  102. Vidhyasekaran P, Muthamilan M (1995) Development of formulations of Pseudomonas fluorescens for control of chickpea wilt. Plant Dis 79:782–786Google Scholar
  103. Vincent MN, Harrison LA, Brackin JM, Kovacevich PA, Mukerji P, Weller DM, Pierson EA (1991) Genetic analysis of the antifungal activity of a soilborne Pseudomonas aureofaciens strain. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:2928–2934PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  104. Voisard C, Keel C, Haas D, Defago G (1989) Cyanide production by Pseudomonas fluorescens helps suppress black root rot of tobacco under gnotobiotic conditions. EMBO J 8:351–358PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  105. Vora MS, Shelat HN, Vyas RV (2008) Liquid biofertilizers: a new vistas. In: Vora MS, Shelat HN, Vyas RV (eds) Handbook of biofertilizers and microbial pesticides. Satish Serial Publishing House, New Delhi, pp 87–90Google Scholar
  106. Yu GY, Sinclair JB, Hartman GL, Beragnolli BL (2002) Production of iturin A by B. amyloliquefaciens suppressing R. solani. Soil Biol Bioche 34:955–963Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MicrobiologyShri S. I. Patil Arts, G. B. Patel Science and S.T.S.K.V.S. Commerce CollegeNandurbarIndia

Personalised recommendations