Efficiency Criteria

  • Satish Kumar Jain


The chapter is concerned with the efficiency notions employed in economics. Pareto-efficiency and Kaldor-Hicks efficiency are discussed rigorously and in some detail. Implications of the acceptance of the value judgment of the Pareto-criterion are explored for the significance of the notions of Pareto-efficiency and Pareto-efficient institutions.


Social State Binary Relation Social Choice Logical Difficulty Total Wealth 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Arrow, Kenneth J. 1951. Social choice and individual values, 2nd ed., 1963. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. Feldman, Allan M. and Roberto Serrano. 2006. Welfare economics and social choice theory, 2nd ed. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Kaldor, Nicholas. 1939. Welfare propositions in economics and inter-personal comparisons of utility. Economic Journal 49: 549–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Posner, Richard. 1985. Wealth maximization revisited. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy 2: 85–105.Google Scholar
  5. Scitovsky, Tibor. 1941. A note on welfare propositions in economics. Review of Economic Studies 9: 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Sen, Amartya K. 1970. Collective choice and social welfare. San Francisco: Holden-Day.Google Scholar
  7. Symposium. 1980. Symposium on efficiency as a legal concern. Hofstra Law Review 8: 485–972.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Satish Kumar Jain
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Economic Studies and PlanningJawaharlal Nehru UniversityNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations