Advertisement

Breeding Systems

  • K. R. Shivanna
  • Rajesh Tandon
Chapter

Abstract

Genetic variation in the population is the basis of adaptation and evolution. Genetic variation is assessed on the basis of the extent of heterozygosity. Heterozygosity enables the species to cope under changed habitat and also its establishment when migrated to new areas. The extent of heterozygosity in the population is dependent on a number of reproductive traits, particularly the sexuality of the species (see Chap. 4) and the breeding system.

Keywords

Pollen Tube Growth Female Flower Inbreeding Depression Pollen Germination Breeding System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Asker SE, Jerling L (1992) Apomixis in plants. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker HG (1974) The evolution of weeds. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 5:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barcaccia G, Albertini E (2013) Apomixis in plant reproduction: a novel perspective on an old dilemma. Plant Reprod 26:159–179PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrett SCH (2011) Why reproductive systems matter for the invasion biology of plants. Invasiveness may result in a change in community composition. In: Richerdson DM (ed) Fifty years of invasion ecology: the legacy of Charles Elton, 1st edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester/HobokenGoogle Scholar
  5. Bicknell RA, Koltunow AM (2004) Understanding apomixis: recent advances and remaining conundrums. Plant Cell 16(suppl 1):S228–S245PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Charlesworth D (1988) A method for estimating outcrossing rates in natural populations of plants. Heredity 61:469–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1987) Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18:237–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Charnov EL (1979) Simultaneous hermaphroditism and sexual selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:2480–2482PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen G, Zhang B, Zhao Z et al (2010) ‘A life or death decision’ for pollen tubes in S-RNase-based self-incompatibility. J Exp Bot 61:2027–2037PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cruden RW (1977) Pollen-ovule ratios: a conservative indicator of breeding systems in flowering plants. Evolution 31:32–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. de Jong TJ, Klinkhamer PGL (2005) Evolutionary ecology of plant reproductive strategies. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. de Nettancourt D (2001) Incompatibility and incongruity in wild and cultivated plants. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dudash MR, Murren CJ (2008) The influence of breeding systems and mating systems on conservation genetics and conservation decisions. In: Carroll SP, Fox CW (eds) Conservation biology: evolution in action. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Eckert CG, Barrett SCH (1994) Inbreeding depression in partially self-fertilizing Decodon verticillatus (Lythraceae): population genetic and experimental analyses. Evolution 48:952–964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eckert CG, Samis KE, Dart S (2006) Reproductive assurance and the evolution of uniparental reproduction in flowering plants. In: Harder LD, Barrett SCH (eds) Ecology and evolution of flower. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 183–203Google Scholar
  16. Gupta P, Shivanna KR, Mohan Ram HY (1996) Apomixis and polyembryony in the guggul plant, Commiphora wightii. Ann Bot 78:67–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harder LD, Barrett SCH (eds) (2006) Ecology and evolution of flowers. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Husband BC, Schemske DW (1996) Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50:54–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kalisz S, Vogler DW (2003) Benefits of autonomous selfing under unpredictable pollinator environments. Ecology 84:2928–2942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kearns A, Inouye DW (1993) Techniques for pollination biologists. University Press, NiwotGoogle Scholar
  21. Kevan PG (1997) Pollination biology and plant breeding systems. In: Shivanna KR, Sawhney VK (eds) Pollen biotechnology for crop production and improvement. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Koltunow AM (1993) Apomixis: embryo sacs and embryos formed without meiosis or fertilization of ovules. Plant Cell 5:1425–1437PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee TD (1988) Patterns of fruit and seed production. In: Doust JL, Doust LL (eds) Plant reproductive ecology: patterns and strategies. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Mulcahy DL, Mulcahy GB (1983) Gametophytic self-incompatibility reexamined. Science 220:1247–1251PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rea AC, Liu P, Nasrallah JB (2010) A transgenic self-incompatible Arabidopsis thaliana model for evolutionary and mechanistic studies of crucifer self-incompatibility. J Exp Bot 61:1897–1906PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Richards AJ (1986) Plant breeding systems. Allen and Unwin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Richards AJ (2003) Apomixis in flowering plants: an overview. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 358:1085–1093PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Seavy SR, Bawa KS (1986) Late-acting self-incompatibility in angiosperms. Bot Rev 52:195–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shivanna KR (2003) Pollen biology and biotechnology. Science Publishers, Inc., PlymouthGoogle Scholar
  30. Shivanna KR (2014) Reproductive assurance through autogamous self-pollination in some annual weed species. Proc Natl Acad Sci, India, Biol Sci 84:681–687Google Scholar
  31. Sunnichan VG, Mohan Ram HY, Shivanna KR (2005) Reproductive biology of Boswellia serrata, the source of salai guggul, an important gum-resin. Bot J Linn Soc 147:73–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Takayama S, Isogai A (2005) Self-incompatibility in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 56:467–489PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tandon R, Shivanna KR, Mohan Ram HY (2003) Reproductive biology of Butea monosperma (Fabaceae). Ann Bot 92:715–723PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vikas, Tandon R (2011) Reproductive biology of Azadirachta indica, a medicinal tree species of arid-zone. Plant Spec Biol 26:116–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wallace DH (1979) Procedures for identifying S-allele genotypes of Brassica. Theor Appl Genet 54:249–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wheeler MJ, Vatovec S, Franklin-Tong VE (2010) The pollen S-determinant in Papaver: comparisons with known plant receptors and protein ligand partners. J Exp Bot 61:2015–2025PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wyatt R (1983) Pollinator-plant interactions and the evolution of breeding system. In: Real L (ed) Pollination biology. Academic, OrlandoGoogle Scholar
  38. Zapata TR, Arroyo MTK (1978) Plant reproductive ecology of a secondary deciduous tropical forest in Venezuela. Biotropica 10:221–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. R. Shivanna
    • 1
  • Rajesh Tandon
    • 2
  1. 1.Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE)BengaluruIndia
  2. 2.Department of BotanyUniversity of DelhiDelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations