Advertisement

Pollen–Pistil Interaction

  • K. R. Shivanna
  • Rajesh Tandon
Chapter

Abstract

Pollen–pistil interaction is unique to flowering plants. This is one of the critical postpollination phases that determine reproductive success. Following conspecific compatible pollination, pollen grains germinate on the receptive stigma and the resulting pollen tubes grow through the tissues of the stigma and style and enter the ovules where they deliver the sperm cells for fertilization. Pollen–pistil interaction involves a series of sequential events from pollination until the pollen tube enters the embryo sac. A break at any level in these sequential events results in the failure of fertilization. There is a continuous dialogue between the pollen grain and later the pollen tube and the tissues of the pistil. Successful completion of pollen–pistil interaction is a prerequisite for fertilization and subsequent fruit and seed development.

Keywords

Pollen Tube Pollen Tube Growth Pollen Germination Aniline Blue Stigma Surface 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Armbruster WS, Debevec EM, Willson MF (2002) Evolution of syncarpy in angiosperms: theoretical and phylogenetic analyses of the effects of carpel fusion on offspring quantity and quality. J Evol Biol 15:657–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chapman LA, Goring DR (2010) Pollen-pistil interaction regulating successful fertilization in the Brassicaceae. J Exp Bot 61:1987–1999PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cheung AY, Wang H, Wu HM (1995) A floral transmitting tissue-specific glycoprotein attracts pollen tubes and stimulates their growth. Cell 82:383–393PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheung AY, Boavida LC, Aggarwal M et al (2010) The pollen tube journey in the pistil and imaging the in vivo process by two-photon microscopy. J Exp Bot 61:1907–1915PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davis LE, Stephenson AS, Winsor JA (1987) Pollen competition improves performance and reproductive output of the common Zucchini squash under field conditions. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 112:712–716Google Scholar
  6. Dickinson HG (1995) Dry stigma, water and self-incompatibility in Brassica. Sex Plant Reprod 8:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Doughty J, Hedderson F, McCubbin A, Dickinson HG (1993) Interaction between a coating-borne peptide of the Brassica pollen grain and stigmatic S-(self-incompatibility) locus-specific glycoproteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:467–471PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Heslop-Harrison J, Heslop-Harrison Y (1986) Pollen tube chemotropism: fact or delusion? In: Crest M, Dallai R (eds) Biology of reproduction and cell motility in plants and animals. University of Siena, SienaGoogle Scholar
  9. Higashiyama T, Hamamura Y (2008) Gametophytic pollen tube guidance. Sex Plant Reprod 21:17–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Higashiyama T, Yabe S, Sasaki N et al (2001) Pollen tube attraction by the synergid cell. Science 293:1480–1483PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hulskamp M, Schneitz K, Pruitt RE (1995) Genetic evidence for a long-range activity that directs pollen tube guidance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 7:57–64PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kawashima T, Berger F (2011) Green love talks; cell–cell communication during double fertilization in flowering plants. AoB Plants 2011 plr015. doi:  10.1093/aobpla/plr015
  13. Lankinen A, Madjidian JA (2011) Enhancing pollen competition by delaying stigma receptivity: pollen deposition schedules affect siring ability, paternal diversity, and seed production in Collinsia heterophylla (Plantaginaceae). Am J Bot 98:1191–1200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Li H-J, Xue Y, Jia D-J et al (2011) POD1 regulates pollen tube guidance in response to micropylar female signaling and acts in early embryo patterning in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 22:3288–3302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Linskens HF, Esser K (1957) Uber einespezifische Anfarbung der Pollenschlauche in Griffel und die Zahl der Kallosepfropfen nach Selbstung und Fremdung. Naturwissenschaften 44:16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lord EM (2001) Adhesion molecules in lily pollination. Sex Plant Reprod 14:57–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lord EM (2003) Adhesion and guidance in compatible pollination. J Exp Bot 54:47–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Martin FW (1959) Staining and observing pollen tubes in the style by means of fluorescence. Stain Technol 34:125–128PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Mo Y, Nagel C, Taylor LP (1992) Biochemical complementation of calchone synthase mutants define a role for flavonols in functional pollen. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:1713–1717Google Scholar
  20. Mulcahy DL (1979) Rise of the angiosperms: a genecological factor. Science 206:20–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mulcahy DL (1984) Manipulation of gametophytic populations. In: Lange W, Zevan AC, Hogenboom C (eds) Efficiency in plant breeding. PUDOC, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  22. Mulcahy DL, Mulcahy GB (1983) Gametophytic self-incompatibility reexamined. Science 220:1247–1251PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mulcahy GB, Mulcahy DL (1985) Ovarian influence on pollen tube growth as indicated by semi-vivo technique. Am J Bot 72:1078–1080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mulcahy DL, Mulcahy GB, Popp R et al (1988) Pollen selection for stress tolerance or the advantage of selection before pollination. In: Cresti M, Gori P, Pacini E (eds) Sexual reproduction in higher plants. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  25. Niimi Y (1982) Studies on the self-incompatibility of Petunia hybrida in excised-style culture. An attempt at improving a technique in excised-style culture. Euphytica 31:787–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Okuda S, Tsutsui H, Shiima K et al (2009) Defensin-like polypeptides LUREs are pollen tube attractants secreted from synergid cells. Nature 458:357–361PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ottaviano E, Sari-Gorla M, Mulcahy DL (1980) Pollen tube growth rates in Zea mays: implications for genetic improvements in crops. Science 210:437–438PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Polanivelu R, Preuss D (2006) Distinct short-range ovule signals attract or repel Arabidopsis thaliana pollen tubes in vitro. BMC Plant Biol 6:7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-6-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Preuss D, Lemieux B, Yen G, Davis RW (1993) A conditional sterile mutation eliminates surface components from Arabidopsis pollen and disrupts cell signaling during fertilization. Genes Dev 7:974–985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Punwani JA, Drews GN (2008) Development and function of the synergid cell. Sex Plant Reprod 21:17–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Russell SD (1992) Double fertilization. Int Rev Cytol 140:357–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Russell SD, Dumas C (eds) (1992) Sexual reproduction in higher plants. Int Rev Cytol 140. Academic Press Inc, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  33. Shivanna KR (2003) Pollen biology and biotechnology. Science Publishers Inc., Enfield/PlymouthGoogle Scholar
  34. Shivanna KR, Johri BM (1985) The angiosperm pollen: structure and function. Wiley Eastern, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  35. Shivanna KR, Rangaswamy NS (1992) Pollen biology: a laboratory manual. Springer, Berlin/HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shivanna KR, Xu H, Taylor P, Knox RB (1988) Isolation of sperms from pollen tubes of flowering plants during fertilization. Plant Physiol 87:647–650PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shivanna KR, Linskens HF, Cresti M (1991) Pollen viability and pollen vigour. Theor Appl Genet 81:38–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Snow AA, Timothy PS (1991) Pollen vigour and the potential of sexual selection in plants. Nature 352:796–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Suen DF, Huang HC (2007) Maize pollen coat xylanase facilitates pollen tube penetration into silk during sexual reproduction. J Biol Chem 282:625–636PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang H, Wu H-M, Cheung AY (1993) Development and pollination regulated accumulation and glycosylation of a stylar transmitting tissue-specific proline-rich protein. Plant Cell 5:1639–1650PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Whitehouse HLK (1950) Multiple allelomorph incompatibility of pollen and style in the evolution of angiosperms. Ann Bot 1:199–216Google Scholar
  42. Wolters-Arts M, Lush WM, Marium C (1998) Lipids are required for directional pollen tube growth. Nature 392:818–821PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zinkl GM, Zwiebel BI, Grier DG, Preuss D (1999) Pollen-stigma adhesion in Arabidopsis: a species-specific interaction mediated by lipophilic molecules in the pollen exine. Development 126:5431–5440PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. R. Shivanna
    • 1
  • Rajesh Tandon
    • 2
  1. 1.Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE)BengaluruIndia
  2. 2.Department of BotanyUniversity of DelhiDelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations