Skip to main content

Theorizing About Depersonalized Bullying at Work

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Depersonalized Bullying at Work

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Psychology ((BRIEFSPSYCHOL))

Abstract

Depersonalized bullying at work has emerged through empirical research as a concept in its own right, emphasizing the importance of the organizational level of analysis in workplace bullying. Yet, the discovery of this concept was not followed up by any attempts to take it forward. The findings of Studies I and II presented in Chap. 3 along with the limited earlier literature are drawn upon to overcome this lacuna. In delineating the source, visibility, form, aetiology, target orientation, duration, power dynamics and outcomes of depersonalized bullying, the singular nature of the phenomenon is established. In developing a theoretical framework of depersonalized bullying, the available knowledge is integrated to demonstrate the linkages between various stakeholders through antecedents, course and consequences as well as temporality, setting, form and other influences. Gaps that warrant further investigation and points where intervention is required can both be identified. Theorizing on these lines allows for conceptual equivalences between interpersonal and depersonalized bullying at work to be achieved. In suggesting mechanisms for action, apart from legal measures and grading systems, primary prevention includes altering the extra-organizational environment and/or organizational goals and instituting ethical workplaces while secondary and tertiary prevention comprises several types of informal and formal social support within and outside the organization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aasland, M. S., Skogstad, A., Notelaers, G., Nielsen, M. B., & Einarsen, S. (2010). The prevalence of destructive leadership behaviour. British Journal of Management, 21(2), 438–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M., & Deetz, S. (1996). Critical theory and post-modernism. In S. R. Clegg & C. Hardy (Eds.), Studying organization: Theory and method (pp. 185–211). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baillien, E., Cuyper, N. D., & Witte, H. D. (2011a). Job autonomy and workload as antecedents of workplace bullying: A two-wave test of Karasek’s job demand control model for targets and perpetrators. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84(1), 191–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baillien, E., Rodriguez- Muñoz, A., van den Broeck, A., & De Witte, H. (2011b). Do demands and resources affect targets’ and perpetrators’ reports of workplace bullying? A two-wave cross-lagged study. Work and Stress, 25(2), 128–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beale, D., & Hoel, H. (2011). Workplace bullying and the employment relationship: Exploring questions of prevention, control and context. Work, Employment & Society, 25(1), 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, V., & Hoel, H. (2008). The customer is always right? Exploring the concept of customer bullying in the British employment service. Journal of Consumer Culture, 8(3), 341–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, S., & Houlihan, M. (2007). Searching for the human in human resource management: Theory, practice and workplace contexts. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branch, S., Ramsay, S., & Barker, M. (2013). Workplace bullying, mobbing and general harassment: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(3), 280–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodsky, C. (1976). The harassed worker. Lexington: D.C. Health and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, C. L., Dewe, P. J., & O’Driscoll, M. P. (2001).Organizational stress, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R. L. (2007). Organization theory and design. New Delhi: Thomson.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Cruz, P. (2012). Workplace bullying in India. New Delhi: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Cruz, P., & Noronha, E. (2009). Experiencing depersonalized bullying: A study of Indian call centre agents. Work Organization, Labour and Globalization, 3(1), 26–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Cruz, P., & Noronha, E. (2010a). The exit coping response to workplace bullying: The contribution of inclusivist and exclusivist HRM strategies. Employee Relations, 32(2), 102–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Cruz, P., & Noronha, E. (2010b). Protecting my interests: Target coping with workplace bullying. The Qualitative Report, 15(3), 507–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Cruz, P., & Noronha, E. (2011). The limits to workplace friendship: Managerialist HRM and bystander behaviour in the context of workplace bullying. Employee Relations, 33(3), 269–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Cruz, P., & Noronha, E. (2012). Clarifying my world: Identity work in the context of workplace bullying. The Qualitative Report, 17(6), 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Cruz, P., & Noronha, E. (2013). Navigating the extended reach: Target experiences of cyberbullying at work. Information and Organization, 23(4), 324–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Cruz, P., & Noronha, E. (2014). Workplace bullying in the context of organizational change: The significance of pluralism. Industrial Relations Journal, 45(1), 2–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Cruz, P., Noronha, E., & Beale, D. (2014). The workplace bullying-organizational change interface: Emerging challenges for human resource management. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(10), 1434–1459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Cuyper, N., De Jong, J., De Witte, H., Isaksson, K., Rigotti, T., & Schalk, R. (2008). Literature review of theory and research on the psychological impact of temporary employment: Towards a conceptual model. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(1), 25–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Cuyper, N., Baillien, E., & De Witte, H. (2009). Job insecurity, perceived employability and targets’ and perpetrators’ experiences of workplace bullying. Work and Stress, 23(3), 206–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deetz, S. A. (1992). Democracy in an age of corporate colonization: Developments in communication and the politics of everyday life. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delbridge, R., & Keenoy, T. (2010). Beyond managerialism? International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(6), 801–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., & Notelaers, G. (2009). Measuring exposure to bullying and harassment at work: Validity, factor structure and psychometric properties of the Negative Acts Questionnaire- Revised. Work and Stress, 23(1), 24–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., & Cooper, C. L. (2011). The concept of bullying and harassment at work: The European tradition. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and harassment in the workplace (pp. 3–40). London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, S., & Raknes, B. I. (1997). Harassment in the workplace and the victimization of men. Violence and Victims, 12(3), 247–263.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frege, C. M., & Kelly, J. (2003). Union revitalization strategies in comparative perspective. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 9(1), 7–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gall, G. (2009). Union organizing: Past, present and future. In G. Gall (Ed.), The future of union organizing (pp. 1–9). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Guest, D. (1998). Human resource management, trade unions and industrial relations. In C. Mabey, G. Salaman, & J. Storey (Eds.), Strategic human resource management (pp. 237–250). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, S. (2010). Workplace bullying through the eyes of human resource practitioners. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, S., Rayner, C., & Warren, S. (2012). Too hot to handle? Trust and human resource practitioners’ implementation of anti-bullying policy. Human Resource Management Journal, 22(4), 392–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauge, L. J., Skogstad, A., & Einarsen, S. (2009). Individual and situational predictors of workplace bullying: Why do perpetrators engage in the bullying of others? Work and Stress, 23(4), 349–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havard, R. (2007). Virtuous leadership. New York: Scepter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoel, H., & Beale, D. (2006). Workplace bullying, psychological perspectives and industrial relations: Towards a contextualized and interdisciplinary approach. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 44(2), 239–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoel, H., & Salin, D. (2003). Organizational antecedents of workplace bullying. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace (pp. 203–218). London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoel, H., Sheehan, M. J., Cooper, C. L., & Einarsen, S. (2011). Organizational effects of workplace bullying. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and harassment in the workplace (pp. 129–148). London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, J. S., & Kahn, R. L. (1985). Measures and concept of social support. In S. Cohen & S. L. Syme (Eds.), Social support and health (pp. 83–108). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ILO, (n.d.). Labour standards. Retrieved 16 April 2014 from http://www.ilo.org/global/standards/lang–en/index.htm.

  • Ironside, M., & Seifert, R. (2003). Tackling bullying in the workplace: The collective dimension. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace (pp. 382–398). London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, M. F., Zapf, D., Winefield, H., & Sarris, A. (2012). Bullying allegations from the accused bully’s perspective. British Journal of Management, 23(4), 489–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karson, M. (2007). Nomothetic versus idiographic. In N. J. Salkind & K. Rasmussen (Eds.), Encyclopedia of measurement and statistics (p. 684). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keashly, L., & Harvey, S. (2006). Emotional abuse at work. In E. K. Kelloway, J. Barling, & J. Furrell (Eds.), Handbook of workplace violence (pp. 95–120). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kochan, T. A., Katz, H. C., & McKerzie, R. B. (1986). The transformation of American industrial relations. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korczynski, M. (2002). Human resource management in service wor. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaVan, H., & Martin, W. M. (2008). Bullying in the US workplace: Normative and process-oriented ethical approaches. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(2), 147–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. T., & Brotheridge, C. M. (2006). When prey turns predatory: Workplace bullying as a predictor of counteraggression/bullying, coping, and well-being. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15(3), 352–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D., & Rayner, C. (2003). Bullying and human resource management: A wolf in sheep’s clothing? In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace (pp. 370–382). London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liefooghe, A. P., & MacKenzie-Davey, K. (2001). Accounts of workplace bullying: The role of the organization. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10(4), 375–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutgen-Sandvik, P. (2005). Water smoothing stones: Subordinate resistance to workplace bullying, Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Arizona, Tempe, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, R., Pouwelse, M., Lodewijkx, H., & Bolman, C. (2013). Workplace mobbing and bystanders’ helping behaviour towards victims: The role of gender, perceived responsibility and anticipated stigma by association. International Journal of Psychology. doi:10.1002/ijop.12018.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, M. B., Notelaers, G., & Einarsen, S. (2011). Measuring exposure to workplace bullying. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and harassment in the workplace (pp. 149–175). London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noronha, E. (2003). Indian trade unions: Today and beyond tomorrow. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 39(1), 95–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noronha, E., & D’Cruz, P. (2009). Employee identity in Indian call centres: The notion of professionalism. New Delhi: Sage/Response.

    Google Scholar 

  • Notelaers, G., & Einarsen, S. (2008). The construction and validity of the short negative scts questionnaire. Paper presented at the 6th International Conference on Workplace Bullying and Harassment, 4–6 June, Montreal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olweus, D. (2003). Bully/victim problems in school. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace (pp. 62–77). London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkes, C., & Davis, A. J. (2013). Ethics and social responsibility: Do HR professionals have the ‘courage to challenge’ or are they set to be permanent ‘bystanders’? International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(12), 2411–2434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paull, M., Omari, M., & Standen, P. (2012). When is a bystander not a bystander? A typology of the roles of bystanders in workplace bullying. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 50(3), 351–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay, S., Troth, A. C., & Branch, S. (2011). Workplace bullying through the lens of social psychology: A group level analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84(4), 799–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, C. (1999). From Research to Implementation: Finding Leverage for Prevention. International Journal of Manpower, 20(1/2), 28–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahdev, K., Vinnicombe, S., & Tyson, S. (1999). Downsizing and the changing role of HR. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 10(5), 906–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samnani, A. K., & Singh, P. (2012). 20 years of workplace bullying research: A review of the antecedents and consequences of bullying in the workplace. Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 17(6), 581–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simha, A., & Cullen, J. B. (2012). Ethical climates and their effects on organizational outcomes: Implications from the past and prophecies for the future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(4), 20–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. (1999). If you could just provide me with a sample: Examining sampling in qualitative and quantitative research papers. Evidence Based Nursing, 2(3), 68–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • vanHeugten, K. (2011). Theorizing active bystanders as change agents in workplace bullying of social workers. Families in Society, 92(2), 219–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Premilla D’Cruz .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

D’Cruz, P. (2015). Theorizing About Depersonalized Bullying at Work. In: Depersonalized Bullying at Work. SpringerBriefs in Psychology. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2044-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics