Skip to main content

Quality of Life in Lacrimal Disorders and Patient Satisfaction Following Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Principles and Practice of Lacrimal Surgery

Abstract

Lacrimal disorders need not necessarily always have only a physical or a functional dimension, there may be emotional, social, and economic or a combination of these aspects to them. Understanding the different facets of patient and the caregiver’s perspectives of the disease before and after medical or surgical interventions contributes significantly to overall patient satisfaction. Rather than objective anatomical outcomes of a surgery alone, patient satisfaction is what all surgeons should ideally aim for. It is in this context that the validated quality of life (QOL) questionnaires help the health-care providers. They are also a very useful tool for clinical research and standardization of outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. MacEwen CJ, Young JD. Epiphora during the first year of life. Eye. 1991;5:596–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sturrock SM, MacEwen CJ, Young JD. Long term results after probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Br J Ophthalmol. 1994;78:892–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee DH, Fudemberg SJ, Davitt BV, et al. Success of simple probing and irrigation in patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction and otitis media. J AAPOS. 2005;9:192–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Holmes JM, Leske DA, Cole SR, et al. A symptom survey and quality of life questionnaire for nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:1675–80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Robinson K, Gatehouse S, Browning GG. Measuring patient benefit from otorhinolaryngological survey and therapy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1996;105:415–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fahy C, Nikolopoulos TP, O’Donoghue GM. Acoustic neuroma surgery and tinnitus. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2002;259:299–301.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Salhab M, Matai V, Salam MA. The impact of functional endoscopic sinus surgery on health status. Rhinology. 2004;42:98–102.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bakri SJ, Carney AS, Robinson K, et al. Quality of life outcomes following dacryocystorhinostomy: external and endonasal laser techniques compared. Orbit. 1999;18:83–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mansour K, Sere M, Oey AG, et al. Long term patient satisfaction of external dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmologica. 2005;219:97–100.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yeniad B, Uludag G, Kozer-Bilgin L. Assessment of patient satisfaction following external versus transcanalicular dacryocystorhinostomy with a diode laser and evaluation if change in quality of life after simultaneous bilateral surgery in patients with bilateral nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Curr Eye Res. 2012;37:286–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ali MJ, Honavar SG. Assessment of patient satisfaction following external versus transcanalicular dacryocystorhinostomy. Curr Eye Res. 2012;37:853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ho A, Sachidananda R, Carrie S, et al. Quality of life assessment after non-laser endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Clin Otolaryngol. 2006;31:399–403.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hii BW, McNab AA, Friebel JD. A comparison of external and endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy in regard to patient satisfaction and cost. Orbit. 2012;31:67–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ibrahim HA, Batterbury M, Banhegyi G, et al. Endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy and external dacryocystorhinostomy outcome profile in a general ophthalmic service unit: a comparative, retrospective study. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 2001;32:220–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dolman PJ. Comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy with non-laser endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:78–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chan W, Malhotra R, Kakizaki H, et al. Perspective: what does the term functional mean in the context of epiphora? Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2012;40:749–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cheung LM, Francis IC, Stapleton F, et al. Symptoms assessment in patients with functional and primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction before and after a successful dacryocystorhinostomy surgery: a prospective study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91:1671–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Kabata Y, Goto S, Takahashi G, et al. Vision-related quality of life in patients undergoing silicone tube intubation for lacrimal passage obstruction. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;152:147–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Smirnov G, Tuomilehto H, Kokki H, et al. Symptom score questionnaire for nasolacrimal duct obstruction in adults – a novel tool to assess the outcomes after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Rhinology. 2010;48:446–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mistry N, Rockley TJ, Reynolds T, et al. Development and validation of a symptom questionnaire for recording outcomes in adult lacrimal surgery. Rhinology. 2011;49:538–45.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Javed Ali MS, FRCS, FRCGP .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer India

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Javed Ali, M. (2015). Quality of Life in Lacrimal Disorders and Patient Satisfaction Following Management. In: Javed Ali, M. (eds) Principles and Practice of Lacrimal Surgery. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2020-6_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2020-6_39

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi

  • Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2019-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2020-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics