Skip to main content

Aesthetic External DCR: The Subciliary Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Principles and Practice of Lacrimal Surgery
  • 1189 Accesses

Abstract

External dacryocystorhinostomy (Ex-DCR) is considered as the gold standard for surgical correction of primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction [1]. It can be performed safely in patients under local anesthesia, with minimal blood loss and economic cost, and has a high success rate of over 90 % in most published series [1, 2]. Despite superior success rate, the inevitable downside of Ex-DCR has been an external skin scar, which has led to the evolution of endonasal and several other nonincisional techniques [3–7]. The success rates with endonasal DCR have been reported to range from 59 to 100 % in various published series with mechanical endonasal DCR being more successful than endolaser DCR [5]. The advantages of endonasal DCR have been reported to be lack of cutaneous scar, less disruption of medial canthal anatomy or lacrimal pump function, decreased operative time, early postoperative rehabilitation, and the ability to simultaneously treat nasal pathologies [6]. However, the disadvantages of the technique include the need for specialized instruments, increased cost, familiarity with nasal anatomy, difficulty in the treatment of canalicular pathologies, need for an expert assistant, and a steep learning curve [6]. Although there have been promising advances in the field of endocanalicular and endonasal DCR surgery, the high success rate of Ex-DCR continues to be confirmed in the literature [8].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Tarbet KJ, Custer PL. External dacryocystorhinostomy. Surgical success, patient satisfaction, and economic cost. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:1065–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Warren JF, Seiff SR, Kavanagh MC. Long-term results of external dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2005;36:446–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Watkins LM, Janfaza P, Rubin PA. The evolution of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Surv Ophthalmol. 2003;48:73–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Goldberg RA. Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: is it really less successful? Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:108–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Moore WM, Bentley CR, Olver JM. Functional and anatomic results after two types of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: surgical and holmium laser. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1575–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Woog JJ, Kennedy RH, Custer PL, et al. Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:2369–77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Javate RM, Campomanes Jr BS, Co ND, et al. The endoscope and the radiofrequency unit in DCR surgery. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;11:54–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Duffy MT. Advances in lacrimal surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2000;11:352–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Adenis JP, Robert PY. Retrocaruncular approach to the medial orbit for dacryocystorhinostomy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003;241:725–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaynak-Hekimhan P, Yilmaz OF. Transconjunctival dacryocystorhinostomy: scarless surgery without endoscope and laser assistance. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;27:206–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cokkeser Y, Evereklioglu C, Er H. Comparative external versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: results in 115 patients (130 eyes). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;123:488–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sham CL, van Hasselt CA. Endoscopic terminal dacryocystorhinostomy. Laryngoscope. 2000;110:1045–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sprekelsen MB, Barberán MT. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: surgical technique and results. Laryngoscope. 1996;106:187–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tsirbas A, Wormald PJ. Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with mucosal flaps. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135:76–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dupuy-Dutemps B. Procédé plastique de dacryocysto-rhinostomie et ses résultats. Ann Oculistique. 1921:241–261.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Linberg JV. Contemporary issues in ophthalmology, vol. 5. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1988. p. 151–67.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Harris GJ, Sakol PJ, Beatty RL. Relaxed skin tension line incision for dacryocystorhinostomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;108:742–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Putterman AM. Eyelid incision approach to dacryocystorhinostomy facilitated with a mechanical retraction system. Am J Ophthalmol. 1994;118:672–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim JH, Woo KI, Chang HR. Eyelid incision for dacryocystorhinostomy in Asians. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2005;19:243–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Akaishi PM, Mano JB, Pereira IC, et al. Functional and cosmetic results of a lower eyelid crease approach for external dacryocystorhinostomy. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2011;74:283–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Heckler FR, Songcharoen S, Sultani FA. Subciliary incision and skin-muscle eyelid flap for orbital fractures. Ann Plast Surg. 1983;10:309–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ben Simon GJ, Molina M, Schwarcz RM, et al. External (subciliary) vs internal (transconjunctival) involutional entropion repair. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139:482–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Milind N. Naik MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer India

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Naik, M.N. (2015). Aesthetic External DCR: The Subciliary Approach. In: Javed Ali, M. (eds) Principles and Practice of Lacrimal Surgery. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2020-6_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2020-6_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi

  • Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2019-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2020-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics