Advertisement

The Great Debate: External Versus Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy

  • Andre Litwin
  • Raman Malhotra
Chapter

Abstract

The principles of standard surgery for blockage of the lacrimal outflow tract probably dates back 1,000 years now when the twelfth-century Andalusian Oculist Mohammad Ibn Aslam Al Ghafiqi described a small spear-shaped instrument perforating the lacrimal bone in a nasal direction “until blood flows through the nose and mouth with care given not to direct the instrument downward as this would be the incorrect direction.” The probe was then wrapped in cotton that was either dry or soaked in ox fat. This would then be exchanged every day in order to maintain the patency of the created fistula [1]. This principle remains the same to date as that for contemporary conjunctivo-dacryocystorhinostomy. Modern dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR), however, dates back to the dawn of the twentieth century [1–4]. In terms of anatomic goals, the aims of surgery are simple: the lacrimal sac is connected directly to the nose by removal of the separating bone and mucosa. A fistula is hence formed that allows tears to pass directly into the nasal vault through the lateral nasal wall. This must occur at a level above the mechanical obstruction in order to bypass it [5]. The traditional popular method has been through an external approach as described by Toti [3] and modified by Dupuy-Dutemps [4]. Although the endonasal approach was described perhaps prior to this [2] it is only in recent decades with the introduction and development of the endoscope, that attention has turned to endoscopic DCR for both primary procedures and to revise failures [6]. DCR is indicated for patients with lacrimal sac or nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) causing either epiphora or dacryocystitis (infection).

Keywords

Middle Turbinate Lateral Nasal Wall Mucosal Flap Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Lacrimal Bone 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Al-Ghafiqi M. Ophthalmic guide. Madrid: El-Escorial Museum; d. 1165 AD.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Caldwell GW. A new operation for the radical cure of obstruction of the nasal duct. N Y Med J. 1893;58:476.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Toti A. Nuovo metodo conservatore di cura radicale delle suppurazioni croniche del sacco lacrimale (dacriocistorinostomia). Clin Mod Firenze. 1904;10:385–7.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dupuy-Dutemps L, Bourguet M. Procede plastique de dacryocystorhinostomie et ses results. Ann Ocul. 1921;158:241–61.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ben Simon GJ, Joseph J, Lee S, et al. External versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction in a tertiary referral center. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:1463–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dolman PJ. Comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy with nonlaser endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:78–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Adenis JP, Robert P-Y. Retrocaruncular approach to the medial orbit for dacryocystorhinostomy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003;241:725–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Robert M-C, Maleki B, Boulos PR. Endocanalicular laser dacryocystorhinostomy with mucosal flaps. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;29:294–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McDonogh M, Meiring JH. Endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy. J Laryngol Otol. 1989;103:585–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tsirbas A, Wormald PJ. Mechanical endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with mucosal flaps. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87:43–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tsirbas A, Davis G, Wormald PJ. Mechanical endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy versus external dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;20:50–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Codère F, Denton P, Corona J. Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a modified technique with preservation of the nasal and lacrimal mucosa. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;26:161–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Patel V, Ross JJ, Malhotra R. Early experience using a new modified bone nibbler for superior osteotomy during endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;27:15–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goldberg RA. Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: is it really less successful? Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:108–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Whittet HB, Shun-Shin GA, Awdry P. Functional endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Eye. 1993;7:545–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tarbet KJ, Custer PL. External dacryocystorhinostomy. Surgical success, patient satisfaction, and economic cost. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:1065–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shun-Shin GA. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a personal technique. Eye. 1998;12:467–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cokkeser Y, Evereklioglu C, Er H. Comparative external versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: results in 115 patients (130 eyes). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;123:488–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Woog JJ, Kennedy RH, Custer PL, et al. Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:2369–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Häusler R, Caversaccio M. Microsurgical endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with long-term insertion of bicanalicular silicone tubes. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124:188–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Malhotra R, Wright M, Olver JM. A consideration of the time taken to do dacryo-cystorhinostomy (DCR) surgery. Eye. 2003;17:691–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tsirbas A, Wormald PJ. Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with mucosal flaps. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135:76–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Davies MJ, Lee S, Lemke S, et al. Predictors of anatomical patency following primary endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a pilot study. Orbit. 2011;30:49–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rose GE. The lacrimal paradox: toward a greater understanding of success in lacrimal surgery. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;20:262–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Patrinely JR, Anderson RL. A review of lacrimal drainage surgery. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986;2:97–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mann BS, Wormald PJ. Endoscopic assessment of the dacryocystorhinostomy ostium after endoscopic surgery. Laryngoscope. 2006;116:1172–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Linberg JV, Anderson RL, Bumsted RM, et al. Study of intranasal ostium external dacryocystorhinostomy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982;100:1758–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ezra E, Restori M, Mannor GE, et al. Ultrasonic assessment of rhinostomy size following external dacryocystorhinostomy. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998;82:786–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Takahashi Y, Nakamura Y, Kakizaki H. Dacryoendoscopic findings in the lacrimal passage in failed dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;29:373–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Türkcü FM, Oner V, Taş M, et al. Anastomosis of both posterior and anterior flaps or only anterior flaps in external dacryocystorhinostomy. Orbit. 2012;31:383–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Katuwal S, Aujla JS, Limbu B, et al. External dacryocystorhinostomy: do we really need to repair the posterior flap? Orbit. 2013;32:102–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Madge SN, Selva D. Intubation in routine dacryocystorhinostomy: why we do what we do. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2009;37:620–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Saiju R, Morse LJ, Weinberg D, et al. Prospective randomised comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone intubation. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93:1220–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cannon PS, Chan W, Selva D. Incidence of canalicular closure with endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy without intubation in primary nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:1688–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Chong KK, Lai FH, Ho M, et al. Randomized trial on silicone intubation in endoscopic mechanical dacryocystorhinostomy (SEND) for primary nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:2139–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Walland MJ, Rose GE. Factors affecting the success rate of open lacrimal surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 1994;78:888–91.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Camara JG, Bengzon AU, Henson RD. The safety and efficacy of mitomycin C in endonasal endoscopic laser-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;16:114–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hartikainen J, Grenman R, Puukka P, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy and endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1106–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Jokinen K, Kärjä J. Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Arch Otolaryngol. 1974;100:41–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rice DH. Endoscopic intranasal dacryocystorhinostomy results in four patients. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990;116:1061.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    McDonogh M. Endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Results in 21 patients. S Afr J Surg. 1992;30:107–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kong YT, Kim TI, Kong BW. A report of 131 cases of endoscopic laser lacrimal surgery. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1793–800.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Massaro BM, Gonnering RS, Harris GJ. Endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy. A new approach to nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990;108:1172–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Woog JJ, Metson R, Puliafito CA. Holmium:YAG endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;116:1–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Madge SN, Chan W, Malhotra R, et al. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in acute dacryocystitis: a multicenter case series. Orbit. 2011;30:1–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Weidenbecher M, Hosemann W, Buhr W. Endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: results in 56 patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1994;103:363–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Sprekelsen MB, Barberán MT. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: surgical technique and results. Laryngoscope. 1996;106:187–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Erdöl H, Akyol N, Imamoglu HI, et al. Long-term follow-up of external dacryocystorhinostomy and the factors affecting its success. Orbit. 2005;24:99–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Zenk J, Karatzanis AD, Psychogios G, et al. Long-term results of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;266:1733–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Onerci M, Orhan M, Ogretmenoğlu O, et al. Long-term results and reasons for failure of intranasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Acta Otolaryngol. 2000;120:319–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Chan W, Malhotra R, Kakizaki H, et al. Perspective: what does the term functional mean in the context of epiphora? Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2012;40:749–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Vicinanzo MG, McGwin G, Boyle M, et al. The consequence of premature silicone stent loss after external dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:1241–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Ali MJ, Ali MJ, Gupta H, Honavar SG, Naik MN. Acquired nasolacrimal duct obstructions secondary to naso-orbito-ethmoid fractures. Patterns and outcomes. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;28:242–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Wearne MJ, Beigi B, Davis G, et al. Retrograde intubation dacryocystorhinostomy for proximal and midcanalicular obstruction. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:2325–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Limawararut V, Valenzuela AA, Sullivan TJ, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid leaks in orbital and lacrimal surgery. Surv Ophthalmol. 2008;53:274–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Sharma V, Martin PA, Benger R, et al. Evaluation of the cosmetic significance of external dacryocystorhinostomy scars. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140:359–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Vagefi MR, Winn BJ, Lin CC, et al. Facial nerve injury during external dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:585–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Lee TS, Woog JJ. Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy in the primary treatment of acute dacryocystitis with abscess formation. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;17:180–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Wu W, Yan W, MacCallum JK, et al. Primary treatment of acute dacryocystitis by endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with silicone intubation guided by a soft probe. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:116–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Tsirbas A, Davis G, Wormald PJ. Revision dacryocystorhinostomy: a comparison of endoscopic and external techniques. Am J Rhinol. 2005;19:322–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Hull S, Lalchan S-A, Olver JM. Success rates in powered endonasal revision surgery for failed dacryocystorhinostomy in a tertiary referral center. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;29:267–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Anderson NG, Wojno TH, Grossniklaus HE. Clinicopathologic findings from lacrimal sac biopsy specimens obtained during dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;19:173–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Salour H, Hatami M-M, Parvin M, et al. Clinicopathological study of lacrimal sac specimens obtained during DCR. Orbit. 2010;29:250–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Barmettler A, Erlich J, Lelli G. Current preferences and reported success rates in dacryocystorhinostomy amongst ASOPRS members. Orbit. 2013;32:20–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Oculoplastic SurgeryQueen Victoria NHS TrustLondonUK
  2. 2.Oculoplastic SurgeryCadogan Clinic and Queen Victoria NHS TrustLondonUK

Personalised recommendations