Abstract
External dacryocystorhinostomy (Ex-DCR) is considered as the gold standard for surgical correction of primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction [1]. It can be performed safely in patients under local anesthesia, with minimal blood loss and economic cost, and has a high success rate of over 90 % in most published series [1, 2]. Despite superior success rate, the inevitable downside of Ex-DCR has been an external skin scar, which has led to the evolution of endonasal and several other nonincisional techniques [3–7]. The success rates with endonasal DCR have been reported to range from 59 to 100 % in various published series with mechanical endonasal DCR being more successful than endolaser DCR [5]. The advantages of endonasal DCR have been reported to be lack of cutaneous scar, less disruption of medial canthal anatomy or lacrimal pump function, decreased operative time, early postoperative rehabilitation, and the ability to simultaneously treat nasal pathologies [6]. However, the disadvantages of the technique include the need for specialized instruments, increased cost, familiarity with nasal anatomy, difficulty in the treatment of canalicular pathologies, need for an expert assistant, and a steep learning curve [6]. Although there have been promising advances in the field of endocanalicular and endonasal DCR surgery, the high success rate of Ex-DCR continues to be confirmed in the literature [8].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Tarbet KJ, Custer PL. External dacryocystorhinostomy. Surgical success, patient satisfaction, and economic cost. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:1065–70.
Warren JF, Seiff SR, Kavanagh MC. Long-term results of external dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2005;36:446–50.
Watkins LM, Janfaza P, Rubin PA. The evolution of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Surv Ophthalmol. 2003;48:73–84.
Goldberg RA. Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: is it really less successful? Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:108–10.
Moore WM, Bentley CR, Olver JM. Functional and anatomic results after two types of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: surgical and holmium laser. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1575–82.
Woog JJ, Kennedy RH, Custer PL, et al. Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:2369–77.
Javate RM, Campomanes Jr BS, Co ND, et al. The endoscope and the radiofrequency unit in DCR surgery. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;11:54–8.
Duffy MT. Advances in lacrimal surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2000;11:352–6.
Adenis JP, Robert PY. Retrocaruncular approach to the medial orbit for dacryocystorhinostomy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003;241:725–9.
Kaynak-Hekimhan P, Yilmaz OF. Transconjunctival dacryocystorhinostomy: scarless surgery without endoscope and laser assistance. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;27:206–10.
Cokkeser Y, Evereklioglu C, Er H. Comparative external versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: results in 115 patients (130 eyes). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;123:488–91.
Sham CL, van Hasselt CA. Endoscopic terminal dacryocystorhinostomy. Laryngoscope. 2000;110:1045–9.
Sprekelsen MB, Barberán MT. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: surgical technique and results. Laryngoscope. 1996;106:187–9.
Tsirbas A, Wormald PJ. Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with mucosal flaps. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135:76–83.
Dupuy-Dutemps B. Procédé plastique de dacryocysto-rhinostomie et ses résultats. Ann Oculistique. 1921:241–261.
Linberg JV. Contemporary issues in ophthalmology, vol. 5. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1988. p. 151–67.
Harris GJ, Sakol PJ, Beatty RL. Relaxed skin tension line incision for dacryocystorhinostomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;108:742–3.
Putterman AM. Eyelid incision approach to dacryocystorhinostomy facilitated with a mechanical retraction system. Am J Ophthalmol. 1994;118:672–4.
Kim JH, Woo KI, Chang HR. Eyelid incision for dacryocystorhinostomy in Asians. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2005;19:243–6.
Akaishi PM, Mano JB, Pereira IC, et al. Functional and cosmetic results of a lower eyelid crease approach for external dacryocystorhinostomy. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2011;74:283–5.
Heckler FR, Songcharoen S, Sultani FA. Subciliary incision and skin-muscle eyelid flap for orbital fractures. Ann Plast Surg. 1983;10:309–13.
Ben Simon GJ, Molina M, Schwarcz RM, et al. External (subciliary) vs internal (transconjunctival) involutional entropion repair. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139:482–7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer India
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Naik, M.N. (2015). Aesthetic External DCR: The Subciliary Approach. In: Javed Ali, M. (eds) Principles and Practice of Lacrimal Surgery. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2020-6_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2020-6_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2019-0
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2020-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)