Integrated Management of Mine Waste Using Biogeotechnologies Focusing Thai Mines



The history of mining for precious minerals dates back to several centuries. Mining is important for economy but causes environmental contamination. However, mine waste reclamation and mine environment cleanup are a subject of recent origin focusing various aspects of biogeotechnologies. In general, the subject of environmental remediation is about three decades old, and today the advances in this field are capable of handling a variety of toxic waste. Different strategies and approaches are employed to render mine waste less toxic. Mining had negative effects on natural resources (biotic and abiotic) and deteriorates the quality of environment. Different types of mine industries are implicated in promoting “industrial deserts” or “lunar scapes” which are overloaded with technogenic waste. Soil washing and cleaning in such situation is cost prohibitive. This chapter deals with reclamation of a zinc, lead, and tin (arsenic) mine waste with reference to Thailand (see graphic abstract Fig. 1).


Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungus Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Mine Waste Mine Tailing Mycorrhizal Plant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The authors gratefully acknowledge the receipt of financial support under the auspices of India-Thailand bilateral scientific cooperation ref. DST/INT/THAI/P-02/2012 dated 31-1-13. Thanks are also due to Mahasarakham University for supporting this joining research.


  1. Ahmad M, Rajapaksha AU, Lim JE, Zhang M, Bolan N, Mohan D, Vithanage M, Lee SS, Ok YS (2014) Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: a review. Chemosphere 99:19–33Google Scholar
  2. Alkorta I, Hernandez-Allica J, Garibasu C (2004) Plants against the global epidemic of arsenic poisoning. Environ Int 30:949–951Google Scholar
  3. Anderson CR, Cook GM (2004) Isolation and characterization of arsenate-reducing bacteria from arsenic-contaminated sites in New Zealand. Curr Microbiol 48:341–347Google Scholar
  4. Ardau C, Lattanzi P, Peretti R, Zucca A (2013) Treatment of mine wastes with Transformed Red Muds (TRM) and other iron compounds: leaching column tests. Proc Earth Planet Sci 7:467–470Google Scholar
  5. Arienzo M, Adamo P, Cozzolino V (2004) The potential of Lolium perenne for revegetation of contaminated soil from a metallurgical site. Sci Total Environ 319:13–25Google Scholar
  6. Arrykul S, Kooptarnon K, Wittayawarawat W (1996) Contamination of arsenic, cadmium, and lead in Pakpanang River Basin, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand. International Symposium on Geology and Environment, 31 January–2 February, 1996Google Scholar
  7. Asensio V, Vega FA, Singh BR, Covelo EF (2013a) Effects of tree vegetation and waste amendments on the fractionation of Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn in polluted mine soils. Sci Total Environ 443:446–453Google Scholar
  8. Asensio V, Vega FA, Andrade ML, Covelo EF (2013b) Tree vegetation and waste amendments to improve the physical condition of copper mine soils. Chemosphere 90:603–610Google Scholar
  9. Assavarak P (2012) Constructed identity and community self-expression to perceive human security; case study of Klity village, Kanchanaburi Province, Thailand. Mediter J Social Sci 3:239–246Google Scholar
  10. Badiozamani MM, Askari-Nasab H (2014) Integration of reclamation and tailings management in oil sands surface mine planning. Environ Model Softw 51:45–58Google Scholar
  11. Bech J, Duran P, Roca N, Poma W, Sanchez I, Barcelo J, Boluda R-PL, Poschenrieder C (2012) Shoot accumulation of several trace elements in native plant species from contaminated soils in the Peruvian Andes. J Geochem Explor 113:106–111Google Scholar
  12. Bell LC (2001) Establishment of native ecosystems after mining – Australian experience across diverse biogeographic zones. Ecol Eng 17:179–186Google Scholar
  13. Benzaazoua M, Bussière B, Demers I, Aubertin M, Fried E, Blier A (2008) Integrated mine tailings management by combining environmental desulphurization and cemented paste backfill: application to mine Doyon, Quebec. Can Min Eng 21:330–340Google Scholar
  14. Bian R, Chen D, Liu X, Cui L, Li L, Pan G, Xie D, Zheng J, Zhang X, Zheng J, Chang A (2013) Biochar soil amendment as a solution to prevent Cd-tainted rice from China: results from a cross-site field experiment. Ecol Eng 58:378–383Google Scholar
  15. Bidar G, Garçon G, Pruvot C, Dewaele D, Cazier F, Douay F, Shirali P (2007) Behavior of Trifolium repens and Lolium perenne growing in a heavy metal contaminated field: plant metal concentration and phytotoxicity. Environ Poll 147:546–553Google Scholar
  16. Bigot M, Guterres J, Rossato L, Pudmenzky A, Doley D, Whittaker M, Pillai-McGarry U, Schmidt S (2013) Metal-binding hydrogel particles alleviate soil toxicity and facilitate healthy plant establishment of the native metallophyte grass Astrebla lappacea in mine waste rock and tailings. J Hazard Mater 248–249:424–434Google Scholar
  17. Bradshaw A (1997) Restoration of mined lands-using natural processes. Ecol Eng 8:255–269Google Scholar
  18. Bradshaw A (2000) The use of natural processes in reclamation – advantages and difficulties. Lands Urban Plan 51:89–100Google Scholar
  19. Cao X, Ma LQ, Shiralipour A (2003) Effects of compost and phosphate amendments on arsenic mobility in soils and arsenic uptake by the hyperaccumulator, Pteris vittata L. Environ Pollut 126:157–167Google Scholar
  20. Cappai G, De Gioannis G, Muntoni A, Spiga D, Zijlstra JJP (2012) Combined use of a transformed red mud reactive barrier and electrokinetics for remediation of Cr/As contaminated soil. Chemosphere 86:400–408Google Scholar
  21. Chen Y, Shen Z, Li X (2004) The use of vetiver grass (Vetiveria zizanioides) in the phytoremediation of soils contaminated with heavy metals. Appl Geochem 19:1553–1565Google Scholar
  22. Chen L, Tian Y, Stehouwer R, Kost D, Guo X, Bigham JM, Beeghly J, Dick WA (2013) Surface coal mine land reclamation using a dry flue gas desulfurization product: long-term biological response. Fuel 105:258–265Google Scholar
  23. Chintakovid W, Visoottiviseth P, Khokiattiwong S, Lauengsuchonkul S (2008) Potential of the hybrid marigolds for arsenic phytoremediation and income generation of remediators in Ron Phibun District, Thailand. Chemosphere 70:1532–1537Google Scholar
  24. Chiu KK, Ye ZH, Wong MH (2006) Growth of vetiveria zizanioides and phragmities Australis on Pb/Zn and Cu mine tailings amended with manure compost and sewage sludge: a greenhouse study. Bioresour Technol 97:158–170Google Scholar
  25. Choprapwon C, Porapakkham Y (2001) Occurrence of cancer in arsenic contaminated area, Ronpibool District, Nakorn Srithmmarat Province, Thailand. In: Chappell WR, Abernathy CO, Calderon RL (eds) Arsenic exposure and health effects. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 201–206Google Scholar
  26. De Koe T (1994) Agrostis castellana and Agrostis delicatula on heavy metal and arsenic enriched sites in NE Portugal. Sci Total Environ 145:103–109Google Scholar
  27. Demers I, Bussière B, Benzaazoua M, Mbonimpa M, Blier A (2008) Column test investigation on the performance of monolayer covers made of desulphurized tailings to prevent acid mine drainage. Min Eng 21:317–329Google Scholar
  28. Dhankher OP, Li Y, Rosen BD, Shi J, Salt D, Senecoff JF, Sashti NA, Meagher RB (2002) Engineering tolerance and hyperaccumulation of arsenic in plants by combining arsenate reductase and γ-glutamyl cysteine synthetase expression. Nat Biotechnol 20:1140–1145Google Scholar
  29. Dixon HBF (1997) The biochemical action of arsonic acids especially as phosphate analogues. In: Sykes AG (ed) Advances in inorganic chemistry. Academic Press, Inc., USA, pp 191–228Google Scholar
  30. Dobran S, Zagury GJ (2005) Arsenic speciation and mobilization in CCA-contaminated soils: influence of organic matter content. Sci Total Environ 364:239–250Google Scholar
  31. Drahota P, Filippi M, Ettler V, Rohovec J, Mihaljevič M, Šebek O (2012) Natural attenuation of arsenic in soils near a highly contaminated historical mine waste dump. Sci Total Environ 414:546–555Google Scholar
  32. Elless MP, Poynton CY, Willms CA, Doyle MP, Lopez AC, Sokkary DA, Ferguson BW, Blaylock MJ (2005) Pilot-scale demonstration of phytofiltration for treatment of arsenic in New Mexico drinking water. Water Res 39:3863–3872Google Scholar
  33. Fall M, Célestin JC, Han FS (2009) Suitability of bentonite-paste tailings mixtures as engineering barrier material for mine waste containment facilities. Min Eng 22:840–848Google Scholar
  34. Fitz WJ, Wenzel WW (2002) Arsenic transformations in the soil–rhizosphere–plant system: fundamentals and potential application to phytoremediation. J Biotechnol 99:259–278Google Scholar
  35. Francesconi K, Visoottiviseth P, Sridokchan W, Goessler W (2002) Arsenic species in an arsenic hyperaccumulating fern, Pityrogramma calomelanos: a potential phytoremediator of arsenic-contaminated soils. Sci Total Environ 284:27–35Google Scholar
  36. Gao Y, Mucci A (2003) Individual and competitive adsorption of phosphate and arsenate on goethite in artificial seawater. Chem Geol 199:91–109Google Scholar
  37. Gaur A, Adholeya A (2004) Prospects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in phytoremediation of heavy metal contaminated soils. Curr Sci 86:528–534Google Scholar
  38. Gregory PJ, Atwell BJ (1991) The fate of carbon in pulse-labelled crops of barley and wheat. Plant Soil 136:205–213Google Scholar
  39. Heeraman DA, Claassen VP, Zasoski RJ (2001) Interaction of lime, organic matter and fertilizer on growth and uptake of arsenic and mercury by Zorro fescue (Vulpia myuros L.). Plant Soil 234:215–231Google Scholar
  40. Holmström H, Öhlander B (2001) Layers rich in Fe- and Mn-oxyhydroxides formed at the tailings-pond water interface, a possible trap for trace metals in flooded mine tailings. J Geochem Explor 74:189–203Google Scholar
  41. Homyog K, Pokethitiyook P, Kruatrachue M, Chaiyarat R, Ngernsansaruay C (2008) Spatial and seasonal variations in lead content of plants colonizing the Bo Ngam lead mine, Thailand. Sci Asia 34:169–178Google Scholar
  42. Huq SM, Joardar JC, Parvin S (2005) Marigold (Tagetes patula) and ornamental arum (Syngonia sp.) as phytoremediators for arsenic in pot soil. Bangladesh J Bot 34:65–70Google Scholar
  43. Jankong P, Visoottiviseth P (2008) Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation on plants growing on arsenic contaminated soil. Chemosphere 72:1092–1097Google Scholar
  44. Jankong P, Visoottiviseth P, Khokiattiwong S (2007) Enhanced phytoremediation of arsenic contaminated land. Chemosphere 68:1906–1912Google Scholar
  45. Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) (2000) Final report on the environmental management planning survey for arsenic contaminated areas of the Nakhon Si Thammarat Province in the Kingdom of Thailand. Mitsui Mineral Development Engineering Co. Ltd., JapanGoogle Scholar
  46. Kalin M, Wheeler WN (2011) Ecological perspectives in restoring mine waste management areas. Proc Environ Sci 9:90–95Google Scholar
  47. Kijjanapanich P, Annachhatre AP, Esposito G, Lens PNL (2014) Use of organic substrates as electron donors for biological sulfate reduction in gypsiferous mine soils from Nakhon Si Thammarat (Thailand). Chemosphere 101:1–7Google Scholar
  48. Kim H, Benson CH (2004) Contributions of advective and diffusive oxygen transport through multilayer composite caps over mine waste. J Contam Hydrol 71:193–218Google Scholar
  49. Koltai H, Kapulnik Y (2010) Arbuscular mycorrhizas: physiology and functions. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  50. Kurosawa K, Egashira K, Tani M, Jahiruddin M, Moslehuddin AZM, Rahman ZM (2008) Groundwater–soil–crop relationship with respect to arsenic contamination in farming villages of Bangladesh – a preliminary study. Environ Pollut 156:563–565Google Scholar
  51. Lee RB (1982) Selectivity and kinetics of ion uptake by barley plants following nutrient deficiency. Ann Bot 50:429–449Google Scholar
  52. Li MS (2006) Ecological restoration of mineland with particular reference to the metalliferous mine wasteland in China: a review of research and practice. Sci Total Environ 357:38–53Google Scholar
  53. Li T, Tao Q, Liang C, Shohag MJI, Yang X, Sparks DL (2013) Complexation with dissolved organic matter and mobility control of heavy metals in the rhizosphere of hyperaccumulator Sedum alfredii. Environ Pollut 182:248–255Google Scholar
  54. Luo Z-B, Wu C, Zhang C, Li H, Lipka U, Polle A (2014) The role of ectomycorrhizas in heavy metal stress tolerance of host plants. Environ Exp Bot (in press) doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2013.10.018#doilink
  55. Lupo JF, Morrison KF (2007) Geosynthetic design and construction approaches in the mining industry. Geotext Geomembr 25:96–108Google Scholar
  56. Ma LQ, Komar KM, Tu C, Zhang WH, Cai Y, Kennelley ED (2001) A fern that hyperaccumulates arsenic. Nature 409:579Google Scholar
  57. Macías F, Caraballo MA, Nieto JM (2012) Environmental assessment and management of metal-rich wastes generated in acid mine drainage passive remediation systems. J Hazard Mater 229–230:107–114Google Scholar
  58. Mandal BK, Suzuki KT (2002) Arsenic round the world: a review. Talanta 58:201–235Google Scholar
  59. Marschner H (1995) Mineral nutrition of higher plants, 2nd edn. Academic Press Ltd., LondonGoogle Scholar
  60. Meeinkuirt W, Pokethitiyook P, Kruatrachue M, Tanhan P, Chaiyarat R (2012) Phytostabilization of a Pb-contaminated mine tailing by various tree species in pot and field trial experiments. Int J Phytoremediat 14:925–938Google Scholar
  61. Meeinkuirt W, Kruatrachue M, Tanhan P, Chaiyarat R, Pokethitiyook P (2013) Phytostabilization potential of Pb mine tailings by two grass species, Thysanolaena maxima and Vetiveria zizanioides. Water Air Soil Pollut 224:1750Google Scholar
  62. Meharg AA, Hartley-Whitaker J (2002) Arsenic uptake and metabolism in arsenic resistant and nonresistant plant species. New Phytol 154:29–43Google Scholar
  63. Mopoung S, Thavornyutikarn P (2006) Leaching of arsenic from contaminated soil amended with red clay. NU Sci J 2(2):151–156Google Scholar
  64. Nakwanit S, Visoottiviseth P, Khokiattiwong S, Sangchoom W (2011) Management of arsenic-accumulated waste from constructed wetland treatment of mountain tap-water. J Hazard Mater 185:1081–1085Google Scholar
  65. Nobuntou W, Parkpian P, Oanh NT, Noomhorm A, Delaune RD, Jugsujinda A (2010) Lead distribution and its potential risk to the environment: lesson learned from environmental monitoring of abandon mine. J Environ Sci Health A 45(13):1702–1714Google Scholar
  66. Pacheco-Torgal F, Castro-Gomes J, Jalali S (2008) Properties of tungsten mine waste geopolymeric binder. Constr Build Mater 22:1201–1211Google Scholar
  67. Pang J, Chan GSY, Zhang J, Liang J, Wong MH (2003) Physiological aspects of vetiver grass for rehabilitation in abandoned metalliferous mine wastes. Chemosphere 52:1559–1570Google Scholar
  68. Panitlertumpai N, Nakbanpote W, Sangdee A, Thumanu K, Nakai I, Hokura A (2013) Zinc and/or cadmium accumulation in Gynura pseudochina (L.) DC. studied in vitro and the effect on crude protein. J Mol Struct 1036:279–291Google Scholar
  69. Pollution Control Department (2004) Lead contamination in Klity creek, Amphoe Tong Pa Pume, Kanchanaburi Province, Pollution Control Department, Bangkok. (Document in Thai)Google Scholar
  70. Prach K, Pyšek P (2001) Using spontaneous succession for restoration of human-disturbed habitats: experience from Central Europe. Ecol Eng 17:55–62Google Scholar
  71. Prasad MNV (2012) Exploitation of weeds and ornamentals for bioremediation of metalliferous substrates in the era of climate change. In: Ahmad P, Prasad MNV (eds) Environmental adaptations and stress tolerance of plants in the era of climate change. Springer, New York, pp 487–508. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-0815-4_23 Google Scholar
  72. Prasad MNV (2014) Engineered phyto-covers as natural caps for containment of hazardous mine and municipal solid waste dump sites – possible energy sources. In: Oztürk M, Ashraf M, Aksoy A, Ahmad MSA (eds) Phytoremediation for green energy. Springer Science + Business Media, Dordrecht. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-7887-0_3 Google Scholar
  73. Prasad MNV, Nakbanpote W, Sebastian A, Panitlertumpai N, Phadermrod C (2014) Phytomanagement of Padaeng zinc mine waste, Mae Sot District, Tak Province, Thailand. In: Munir ozturk et al. (eds) Soil remediation and plants. Elsevier. (in press)Google Scholar
  74. Pusapukdepob J, Sawangwong P, Pulket C, Satraphat D, Saowakontha S, Panutrakul S (2007) Health risk assessment of villagers who live near a lead mining area: a case study of Klity village, Kanchanaburi province, Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 38(1):168–177Google Scholar
  75. Ram LC, Masto RE (2010) An appraisal of the potential use of fly ash for reclaiming coal mine spoil. J Environ Manag 91:603–617Google Scholar
  76. Rotkittikhun P, Kruatrachue M, Chaiyarat R, Ngernsansaruay C, Pokethitiyook P, Paijitprapaporn A, Baker AJM (2006) Uptake and accumulation of lead by plants from the Bo Ngam lead mine area in Thailand. Environ Pollut 144:681–688Google Scholar
  77. Rotkittikhun P, Chaiyarat R, Kruatrachue M, Pokethitiyook P, Baker AJM (2007) Growth and lead accumulation by the grasses Vetiveria zizanioides and Thysanolaena maxima in lead-contaminated soil amended with pig manure and fertilizer: a glasshouse study. Chemosphere 66:45–53Google Scholar
  78. Santibáñez C, Ginocchio R, Varnero MT (2007) Evaluation of nitrate leaching from mine tailings amended with biosolids under Mediterranean type climate conditions. Soil Biol Biochem 39:1333–1340Google Scholar
  79. Santibáñez C, Verdugo C, Ginocchio R (2008) Phytostabilization of copper mine tailings with biosolids: implications for metal uptake and productivity of Lolium perenne. Sci Total Environ 395:1–10Google Scholar
  80. Sharples JM, Meharg AA, Chambers SM, Cairney JWG (1999) Arsenate sensitivity in ericoid and ectomycorrhizal fungi. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:1848–1855Google Scholar
  81. Sharples JM, Meharg AA, Chambers SM, Cairney JWG (2000a) Mechanism of arsenate resistance in the ericoid mycorrhizal fungus Hymenoscyphus ericae. Plant Physiol 124:1327–1334Google Scholar
  82. Sharples JM, Meharg AA, Chambers SM, Cairney JWG (2000b) Evolution: symbiotic solution to arsenic contamination. Nature 404:951–952Google Scholar
  83. Simmons RW, Pongsakul P, Saiyasitpanich D, Klinphoklap S (2005) elevated levels of cadmium and zinc in paddy soils and elevated levels of cadmium in rice grain downstream of a zinc mineralized area in Thailand: implications for public health. Environ Geochem Health 27:501–511Google Scholar
  84. Siripornadulsil S, Siripornadulsil W (2013) Cadmium-tolerant bacteria reduce the uptake of cadmium in rice: potential for microbial bioremediation. Ecotoxicol Environ Safe 94:94–103Google Scholar
  85. Sneller FEC, van Heerwaarden LM, Kraaijeveldsmit FJL, Ten Bookum WM, Koevoets PLM, Schat H, Verkleij JAC (1999) Toxicity of arsenate in Silene vulgaris, accumulation and degradation of arsenate-induced phytochelatins. New Phytol 144:223–232Google Scholar
  86. Solís-Domínguez FA, Valentín-Vargas A, Chorover J, Maier RM (2011) Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on plant biomass and the rhizosphere microbial community structure of mesquite grown in acidic lead/zinc mine tailings. Sci Total Environ 409:1009–1016Google Scholar
  87. Soongsombat P, Kruatrachue M, Chaiyarat R, Pokethitiyook P, Ngernsansaruay C (2009) Lead tolerance and accumulation in Pteris vittata and Pityrogramma calomelanos, and their potential for phytoremediation of lead-contaminated soil. Int J Phytoremediat 11:396–412Google Scholar
  88. Sridokchan W, Markich S, Visoottiviseth P (2005) Arsenic tolerance, accumulation and elemental distribution in twelve ferns: a screening study. Australas J Ecotoxicol 11:101–110Google Scholar
  89. Stierle AA, Stierle DB (2013) Bioprospecting in the Berkeley Pit: the use of signal transduction enzyme inhibition assays to isolate bioactive secondary metabolites from the extremophilic fungi of an acid mine Waste Lake. Stud Nat Prod Chem 39:1–45Google Scholar
  90. Stokes A, Sotir R, Chen W, Ghestem M (2010) Soil bio- and eco-engineering in China: past experience and future priorities. Ecol Eng 36:247–257Google Scholar
  91. Sukyankij S, Panichpat T (2012) Comparison of sunflower and sorghum in absorbing lead contaminated soil at Klity village, Kanchanaburi province. The 9th National Kasetsart University Kamphaeng saen Conference, 9, pp 428–436Google Scholar
  92. Surat W, Kruatrachue M, Pokethitiyook P, Tanhan P, Samranwanich T (2008) Potential of Sonchus arvensis for the phytoremediation of lead-contaminated soil. Int J Phytoremediat 10(4):325–342Google Scholar
  93. Swaddiwudhipong W, Limpatanachote P, Mahasakpan P, Krintratun S, Punta B, Funkhiew T (2012) Progress in cadmium-related health effects in persons with high environmental exposure in northwestern Thailand: a five-year follow-up. Environ Res 112:194–198Google Scholar
  94. Tamang B, Rockwood DL, Langholtz M, Maehr E, Becker B, Segrest S (2008) Fast-growing trees for cogon grass (Imperata cylindrica) suppression and enhanced colonization of understory plant species on a phosphate-mine clay settling area. Ecol Eng 32:329–336Google Scholar
  95. Tanhan P, Kruatrachue M, Pokethitiyook P, Chaiyarat R (2007) Uptake and accumulation of cadmium, lead and zinc by Siam weed [Chromolaena odorata (L.) King & Robinson]. Chemosphere 68(2):323–329Google Scholar
  96. Tanhan P, Pokethitiyook P, Kruatrachue M, Chaiyarat R, Upatham S (2011) Effects of soil amendments and EDTA on lead uptake by Chromolaena odorata: greenhouse and field trial experiments. Int J Phytoremediat 13(9):897–911Google Scholar
  97. Tanpibal V (1989) Characteristics and management of tin mine tailings in Thailand. Soil Technol 2:17–26Google Scholar
  98. The Nation (2013) Lead contamination: Klity villagers want creek cleaned quickly. Kanchanaburi, March 30, 2013Google Scholar
  99. Tlustoš P, Balík J, Pavlíková D, Száková J (1997) The uptake of cadmium, zinc, arsenic and lead by chosen crops. Rostl Výr 43:487–494Google Scholar
  100. Truong P (2004) Vetiver grass technology for mine tailings rehabilitation. In: Barker D, Watson A, Sompatpanit S, Northcut B, Maglinao A (eds) Ground and water bioengineering for erosion control and slope stabilization. Science, Enfield, pp 379–389Google Scholar
  101. Tu S, Ma LQ, MacDonald GE, Bondada B (2004) Effects of arsenic species and phosphorus on arsenic absorption, arsenate reduction and thiol formation in excised parts of Pteris vittata L. Environ Exp Bot 51:121–131Google Scholar
  102. Valente T, Gomes P, Pamplona J, de la Torre ML (2012) Natural stabilization of mine waste-dumps – evolution of the vegetation cover in distinctive geochemical and mineralogical environments. J Geochem Explor 123:152–161Google Scholar
  103. Visoottiviseth P, Francesconi K, Sridokchan W (2002) The potential of Thai indigenous plant species for the phytoremediation of arsenic contaminated land. Environ Pollut 118:453–461Google Scholar
  104. Wang HB, He HB, Yang GD, Ye CY, Niu BH, Lin WX (2010) Effects of two species of inorganic arsenic on the nutrient physiology of rice seedlings. Acta Physiol Plant 32:245–251Google Scholar
  105. Waranusantigul P, Lee H, Kruatrachue M, Pokethitiyook P, Auesukaree C (2011) Isolation and characterization of lead-tolerant Ochrobactrum intermedium and its role in enhancing lead accumulation by Eucalyptus camaldulensis. Chemosphere 85:584–590Google Scholar
  106. Williams M, Fordyce F, Paijitprapapon A, Charoenchaisri P (1996) Arsenic contamination in surface drainage and groundwater in part of the southeastern Asian tin belt, Nakhon Si Thammarat Province, southern Thailand. Environ Geol 27:16–33Google Scholar
  107. Wong MH (2003) Ecological restoration of mine degraded soils, with emphasis on metal contaminated soils. Chemosphere 50:775–780Google Scholar
  108. Wu FY, Ye ZH, Wong MH (2009) Intraspecific differences of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in their impacts on arsenic accumulation by Pteris vittata L. Chemosphere 76:1258–1264Google Scholar
  109. Zhang L, Ahmari S, Zhang J (2011) Synthesis and characterization of fly ash modified mine tailings-based geopolymers construction and building materials. Constr Build Mater 25:3773–3781Google Scholar
  110. Zhao FJ, Dunham SJ, McGrath SP (2002) Arsenic hyperaccumulation by different fern species. New Phytol 156:27–31Google Scholar
  111. Zornoza R, Cano AF, Carmona DM, Martínez-Martínez S, Acosta JA (2012) Plant cover and soil biochemical properties in a mine tailing pond five years after application of marble wastes and organic amendments. Pedosphere 22:22–32Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plant SciencesUniversity of HyderabadHyderabadIndia
  2. 2.Department of Biology, Faculty of ScienceMahasarakham UniversityMahasarakhamThailand

Personalised recommendations