Abstract
Epiphora or watering is one of the most common symptoms of any ocular pathology. Though most cases of watering are due to nonpatency in the lacrimal outflow pathway, others like eyelid and adnexal disorders, corneal and ocular surface pathology can also manifest as watering. In this context, it is important to distinguish between the terms epiphora and pseudoepiphora or hyperlacrimation [1, 2]. True epiphora refers to watering due to obstruction in the lacrimal outflow pathway, while hyerlacrimation refers to excessive watering due to reflex irritation of the corneal and conjunctival surface as in cases of dry eye, corneal abrasion, corneal foreign body, etc. (Fig. 6.1a–f). It is also important to differentiate between anatomical and functional lacrimal pathway obstruction. Anatomical obstruction refers to any structural pathology in the lacrimal outflow pathway which hinders tear drainage. Conditions like punctal and canalicular stenosis and block, nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO), etc., are the causes of anatomical obstruction. In functional dysfunction, the lacrimal outflow pathway is normal anatomically with a patent syringing. However, there is a failure of the lacrimal pump mechanisms which could be due to pathology outside the lacrimal pathway like punctal ectropion, eyelid laxity, or due to problems in the lacrimal pump mechanism itself as in cases of facial palsy. Hence, a detailed and comprehensive evaluation is needed to identify the cause of watering and initiate appropriate management. The goal of the evaluation is to differentiate true epiphora from hyperlacrimation, differentiate obstructive cause of epiphora from nonobstructive cause, and find the site of obstruction in cases of obstructive epiphora. The evaluation can be divided into history taking, local examination, lacrimal system vital signs, ancillary investigations, and nasal evaluation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Hurwitz JJ. The lacrimal system. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1996.
Weber RK. Atlas of lacrimal surgery. New York: Springer; 2007.
Lavrich JB, Nelson LB. Disorders of the lacrimal system apparatus. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1993;40(4):767–76.
Davey J, Billson FA. Watering eyes: an important sign of congenital glaucoma. Med J Aust. 1974;2(14):531–2.
Ali MJ, Naik MN, Honavar SG. Acquired Nasolacrimal duct obstructions secondary to naso-orbito-ethmoid fractures: patterns and outcomes. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;28(4):242–5.
Lehto I. Side effects of topical treatment in pigmentary glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1992;70(2):225–7.
Collin JR. Epiphora in facial paralysis. Br J Plast Surg. 1993;46(2):149–50.
Gürdal C, Saraç O, Genç I, et al. Ocular surface and dry eye in Graves’ disease. Curr Eye Res. 2011;36(1):8–13.
Murthy R, Honavar SG, Naik M, et al. Centurion syndrome: clinical presentation and surgical outcome. Orbit. 2009;28(5):269–74.
Welham RA, Bates AK, Stasior GO. Congenital lacrimal fistula. Eye (Lond). 1992;6(Pt 2):211–4.
Thomas R, Thomas S, Braganza A, et al. Evaluation of the role of irrigation prior to cataract surgery. Indian J Ophthalmol. 1997;45(4):211–4.
Liarakos VS, Boboridis KG, Mavrikakis E, et al. Management of canalicular obstructions. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2009;20(5):395–400.
Khoubian JF, Kikkawa DO, Gonnering RS. Trephination and silicone stent intubation for the treatment of canalicular obstruction: effect of the level of obstruction. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;22(4):248–52.
Kashkouli MB, Mirzajani H, Jamshidian-Tehrani M. Reliability of fluorescein dye disappearance test in assessment of adults with nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;29(3):167–9.
MacEwen CJ, Young JD. The fluorescein disappearance test (FDT): an evaluation of its use in infants. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1991;28(6):302–5.
Lefebvre DR, Freitag SK. Update on imaging of the lacrimal drainage system. Semin Ophthalmol. 2012;27(5–6):175–86.
Francisco FC, Carvalho AC, Francisco VF, et al. Evaluation of 1000 lacrimal ducts by dacryocystography. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91(1):43–6.
Sagili S, Selva D, Malhotra R. Lacrimal scintigraphy: “interpretation more art than science”. Orbit. 2012;31(2):77–85.
Elmorsy SM, Fayk HM. Nasal endoscopic assessment of failure after external dacryocystorhinostomy. Orbit. 2010;29(4):197–201.
Hakim OM, Mandour W, Elbaz E. Nasal endoscopic visualization and management of the leading causes of probing failure. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2010;47(4):214–9.
Ghose S, Chhabra MS, Thakar A, et al. Nasal endoscopy in congenital dacryocystitis. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2006;43(6):341–5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer India
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Das, S. (2015). Evaluation of Epiphora. In: Javed Ali, M. (eds) Principles and Practice of Lacrimal Surgery. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2020-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2020-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2019-0
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2020-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)